913 resultados para Categorization Processes
Resumo:
Although aspects of social identity theory are familiar to organizational psychologists, its elaboration, through self-categorization theory, of how social categorization and prototype-based depersonalization actually produce social identity effects is less well known. We describe these processes, relate self-categorization theory to social identity theory, describe new theoretical developments in detail, and show how these developments can address a: range of organizational phenomena. We discuss cohesion and deviance, leadership, subgroup and sociodemographic structure, and mergers and acquisitions.
Resumo:
Health disparities between groups remain even after accounting for established causes such as structural and economic factors. The present research tested, for the first time, whether multiple social categorization processes can explain enhanced support for immigrant health (measured by respondents’ behavioral intention to support immigrants’ vaccination against A H1N1 disease by cutting regional public funds). Moreover, the mediating role of individualization and the moderating role of social identity complexity were tested. Findings showed that multiple versus single categorization of immigrants lead to support their right to health and confirmed the moderated mediation hypothesis. The potential in developing this sort of social cognitive intervention to address health disparities is discussed.
Resumo:
Adopting an intergroup perspective, the research was designed to examine predictors of employee responses to an organizational merger Data were collected from 465 fleet staff employed in a newly merged airline company. As predicted from social identity theory, the negative effects of the merger were most marked for employees of the low-status premerger organization. Also, as predicted, the perception of permeable intergroup boundaries in the new organization was associated positively with identification with the new organization and both job-related and person-related outcomes among employees of the low-status premerger organization but negatively with person-related outcomes among employees of the high-status premerger organization. As predicted, there was some evidence that the main and interactive effects involving status, perceived permeability, and intergroup contact on employee adjustment were mediated through strength of identification with the new organization.
Resumo:
This thesis focuses on the social-psychological factors that help coping with structural disadvantage, and specifically on the role of cohesive ingroups and the sense of connectedness and efficacy they entail in this process. It aims to complement existing group-based models of coping that are grounded in a categorization perspective to groups and consequently focus exclusively on the large-scale categories made salient in intergroup contexts of comparisons. The dissertation accomplishes this aim through a reconsideration of between-persons relational interdependence as a sufficient and independent antecedent of a sense of groupness, and the benefits that a sense of group connectedness in one's direct environment, regardless of the categorical or relational basis of groupness, might have in the everyday struggles of disadvantaged group members. The three empirical papers aim to validate this approach, outlined in the first theoretical introduction, by testing derived hypotheses. They are based on data collected with youth populations (15-30) from three institutions in French-speaking Switzerland within the context of a larger project on youth transitions. Methods of data collection are paper-pencil questionnaires and in-depth interviews with a selected sub-sample of participants. The key argument of the first paper is that members of socially disadvantaged categories face higher barriers to their life project and that a general sense of connectedness, either based on categorical identities or other proximal groups and relations, mitigates the feeling of powerlessness associated with this experience. The second paper develops and tests a model that defines individual needs satisfaction as antecedent of self-group bonds and the efficacy beliefs derived from these intragroup bonds as the mechanism underlining the role of ingroups in coping. The third paper highlights the complexities that might be associated with the construction of a sense of groupness directly from intergroup comparisons and categorization-based disadvantage, and points out a more subtle understanding of the processes underling the emergence of groupness out of the situation of structural disadvantage. Overall, the findings confirm the central role of ingroups in coping with structural disadvantage and the importance of an understanding of groupness and its role that goes beyond the dominant focus on intergroup contexts and categorization processes.
