964 resultados para Circuit courts
Resumo:
Lettered on cover: Insurance digest.
Resumo:
fold. front. hand-colored.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"January 19, 1990."
Resumo:
Shaw & Shoemaker 1846.
Resumo:
"An abridgement of Dallas, Cranch, and Wheaton, on the same general plan as the subsequent condensation by Curtis."--Soule, Lawyer's ref. manual, 1884.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"Appendix: [Inquiry into the subject of the territorial limits and jurisdiction of the Circuit and District courts of the United States in states divided into districts, by Edward McCrady]":v.3, p.[665]-690.
Resumo:
Publisher varies: v. 2-3, Day, Egbert, & Fidlar; v. 4-5, Egbert, Fidlar & Chambers
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
No more published
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Title varies: v. 1-18, Ohio Circuit court reports. New series...Cases adjudged in the Circuit courts of Ohio; v. 19-20, Ohio Circuit Court and Appellate court reports. New series...Cases adjudged in the Circuit courts and Courts of appeal of Ohio; v. 21-26, Ohio Appellate and Circuit court reports. New series...Cases adjudged in the courts of appeal and circuit courts of Ohio; v. 27-32, Ohio Courts of appeals reports (cited O.C.A.)...Cases adjusted in the Courts of appeals of Ohio.
Resumo:
The current study is about the legitimacy of lower court jurisdiction as a way of exercising basic legal rights, proposing, therefore, a new legal-administrative model for appellate court. In order to achieve that, a demonstration of the importance of basic legal rights in the Brazilian legal system and an open interpretation in light of the Constitution, as a way to affirm said rights, among which are accessibility to the justice system and proper legal protection, is required. As a result, the legitimacy to access the legal system resides in the Constitution, where the interpreter should seek its basic principles to achieve basic legal rights. It is observed that the lack of credibility regarding lower court decisions comes from the dogmatic view of truth born from power, and therefore, that the truth resides in decisions from appellate court and not from lower court judges. A lower court judge holds a privileged position in providing basic legal rights for citizens, considering his close contact to the parties, the facts, and the evidences brought forth. Class action suit is presented as an important instrument able to lead the lower court judge to provide basic legal rights. Small Claims Courts may be used as paradigm to the creation of Appellate State Courts formed by lower court judges, reserving to higher jurisdiction courts and Federal Circuit Courts, the decisions of original competency and the management and institutional representation of the judiciary system. Instilling an internal democratization of the judiciary is also required, which means the participation of lower court judges in electing their peers to chief positions in the court system, as well as establishing a limited mandate to higher court judges.
Resumo:
Act of February 13, 1925: An act to amend the Judicial code, and to further define the jurisdiction of the Circuit courts of appeals and of the Supreme court, and for other purposes; Act of January 31, 1928: An act in reference to writs of error; Act of April 26, 1928: An act to amend section 2 of an act entitled "An act in reference to writs of error" (12 pages at end) Eighty pages: "Amendments effective Sept. 1, 1932" inserted. (c.1).