CDIO and the European Project Semester: a match for capstone projects?

The CDIO Initiative is an open innovative educational framework for engineering graduation degrees set in the context of Conceiving – Designing – Implementing – Operating real-world systems and products, which is embraced by a network of worldwide universities, the CDIO collaborators. A CDIO compliant engineering degree programme typically includes a capstone module on the final semester. Its purpose is to expose students to problems of a greater dimension and complexity than those faced throughout the degree programme as well as to put them in contact with the so-called real world, in opposition to the academic world. However, even in the CDIO context, there are barriers that separate engineering capstone students from the real world context of an engineering professional: (i) limited interaction with experts from diverse scientific areas; (ii) reduced cultural and scientific diversity within the teams; and (iii) lack of a project supportive framework to foster the complementary technical and non-technical skills required in an engineering professional. To address these shortcomings, we propose the adoption of the European Project Semester (EPS) framework, a one semester student centred international capstone programme offered by a group of European engineering schools (the EPS Providers) as part of their student exchange programme portfolio. The EPS package is organised around a central module – the EPS project – and a set of complementary supportive modules. Project proposals refer to open multidisciplinary real world problems and supervision becomes coaching. The students are organised in teams, grouping individuals from diverse academic backgrounds and nationalities, and each team is fully responsible for conducting its project. EPS complies with the CDIO directives on Design-Implement experiences and provides an integrated framework for undertaking capstone projects, which is focussed on multicultural and multidisciplinary teamwork, problem-solving, communication, creativity, leadership, entrepreneurship, ethical reasoning and global contextual analysis. As a result, we recommend the adoption of the EPS within CDIO capstone modules for the benefit of engineering students.

Las competencias del profesorado en el entorno CDIO.

Monográfico con el título: 'Competencias docentes en la Educación Superior'. Resumen basado en el de la publicación

Evolution and implementation of CDIO initiatives at ETSII-UPM

The School of Industrial Engineering at Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ETSII-UPM) has been promoting student-centred teaching-learning activities, according to the aims of the Bologna Declaration, well before the official establishment of the European Area of Higher Education. Such student-centred teaching-learning experiences led us to the conviction that project based learning is rewarding, both for students and academics, and should be additionally promoted in our new engineering programmes, adapted to the Grade-Master structure. The level of commitment of our teachers with these activities is noteworthy, as the teaching innovation experiences carried out in the last ten years have led to the foundation of 17 Teaching Innovation Groups at ETSII-UPM, hence leading the ranking of teaching innovation among all UPM centres. Among interesting CDIO activities our students have taken part in especially complex projects, including the Formula Student, linked to the complete development of a competition car, and the Cybertech competition, aimed at the design, construction and operation of robots for different purposes. Additional project-based learning teamwork activities have been linked to toy design, to the development of medical devices, to the implementation of virtual laboratories, to the design of complete industrial installations and factories, among other activities detailed in present study. The implementation of Bologna process will culminate at ETSII-UPM with the beginning of the Master’s Degree in Industrial Engineering, in academic year 2014-15. The program has been successfully approved by the Spanish Agency for Accreditation (ANECA), with the inclusion of a set of subjects based upon the CDIO methodology denominated generally “INGENIA”, linked to the Spanish “ingeniar” (to provide ingenious solutions), also related etymologically in Spanish with “ingeniero”, engineer. INGENIA students will live through the complete development process of a complex product or system and there will be different kind of projects covering most of the engineering majors at ETSII-UPM.

Evaluating and developing project-based learning:an empirical approach to evaluating CDIO

