Le Coliti Microscopiche nei soggetti con diarrea non ematica: uno studio prospettico

Introduzione: le Coliti Microscopiche, altrimenti note come Colite Collagena e Colite Linfocitica, sono disordini infiammatori cronici del colon che causano diarrea e colpiscono più frequentemente donne in età avanzata e soggetti in terapia farmacologica. Negli ultimi anni la loro incidenza sembra aumentata in diversi paesi occidentali ma la prevalenza in Italia è ancora incerta. Scopo: il presente studio prospettico e multicentrico è stato disegnato per valutare la prevalenza delle CM in pazienti sottoposti a colonscopia per diarrea cronica non ematica. Pazienti e metodi: dal Maggio 2010 al Settembre 2010 sono stati arruolati consecutivamente tutti i soggetti adulti afferenti in due strutture dell’area metropolitana milanese per eseguire una pancolonscopia. Nei soggetti con diarrea cronica non ematica sono state eseguite biopsie multiple nel colon ascendente, sigma e retto nonché in presenza di lesioni macroscopiche. Risultati: delle 8008 colonscopie esaminate 265 sono state eseguite per diarrea cronica; tra queste, 8 presentavano informazioni incomplete, 52 riscontri endoscopici consistenti con altri disordini intestinali (i.e. IBD, tumori, diverticoliti). 205 colonscopie sono risultate sostanzialmente negative, 175 dotate di adeguato campionamento microscopico (M:F=70:105; età mediana 61 anni). L’analisi istologica ha permesso di documentare 38 nuovi casi di CM (M:F=14:24; età mediana 67.5 anni): 27 CC (M:F=10:17; età mediana 69 anni) e 11 CL (M:F=4:7; età mediana 66 anni). In altri 25 casi sono state osservate alterazioni microscopiche prive dei sufficienti requisiti per la diagnosi di CM. Conclusioni: nel presente studio l’analisi microscopica del colon ha identificato la presenza di CM nel 21,7% dei soggetti con diarrea cronica non ematica ed indagine pancolonscopica negativa. Lo studio microscopico del colon è pertanto un passo diagnostico fondamentale per il corretto inquadramento diagnostico delle diarree croniche, specialmente dopo i 60 anni di età. Ampi studi prospettici e multicentrici dovranno chiarire ruolo e peso dei fattori di rischio associati a questi disordini.

Barriers to Timely Screening Colonoscopy

Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) can be largely prevented or effectively treated in its early stages, yet disparities exist in timely screening. The aim of this study was to explore the disparities in CRC screening on the basis of health insurance status including private, Medicare, Medicaid, and State Administered General Assistance (SAGA). Methods: A retrospective chart review for the period January 2000 to May 2007 (95 records) was conducted at two clinic sites; a private clinic and a university hospital clinic. All individuals at these sites who met study criteria (>50 years old with screening colonoscopy) were included. Age, gender, date of first clinic visit when screening referral was made, and date of completed procedure (screening colonoscopy) were recorded. Groups were dichotomized between individuals with private health insurance and individuals with public health insurance. Individuals with any history of CRC, known pre-cancerous conditions as well as family history of CRC requiring frequent colonoscopy were excluded from the study. Linear model analysis was performed to compare the average waiting time to receiving screening colonoscopy between the groups. T-test was performed to analyze age or gender related differences between the two groups as well as within each group. Results: The average waiting time (33 days) for screening colonoscopy in privately insured individuals was significantly lower than publicly insured individuals (200 days). The time difference between the first clinic visit and the procedure was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) between the two groups. There was no statistical difference (p=0.089) in gender between these groups (public vs. private). There were also no statistically significant gender or age related differences found within each group. Conclusions: Disparities exist in timely screening for CRC and one of the barriers leading to delayed CRC screening includes health insurance status of an individual. Even within the insured group, type of insurance plays major role. There is a negative correlation between public health insurance status and timely screening. Differences in access to medical care and delivery of care experienced by patients who are publicly insured through Medicaid, Medicare, and SAGA, suggests that the State of Connecticut needs to implement changes in health care policies that would provide timely screening colonoscopy. It is evident that health insurance coverage facilitates timely access to healthcare. Therefore, there is a need for increased efforts in advocacy for policy, payment and physician participation in public insurance programs. A state-wide comprehensive program involving multiple components targeting different levels of change such as provider, patients and the community should help reduce some of the observed causes of healthcare disparities based on the insurance status.