Clinical guideline for diagnosis and management of melioidosis

Melioidosis is an emerging infection in Brazil and neighbouring South American countries. The wide range of clinical presentations include severe community-acquired pneumonia, septicaemia, central nervous system infection and less severe soft tissue infection. Diagnosis depends heavily on the clinical microbiology laboratory for culture. Burkholderia pseudomallei, the bacterial cause of melioidosis, is easily cultured from blood, sputum and other clinical samples. However, B. pseudomallei can be difficult to identify reliably, and can be confused with closely related bacteria, some of which may be dismissed as insignificant culture contaminants. Serological tests can help to support a diagnosis of melioidosis, but by themselves do not provide a definitive diagnosis. The use of a laboratory discovery pathway can help reduce the risk of missing atypical B. pseudomallei isolates. Recommended antibiotic treatment for severe infection is either intravenous Ceftazidime or Meropenem for several weeks, followed by up to 20 weeks oral treatment with a combination of trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole and doxycycline. Consistent use of diagnostic microbiology to confirm the diagnosis, and rigorous treatment of severe infection with the correct antibiotics in two stages; acute and eradication, will contribute to a reduction in mortality from melioidosis.

Prevention and Control Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) National Clinical Guideline No. 2

Prevention and Control Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) National Clinical Guideline No. 2   Click here to download National Clinical Guideline – MRSA  PDF 1MB Click here to download National Clinical Guideline – MRSA (Summary) PDF 389KB Click here to download the Presentation at the Launch of the 2nd National Clinical Guideline Prevention and Control of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)PDF 1.04MB  

Efficacy of clinical guideline implementation to improve the appropriateness of chest physiotherapy prescription among inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Although there is no strong evidence of benefit, chest physiotherapy (CP) seems to be commonly used in simple pneumonia. CP requires equipment and frequently involves the assistance of a respiratory therapist, engendering a significant medical workload and cost. AIM: To measure and compare the efficacy of two modalities of chest physiotherapy (CP) guideline implementation on the appropriateness of CP prescription among patients hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We measured the CP prescription rate and duration in all consecutive CAP inpatients admitted in a division of general internal medicine at an urban teaching community hospital during three consecutive one-year time periods: (1) before any guideline implementation; (2) after a passive implementation by medical grand rounds and guideline diffusion through mailing; (3) after adding a one-page reminder in the CAP patient's medical chart highlighting our recommendations. Death and recurrent hospitalisation rates within one year after hospitalisation were recorded to assess whether CP prescription reduction, if any, impaired patient outcomes. RESULTS: During the three successive phases, 127, 157, and 147 patients with similar characteristics were included. Among all CAP inpatients, the CP prescription rate decreased from 68% (86/127) to 51% (80/157), and to 48% (71/147), respectively (P for trend <0.01 for trend). A significant reduction in CP duration was observed after the active guideline implementation (12.0, 11.0, 7.0days, respectively) and persisted after adjustment for length of stay. Reductions in CP prescription rate and duration were also observed among CAP patients with COPD CP prescription rate: 97% (30/31), 67% (24/36), 75% (35/47), respectively (P<0.01 for trend). The mean cost of CP per patient was reduced by 56%, from $709 to $481, and to $309, respectively. Neither the in-hospital deaths, the one-year overall recurrent hospitalisation nor the one-year CAP-specific recurrent hospitalisation significantly differed between the three phases. CONCLUSION: Both passive and active implementation of guidelines appear to improve the appropriateness of CP prescription among inpatients with CAP without impairing their outcomes. Restricting CP use to patients who benefit from this treatment might be an opportunity to decrease CAP medical cost and workload.

The care of women requesting induced abortion: evidence-based clinical guideline number 7

La guía RCOG sobre el cuidado de las mujeres que solicitan aborto inducido fue publicada por primera vez en el año 2000. Una versión actualizada siguió esta pauta en 2004, hasta que esta revisión tuvo lugar durante 2010 y 2011

National Clinical Effectiveness Committee (NCEC) Annual Report 2013

This first Annual Report of the NCEC outlines the activity of NCEC and provides information on the development for the first time in Ireland processes for prioritisation and quality assurance of National Clinical Guidelines. The Annual Report sets the agenda for NCEC going forward in line with its terms of reference. Of note two National Clinical Guidelines were quality assured by NCEC and endorsed by the Minister for Health in 2013. These are National Clinical Guideline No. 1 – National Early Warning Score and National Clinical Guideline No. 2 – Prevention and Control Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The implementation of National Clinical Guidelines is a significant patient quality and safety initiative and will improve health outcomes for patients, reduce variation in practice and improve the quality of clinical decisions. Quality assured National Clinical Guidelines will help to further improve the quality, safety and cost effectiveness of healthcare across Ireland. Download the Report  

Mon enfant saigne facilement: approche clinique et paraclinique pour le praticien [My child bleeds easily: clinical and paraclinical approach]

The aim of this review article is to provide a clinical guideline for the child presenting with easy bruising, distinguishing among the different etiologic groups associated with this symptom what is normal and what is not, allowing then to establish an algorithm for work-up and follow-up. We also precise in which concrete situation it would be necessary to refer the child to a pediatric hematologist.

