Subcellular localization of the steroid receptor coactivators (SRCs) and MEF2 in muscle and rhabdomyosarcoma cells

Skeletal muscle differentiation and the activation of muscle-specific gene expression are dependent on the concerted action of the MyoD family and the MADS protein, MEF2, which function in a cooperative manner. The steroid receptor coactivator SRC-2/GRIP-1/TIF-2, is necessary for skeletal muscle differentiation, and functions as a cofactor for the transcription factor, MEF2. SRC-P belongs to the SRC family of transcriptional coactivators/cofactors that also includes SRC-1 and SRC-3/RAC-3/ACTR/ AIB-1. In this study we demonstrate that SRC-P is essentially localized in the nucleus of proliferating myoblasts; however, weak (but notable) expression is observed in the cytoplasm. Differentiation induces a predominant localization of SRC-P to the nucleus; furthermore, the nuclear staining is progressively more localized to dot-like structures or nuclear bodies. MEF2 is primarily expressed in the nucleus, although we observed a mosaic or variegated expression pattern in myoblasts; however, in myotubes all nuclei express MEF2. GRIP-1 and MEF2 are coexpressed in the nucleus during skeletal muscle differentiation, consistent with the direct interaction of these proteins. Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) cells derived from malignant skeletal muscle tumors have been proposed to be deficient in cofactors. Alveolar RMS cells very weakly express the steroid receptor coactivator, SRC-P, in a diffuse nucleocytoplasmic staining pattern. MEF2 and the cofactors, SRC-1 and SRC-3 are abundantly expressed in alveolar and embryonal RMS cells; however, the staining is not localized to the nucleus. Furthermore, the subcellular localization and transcriptional activity of MEF2C and a MEF2-dependent reporter are compromised in alveolar RMS cells. In contrast, embryonal RMS cells express SRC-2 in the nucleus, and MEF2 shuttles from the cytoplasm to the nucleus after serum withdrawal. In conclusion, this study suggests that the steroid receptor coactivator SRC-P and MEF2 are localized to the nucleus during the differentiation process. In contrast, RMS cells display aberrant transcription factor SRC localization and expression, which may underlie certain features of the RMS phenotype.

Neurobiology of addiction: the role of transcription factors CREB and C/EBP as well as that of their coactivators

