California digest supplement, 1915-1919; a digest of the cases decided by the Supreme and Appellate courts of California and by the federal courts on questions of California law since Kerr's California digest, as contained in Raymond's 1916 supplement and in the 1917-1919 California current digests, inclusive, up to volume 178 California Supreme court reports, volume 37 California Appellate reports, and up to 58 California decisions, page 137; California Appellate decisions, page 258; 182 Pacific reporter (California cases), page 991; 258 Federal reporter (California cases), page 161; 39 Supreme court reporter (California cases), page 568. With references to Ruling case law, and important notes in American decisions, American state reports, Annotated cases, Lawyers' reports annotated, and American law reports, also an alphabetical table, direct and reverse, of all cases digested, showing on what page and under what subject each case is found digested in this digest, and also where the various California cases are cited in annotations in "The American series of annotated reports".

Mode of access: Internet.

In the Supreme Court of the State of California : the People, etc., respondent, vs. the Hibernia Savings and Loan Society, appellant; argument of Eugene Liès, Am. Cu. against the constitutionality of laws taxing credits.

Mode of access: Internet.

Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of California

Mode of access: Internet.

California rules of court : rules of practice and procedure adopted by the Judicial Council and the Supreme Court /

Mode of access: Internet.

California digest : being a digest of decisions of the Supreme Court of the state of California /

Caption title on p. [1]: Digest of California decisions.

Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal

Title Varies: Rules of the Court (Varies Slightly)

The eight hours day for wage earning women: United States Supreme Court upholds the California law : List of eight hours laws

National Consumers' League.

Rules on Appeal, Including Rules on Original Proceedings, for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the State of California

Mode of access: Internet.

Vol. 1 transcript of record. Supreme court of the United States. No. 492. October term, 1916. Oregon & California Railroad Company et al., petitioners, vs. the United States. On writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit. Petition for cetiorari filed October 20, 1916. Certiorari granted November 6, 1916. (25,313).

Mode of access: Internet.

California cumulative quarterly digest : a digest of all current decisions of the Supreme and Appellate courts of California ... together with a current and keynote citer

Mode of access: Internet.

The inherent equitable jurisdiction and the plenary power of the Supreme Court of New South Wales to order the winding up of companies

Not all companies in Australia are amenable to a winding up order pursuant to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The Supreme Court of New South Wales has previously dealt with such winding up applications by apparently focusing on the inherent jurisdiction of the court to consider whether the court has jurisdiction to firstly consider the winding up application. This article proposes an original alternative paradigm: the plenary power provided to the court by s 23 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) can be utilised to initially attract the jurisdiction of the court and subsequently the inherent jurisdiction specifically utilising the equitable “just and equitable” ground is available to the court to consider and make such a winding up order if appropriate. Variation of such a paradigm may also be available to the court when considering the inherent jurisdiction in relation to corporation matters more generally.

Bilski v Kappos : The United States Supreme Court delivers mixed views on patenting non-physical inventions and business methods

The United States Supreme Court has handed down a once in a generation patent law decision that will have important ramifications for the patentability of non-physical methods, both internationally and in Australia. In Bilski v Kappos, the Supreme Court considered whether an invention must either be tied to a machine or apparatus, or transform an article into a different state or thing to be patentable. It also considered for the first time whether business methods are patentable subject matter. The decision will be of particular interest to practitioners who followed the litigation in Grant v Commissioner of Patents, a Federal Court decision in which a Brisbane-based inventor was denied a patent over a method of protecting an asset from the claims of creditors.

Caveat today gone tomorrow : Applying to the Supreme Court to Remove a Caveat

While there are many reasons why a client may seek removal of a caveat (which retains an interest in land or water allocation), the procedures involved require careful adherence.