Patient-oriented computerized clinical guidelines for mobile decision support in gestational diabetes

The risks associated with gestational diabetes (GD) can be reduced with an active treatment able to improve glycemic control. Advances in mobile health can provide new patient-centric models for GD to create personalized health care services, increase patient independence and improve patients’ self-management capabilities, and potentially improve their treatment compliance. In these models, decision-support functions play an essential role. The telemedicine system MobiGuide provides personalized medical decision support for GD patients that is based on computerized clinical guidelines and adapted to a mobile environment. The patient’s access to the system is supported by a smartphone-based application that enhances the efficiency and ease of use of the system. We formalized the GD guideline into a computer-interpretable guideline (CIG). We identified several workflows that provide decision-support functionalities to patients and 4 types of personalized advice to be delivered through a mobile application at home, which is a preliminary step to providing decision-support tools in a telemedicine system: (1) therapy, to help patients to comply with medical prescriptions; (2) monitoring, to help patients to comply with monitoring instructions; (3) clinical assessment, to inform patients about their health conditions; and (4) upcoming events, to deal with patients’ personal context or special events. The whole process to specify patient-oriented decision support functionalities ensures that it is based on the knowledge contained in the GD clinical guideline and thus follows evidence-based recommendations but at the same time is patient-oriented, which could enhance clinical outcomes and patients’ acceptance of the whole system.

A decision support system to facilitate management of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding

Objective: To develop a model to predict the bleeding source and identify the cohort amongst patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) who require urgent intervention, including endoscopy. Patients with acute GIB, an unpredictable event, are most commonly evaluated and managed by non-gastroenterologists. Rapid and consistently reliable risk stratification of patients with acute GIB for urgent endoscopy may potentially improve outcomes amongst such patients by targeting scarce health-care resources to those who need it the most. Design and methods: Using ICD-9 codes for acute GIB, 189 patients with acute GIB and all. available data variables required to develop and test models were identified from a hospital medical records database. Data on 122 patients was utilized for development of the model and on 67 patients utilized to perform comparative analysis of the models. Clinical data such as presenting signs and symptoms, demographic data, presence of co-morbidities, laboratory data and corresponding endoscopic diagnosis and outcomes were collected. Clinical data and endoscopic diagnosis collected for each patient was utilized to retrospectively ascertain optimal management for each patient. Clinical presentations and corresponding treatment was utilized as training examples. Eight mathematical models including artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), shrunken centroid (SC), random forest (RF), logistic regression, and boosting were trained and tested. The performance of these models was compared using standard statistical analysis and ROC curves. Results: Overall the random forest model best predicted the source, need for resuscitation, and disposition with accuracies of approximately 80% or higher (accuracy for endoscopy was greater than 75%). The area under ROC curve for RF was greater than 0.85, indicating excellent performance by the random forest model Conclusion: While most mathematical models are effective as a decision support system for evaluation and management of patients with acute GIB, in our testing, the RF model consistently demonstrated the best performance. Amongst patients presenting with acute GIB, mathematical models may facilitate the identification of the source of GIB, need for intervention and allow optimization of care and healthcare resource allocation; these however require further validation. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Real-time monitoring of progression towards renal failure in primary care patients

First published online: December 16, 2014.

Stroke

Stroke is a preventable and treatable disease. It can present with the sudden onset of any neurological disturbance, including limb weakness or numbness, speech disturbance, visual loss or disturbance of balance. Over the last two decades, a growing body of evidence has overturned the traditional perception that stroke is simply a consequence of aging which inevitably results in death or severe disability. Evidence is accumulating for more effective primary and secondary prevention strategies, better recognition of people at highest risk and thus most in need of active intervention, interventions that are effective so on after the onset of symptoms, and an understanding of the processes of care that contribute to a better outcome. In addition, there is now good evidence to support interventions and care processes in stroke rehabilitation. In the UK, the National Sentinel Stroke Audits 2,3 have documented changes in secondary care provision over the last 10 years, with increasing numbers of patients being treated in stroke units, more evidence-based practice, and reductions in mortality and length of stay. In order for evidence from research studies to improve outcomes for patients, it needs to be put into practice. National guidelines provide clinicians, managers and service users with summaries of evidence and recommendations for clinical practice. Implementation of guidelines in practice, supported by regular audit, improves the processes of care and clinical outcome. This guideline covers interventions in the acute stage of a stroke (‘acute stroke’) or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Most of the evidence considered relates to interventions in the first 48 hours after onset of symptoms, although some interventions of up to 2 weeks are covered as well. This guideline is a stand-alone document, but is designed to be read alongside the Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party guideline ‘National clinical guideline for stroke’* which considers evidence for interventions from the acute stage into rehabilitation and life after stroke. The Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party guideline is an update of the 2004 2nd edition and includes all the recommendations contained within this guideline. This acute stroke and TIA guideline is also designed to be read alongside the Department of Health’s (DH) ‘National stroke strategy’ (NSS). Where there are differences between the recommendations made within this acute stroke and TIA guideline and the NSS, the Guideline Development Group (GDG) members feel that their recommendations are derived from systematic methodology to identify all of the relevant literature.