Résumé Le présent travail de thèse a fait face au défi de lier les changements transcriptionnels dans les neurones du système nerveux central au développement de l'addiction aux drogues. I1 est connu que l'apprentissage induit des modifications au niveau de la structure du cerveau, principalement en changeant la manière dont les neurones sont interconnectés par des synapses. De plus en plus d'évidences soutiennent un scénario selon lequel l'activité neuronale déclenche des cascades de signalisation intracellulaire qui ciblent des facteurs de transcription. Ces derniers peuvent activer la transcription de gènes spécifiques qui codent pour des protéines nécessaires au renforcement des synapses mémorisant ainsi la nouvelle information. Puisque l'addiction peut être considérée comme une forme aberrante d'apprentissage, et que les modifications synaptiques sont connues pour être impliquées dans le processus d'addiction, nous essayons de décrire des mécanismes transcriptionels étant à la base des changements synaptiques induits par les drogues. Comme modèle nous utilisons des cultures primaires des neurones de striatum, d'hippocampe et de cortex de souris ainsi que des tranches de cerveau de rat. Une des caractéristiques communes de quasiment toutes les substances addictives est de pouvoir activer le système mésolimbique dopaminergique provoquant la libération de dopamine sur les neurones du striatum (du noyau accumbens). Dans ce travail de thèse nous démontrons que dans des cultures du striatum, la dopamine induit le facteur de transcription C/EBPβ qui, à son tour, provoque l'expression du gène codant pour la substance P. Ce mécanisme pourrait potentiellement contribuer à la tolérance envers les drogues puisqu'il fait partie d'une rétroaction (feed-back) sur les cellules produisant la dopamine. Etant donné que ces résultats montrent l'importance de C/EBPβ dans la psychopathologie de l'addiction, nous avons également décidé d'étudier les mécanismes fondamentaux de l'activation de la transcription par C/EBPβ. Nos expériences démontrent que trois isoformes activatrices de la famille C/EBP recrutent le coactivateur CBP et provoquent en même temps sa phosphorylation. Enfin, nous montrons que les coactivateurs nommés TORC, nouvellement découverts et clonés, sont capables de détecter la coïncidence d'un signal cAMP et d'une entrée de calcium dans des neurones. Par conséquent les TORCs pourraient contribuer à détecter la coïncidence d'un signal glutamate et d'un signal dopamine dans les neurones de striatum, ce qui pourrait être important pour associer les effets hédonistes de la drogue à l'information contextuelle (par exemple à l'environnement où la drogue a été consommée). Nous sommes les premiers à observer que les TORCs sont nécessaires pour la potentiation à long terme dans l'hippocampe. Summary The present thesis work faced the challenge to link the development of drug addiction to transcriptional changes in the neurons of the central nervous system. Experience and learning are known to induce structural modifications in the brain, and these changes are thought to occur mainly in the way neurons are interconnected by synapses. More and more evidences point to a scenario in which neuronal activity would activate signalization cascades that impinge on transcription factors, which, in turn, would activate genes necessary for the reinforcement of synapses coding for new informations. Given that drug addiction can be considered as an aberrant form of learning and is thought to involve synaptic modifications, we try to elucidate some of the transcriptional mechanisms that could underlie drug-induced synaptic changes. As a model system, we use primary cultures of striatal, cortical and hippocampal neurons dissected from mouse embryos as well as brain slices from rats. One of the common features of virtually all drugs of abuse is to activate the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic system that results in the release of dopamine onto the neurons of the striatum (nucleus accumbens). In this thesis work we show that in striatal cultures, dopamine induces the transcription factor C/EBPβ that in turn drives the expression of the gene coding for substance P. This mechanism is likely to be important for the drug-induced tolerance in the brain since it might be a part of a feedback acting on dopaminergic neurons. Given the suspected importance of C/EBPβ in drug addiction, we also try to elucidate some aspects of the basic mechanisms by which the C/EBP family activates transcription. We show that three activating members of the C/EBP family recruit the coactivator CBP and trigger its phosphorylation. Finally, we demonstrate that the newly discovered and cloned transcriptional coactivators, named TORCs (transducers of regulated CREB activity) are able to detect the coincidence of a calcium and a cAMP signal in the central nervous system. This way, TORCs could contribute to the detection of a coincidence between a glutamate and a dopamine signal in striatal neurons - a process that is suggested to be important for an association between the rewarding effect of a drug and contextual information (such as the environment where the drug had been taken). We demonstrate that TORCs are required for hippocampal LTP.

Estradiol repression of tumor necrosis factor-α transcription requires estrogen receptor activation function-2 and is enhanced by coactivators

The tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) promoter was used to explore the molecular mechanisms of estradiol (E2)-dependent repression of gene transcription. E2 inhibited basal activity and abolished TNF-α activation of the TNF-α promoter. The E2-inhibitory element was mapped to the −125 to −82 region of the TNF-α promoter, known as the TNF-responsive element (TNF-RE). An AP-1-like site in the TNF-RE is essential for repression activity. Estrogen receptor (ER) β is more potent than ERα at repressing the −1044 TNF-α promoter and the TNF-RE upstream of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter, but weaker at activating transcription through an estrogen response element. The activation function-2 (AF-2) surface in the ligand-binding domain is required for repression, because anti-estrogens and AF-2 mutations impair repression. The requirement of the AF-2 surface for repression is probably due to its capacity to recruit p160 coactivators or related coregulators, because overexpressing the coactivator glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein-1 enhances repression, whereas a glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein-1 mutant unable to interact with the AF-2 surface is ineffective. Furthermore, receptor interacting protein 140 prevents repression by ERβ, probably by interacting with the AF-2 surface and blocking the binding of endogenous coactivators. These studies demonstrate that E2-mediated repression requires the AF-2 surface and the participation of coactivators or other coregulatory proteins.