As a global profession, engineering is integral to the maintenance and further development of society. Indeed, contemporary social problems requiring engineering solutions are not only a consequence of natural and ‘manmade’ disasters (such as the Japanese earthquake or the oil leakage in the Gulf of Mexico) but also encapsulate 21st Century dilemmas around sustainability, poverty and pollution [2,6,7]. Given the complexity of such problems and the constant need for innovation, the demand for engineering education to provide a ready supply of suitably qualified engineering graduates, able to make innovative decisions has never been higher [3,5]. Bearing this in mind, and taking account problems of attrition in engineering education [1,6,4] innovation in the way in which the curriculum is developed and delivered is crucial. CDIO [Conceive, Design, Implement, Operate] provides a potentially ground-breaking solution to such dilemmas. Aimed at equipping students with practical engineering skills supported by the necessary theoretical background, CDIO could potentially change the way engineering is perceived and experienced within higher education. Aston University introduced CDIO into its Mechanical Engineering and Design programmes in October 2011. From its induction, engineering education researchers have ‘shadowed’ the staff responsible for developing and teaching the programme. Utilising an Action Research Design, and adopting a mixed methodological research design, the researchers have worked closely with the teaching team to critically reflect on the processes involved in introducing CDIO into the curriculum. Concurrently, research has been conducted to capture students’ perspectives of CDIO. In evaluating the introduction of CDIO at Aston, the researchers have developed a distinctive research strategy with which to evaluate CDIO. It is the emergent findings from this research that form the basis of this paper. Although early-on in its development CDIO is making a significant difference to engineering education at the University. The paper draws attention to pedagogical, practical and professional issues – discussing each one in turn and in doing so critically analysing the value of CDIO from academic, student and industrial perspectives. The paper concludes by noting that whilst CDIO represents a forwardthinking approach to engineering education, the need for constant innovation in learning and teaching should not be forgotten. Indeed, engineering education needs to put itself at the forefront of pedagogic practice. Providing all-rounded engineers, ready to take on the challenges of the 21st Century!

Reflection and reflexivity in reviewing and evaluating CDIO:an empirical approach to evaluation

Facilitated by an Engineer and a Social Scientist, both of whom have expertise in Engineering Education Research and Evaluation (EERE), this interactive workshop is divided into three main sections, each one focusing on a different area of evaluation. It will build on research conducted at Aston University School of Engineering and Applied Science to explore and critique the value of introducing CDIO across the first year undergraduate curriculum. Participants will be invited to consider the pedagogical and engineering related challenges of evaluating the academic and practical value of CDIO as a strategy for learning and teaching in the discipline. An empirical approach to evaluation developed by the researchers to provide empirically grounded evidence of the pedagogical and vocational value of CDIO will form the theoretical and conceptual basis of the workshop. This approach is distinctive in that it encapsulates both engineering and social science methods of evaluation. It is also contemporaneous in nature, with the researchers acting as a ‘fly on the wall’ capturing data as the programme unfolds. Through facilitated discussion and participation, the workshop will provide colleagues with the opportunity to develop a cross-disciplinary, empirically grounded research proposal specifically for the purposes of critically evaluating CDIO. It is anticipated that during the workshop, colleagues will work together in small groups. Suitable pedagogical approaches and tools will be suggested and a purposefully developed Engineering Education Research Guide, written by the workshop facilitators, will be given to all participants to inform and support the Workshop approach.

Engineering the future:CDIO as a tool for combating retention difficulties

With the demand for engineering graduates at what may be defined as an unprecedented high, many universities find themselves facing significant levels of student attrition-with high "drop-out levels" being a major issue in engineering education. In order to address this, Aston University in the UK has radically changed its undergraduate engineering education curriculum, introducing capstone CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement, Operate) modules for all first year students studying Mechanical Engineering and Design. The introduction of CDIO is aimed at making project / problem based learning the norm. Utilising this approach, the learning and teaching in engineering purposefully aims to promote innovative thinking, thus equipping students with high-level problem-solving skills in a way that builds on theory whilst enhancing practical competencies and abilities. This chapter provides an overview of an Action Research study undertaken contemporaneously with the development, introduction, and administration of the first two semesters of CDIO. It identifies the challenges and benefits of the approach and concludes by arguing that whilst CDIO is hard work for staff, it can make a real difference to students' learning experiences, thereby positively impacting retention. © 2012, IGI Global.

Engineering for employability:a transition into CDIO

This paper draws upon the findings of a three year study which tracks an institutions journey of CDIO. In focusing on the student perspective the findings discuss students’ prior learning experiences and their expectations of university. The study considers students’ early perceptions of CDIO; emergent findings suggest that whilst CDIO is not really what students expect when they first arrive at university, most prefer it to ‘traditional lectures’. Indeed the majority indicate that they believe the approach enhances their employability and provides a more engaging learning experience. The conclusion argues that with its focus on problem-based learning and team-working, CDIO has changed the face of the 1st year experience for mechanical engineering and designed students within the university and that in doing so it has enhanced transition and ultimately promoted student success.