Resumo:
Notre étude est bipartite. En premier lieu nous avons effectué une étude empirique des différences entre les processus de catégorisation explicite (verbalisable) et implicite (non-verbalisable). Nous avons examiné la difficulté et le temps nécessaire pour apprendre trois tâches de catégorisation dites par air de famille, par règle logique conjonctive et par règle logique disjonctive. Nous avons ensuite utilisé un réseau neuronal pour modéliser la catégorisation en lui faisant compléter les mêmes tâches. La comparaison entre les deux nous permet de juger de l’adéquation du modèle. Les données empiriques ont montré un effet de la typicité et de la familiarité en accord avec la documentation et nous trouvons que la tâche de catégorisation par règle disjonctive est la plus difficile alors que la tâche de catégorisation par air de famille est la plus facile. La modélisation par le réseau est une réussite partielle mais nous présentons des solutions afin qu’un réseau futur puisse modéliser le processus catégoriel humain efficacement
Resumo:
This article proposes a model explaining how family control/influence in an organization affects individual stakeholders’ perceptions of benevolence. The model suggests two effects. First, based on socioemotional wealth research, we propose that family control/influence positively affects stakeholders’ perceptions of benevolence through the benevolent behavior that the organization shows toward its stakeholders. However, this effect can be negatively influenced if the family’s socioemotional wealth goals in terms of “Family control and influence” and/or “Renewal of family bonds to the firm through dynastic succession” are at risk. Second, we argue that family control/influence, to the extent that it is perceivable to the stakeholder, influences stakeholders’ perceptions of benevolence through categorization processes. However, the impact of perceivable family control/influence on stakeholders’ perceptions of benevolence is not straightforward but instead hinges on a set of individual-level contingency factors of the stakeholder, such as stakeholders’ family business in-group membership, stakeholders’ secondhand category information, and stakeholders’ firsthand category information.
Resumo:
La identidad en la interacción ha sido objeto de numerosos estudios dentro de la Etnometodología. Esta investigación busca combinar los métodos de investigación del MCA (Membership Categorization Analysis) con la teoría de la ejecución y el concepto de alternancia de marcos para explicar el despliegue dinámico de la identidad de los participantes en entrevistas transcriptas. Utilizando los recursos retóricos, lingüísticos y discursivos que tienen a su disposición, los participantes construyen colaborativamente diferentes identidades para sí mismos y para el otro en el curso de la interacción, que están disponibles para la audiencia en la versión escrita. Los resultados muestran que el entrevistador construye su identidad posicionándose como performer o ejecutante (en el sentido de Bauman) frente a la audiencia (los futuros lectores de la entrevista) y a su entrevistado del momento, y alternando estratégicamente entre el marco humorístico y el marco serio. El entrevistador emplea una serie de recursos retóricos, discursivos y lingüísticos para producir el efecto cómico que ayudan a constituir su identidad como transgresor e ingenioso. Por otra parte, la identidad de los entrevistados se construye a través de procesos de auto y heterocategorización.
Resumo:
La identidad en la interacción ha sido objeto de numerosos estudios dentro de la Etnometodología. Esta investigación busca combinar los métodos de investigación del MCA (Membership Categorization Analysis) con la teoría de la ejecución y el concepto de alternancia de marcos para explicar el despliegue dinámico de la identidad de los participantes en entrevistas transcriptas. Utilizando los recursos retóricos, lingüísticos y discursivos que tienen a su disposición, los participantes construyen colaborativamente diferentes identidades para sí mismos y para el otro en el curso de la interacción, que están disponibles para la audiencia en la versión escrita. Los resultados muestran que el entrevistador construye su identidad posicionándose como performer o ejecutante (en el sentido de Bauman) frente a la audiencia (los futuros lectores de la entrevista) y a su entrevistado del momento, y alternando estratégicamente entre el marco humorístico y el marco serio. El entrevistador emplea una serie de recursos retóricos, discursivos y lingüísticos para producir el efecto cómico que ayudan a constituir su identidad como transgresor e ingenioso. Por otra parte, la identidad de los entrevistados se construye a través de procesos de auto y heterocategorización.
Resumo:
La identidad en la interacción ha sido objeto de numerosos estudios dentro de la Etnometodología. Esta investigación busca combinar los métodos de investigación del MCA (Membership Categorization Analysis) con la teoría de la ejecución y el concepto de alternancia de marcos para explicar el despliegue dinámico de la identidad de los participantes en entrevistas transcriptas. Utilizando los recursos retóricos, lingüísticos y discursivos que tienen a su disposición, los participantes construyen colaborativamente diferentes identidades para sí mismos y para el otro en el curso de la interacción, que están disponibles para la audiencia en la versión escrita. Los resultados muestran que el entrevistador construye su identidad posicionándose como performer o ejecutante (en el sentido de Bauman) frente a la audiencia (los futuros lectores de la entrevista) y a su entrevistado del momento, y alternando estratégicamente entre el marco humorístico y el marco serio. El entrevistador emplea una serie de recursos retóricos, discursivos y lingüísticos para producir el efecto cómico que ayudan a constituir su identidad como transgresor e ingenioso. Por otra parte, la identidad de los entrevistados se construye a través de procesos de auto y heterocategorización.