Protease footprinting reveals a surface on transcription factor TFIIB that serves as an interface for activators and coactivators.

Transcriptional stimulation by the model activator GAL4-VP16 (a chimeric protein consisting of the DNA-binding domain of the yeast activator GAL4 and the acidic activation domain of the herpes simplex virus protein VP16) involves a series of poorly understood protein-protein interactions between the VP16 activation domain and components of the RNA polymerase II general transcription machinery. One of these interactions is the VP16-mediated binding and recruitment of transcription factor TFIIB. However, TATA box-binding protein (TBP)-associated factors (TAFs), or coactivators, are required for this interaction to culminate in productive transcription complex assembly, and one such TAF, Drosophila TAF40, reportedly forms a ternary complex with VP16 and TFIIB. Due to TFIIB's central role in gene activation, we sought to directly visualize the surfaces of this protein that mediate formation of the ternary complex. We developed an approach called protease footprinting in which the broad-specificity proteases chymotrypsin and alkaline protease were used to probe binding of 32P-end-labeled TFIIB to GAL4-VP16 or TAF40. Analysis of the cleavage products revealed two regions of TFIIB protected by VP16 from protease attack, one of which overlapped with a region protected by TAF40. The close proximity of the VP16 and TAF40 binding sites on the surface of TFIIB suggests that this region could act as a regulatory interface mediating the effects of activators and coactivators on transcription complex assembly.

Characterization of the retinoid orphan-related receptor-alpha coactivator binding interface: A structural basis for ligand-independent transcription

The retinoid orphan-related receptor-alpha (RORalpha) is a member of the ROR subfamily of orphan receptors and acts as a constitutive activator of transcription in the absence of exogenous ligands. To understand the basis of this activity, we constructed a homology model of Rill using the closely related TRbeta as a template. Molecular modeling suggested that bulky hydrophobic side chains occupy the RORa ligand cavity leaving a small but distinct cavity that may be involved in receptor stabilization. This model was subject to docking simulation with a receptor-interacting peptide from the steroid receptor coactivator, GR-interacting protein-1, which delineated a coactivator binding surface consisting of the signature motif spanning helices 3-5 and helix 12 [activation function 2 (AF2)]. Probing this surface with scanning alanine mutagenesis showed structural and functional equivalence between homologous residues of RORalpha and TRbeta. This was surprising (given that Rill is a ligand-independent activator, whereas TRbeta has an absolute requirement for ligand) and prompted us to use molecular modeling to identify differences between Rill and TRbeta in the way that the All helix interacts with the rest of the receptor. Modeling highlighted a nonconserved amino acid in helix 11 of RORa (Phe491) and a short-length of 3.10 helix at the N terminus of AF2 which we suggest i) ensures that AF2 is locked permanently in the holoconformation described for other liganded receptors and thus 2) enables ligand-independent recruitment of coactivators. Consistent with this, mutation of RORa Phe491 to either methionine or alanine (methionine is the homologous residue in TRbeta), reduced and ablated transcriptional activation and recruitment of coactivators, respectively. Furthermore, we were able to reconstitute transcriptional activity for both a deletion mutant of Ill lacking All and Phe491 Met, by overexpression of a GAL-AF2 fusion protein, demonstrating ligand-independent recruitment of AF2 and a role for Phe491 in recruiting AF2.

The AF-1 Domain of the Orphan Nuclear Receptor NOR-1 Mediates Trans-activation, Coactivator Recruitment, and Activation by the Purine Anti-metabolite 6-Mercaptopurine