Generic competences in engineering field: a comparative study between Latin America and European Union

In this work, a comparison between the competences codes in the CDIÓs* curriculum, the ones defined for the Tunning Project and the International Project Management Association (IPMA) is made. The goal is to define the most appropriate competences codes for the engineering education in Latin America. The CDIO code is obtained from the engineering practice, and responds to the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) standards of accreditation. The Tuning competences are the ones defined for Latin America and the IPMÁs are international competences for project management. It is the first time that the competences defined in ABET accreditation standards in the engineering field are compared with the international competences according to IPMÁs model. The results give evidence that, in first place, there is a need to apply holistic models in the definition of an engineering curriculum. Second, the pertinence of these models in the definition of engineering programs in Latin America.

Competencias genericas en ingeniería: un estudio comparado en el contexto internacional

En este trabajo se comparan las codificaciones de competencias del Plan de estudios de CDIO (Conceive, Desing, Implement and Operate systems in the enterprise and societal context) con las definidas por el Proyecto Tuning y las de IPMA (International Project Management Asociation). También se determina el tipo de aprendizaje más apropiado para lograr la adquisición de competencias en la formación de los ingenieros y se revisa la evolución de los programas de ingeniería industrial en Perú, España y EE.UU para definir las competencias específicas aplicables al caso peruano. La codificación de CDIO responde a los estándares de acreditación de ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) y las competencias del Proyecto Tuning son las definidas para Latinoamérica. Se comparan las competencias definidas en los estándares de acreditación ABET en el ámbito de las ingenierías, con las competencias internacionales según el modelo IPMA. Los resultados evidencian la necesidad de aplicar modelos holísticos que abarquen competencias técnicas, contextuales y de comportamiento en los planes de estudio de ingeniería, su pertinencia para la definición de programas de ingeniería en Latinoamérica y la posibilidad de definir un plan de estudios de ingeniería industrial con una estrategia de aprendizaje apropiada.

Diseño, implantación y seguimiento de la asignatura "Ingenia: Proyecto de Máquinas"

El presente proyecto fin de carrera surge y se engloba dentro del marco del Proyecto de Innovación Educativa IE-14-15-05008 y abarca el proceso de diseño, implantación y seguimiento de la nueva asignatura “Ingenia: Proyecto de Máquinas” perteneciente al recién estrenado Máster en Ingeniería Industrial que oferta la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Esto debe realizarse dentro del ámbito de organización educativa que constituye el Marco Europeo de Educación Superior y que con el Proceso de Bolonia (1999) propuso un cambio en el modelo educativo, que permitiese entre otras cosas, impulsar cambios en las metodologías docentes. Durante gran parte del siglo XX, la enseñanza de la ingeniería en las universidades ofrecía una exposición efectiva a la práctica. Era enseñada por ingenieros que estaban ejerciendo su profesión y se concentraba en la resolución de problemas tangibles mientras que los estudiantes aprendían a conceptualizar y diseñar productos y sistemas. La rápida expansión del conocimiento científico y técnico que ocurrió a finales de los 90s causó que la enseñanza de la ingeniería se convirtiera en la enseñanza de la “ciencia de la ingeniería”, con una menor concentración práctica. Los líderes de la industria empezaron a hallar que los estudiantes que se graduaban, si bien tenían una sólida capacitación técnica, carecían de muchas de las habilidades requeridas en las situaciones de ingeniería del mundo real. La enseñanza en general y la enseñanza de la Ingeniería en particular necesitan por tanto de una reforma educativa integral. De esta necesidad, surge la iniciativa CDIO (ConcebirDiseñar-Implementar-Operar), un marco educativo innovador dirigido a producir la próxima generación de líderes de ingeniería; siendo este el marco al que se abrazan las asignaturas tipo “INGENIA” y con el que se pretenden alcanzar las habilidades tanto técnicas como personales e interpersonales que requiere la nueva generación de ingenieros para ser competitivos en un sector cada vez más amplio y multidisciplinar. Para conseguir el cambio requerido antes citado, se hace necesaria la realización de proyectos de innovación educativa como el presente, que ayuden durante el proceso de transición que está viviendo el modelo educativo. Para lograr estos, el presente proyecto pretende dar respuesta a preguntas como: ¿De dónde venimos y hacia dónde debemos ir?, ¿Por qué es necesario un cambio?, ¿Qué pretendemos alcanzar con este cambio?, ¿Qué resultados esperamos de ello?, ¿Qué cambios se han introducido y cuales hay pendientes por introducir?, ¿Cómo planificar la reestructuración y adaptación de recursos y contenidos docentes para alcanzar los objetivos?, ¿De qué recursos se dispone y cuales hay que incorporar?, ¿Cómo debemos medir, evaluar y difundir los resultados obtenidos?, ¿Qué conclusiones se pueden extraer de los resultados? Para dar respuesta a estas y otras preguntas se abordan los puntos que se exponen a continuación. Los principales apartados del presente proyecto son la INTRODUCCIÓN, PLANIFICACIÓN y RESULTADOS OBTENIDOS. En primer lugar, durante la INTRODUCCIÓN se realiza una descripción del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior (EEES), resumiendo cuáles son los objetivos estratégicos del mismo, y la conexión existente con la enseñanza de la Ingeniería Mecánica. Posteriormente se aborda un breve estudio de las metodologías docentes tradicionales empleadas en la enseñanza para inmediatamente después introducir las bases del aprendizaje activo. Se analizan las necesidades que han llevado a plantear los cambios en las metodologías docentes. Para esto se analizan varios estudios enfocados a concretar las características que se requieren en los recién egresados de titulaciones técnicas. Como consecuencia de las necesidades descritas surge la iniciativa CDIO, marco a la que se acogen las asignaturas “Ingenia” y que se estudiará en profundidad. Por último y tras introducir el contexto del proyecto, se describen los objetivos del mismo así como la planificación de las actividades. Con el apartado PLANIFICACIÓN se pretende describir las actividades realizadas del proceso de diseño de la asignatura abarcando la programación de actividades, gestión y empleo de recursos, metodologías docentes empleadas, plan de evaluación, entre otras actividades. En el apartado RESULTADOS OBTENIDOS se describen los prototipos fabricados, los resultados de aprendizaje, la valoración de la asignatura y problemas encontrados. Todo ello será de especial interés para extraer lecciones aprendidas y proponer acciones correctoras y/o de mejora.

