A novel procedure for establishing clinching parameters for high strength steel sheet

The building industry has a particular interest in using clinching as a joining method for frame constructions of light-frame housing. Normally many clinch joints are required in joining of frames.In order to maximise the strength of the complete assembly, each clinch joint must be as sound as possible. Experimental testing is the main means of optimising a particular clinch joint. This includes shear strength testing and visual observation of joint cross-sections. The manufacturers of clinching equipment normally perform such experimental trials. Finite element analysis can also be used to optimise the tool geometry and the process parameter, X, which represents the thickness of the base of the joint. However, such procedures require dedicated software, a skilled operator, and test specimens in order to verify the finite element model. In addition, when using current technology several hours' computing time may be necessary. The objective of the study was to develop a simple calculation procedure for rapidly establishing an optimum value for the parameter X for a given tool combination. It should be possible to use the procedure on a daily basis, without stringent demands on the skill of the operator or the equipment. It is also desirable that the procedure would significantly decrease thenumber of shear strength tests required for verification. The experimental workinvolved tests in order to obtain an understanding of the behaviour of the sheets during clinching. The most notable observation concerned the stage of the process in which the upper sheet was initially bent, after which the deformation mechanism changed to shearing and elongation. The amount of deformation was measured relative to the original location of the upper sheet, and characterised as the C-measure. By understanding in detail the behaviour of the upper sheet, it waspossible to estimate a bending line function for the surface of the upper sheet. A procedure was developed, which makes it possible to estimate the process parameter X for each tool combination with a fixed die. The procedure is based on equating the volume of material on the punch side with the volume of the die. Detailed information concerning the behaviour of material on the punch side is required, assuming that the volume of die does not change during the process. The procedure was applied to shear strength testing of a sample material. The sample material was continuously hot-dip zinc-coated high-strength constructional steel,with a nominal thickness of 1.0 mm. The minimum Rp0.2 proof stress was 637 N/mm2. Such material has not yet been used extensively in light-frame housing, and little has been published on clinching of the material. The performance of the material is therefore of particular interest. Companies that use clinching on a daily basis stand to gain the greatest benefit from the procedure. By understanding the behaviour of sheets in different cases, it is possible to use data at an early stage for adjusting and optimising the process. In particular, the functionality of common tools can be increased since it is possible to characterise the complete range of existing tools. The study increases and broadens the amount ofbasic information concerning the clinching process. New approaches and points of view are presented and used for generating new knowledge.

A support system for evaluating a suitable joining method in the production of sheet metal goods

This report illustrates a comparative study of various joining methods involved in sheet metal production. In this report it shows the selection of joining methods, which includes comparing the advantages and disadvantages of a method over the other ones and choosing the best method for joining. On the basis of various joining process from references, a table is generated containing set of criterion that helps in evaluation of various sheet metal joining processes and in selecting the most suitable process for a particular product. Three products are selected and a comprehensive study of the joining methods is analyzed with the help of various parameters. The table thus is the main part of the analysis process of this study and can be advanced with the beneficial results. It helps in a better and easy understanding and comparing the various methods, which provides the foundation of this study and analysis. The suitability of the joining method for various types of cases of different sheet metal products can be tested with the help of this table. The sections of the created table display the requirements of manufacturing. The important factor has been considered and given focus in the table, as how the usage of these parameters is important in percentages according to particular or individual case. The analysis of the methods can be extended or altered by changing the parameters according to the constraint. The use of this table is demonstrated by pertaining the cases from sheet metal production.

Ohutlevykotelon valmistettavuuden ja pinnoitettavuuden huomioiminen suunnittelussa