NOR-1/NR4A3 is an orphan member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. NOR-1 and its close relatives Nurr1 and Nur77 are members of the NR4A subgroup of nuclear receptors. Members of the NR4A subgroup are induced through multiple signal transduction pathways. They have been implicated in cell proliferation, differentiation, T-cell apoptosis, chondrosarcomas, neurological disorders, inflammation, and atherogenesis. However, the mechanism of transcriptional activation, coactivator recruitment, and agonist-mediated activation remain obscure. Hence, we examined the molecular basis of NOR-1-mediated activation. We observed that NOR-1 trans-activates gene expression in a cell- and target-specific manner; moreover, it operates in an activation function (AF)-1-dependent manner. The N-terminal AF-1 domain delimited to between amino acids 1 and 112, preferentially recruits the steroid receptor coactivator (SRC). Furthermore, SRC-2 modulates the activity of the AF-1 domain but not the C-terminal ligand binding domain (LBD). Homology modeling indicated that the NOR-1 LBD was substantially different from that of hRORbeta, a closely related AF-2-dependent receptor. In particular, the hydrophobic cleft characteristic of nuclear receptors was replaced with a very hydrophilic surface with a distinct topology. This observation may account for the inability of this nuclear receptor LBD to efficiently mediate cofactor recruitment and transcriptional activation. In contrast, the N-terminal AF-1 is necessary for cofactor recruitment and can independently conscript coactivators. Finally, we demonstrate that the purine anti-metabolite 6-mercaptopurine, a widely used antineoplastic and anti-inflammatory drug, activates NOR-1 in an AF-1-dependent manner. Additional 6-mercaptopurine analogs all efficiently activated NOR-1, suggesting that the signaling pathways that modulate proliferation via inhibition of de novo purine and/or nucleic acid biosynthesis are involved in the regulation NR4A activity. We hypothesize that the NR4A subgroup mediates the genotoxic stress response and suggest that this subgroup may function as sensors that respond to genotoxicity.

Integrating receptor interactions and dynamics and Interference with endocrine disruptors in the mechanisms of action of PPAR nuclear receptors