Student input in the development of a marking scheme for improved engineering logbooks

Engineers logbooks are an important part of the CDIO process, as a prequel to the logooks they will be expected to keep when in industry. Previously however, students logbooks were insufficient and students did not appear to appreciate the importance of the logbooks or how they would be assessed. In an attempt to improve the students understanding and quality of logbooks, a group of ~100 1st year CDIO students were asked to collaboratively develop a marking matrix with the tutors. The anticipated outcome was that students would have more ownership in, and a deeper understanding of, the logbook and what is expected from the student during assessment. A revised marking matrix was developed in class and a short questionnaire was implemented on delivery of the adapted matrix to gauge the students response to the process. Marks from the logbooks were collected twice during teaching period one and two and compared to marks from previous years. This poster will deliver the methodology and outcomes for this venture.

Practice based learning approaches in collaborative design and engineering education:a case study investigation into the benefits of a crossdisciplinary practice based learning strategy

This study explores the ongoing pedagogical development of a number of undergraduate design and engineering programmes in the United Kingdom. Observations and data have been collected over several cohorts to bring a valuable perspective to the approaches piloted across two similar university departments while trialling a number of innovative learning strategies. In addition to the concurrent institutional studies the work explores curriculum design that applies the principles of Co-Design, multidisciplinary and trans disciplinary learning, with both engineering and product design students working alongside each other through a practical problem solving learning approach known as the CDIO learning initiative (Conceive, Design Implement and Operate) [1]. The study builds on previous work presented at the 2010 EPDE conference: The Effect of Personality on the Design Team: Lessons from Industry for Design Education [2]. The subsequent work presented in this paper applies the findings to mixed design and engineering team based learning, building on the insight gained through a number of industrial process case studies carried out in current design practice. Developments in delivery also aligning the CDIO principles of learning through doing into a practice based, collaborative learning experience and include elements of the TRIZ creative problem solving technique [3]. The paper will outline case studies involving a number of mixed engineering and design student projects that highlight the CDIO principles, combined with an external industrial design brief. It will compare and contrast the learning experience with that of a KTP derived student project, to examine an industry based model for student projects. In addition key areas of best practice will be presented, and student work from each mode will be discussed at the conference.