Resumo:
La nueva generación de la Web, la Web Semántica, plantea potenciales oportunidades para dotar de significado a los contenidos Web. Las ontologías constituyen una de las principales herramientas para especificar explícitamente los conceptos de un dominio concreto, sus propiedades y sus relaciones; de manera que la información se publique en formatos que sean inteligibles automáticamente por agentes máquinas que pueden localizar y gestionar de forma precisa la información. En este trabajo se presenta un marco de trabajo para una red de ontologías para representar conceptos, atributos, operaciones y restricciones, en relación a los ítems curriculares que se usan en procesos nacionales de categorización de docentes universitarios ecuatorianos. En una primera parte se muestra el contexto del dominio, trabajos relacionados, luego se describe el proceso seguido, la abstracción del modelo ontológico y finalmente se presenta una ontología. Es una ontología de dominio debido a que proporciona el significado de los conceptos y sus relaciones dentro del dominio de ítems curriculares producidos por docentes universitarios, que son requisitos de los proceso de categorización docente universitaria en Ecuador.
Resumo:
Discriminating complex sounds relies on multiple stages of differential brain activity. The specific roles of these stages and their links to perception were the focus of the present study. We presented 250ms duration sounds of living and man-made objects while recording 160-channel electroencephalography (EEG). Subjects categorized each sound as that of a living, man-made or unknown item. We tested whether/when the brain discriminates between sound categories even when not transpiring behaviorally. We applied a single-trial classifier that identified voltage topographies and latencies at which brain responses are most discriminative. For sounds that the subjects could not categorize, we could successfully decode the semantic category based on differences in voltage topographies during the 116-174ms post-stimulus period. Sounds that were correctly categorized as that of a living or man-made item by the same subjects exhibited two periods of differences in voltage topographies at the single-trial level. Subjects exhibited differential activity before the sound ended (starting at 112ms) and on a separate period at ~270ms post-stimulus onset. Because each of these periods could be used to reliably decode semantic categories, we interpreted the first as being related to an implicit tuning for sound representations and the second as being linked to perceptual decision-making processes. Collectively, our results show that the brain discriminates environmental sounds during early stages and independently of behavioral proficiency and that explicit sound categorization requires a subsequent processing stage.
Resumo:
This article studies alterations in the values, attitudes, and behaviors that emerged among U.S. citizens as a consequence of, and as a response to, the attacks of September 11, 2001. The study briefly examines the immediate reaction to the attack, before focusing on the collective reactions that characterized the behavior of the majority of the population between the events of 9/11 and the response to it in the form of intervention in Afghanistan. In studying this period an eight-phase sequential model (Botcharova, 2001) is used, where the initial phases center on the nation as the ingroup and the latter focus on the enemy who carried out the attack as the outgroup. The study is conducted from a psychosocial perspective and uses "social identity theory" (Tajfel & Turner, 1979, 1986) as the basic framework for interpreting and accounting for the collective reactions recorded. The main purpose of this paper is to show that the interpretation of these collective reactions is consistent with the postulates of social identity theory. The application of this theory provides a different and specific analysis of events. The study is based on data obtained from a variety of rigorous academic studies and opinion polls conducted in relation to the events of 9/11. In line with social identity theory, 9/11 had a marked impact on the importance attached by the majority of U.S. citizens to their identity as members of a nation. This in turn accentuated group differentiation and activated ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination (Tajfel & Turner, 1979, 1986). Ingroup favoritism strengthened group cohesion, feelings of solidarity, and identification with the most emblematic values of the U.S. nation, while outgroup discrimination induced U.S. citizens to conceive the enemy (al-Qaeda and its protectors) as the incarnation of evil, depersonalizing the group and venting their anger on it, and to give their backing to a military response, the eventual intervention in Afghanistan. Finally, and also in line with the postulates of social identity theory, as an alternative to the virtual bipolarization of the conflict (U.S. vs al-Qaeda), the activation of a higher level of identity in the ingroup is proposed, a group that includes the United States and the largest possible number of countries¿ including Islamic states¿in the search for a common, more legitimate and effective solution.