Abstract Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) form a family of three nuclear receptors regulating important cellular and metabolic functions. PPARs control gene expression by directly binding to target promoters as heterodimers with the Retinoid X Receptor (RXR), and their transcriptional activity is enhanced upon activation by natural or pharmacological ligands. The binding of PPAR/RXR heterodimers on target promoters allows the anchoring of a series of coactivators and corepressors involved in promoter remodeling and the recruitment of the transcription machinery. The transcriptional output finally depends on a complex interplay between (i) the respective expression levels of PPARs, RXRs and of other nuclear receptors competing for DNA binding and RXR recruitment, (ii) the availability and the nature of PPAR and RXR ligands, (iii) the expression levels and the nature of the different coactivators and corepressors and (iv) the sequence and the epigenetic status of the promoter. Understanding how all these factors and signals integrate and fine-tune transcription remains a challenge but is necessary to understand the specificity of the physiological functions regulated by PPARs. The work presented herein focuses on the molecular mechanisms of PPAR action and aims at understanding how the interactions and mobility of the receptor modulate transcription in the physiological context of a living cell: Such observations in vivo rely on the use of engineered fluorescent protein chimeras and require the development and the application of complementary imaging techniques such as Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP), Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) and Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS). Using such techniques, PPARs are shown to reside solely in the nucleus where they are constitutively associated with RXR but transcriptional activation by ligand binding -does not promote the formation of sub-nuclear structures as observed with other nuclear receptors. In addition, the engagement of unliganded PPARs in large complexes of cofactors in living cells provides a molecular basis for their ligand-independent activity. Ligand binding reduces receptor diffusion by promoting the recruitment of coactivators which further enlarge the size of PPAR complexes to acquire full transcriptional competence. Using these molecular approaches, we deciphered the molecular mechanisms through which phthalates, a class of pollutants from the plastic industry, interfere with PPARγ signaling. Mono-ethyl-hexyl-phthalate (MEHP) binding induces the recruitment of a specific subset of cofactors and translates into the expression of a specific subset of target genes, the transcriptional output being strongly conditioned by the differentiation status of the cell. This selective PPARγ modulation induces limited adipogenic effects in cellular models while exposure to phthalates in animal models leads to protective effects on glucose tolerance and diet-induced obesity. These results demonstrate that phthalates influence lipid and carbohydrate metabolism through complex mechanisms which most likely involve PPARγ but also probably PPARα and PPARß, Altogether, the molecular and physiological demonstration of the interference of pollutants with PPAR action outlines an important role of chemical exposure in metabolic regulations. Résumé Les PPARs (Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors) forment une famille de récepteurs nucléaires qui régulent des fonctions cellulaires et métaboliques importantes. Les PPARs contrôlent l'expression des gènes en se liant directement à leurs promoteurs sous forme d'hétérodimères avec les récepteurs RXR (Retinoid X Receptor), et leur activité transcriptionnelle est stimulée par la liaison de ligands naturels ou pharmacologiques. L'association des hétérodimères PPAR/RXR avec les promoteurs des gènes cibles permet le recrutement de coactivateurs et de corépresseurs qui vont permettre le remodelage de la chromatine et le recrutement de la machinerie transcriptionnelle. Les actions transcriptionnelles du récepteur dépendent toutefois d'interactions complexes qui sont régulées par (i) le niveau d'expression des PPARs, des RXRs et d'autres récepteurs nucléaires entrant en compétition pour la liaison à l'ADN et l'association avec RXR, (ii) la disponibilité et la nature de ligands de PPAR et de RXR, (iii) les niveaux d'expression et la nature des différents coactivateurs et corépresseurs et (iv) la séquence et le marquage épigénétique des promoteurs. La compréhension des mécanismes qui permettent d'intégrer ces aspects pour assurer une régulation fine de l'activité transcriptionnelle est un défi qu'il est nécessaire de relever pour comprendre la spécificité des fonctions physiologiques régulées par les PPARs. Ce travail concerne l'étude des mécanismes d'action moléculaire des PPARs et vise à mieux comprendre comment les interactions du récepteur avec d'autres protéines ainsi que la mobilité de ce dernier régulent son activité transcriptionnelle dans le contexte physiologique des cellules vivantes. De telles observations reposent sur l'emploi de protéines fusionnées à des protéines fluorescentes ainsi que sur le développement et l'utilisation de techniques d'imagerie complémentaires telles que le FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching), le FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) ou la FCS (Fluorescence Corrélation Spectroscopy). En appliquant ces méthodes, nous avons pu montrer que les PPARs résident toujours dans le noyau où ils sont associés de manière constitutive à RXR, mais que l'ajout de ligand n'induit pas la formation de structures sub-nucléaires comme cela a pu être décrit pour d'autres récepteurs nucléaires. De plus, les PPARs sont engagés dans de larges complexes protéiques de cofacteurs en absence de ligand, ce qui procure une explication moléculaire à leur activité ligand-indépendante. La liaison du ligand réduit la vitesse de diffusion du récepteur en induisant le recrutement de coactivateurs qui augmente encore plus la taille des complexes afin d'acquérir un potentiel d'activation maximal. En utilisant ces approches moléculaires, nous avons pu caractériser les mécanismes permettant aux phtalates, une classe de polluants provenant de l'industrie plastique, d'interférer avec PPARγ. La liaison du mono-ethyl-hexyl-phtalate (NERF) à PPARγ induit un recrutement sélectif de cofacteurs, se traduisant par l'induction spécifique d'un sous-ensemble de gènes qui varie en fonction du niveau de différentiation cellulaire. La modulation sélective de PPARγ par le MEHP provoque une adipogenèse modérée dans des modèles cellulaires alors que l'exposition de modèles animaux aux phtalates induit des effets bénéfiques sur la tolérance au glucose et sur le développement de l'obésité. Toutefois, les phtalates ont une action complexe sur le métabolisme glucido-lipidique en faisant intervenir PPARγ mais aussi probablement PPARα et PPARß. Cette démonstration moléculaire et physiologique de l'interférence des polluants avec les récepteurs nucléaires PPAR souligne un rôle important de l'exposition à de tels composés dans les régulations métaboliques.

Essential role of the Wnt pathway effector Tcf-1 for the establishment of functional CD8 T cell memory.

