German-Irish corporate relationships:the cultural dimension

The thesis raises the question of whether or not in an age of internationalisation and globalisation, the cultural differences which exist between Germany and Ireland are still relevant to German-Irish corporate relationships or have internationally accepted best practices removed culture from the equation? The first three chapters establish the theoretical framework of the thesis by outlining the broadly culturalist/institutionalist approach, based on the work of Hofstede and Maurice et al, to be pursued, profiling the business cultures of both countries by analysing the components of their respective national institutional frameworks, and the examining existing approaches to the study of mother company-foreign subsidiary relationships. Chapters four to seven constitute the empirical section of the thesis. Using the interviews carried out with two sample groups (Sample Group A: 15 German mother companies and 14 of their Irish operations and Sample Group B: 7 Irish mother companies and 9 of their German operations), the mother companies in both groups are examined to see whether or not they demonstrate characteristics which are in keeping with their national business cultures. Their foreign operations are then analysed as is the mother company-foreign subsidiary relationship to determine whether or not any mother company influences are visible. The general approaches adopted by the two groups of mother companies to their foreign operations are compared and contrasted. Finally, differences in national attitudes and values are identified and their impact assessed. The analysis reveals that despite existing pressures towards convergence, the cultural differences between both countries are still relevant to the relationship particularly at the level of attitudes and values and although similarities in the mother company approaches to their subsidiaries are present, national specificities may nevertheless be detected.

Gobierno provincial, empresarios y CGT frente a la apertura del juego corporativo durante el primer peronismo : Santa Fe, 1952-1955

Este artículo describe los conflictos suscitados durante el primer peronismo entre el Poder Ejecutivo de Santa Fe, la Federación Económica que agrupó a los empresarios del distrito y los diputados sindicales pertenecientes a la CGT a causa de la inclusión de la mencionada Federación en la gestión de gobierno. Tales conflictos se desarrollaron en un proceso de creciente corporativización de la política. Se reconstruyen brevemente dos movimientos paralelos que fomentaron dicha corporativización: la agremiación de los empresarios radicados en la provincia, quienes lograron conformar una central única; y la acción de los diputados sindicales dentro de la Cámara Legislativa provincial

Gobierno provincial, empresarios y CGT frente a la apertura del juego corporativo durante el primer peronismo : Santa Fe, 1952-1955

Este artículo describe los conflictos suscitados durante el primer peronismo entre el Poder Ejecutivo de Santa Fe, la Federación Económica que agrupó a los empresarios del distrito y los diputados sindicales pertenecientes a la CGT a causa de la inclusión de la mencionada Federación en la gestión de gobierno. Tales conflictos se desarrollaron en un proceso de creciente corporativización de la política. Se reconstruyen brevemente dos movimientos paralelos que fomentaron dicha corporativización: la agremiación de los empresarios radicados en la provincia, quienes lograron conformar una central única; y la acción de los diputados sindicales dentro de la Cámara Legislativa provincial

Gobierno provincial, empresarios y CGT frente a la apertura del juego corporativo durante el primer peronismo : Santa Fe, 1952-1955

Este artículo describe los conflictos suscitados durante el primer peronismo entre el Poder Ejecutivo de Santa Fe, la Federación Económica que agrupó a los empresarios del distrito y los diputados sindicales pertenecientes a la CGT a causa de la inclusión de la mencionada Federación en la gestión de gobierno. Tales conflictos se desarrollaron en un proceso de creciente corporativización de la política. Se reconstruyen brevemente dos movimientos paralelos que fomentaron dicha corporativización: la agremiación de los empresarios radicados en la provincia, quienes lograron conformar una central única; y la acción de los diputados sindicales dentro de la Cámara Legislativa provincial

A SEGMENTAÇÃO DE PÚBLICOS NA COMUNICAÇÃO EMPRESARIAL: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA

A dissertação tem como base a importância do entendimento a respeito dos relacionamentos organizacionais para uma abordagem segmentada dos públicos na comunicação empresarial. A partir de uma reflexão teórica sobre o assunto e da observação de práticas atuais de mercado, foram estabelecidos parâmetros que contribuem para uma conceituação mais precisa dos interlocutores das corporações, no sentido de prover suas demandas informacionais. Tanto na análise das obras consultadas quanto na avaliação dos resultados da pesquisa com empresas de tradição na área de comunicação, demonstrou-se que há lacunas importantes a serem preenchidas. Entes elas, a inexistência de mecanismos que possam aferir com maior precisão as expectativas dos vários segmentos de público em relação à comunicação das empresas, em uma via de mão-dupla, bem como a falta de canais de comunicação regulares com determinados grupos, notadamente no âmbito externo. As análises apontam para a adoção de um sistema de gestão do conhecimento focado nos públicos como elemento fundamental para a eficácia dos processos comunicacionais.(AU)

