Food, drug, and dairy laws. Corrected to the close of the legislative session of 1931.

At head of title: Public service division. University of Nevada. Department of food and drugs.

Changes in licensing for certain dairy imports /

Issued July 1981.

Hearing to review federal milk marketing rulemaking procedures : hearing before the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry of the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, April 24, 2007.

"Serial no. 110-13."

Apontamentos para a revisão das instruções regulamentares para a fiscalisação dos leites e dos laticinios aprovadas pelo Decreto de 14 de setembro de 1900 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Farm size and regional distribution of the benefit under Federal milk market regulation /

At head of title: Economic report.

Milk ordinance and code.

Some editions published without the code.

Legal status of standardized milk in the various states in 1935 as indicated in letters from state officials.

Mode of access: Internet.

[Hearing held at Syracuse, New York on July 10, 1952, respecting New York Milk Shed, U.S.D.A. Docket no. AO-241.]

Mode of access: Internet.

Milk and cream. Regulations controlling the production and sale of milk and cream [being part of the sanitary code...]

Mode of access: Internet.

Grade "A" pasteurized milk ordinance; 1965 recommendations of the United States Public Health Service.

1953 ed., issued by Public Health Service, has title: Milk ordinance and code.

Federal milk marketing orders : their establishment, terms and operations /

"October 1956."

Renovated butter : hearing ... Seventy-eighth Congress, first session, on S. 1006, a bill to authorize the condemnation of materials which are intended for use in process or renovated butter and which are unfir for human consumption, and for other purposes. June 8, 1943.

Mode of access: Internet.

Laws relating to dairy products.

"Renovated butter law, Butter substitutes law, False advertising law, Dairy products law."

Privacy invasive geo-mashups : privacy 2.0 and the limits of first generation information privacy laws

Online technological advances are pioneering the wider distribution of geospatial information for general mapping purposes. The use of popular web-based applications, such as Google Maps, is ensuring that mapping based applications are becoming commonplace amongst Internet users which has facilitated the rapid growth of geo-mashups. These user generated creations enable Internet users to aggregate and publish information over specific geographical points. This article identifies privacy invasive geo-mashups that involve the unauthorized use of personal information, the inadvertent disclosure of personal information and invasion of privacy issues. Building on Zittrain’s Privacy 2.0, the author contends that first generation information privacy laws, founded on the notions of fair information practices or information privacy principles, may have a limited impact regarding the resolution of privacy problems arising from privacy invasive geo-mashups. Principally because geo-mashups have different patterns of personal information provision, collection, storage and use that reflect fundamental changes in the Web 2.0 environment. The author concludes by recommending embedded technical and social solutions to minimize the risks arising from privacy invasive geo-mashups that could lead to the establishment of guidelines for the general protection of privacy in geo-mashups.

Regulating Multi-National Corporations Through State-Based Laws : Problems with Enforcing Human Rights Under The Alien Tort Statute

Under the Alien Tort Statute United States of America (“America”) Federal Courts have the jurisdiction to hear claims for civil wrongs, committed against non-American citizens, which were perpetrated outside America’s national borders. The operation of this law has confronted American Federal Courts with difficulties on how to manage conflicts between American executive foreign policy and judicial interpretations of international law. Courts began to pass judgment over conduct which was approved by foreign governments. Then in 2005 the American Supreme Court wound back the scope of the Alien Tort Statute. This article will review the problems with the expansion of the Alien Tort Statute and the reasons for its subsequent narrowing.