Immune protection from intracellular pathogens depends on the generation of terminally differentiated effector and of multipotent memory precursor CD8 T cells, which rapidly regenerate effector and memory cells during recurrent infection. The identification of factors and pathways involved in CD8 T cell differentiation is of obvious importance to improve vaccination strategies. Here, we show that mice lacking T cell factor 1 (Tcf-1), a nuclear effector of the canonical Wingless/Integration 1 (Wnt) signaling pathway, mount normal effector and effector memory CD8 T cell responses to infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). However, Tcf-1-deficient CD8 T cells are selectively impaired in their ability to expand upon secondary challenge and to protect from recurrent virus infection. Tcf-1-deficient mice essentially lack CD8 memory precursor T cells, which is evident already at the peak of the primary response, suggesting that Tcf-1 programs CD8 memory cell fate. The function of Tcf-1 to establish CD8 T cell memory is dependent on the catenin-binding domain in Tcf-1 and requires the Tcf-1 coactivators and Wnt signaling intermediates beta-catenin and gamma-catenin. These findings demonstrate that the canonical Wnt signaling pathway plays an essential role for CD8 central memory T cell differentiation under physiological conditions in vivo. They raise the possibility that modulation of Wnt signaling may be exploited to improve the generation of CD8 memory T cells during vaccination or for therapies designed to promote sustained cytotoxic CD8 T cell responses against tumors.

Association with coregulators is the major determinant governing peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor mobility in living cells.

The nucleus is an extremely dynamic compartment, and protein mobility represents a key factor in transcriptional regulation. We showed in a previous study that the diffusion of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), a family of nuclear receptors regulating major cellular and metabolic functions, is modulated by ligand binding. In this study, we combine fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, dual color fluorescence cross-correlation microscopy, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer to dissect the molecular mechanisms controlling PPAR mobility and transcriptional activity in living cells. First, we bring new evidence that in vivo a high percentage of PPARs and retinoid X receptors is associated even in the absence of ligand. Second, we demonstrate that coregulator recruitment (and not DNA binding) plays a crucial role in receptor mobility, suggesting that transcriptional complexes are formed prior to promoter binding. In addition, association with coactivators in the absence of a ligand in living cells, both through the N-terminal AB domain and the AF-2 function of the ligand binding domain, provides a molecular basis to explain PPAR constitutive activity.

Long-term cerebral plasticity-related gene expression : a study of the respective role of CBP and CRTC1 in CREB transcriptional activation