Korkean IP-luokituksen ohutlevykotelointi on haastava kokonaisuus. Koteloinnin tiivistys ruiskutettavalla polyureapinnoitteella edellyttää usean osa-alueen samanaikaista hallintaa. Kotelo on alusta alkaen suunniteltava pinnoitettavaksi, sillä pinnoitus asettaa lukuisia vaatimuksia ja rajoituksia esimerkiksi käytettäville muodoille, rakenteille ja liittämismenetelmille. Polyurea on elastomeeri, josta valmistettua pinnoitetta voidaan levittää erityisellä ruiskutuslaitteistolla. Polyureapinnoite sallii kotelon asentamisen vaikeisiin olosuhteisiin, sillä se kestää kemikaaleja, kulutusta ja iskuja sekä tarjoaa tiiveyden lisäksi korroosiosuojan koteloinnille. Pinnoitteen ominaisuuksia, kuten kovuutta, elastisuutta ja kemikaalien sekä UV-säteilyn kestoa voidaan räätälöidä käyttökohteen mukaan. Polyurepinnoitteeella pinnoitettavat pinnat on pyrittävä pitämään mahdollisimman yksinkertaisina, mikä tarkoittaa käytännössä kaikenlaisten kohoumien, ulkonevien osien, reikien ja muiden epäjatkuvuuskohtien välttämistä. Kaikki epäjatkuvuuskohdat vaativat erityishuomiota pinnoituksen aikana, sillä epäjatkuvuuskohtien onnistunut pinnoitus vaatii ruiskutusta useasta suunnasta, mikä lisää virhemahdollisuuksia ja siten vaarantaa koteloinnin tiiveyden. Liittämismenetelmät ovat yksinkertaisten muotojen ohella avainasemassa pinnoituksen onnistumisen kannalta. Menetelmistä tulee suosia sellaisia, joiden pinnoitettavaan pintaan aiheuttama epäjatkuvuuskohta on mahdollisimman vähäinen. Tällaisia menetelmiä ovat esimerkiksi vastuspistehitsaus ja puristeruuvi.

Diseño y comportamiento de uniones estructurales mecánicas y adhesivas. Condiciones superficiales y operacionales