General Palliative Care Guidance for Control of Pain in Patients with Cancer (PDF 56 KB)

This document is intended to be a practical clinical guideline for the control of pain in patients with cancer. Its target group is hospital staff, primary care team members and nursing home staff. It attempts to apply the clinical principles outlined in the document 'Control of Pain in Patients with Cancer' published by "Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network" (SIGN). This document has been adapted with the permission of SIGN. Rigour of Development A full evidence based reference list is available with the SIGN document. This can be accessed at www.sign.ac.uk. Contents not based on the SIGN document are referenced separately. This document has been developed as one part of the recommendations identified in the Regional Review of Palliative Care Services, 'Partnerships in Caring'. The development of these Pain Guidelines was led by the Northern Ireland Group of the National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care, whose membership is detailed in Appendix 4. They will be reviewed and updated in two years. A wide consultation process with potential users was undertaken. åÊ åÊ

Metastatic spinal cord compression: Implementing NICE guidance

Metastatic spinal cord compression: Implementing NICE guidanceThis presentation has been written to help you raise awareness of the NICE clinical guideline on Metastatic spinal cord compression: Diagnosis & management of adults at risk of and with MSCC. This guideline has been written for healthcare professionals and other staff who care for people with metastatic spinal cord compression..

Maternal Obesity in the UK: Findings from a national project

In 2008, the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH), now known as the Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE), commenced a 3-year UK-wide Obesity in Pregnancy project. The project was initiated in response to a number of factors. At the time, these included: i) growing evidence that obesity is associated with increased morbidity and mortality for both mother and baby, ii) evidence from the CEMACH 'Saving Mothers' Lives' report showed that women with obesity were over-represented among those who died of direct deaths compared to those who died of indirect deaths, 1 iii) unknown national and regional prevalence rates of maternal obesity, and iv) the need for a national clinical guideline for the care of women with obesity in pregnancy.

Des soins de qualité pour la dépression en première ligne : une contribution à l’amélioration de l’état de santé de la population québécoise