A SEGMENTAÇÃO DE PÚBLICOS NA COMUNICAÇÃO EMPRESARIAL: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA

A dissertação tem como base a importância do entendimento a respeito dos relacionamentos organizacionais para uma abordagem segmentada dos públicos na comunicação empresarial. A partir de uma reflexão teórica sobre o assunto e da observação de práticas atuais de mercado, foram estabelecidos parâmetros que contribuem para uma conceituação mais precisa dos interlocutores das corporações, no sentido de prover suas demandas informacionais. Tanto na análise das obras consultadas quanto na avaliação dos resultados da pesquisa com empresas de tradição na área de comunicação, demonstrou-se que há lacunas importantes a serem preenchidas. Entes elas, a inexistência de mecanismos que possam aferir com maior precisão as expectativas dos vários segmentos de público em relação à comunicação das empresas, em uma via de mão-dupla, bem como a falta de canais de comunicação regulares com determinados grupos, notadamente no âmbito externo. As análises apontam para a adoção de um sistema de gestão do conhecimento focado nos públicos como elemento fundamental para a eficácia dos processos comunicacionais.(AU)

A SEGMENTAÇÃO DE PÚBLICOS NA COMUNICAÇÃO EMPRESARIAL: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA

A dissertação tem como base a importância do entendimento a respeito dos relacionamentos organizacionais para uma abordagem segmentada dos públicos na comunicação empresarial. A partir de uma reflexão teórica sobre o assunto e da observação de práticas atuais de mercado, foram estabelecidos parâmetros que contribuem para uma conceituação mais precisa dos interlocutores das corporações, no sentido de prover suas demandas informacionais. Tanto na análise das obras consultadas quanto na avaliação dos resultados da pesquisa com empresas de tradição na área de comunicação, demonstrou-se que há lacunas importantes a serem preenchidas. Entes elas, a inexistência de mecanismos que possam aferir com maior precisão as expectativas dos vários segmentos de público em relação à comunicação das empresas, em uma via de mão-dupla, bem como a falta de canais de comunicação regulares com determinados grupos, notadamente no âmbito externo. As análises apontam para a adoção de um sistema de gestão do conhecimento focado nos públicos como elemento fundamental para a eficácia dos processos comunicacionais.(AU)

Corporate brand identity management in a technological faculty – how brand relationships influence students and companies reputations

Identity is traditionally defined as an emission concept [1]. Yet, some research points out that there are external factors that can influence it [2]; [3]; [4]. This subject is even more relevant if one considers corporate brands. According to Aaker [5] the number, the power and the credibility of corporate associations are bigger in the case of corporate brands. Literature recognizes the influence of relationships between companies in identity management. Yet, given the increasingly important role of corporate brands, it is surprising that to date no attempt to evaluate that influence has been made in the management of corporate brand identity. Also Keller and Lehman [6] highlight relationships and costumer experience as two areas requiring more investigation. In line with this, the authors intend to develop an empirical research in order to evaluate the influence of relationships between brands in the identity of corporate brand from an internal perspective by interviewing internal stakeholders (brand managers and internal clients). This paper is organized by main contents: theoretical background, research methodology, data analysis and conclusions and finally cues to future investigation.

Unpacking the mechanism by which corporate responsibility impacts stakeholder relationships

Most research on corporate responsibility (CR) has investigated CR from the perspective of organizations, often focusing on how organizations define, manage and implement CR to gain benefits or competitive advantage. The benefits of CR for organizations are, however, often said to be achieved through increased support of stakeholders. Despite this, limited attention has been given to understanding CR from the perspective of stakeholders and, in particular, the mechanism by which CR drives stakeholder support. This study addresses this deficit. Building on advances in the application of psychological theories to the field of management, the research develops and empirically tests a theoretical model of how CR-related experiences and beliefs drive stakeholder trust and positive intent. The research is conducted with customers (n = 708) and employees (n = 359) of a service organization in the UK that introduced a range of CR-related activities into their business. The findings contribute to literature by empirically demonstrating (a) the impact of CR-related experiences on the development of beliefs about, and trust towards, the organization; (b) the importance of ‘others-related’ CR experiences even in the presence of ‘self-related’ CR experiences; and (c) the role of beliefs as partial mediators in how experiences of CR, both ‘self-related’ and ‘others-related’, translate into trust and positive intent.