Resumo:
This article studies alterations in the values, attitudes, and behaviors that emerged among U.S. citizens as a consequence of, and as a response to, the attacks of September 11, 2001. The study briefly examines the immediate reaction to the attack, before focusing on the collective reactions that characterized the behavior of the majority of the population between the events of 9/11 and the response to it in the form of intervention in Afghanistan. In studying this period an eight-phase sequential model (Botcharova, 2001) is used, where the initial phases center on the nation as the ingroup and the latter focus on the enemy who carried out the attack as the outgroup. The study is conducted from a psychosocial perspective and uses "social identity theory" (Tajfel & Turner, 1979, 1986) as the basic framework for interpreting and accounting for the collective reactions recorded. The main purpose of this paper is to show that the interpretation of these collective reactions is consistent with the postulates of social identity theory. The application of this theory provides a different and specific analysis of events. The study is based on data obtained from a variety of rigorous academic studies and opinion polls conducted in relation to the events of 9/11. In line with social identity theory, 9/11 had a marked impact on the importance attached by the majority of U.S. citizens to their identity as members of a nation. This in turn accentuated group differentiation and activated ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination (Tajfel & Turner, 1979, 1986). Ingroup favoritism strengthened group cohesion, feelings of solidarity, and identification with the most emblematic values of the U.S. nation, while outgroup discrimination induced U.S. citizens to conceive the enemy (al-Qaeda and its protectors) as the incarnation of evil, depersonalizing the group and venting their anger on it, and to give their backing to a military response, the eventual intervention in Afghanistan. Finally, and also in line with the postulates of social identity theory, as an alternative to the virtual bipolarization of the conflict (U.S. vs al-Qaeda), the activation of a higher level of identity in the ingroup is proposed, a group that includes the United States and the largest possible number of countries¿ including Islamic states¿in the search for a common, more legitimate and effective solution.
Resumo:
This thesis addresses the problem of categorizing natural objects. To provide a criteria for categorization we propose that the purpose of a categorization is to support the inference of unobserved properties of objects from the observed properties. Because no such set of categories can be constructed in an arbitrary world, we present the Principle of Natural Modes as a claim about the structure of the world. We first define an evaluation function that measures how well a set of categories supports the inference goals of the observer. Entropy measures for property uncertainty and category uncertainty are combined through a free parameter that reflects the goals of the observer. Natural categorizations are shown to be those that are stable with respect to this free parameter. The evaluation function is tested in the domain of leaves and is found to be sensitive to the structure of the natural categories corresponding to the different species. We next develop a categorization paradigm that utilizes the categorization evaluation function in recovering natural categories. A statistical hypothesis generation algorithm is presented that is shown to be an effective categorization procedure. Examples drawn from several natural domains are presented, including data known to be a difficult test case for numerical categorization techniques. We next extend the categorization paradigm such that multiple levels of natural categories are recovered; by means of recursively invoking the categorization procedure both the genera and species are recovered in a population of anaerobic bacteria. Finally, a method is presented for evaluating the utility of features in recovering natural categories. This method also provides a mechanism for determining which features are constrained by the different processes present in a multiple modal world.
Resumo:
Optimal adjustment of brain networks allows the biased processing of information in response to the demand of environments and is therefore prerequisite for adaptive behaviour. It is widely shown that a biased state of networks is associated with a particular cognitive process. However, those associations were identified by backward categorization of trials and cannot provide a causal association with cognitive processes. This problem still remains a big obstacle to advance the state of our field in particular human cognitive neuroscience. In my talk, I will present two approaches to address the causal relationships between brain network interactions and behaviour. Firstly, we combined connectivity analysis of fMRI data and a machine leaning method to predict inter-individual differences of behaviour and responsiveness to environmental demands. The connectivity-based classification approach outperforms local activation-based classification analysis, suggesting that interactions in brain networks carry information of instantaneous cognitive processes. Secondly, we have recently established a brand new method combining transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and EEG. We use the method to measure signal transmission between brain areas while introducing extrinsic oscillatory brain activity and to study causal association between oscillatory activity and behaviour. We show that phase-matched oscillatory activity creates the phase-dependent modulation of signal transmission between brain areas, while phase-shifted oscillatory activity blunts the phase-dependent modulation. The results suggest that phase coherence between brain areas plays a cardinal role in signal transmission in the brain networks. In sum, I argue that causal approaches will provide more concreate backbones to cognitive neuroscience.