Contexte De nombreuses études, utilisant des indicateurs de qualité variés, ont démontré que la qualité des soins pour la dépression n’est pas optimale en première ligne. Peu de ces études ont examiné les facteurs associés à la réception d’un traitement adéquat, en particulier en tenant compte simultanément des caractéristiques individuelles et organisationnelles. L'association entre un traitement adéquat pour un épisode dépressif majeur (EDM) et une amélioration des symptômes dépressifs n'est pas bien établie dans des conditions non-expérimentales. Les objectifs de cette étude étaient de : 1) réaliser une revue systématique des indicateurs mesurant la qualité du traitement de la dépression en première ligne ; 2) estimer la proportion de patients souffrant d’EDM qui reçoivent un traitement adéquat (selon les guides de pratique clinique) en première ligne ; 3) examiner les caractéristiques individuelles et organisationnelles associées à l’adéquation du traitement pour la dépression ; 4) examiner l'association entre un traitement minimalement adéquat au cours des 12 mois précédents et l'évolution des symptômes dépressifs à 6 et 12 mois. Méthodes La littérature sur la qualité du traitement de la dépression a été examinée en utilisant un ensemble de mots-clés (« depression », « depressive disorder », « quality », « treatment », « indicator », « adequacy », « adherence », « concordance », « clinical guideline » et « guideline ») et « 360search », un moteur de recherche fédérée. Les données proviennent d'une étude de cohorte incluant 915 adultes consultant un médecin généraliste, quel que soit le motif de consultation, répondant aux critères du DSM-IV pour l’EDM dans la dernière année, nichés dans 65 cliniques de première ligne au Québec, Canada. Des analyses multiniveaux ont été réalisées. Résultats Bien que majoritairement développés à partir de guides de pratique clinique, une grande variété d'indicateurs a été observée dans la revue systématique de littérature. La plupart des études retenues ont utilisé des indicateurs de qualité rudimentaires, surtout pour la psychothérapie. Les méthodes utilisées étaient très variées, limitant la comparabilité des résultats. Toutefois, quelque soit la méthode choisie, la plupart des études ont révélé qu’une grande proportion des personnes souffrant de dépression n’ont pas reçu de traitement minimalement adéquat en première ligne. Dans notre échantillon, l’adéquation était élevée (> 75 %) pour un tiers des indicateurs de qualité mesurés, mais était faible (< 60 %) pour près de la moitié des mesures. Un peu plus de la moitié de l'échantillon (52,2 %) a reçu au moins un traitement minimalement adéquat pour la dépression. Au niveau individuel, les jeunes adultes (18-24 ans) et les personnes de plus de 65 ans avaient une probabilité moins élevée de recevoir un traitement minimalement adéquat. Cette probabilité était plus élevée pour ceux qui ont un médecin de famille, une assurance complémentaire, un trouble anxieux comorbide et une dépression plus sévère. Au niveau des cliniques, la disponibilité de la psychothérapie sur place, l'utilisation d'algorithmes de traitement, et le mode de rémunération perçu comme adéquat étaient associés à plus de traitement adéquat. Les résultats ont également montré que 1) la réception d'au moins un traitement minimalement adéquat pour la dépression était associée à une plus grande amélioration des symptômes dépressifs à 6 et à 12 mois; 2) la pharmacothérapie adéquate et la psychothérapie adéquate étaient toutes deux associées à de plus grandes améliorations dans les symptômes dépressifs, et 3) l'association entre un traitement adéquat et l'amélioration des symptômes dépressifs varie en fonction de la sévérité des symptômes au moment de l'inclusion dans la cohorte, un niveau de symptômes plus élevé étant associé à une amélioration plus importante à 6 et à 12 mois. Conclusions Nos résultats suggèrent que des interventions sont nécessaires pour améliorer la qualité du traitement de la dépression en première ligne. Ces interventions devraient cibler des populations spécifiques (les jeunes adultes et les personnes âgées), améliorer l'accessibilité à la psychothérapie et à un médecin de famille, et soutenir les médecins de première ligne dans leur pratique clinique avec des patients souffrant de dépression de différentes façons, telles que le développement des connaissances pour traiter la dépression et l'adaptation du mode de rémunération. Cette étude montre également que le traitement adéquat de la dépression en première ligne est associé à une amélioration des symptômes dépressifs dans des conditions non-expérimentales.

Trauma abdominal penetrante: Revision sistematica de la literatura

Introducción El manejo de las heridas abdominales penetrantes ha variado en los últimos 30 años, la laparotomía mandatoria es la conducta más usada en el Hospital Occidente De Kennedy a pesar presentar complicaciones y aumentar las tasas de morbimortalidad. Existen diferentes conductas selectivas del trauma abdominal penetrante como son: valoraciones físicas seriadas, ultrasonografía, laparoscopia, TAC de triple contraste y lavado peritoneal; sin embargo no se ha definido cuál de estos métodos es el más eficiente para el diagnóstico. El objetivo es determinar cual es el método diagnostico más efectivo para evaluar el trauma abdominal penetrante dependiendo del sitio topográfico de la lesión. Métodos: Revisión sistemática de la literatura en revistas indexadas a nivel mundial y literatura gris colombiana. Se escogieron artículos entre 1990 y 2010 que suministraran la mejor evidencia. Se evaluó su calidad metodológica de acuerdo a las recomendaciones desarrolladas por la Asociación Médica Americana en JAMA 1993. Adicionalmente se utilizó el SCORE de calidad metodológico publicado en la revista Chilena de Cirugía 2003. Los estudios incluidos fueron organizados en una tabla de evidencia donde se tuvo en cuenta los siguientes puntos: fecha de publicación, revista, autor, nivel de evidencia y desenlace principal. Resultados: En total se encontraron 98 artículos, según los criterios de elegibilidad se seleccionaron 57 y se adiciono 2 guías de manejo clínico. A pesar de la heterogeneidad de los estudios se encontró concordancia en 17 artículos en cuanto la disminución de complicaciones, tiempo de estancia hospitalaria y disminución de laparotomías negativas con el uso de la TAC de triple contraste y la laparoscopia diagnostica. Conclusión: No existe un juicio para determinar que metodología diagnóstica es la más eficiente en el manejo conservador, pero resulta evidente que la tendencia actual del manejo del trauma abdominal está dirigida a seleccionar y a enfocar al paciente de forma individual. Las alternativas más efectivas hasta el momento ha considerar son la TAC de triple contraste y la laparoscopia diagnostica en las heridas en flancos, dorso y región toracoabdominal respectivamente.