Building employee relationships through corporate social responsibility: the moderating role of social cynicism and reward for application

We explore the role of deeply held beliefs, known as social axioms, in the context of employee–organization relationships. Specifically, we examine how the beliefs identified as social cynicism and reward for application moderate the relationship between employees’ work-related experiences, perceptions of CSR, attitudes, and behavioral intentions toward their firm. Utilizing a sample of 130 retail employees, we find that CSR affects more positively employees low on social cynicism and reduces distrust more so than with cynical employees. Employees exhibiting strong reward for application are less positively affected by CSR, whereas their experiences of other work-related factors are more likely to reduce distrust. Our findings suggest the need for a differentiated view of CSR in the context of employee studies and offer suggestions for future research and management practice.

Exploratory study of corporate social responsibility: blogs as a communication tool to enhance company-stakeholders relationships

O conceito de responsabilidade social corporativa (RSE) evoluiu gradualmente do objetivo de satisfazer as expectativas dos acionistas para o cumprimento das expectativas das partes interessadas. Tornou-se um conceito amplamente aceitado e promovido como as empresas enfrentam maiores pressões de atores internos e externos para cumprir objetivos sociais maiores. Assim, elas cada vez mais comunicam sobre os esforços de responsabilidade social delas, a fim de fomentar a confiança e o envolvimento dos stakeholders. Mas o aumento da cidadania global e as novas tecnologias de informação e de comunicação – como as mídias sociaias – está criando uma paisagem desafiador para a comunicação RSE, se traduzindo em escrutínio e ceticismo do público. No entanto, também está criando novas oportunidades para as empresas compartilhar e interagir com as partes interessadas. O estudo analisa especificamente como os blogs corporativos dedicados à comunicação RSE conseguem melhorar as relações entre as empresas e as partes interessadas. Esta pesquisa exploratória da estrutura e das mensagens de 9 blogs corporativos, é baseada em um quadro de análise sobre comunicação RSE em plataformas de mídias sociais desenvolvido por Gomez e Chalmeta (2013). O quadro está melhorado e adaptado para blogs graças à literatura sobre comunicação RSE, mídias sociais e blogs corporativos. Os resultados demonstram que o uso de características de blogs como apresentação, conteúdo e interatividade, é diversificado e reflete estratégias diferentes de comunicação RSE. Blogs permitem às empresas aumentar a visibilidade da comunicação RSE, melhorar a credibilidade e a legitimidade dos esforços de responsabilidade social, e também trazer discussões com os stakeholders. No entanto, demonstramos que as características e recursos dos blogs raramente são totalmente desenvolvidos, sugerindo avenidas para a melhoria no campo da comunicação nas mídias sociais. Especificamente, o uso da interatividade para criar relações baseadas em diálogo entre empresas e stakeholders está até atrasado em relação à extensão das oportunidades oferecidas pelos blogs. Além disso, o grau de utilização das ferramentas de blogs determina a eficácia da comunicação de RSE 2.0 das empresas na criação de relações empresa-stakeholder.

Is the sum more than the corporate entrepreneurship parts? the different effects of social capital on innovation, venturing, and renewal processes

