74 resultados para Conscientious objectors
Resumo:
Review
Resumo:
Aporta dades sobre l'objecció de consciència i valora el canvi cap a la prestació social substitutòria
Resumo:
Includes bibliographical references.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
This article discusses the problematic and evading development of conscientiousobjection in the context of the Colombian constitutional jurisprudence. From a historical allusion to the famous case of the “Mayflower Pilgrims” –which serve as areference to the central problems that faces the objector–, it seeks to define the scopeof conscientious objection as a fundamental right (as a fundamental justice claim)in regard to the “factual” and “legal” possibilities for its exercise, for which there willbe a brief contrast between the most representative cases decided by the ColombianConstitutional Court in such matter. The core of the article is the idea that thereis an ideological prevalence that, unjustifiably, makes it difficult and in some casesdenies the exercise of the right to object in consciousness, particularly when it comes tothe right of life in regard to the abortion case.
Resumo:
Testimoni de l’autor sobre la seva declaració, l’any 1977, de no voler fer el servei militar. Es va declarar objector de consciència i, amb aquesta acció, ell i altres varen tocar, com es deia en aquell moment, els pilars fonamentals de la societat
Resumo:
In medicine, the vast majority of conscientious objection (CO) is exercised within the reproductive healthcare field – particularly for abortion and contraception. Current laws and practices in various countries around CO in reproductive healthcare show that it is unworkable and frequently abused, with harmful impacts on women's healthcare and rights. CO in medicine is supposedly analogous to CO in the military, but in fact the two have little in common. This paper argues that CO in reproductive health is not actually Conscientious Objection, but Dishonourable Disobedience (DD) to laws and ethical codes. Healthcare professionals who exercise CO are using their position of trust and authority to impose their personal beliefs on patients, who are completely dependent on them for essential healthcare. Health systems and institutions that prohibit staff from providing abortion or contraception services are being discriminatory by systematically denying healthcare services to a vulnerable population and disregarding conscience rights for abortion providers. CO in reproductive healthcare should be dealt with like any other failure to perform one's professional duty, through enforcement and disciplinary measures. Counteracting institutional CO may require governmental or even international intervention.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada: An Ethical Analysis of Conscientious and Religious Objections
Resumo:
Article
Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada: An Ethical Analysis of Conscientious and Religious Objections
Resumo:
Article