Application of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) to evaluate the whole gastrointestinal tract: a comparative study of single-camera and dual-camera analysis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) was developed for the evaluation of colorectal pathology. In this study, our aim was to assess if a dual-camera analysis using CCE allows better evaluation of the whole gastrointestinal (GI) tract compared to a single-camera analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 21 patients (12 males, mean age 56.20 years) submitted for a CCE examination. After standard colon preparation, the colon capsule endoscope (PillCam Colon™) was swallowed after reinitiation from its "sleep" mode. Four physicians performed the analysis: two reviewed both video streams at the same time (dual-camera analysis); one analyzed images from one side of the device ("camera 1"); and the other reviewed the opposite side ("camera 2"). We compared numbers of findings from different parts of the entire GI tract and level of agreement among reviewers. RESULTS A complete evaluation of the GI tract was possible in all patients. Dual-camera analysis provided 16% and 5% more findings compared to camera 1 and camera 2 analysis, respectively. Overall agreement was 62.7% (kappa = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.373-0.510). Esophageal (kappa = 0.611) and colorectal (kappa = 0.595) findings had a good level of agreement, while small bowel (kappa = 0.405) showed moderate agreement. CONCLUSION The use of dual-camera analysis with CCE for the evaluation of the GI tract is feasible and detects more abnormalities when compared with single-camera analysis.

Application of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) to evaluate the whole gastrointestinal tract: a comparative study of single-camera and dual-camera analysis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) was developed for the evaluation of colorectal pathology. In this study, our aim was to assess if a dual-camera analysis using CCE allows better evaluation of the whole gastrointestinal (GI) tract compared to a single-camera analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 21 patients (12 males, mean age 56.20 years) submitted for a CCE examination. After standard colon preparation, the colon capsule endoscope (PillCam Colon™) was swallowed after reinitiation from its "sleep" mode. Four physicians performed the analysis: two reviewed both video streams at the same time (dual-camera analysis); one analyzed images from one side of the device ("camera 1"); and the other reviewed the opposite side ("camera 2"). We compared numbers of findings from different parts of the entire GI tract and level of agreement among reviewers. RESULTS A complete evaluation of the GI tract was possible in all patients. Dual-camera analysis provided 16% and 5% more findings compared to camera 1 and camera 2 analysis, respectively. Overall agreement was 62.7% (kappa = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.373-0.510). Esophageal (kappa = 0.611) and colorectal (kappa = 0.595) findings had a good level of agreement, while small bowel (kappa = 0.405) showed moderate agreement. CONCLUSION The use of dual-camera analysis with CCE for the evaluation of the GI tract is feasible and detects more abnormalities when compared with single-camera analysis.

Caracterización de pólipos colorectales en pacientes sometidos a colonoscopia en el Hospital Universitario de la Samaritana durante el periodo 2009 a 2011

Los pólipos del colon son un importante factor de riesgo para el desarrollo de neoplasia, su identificación precoz, remoción y clasificación histológica es fundamental para determinar curación y sobrevida. OBJETIVO: Describir las características de los pólipos del colon resecados en un hospital de tercer nivel de Cundinamarca. METODOS: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo tipo serie de casos, de pacientes mayores de 18 años sometidos a colonoscopía en quienes se resecaron pólipos de colon, durante el periodo 2009 a 2011. RESULTADOS: Durante el periodo de estudio de realizaron 3267 colonoscopías, se excluyeron los pacientes que no tenían pólipos, sin reporte de patología o en quienes no se recupero la pieza para histología. Se analizaron 381 pacientes con pólipos los cuales fueron incluidos en el análisis final. La localización principal de los pólipos fueron recto y sigmoide 66%, poliposis múltiple se identifico en el 2,9%. Los pólipos hiperplásicos fueron los mas frecuentemente diagnosticado, seguido por adenomas tubulares. En los pacientes que se le realizó resección de múltiples pólipos se diagnosticó cáncer en 2. Las indicaciones de realización de colonoscopía que no están claramente aprobadas pero en las cuales se identificaron y resecaron pólipos son mas del 30%. CONCLUSIONES: La mayoría de pacientes eran mujeres, sigue siendo el sangrado digestivo la principal indicación de realización de colonoscopía. Los pólipos hiperplásicos seguido de los adenomas son el principal hallazgo de patología.