Principal Topic Although corporate entrepreneurship is of vital importance for long-term firm survival and growth (Zahra and Covin, 1995), researchers still struggle with understanding how to manage corporate entrepreneurship activities. Corporate entrepreneurship consists of three parts: innovation, venturing, and renewal processes (Guth and Ginsberg, 1990). Innovation refers to the development of new products, venturing to the creation of new businesses, and renewal to redefining existing businesses (Sharma, and Chrisman, 1999; Verbeke et al., 2007). Although there are many studies focusing on one of these aspects (cf. Burgelman, 1985; Huff et al., 1992), it is very difficult to compare the outcomes of these studies due to differences in contexts, measures, and methodologies. This is a significant lack in our understanding of CE, as firms engage in all three aspects of CE, making it important to compare managerial and organizational antecedents of innovation, venturing and renewal processes. Because factors that may enhance venturing activities may simultaneously inhibit renewal activities. The limited studies that did empirically compare the individual dimensions (cf. Zahra, 1996; Zahra et al., 2000; Yiu and Lau, 2008; Yiu et al., 2007) generally failed to provide a systematic explanation for potential different effects of organizational antecedents on innovation, venturing, and renewal. With this study we aim to investigate the different effects of structural separation and social capital on corporate entrepreneurship activities. The access to existing and the development of new knowledge has been deemed of critical importance in CE-activities (Floyd and Wooldridge, 1999; Covin and Miles, 2007; Katila and Ahuja, 2002). Developing new knowledge can be facilitated by structurally separating corporate entrepreneurial units from mainstream units (cf. Burgelman, 1983; Hill and Rothaermel, 2003; O'Reilly and Tushman, 2004). Existing knowledge and resources are available through networks of social relationships, defined as social capital (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998; Yiu and Lau, 2008). Although social capital has primarily been studied at the organizational level, it might be equally important at top management level (Belliveau et al., 1996). However, little is known about the joint effects of structural separation and integrative mechanisms to provide access to social capital on corporate entrepreneurship. Could these integrative mechanisms for example connect the separated units to facilitate both knowledge creation and sharing? Do these effects differ for innovation, venturing, and renewal processes? Are the effects different for organizational versus top management team integration mechanisms? Corporate entrepreneurship activities have for example been suggested to take place at different levels. Whereas innovation is suggested to be a more bottom-up process, strategic renewal is a more top-down process (Floyd and Lane, 2000; Volberda et al., 2001). Corporate venturing is also a more bottom-up process, but due to the greater required resource commitments relative to innovation, it ventures need to be approved by top management (Burgelman, 1983). As such we will explore the following key research question in this paper: How do social capital and structural separation on organizational and TMT level differentially influence innovation, venturing, and renewal processes? Methodology/Key Propositions We investigated our hypotheses on a final sample of 240 companies in a variety of industries in the Netherlands. All our measures were validated in previous studies. We targeted a second respondent in each firm to reduce problems with single-rater data (James et al., 1984). We separated the measurement of the independent and the dependent variables in two surveys to create a one-year time lag and reduce potential common method bias (Podsakoff et al., 2003). Results and Implications Consistent with our hypotheses, our results show that configurations of structural separation and integrative mechanisms have different effects on the three aspects of corporate entrepreneurship. Innovation was affected by organizational level mechanisms, renewal by integrative mechanisms on top management team level and venturing by mechanisms on both levels. Surprisingly, our results indicated that integrative mechanisms on top management team level had negative effects on corporate entrepreneurship activities. We believe this paper makes two significant contributions. First, we provide more insight in what the effects of ambidextrous organizational forms (i.e. combinations of differentiation and integration mechanisms) are on venturing, innovation and renewal processes. Our findings show that more valuable insights can be gained by comparing the individual parts of corporate entrepreneurship instead of focusing on the whole. Second, we deliver insights in how management can create a facilitative organizational context for these corporate entrepreneurship activities.

Critical discourse analysis and political economy of communication : understanding the new corporate order

This article uses critical discourse analysis to analyse material shifts in the political economy of communications. It examines texts of major corporations to describe four key changes in political economy: (1) the separation of ownership from control; (2) the separation of business from industry; (3) the separation of accountability from responsibility; and (4) the subjugation of ‘going concerns’ by overriding concerns. The authors argue that this amounts to a political economic shift from traditional concepts of ‘capitalism’ to a new ‘corporatism’ in which the relationships between public and private, state and individual interests have become redefined and obscured through new discourse strategies. They conclude that the present financial and regulatory ‘crisis’ cannot be adequately resolved without a new analytic framework for examining the relationships between corporation, discourse and political economy.

Corporate governance and compliance : preventative measure or just another fad?

In the wake of recent corporate collapses, 'corporate governance' has received unprecedented levels of attention. It can be narrowly defined as how a company is directed and steered. The responsibility of steering a company is entrusted with the board of directors, who become the focus of governance mechanisms.Yet this is not as straightforward as it appears - Australia has experienced massive shifts in business regulations over the past two decades. One innovation in Australian business regulation is 'enforced self-regulation' which combines the benefits of voluntary self-regulation with the coercive power of the State, implemented via a compliance program. A possible hazard of compliance system is that management might treat this responsibility as a 'box ticking' exercise. Therefore effective governance and compliance entails more than setting up internal and regulatory mechanisms; the willingness of various stakeholders to collaborate is crucial. This suggests that managing relationships between stakeholders of an organization is the key to averting corporate collapses.