Las uniones estructurales mecánicas y adhesivas requieren la combinación de un número importante de parámetros para la obtención de la continuidad estructural que exigen las condiciones de diseño. Las características de las uniones presentan importantes variaciones, ligadas a las condiciones de ejecución, tanto en uniones mecánicas como especialmente en uniones adhesivas y mixtas (unión mecánica y adhesiva, también conocidas como uniones híbridas). Las propiedades mecánicas de las uniones adhesivas dependen de la naturaleza y propiedades de los adhesivos y también de muchos otros parámetros que influyen directamente en el comportamiento de estas uniones. Algunos de los parámetros más significativos son: el acabado superficial de los materiales, área y espesor de la capa adhesiva, diseño adecuado, secuencia de aplicación, propiedades químicas de la superficie y preparación de los sustratos antes de aplicar el adhesivo. Los mecanismos de adhesión son complejos. En general, cada unión adhesiva solo puede explicarse considerando la actuación conjunta de varios mecanismos de adhesión. No existen adhesivos universales para un determinado material o aplicación, por lo que cada pareja sustrato-adhesivo requiere un particular estudio y el comportamiento obtenido puede variar, significativamente, de uno a otro caso. El fallo de una junta adhesiva depende del mecanismo cohesión-adhesión, ligado a la secuencia y modo de ejecución de los parámetros operacionales utilizados en la unión. En aplicaciones estructurales existen un número muy elevado de sistemas de unión y de posibles sustratos. En este trabajo se han seleccionado cuatro adhesivos diferentes (cianoacrilato, epoxi, poliuretano y silano modificado) y dos procesos de unión mecánica (remachado y clinchado). Estas uniones se han aplicado sobre chapas de acero al carbono en diferentes estados superficiales (chapa blanca, galvanizada y prepintada). Los parámetros operacionales analizados han sido: preparación superficial, espesor del adhesivo, secuencia de aplicación y aplicación de presión durante el curado. Se han analizado tanto las uniones individuales como las uniones híbridas (unión adhesiva y unión mecánica). La combinación de procesos de unión, sustratos y parámetros operacionales ha dado lugar a la preparación y ensayo de más de mil muestras. Pues, debido a la dispersión de resultados característica de las uniones adhesivas, para cada condición analizada se han ensayado seis probetas. Los resultados obtenidos han sido: El espesor de adhesivo utilizado es una variable muy importante en los adhesivos flexibles, donde cuanto menor es el espesor del adhesivo mayor es la resistencia mecánica a cortadura de la unión. Sin embargo en los adhesivos rígidos su influencia es mucho menor. La naturaleza de la superficie es fundamental para una buena adherencia del adhesivo al substrato, que repercute en la resistencia mecánica de la unión. La superficie que mejor adherencia presenta es la prepintada, especialmente cuando existe una alta compatibilidad entre la pintura y el adhesivo. La superficie que peor adherencia tiene es la galvanizada. La secuencia de aplicación ha sido un parámetro significativo en las uniones híbridas, donde los mejores resultados se han obtenido cuando se aplicaba primero el adhesivo y la unión mecánica se realizaba antes del curado del adhesivo. La aplicación de presión durante el curado se ha mostrado un parámetro significativo en los adhesivos con poca capacidad para el relleno de la junta. En los otros casos su influencia ha sido poco relevante. El comportamiento de las uniones estructurales mecánicas y adhesivas en cuanto a la resistencia mecánica de la unión puede variar mucho en función del diseño de dicha unión. La resistencia mecánica puede ser tan grande que falle antes el substrato que la unión. Las mejores resistencias se consiguen diseñando las uniones con adhesivo cianoacrilato, eligiendo adecuadamente las condiciones superficiales y operacionales, por ejemplo chapa blanca aplicando una presión durante el curado de la unión. La utilización de uniones mixtas aumenta muy poco o nada la resistencia mecánica, pero a cambio proporciona una baja dispersión de resultados, siendo destacable para la superficie galvanizada, que es la que presenta peor reproducibilidad cuando se realizan uniones sólo con adhesivo. Las uniones mixtas conducen a un aumento de la deformación antes de la rotura. Los adhesivos dan rotura frágil y las uniones mecánicas rotura dúctil. La unión mixta proporciona ductilidad a la unión. Las uniones mixtas también pueden dar rotura frágil, esto sucede cuando la resistencia del adhesivo es tres veces superior a la resistencia de la unión mecánica. Las uniones híbridas mejoran la rigidez de la junta, sobre todo se aprecia un aumento importante en las uniones mixtas realizadas con adhesivos flexibles, pudiendo decirse que para todos los adhesivos la rigidez de la unión híbrida es superior. ABSTRACT The mechanical and adhesive structural joints require the combination of a large number of parameters to obtain the structural continuity required for the design conditions. The characteristics of the junctions have important variations, linked to performance conditions, in mechanical joints as particular in mixed adhesive joints (mechanical and adhesive joints, also known as hybrid joints). The mechanical properties of the adhesive joints depend of the nature and properties of adhesives and also of many other parameters that directly influence in the behavior of these joints. Some of the most significant parameters are: the surface finished of the material, area and thickness of the adhesive layer, suitable design, and application sequence, chemical properties of the surface and preparation of the substrate before applying the adhesive. Adhesion mechanisms are complex. In general, each adhesive joint can only be explained by considering the combined action of several adhesions mechanisms. There aren’t universal adhesives for a given material or application, so that each pair substrate-adhesive requires a particular study and the behavior obtained can vary significantly from one to another case. The failure of an adhesive joint depends on the cohesion-adhesion mechanism, linked to the sequence and manner of execution of the operational parameters used in the joint. In the structural applications, there are a very high number of joining systems and possible substrates. In this work we have selected four different adhesives (cyanoacrylate, epoxy, polyurethane and silano modified) and two mechanical joining processes (riveting and clinching). These joints were applied on carbon steel with different types of surfaces (white sheet, galvanized and pre-painted). The operational parameters analyzed were: surface preparation, thickness of adhesive, application sequence and application of pressure during curing. We have analyzed individual joints both as hybrid joints (adhesive joint and mechanical joint). The combination of joining processes, substrates and operational parameters has resulted in the preparation and testing of over a thousand specimens. Then, due to the spread of results characteristic of adhesive joints, for each condition analyzed we have tested six samples. The results have been: The thickness of adhesive used is an important variable in the flexible adhesives, where the lower the adhesive thickness greater the shear strength of the joint. However in rigid adhesives is lower influence. The nature of the surface is essential for good adherence of the adhesive to the substrate, which affects the shear strength of the joint. The surface has better adherence is preprinted, especially when there is a high compatibility between the paint and the adhesive. The surface which has poor adherence is the galvanized. The sequence of application has been a significant parameter in the hybrid junctions, where the best results are obtained when applying first the adhesive and the mechanical joint is performed before cured of the adhesive. The application of pressure during curing has shown a significant parameter in the adhesives with little capacity for filler the joint. In other cases their influence has been less relevant. The behavior of structural mechanical and adhesive joints in the shear strength of the joint can vary greatly depending on the design of such a joint. The shear strength may be so large that the substrate fails before the joint. The best shear strengths are achieved by designing the junctions with cyanoacrylate adhesive, by selecting appropriately the surface and operating conditions, for example by white sheet applying a pressure during curing of the joint. The use of hybrid joints no increase shear strength, but instead provides a low dispersion of results, being remarkable for the galvanized surface, which is the having worst reproducibility when performed bonded joints. The hybrid joints leading to increased deformation before rupture. The joints witch adhesives give brittle fracture and the mechanics joints give ductile fracture. Hybrid joint provides ductility at the joint. Hybrid joint can also give brittle fracture, this happens when the shear strength of the adhesive is three times the shear strength of the mechanical joint. The hybrid joints improve stiffness of joint, especially seen a significant increase in hybrid joints bonding with flexible adhesives, can be said that for all the adhesives, the hybrid junction stiffness is higher.