1.1 AbstractThe treatment of memory disorders and cognitive deficits in various forms of mental retardation may greatly benefit from a better understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of memory formation. Different forms of memory have distinct molecular requirements.Short-term memory (STM) is thought to be mediated by covalent modifications of existing synaptic molecules, such as phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of enzymes, receptors or ion channels. In contrast, long-term memoiy (LTM) is thought to be mediated by growth of new synapses and restructuring of existing synapses. There is extensive evidence that changes in gene expression and de novo protein synthesis are key processes for LTM formation. In this context, the transcription factor CREB (cAMP-response element-binding protein) was shown to be crucial. Activation of CREB requires phosphorylation of a serine residue (Ser-133), and the subsequent recruitment of a coactivator called CREB-binding protein (CBP). Moreover, we have recently shown that another coactivator called CREB Regulated Transcription Coactivator 1 (CRTC1) functions as a calcium- and cAMP-sensitive coincidence detector in neurons, and is involved in hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity. Given the importance of cAMP and calcium signaling for plasticity-related gene expression in neurons and in astrocytes, we sought to determine the respective involvement of the CREB coactivators CBP and CRTC1 in CREB-mediated transcription.We developed various strategies to selectively interfere with these CREB coactivators in mouse primary neurons and in astrocytes in vitro. However, despite several pieces of evidence implicating CBP and/or CRTC1 in the regulation of neuronal plasticity genes, we could not clearly determine the respective requirement of these coactivators for the activation of these genes. Nevertheless, we showed that calcineurin activity, which is important for CRTC1 nuclear translocation, is necessary for the expression of some CREB-regulated plasticity genes. We associated this phenomena to physiopathological conditions observed in Down's syndrome. In addition, we demonstrated that in astrocytes, noradrenaline stimulates CREB-target gene expression through β-adrenergic receptor activation, intracellular cAMP pathway activation, and CRTC-induced CREB transactivation.Defining the respective role of CREB and its coactivators CBP and CRTC1 in neuronal and astrocytic cultures in vitro sets the stage for future in vivo studies and for the possible development of new therapeutic strategies to improve the treatment of memoiy and cognitive disorders.1.2 RésuméUne meilleure connaissance des mécanismes moléculaires et cellulaires responsables de la formation de la mémoire pourrait grandement améliorer le traitement des troubles de la mémoire ainsi que des déficits cognitifs observés dans différentes formes de pathologies psychiatriques telles que le retard mental. Les différentes formes de mémoire dépendent de processus moléculaires différents.La mémoire à court terme (STM) semble prendre forme suite à des modifications covalentes de molécules synaptiques préexistantes, telles que la phosphorylation ou la déphosphorylation d'enzymes, de récepteurs ou de canaux ioniques. En revanche, la mémoire à long terme (LTM) semble être due à la génération de nouvelles synapses et à la restructuration des synapses existantes. De nombreuses études ont permis de démontrer que les changements dans l'expression des gènes et la synthèse de protéine de novo sont des processus clés pour la formation de la LTM. Dans ce contexte, le facteur de transcription CREB (cAMP-response element-binding protein) s'est avéré être un élément crucial. L'activation de CREB nécessite la phosphorylation d'un résidu sérine (Ser-133), et le recrutement d'un coactivateur nommé CBP (CREB binding protein). En outre, nous avons récemment démontré qu'un autre coactivateur de CREB nommé CRTC1 (CREB Regulated Transcription Coactivator 1) agit comme un détecteur de coïncidence de l'AMP cyclique (AMPc) et du calcium dans les neurones et qu'il est impliqué dans la formation de la plasticité synaptique à long terme dans l'hippocampe. Etant donné l'importance des voies de l'AMPc et du calcium dans l'expression des gènes impliqués dans la plasticité cérébrale, nous voulions déterminer le rôle respectif des coactivateurs de CREB, CBP et CRTC1.Nous avons développé diverses stratégies pour interférer de façon sélective avec les coactivateurs de CREB dans les neurones et dans les astrocytes chez la souris in vitro. Nos résultats indiquent que CBP et CRTC1 sont tous deux impliqués dans la transcription dépendante de CREB induite par l'AMPc et le calcium dans les neurones. Cependant, malgré plusieurs évidences impliquant CBP et/ou CRTC1 dans l'expression de gènes de plasticité neuronale, nous n'avons pas pu déterminer clairement leur nécessité respective pour l'activation de ces gènes. Toutefois, nous avons montré que l'activité de la calcineurine, dont dépend la translocation nucléaire de CRTC1, est nécessaire à l'expression de certains de ces gènes. Nous avons pu associer ce phénomène à une condition physiopathologique observée dans le syndrome de Down. Nous avons également montré que dans les astrocytes, la noradrénaline stimule l'expression de gènes cibles de CREB par une activation des récepteurs β- adrénergiques, l'activation de la voie de l'AMPc et la transactivation de CREB par les CRTCs.Définir le rôle respectif de CREB et de ses coactivateurs CBP et CRTC1 dans les neurones et dans les astrocytes in vitro permettra d'acquérir les connaissances nécessaires à de futures études in vivo et, à plus long terme d'éventuellement développer des stratégies thérapeutiques pour améliorer les traitements des troubles cognitifs.

Fatty acids, eicosanoids, and hypolipidemic agents identified as ligands of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors by coactivator-dependent receptor ligand assay.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear hormone receptors controlling the expression of genes involved in lipid homeostasis. PPARs activate gene transcription in response to a variety of compounds including hypolipidemic drugs as well as natural fatty acids. From the plethora of PPAR activators, Scatchard analysis of receptor-ligand interactions has thus far identified only four ligands. These are the chemotactic agent leukotriene B4 and the hypolipidemic drug Wy 14,643 for the alpha-subtype and a prostaglandin J2 metabolite and synthetic antidiabetic thiazolidinediones for the gamma-subtype. Based on the hypothesis that ligand binding to PPAR would induce interactions of the receptor with transcriptional coactivators, we have developed a novel ligand sensor assay, termed coactivator-dependent receptor ligand assay (CARLA). With CARLA we have screened several natural and synthetic candidate ligands and have identified naturally occurring fatty acids and metabolites as well as hypolipidemic drugs as bona fide ligands of the three PPAR subtypes from Xenopus laevis. Our results suggest that PPARs, by their ability to interact with a number of structurally diverse compounds, have acquired unique ligand-binding properties among the superfamily of nuclear receptors that are compatible with their biological activity.

CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein family members recruit the coactivator CREB-binding protein and trigger its phosphorylation.

CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) family members are transcription factors involved in important physiological processes, such as cellular proliferation and differentiation, regulation of energy homeostasis, inflammation, and hematopoiesis. Transcriptional activation by C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta involves the coactivators CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300, which promote transcription by acetylating histones and recruiting basal transcription factors. In this study, we show that C/EBPdelta is also using CBP as a coactivator. Based on sequence homology with C/EBPalpha and -beta, we identify in C/EBPdelta two conserved amino acid segments that are necessary for the physical interaction with CBP. Using reporter gene assays, we demonstrate that mutation of these residues prevents CBP recruitment and diminishes the transactivating potential of C/EBPdelta. In addition, our results indicate that C/EBP family members not only recruit CBP but specifically induce its phosphorylation. We provide evidence that CBP phosphorylation depends on its interaction with C/EBPdelta and define point mutations within one of the two conserved amino acid segments of C/EBPdelta that abolish CBP phosphorylation as well as transcriptional activation, suggesting that this new mechanism could be important for C/EBP-mediated transcription.

Intestinal antiinflammatory effect of 5-aminosalicylic acid is dependent on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma.

5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is an antiinflammatory drug widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. It is known to inhibit the production of cytokines and inflammatory mediators, but the mechanism underlying the intestinal effects of 5-ASA remains unknown. Based on the common activities of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) ligands and 5-ASA, we hypothesized that this nuclear receptor mediates 5-ASA therapeutic action. To test this possibility, colitis was induced in heterozygous PPAR-gamma(+/-) mice and their wild-type littermates, which were then treated with 5-ASA. 5-ASA treatment had a beneficial effect on colitis only in wild-type and not in heterozygous mice. In epithelial cells, 5-ASA increased PPAR-gamma expression, promoted its translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, and induced a modification of its conformation permitting the recruitment of coactivators and the activation of a peroxisome-proliferator response element-driven gene. Validation of these results was obtained with organ cultures of human colonic biopsies. These data identify PPAR-gamma as a target of 5-ASA underlying antiinflammatory effects in the colon.

Coregulator Control of Androgen Receptor Action by a Novel Nuclear Receptor-Binding Motif

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that is essential for prostate cancer development. It is activated by androgens through its ligand-binding domain (LBD), which consists predominantly of 11 α-helices. Upon ligand binding, the last helix is reorganized to an agonist conformation termed activator function-2 (AF-2) for coactivator binding. Several coactivators bind to the AF-2 pocket through conserved LXXLL or FXXLF sequences to enhance the activity of the receptor. Recently, a small compound-binding surface adjacent to AF-2 has been identified as an allosteric modulator of the AF-2 activity and is termed binding function-3 (BF-3). However, the role of BF-3 in vivo is currently unknown, and little is understood about what proteins can bind to it. Here we demonstrate that a duplicated GARRPR motif at the N terminus of the cochaperone Bag-1L functions through the BF-3 pocket. These findings are supported by the fact that a selective BF-3 inhibitor or mutations within the BF-3 pocket abolish the interaction between the GARRPR motif(s) and the BF-3. Conversely, amino acid exchanges in the two GARRPR motifs of Bag-1L can impair the interaction between Bag-1L and AR without altering the ability of Bag-1L to bind to chromatin. Furthermore, the mutant Bag-1L increases androgen-dependent activation of a subset of AR targets in a genome-wide transcriptome analysis, demonstrating a repressive function of the GARRPR/BF-3 interaction. We have therefore identified GARRPR as a novel BF-3 regulatory sequence important for fine-tuning the activity of the AR.