John Stuart, earl of Bute,

"List of the principal authorities used by the author": p. [104]-105.

An answer to A letter to the Right Honourable the Earl of B*** : in which the false reasoning, and absurd conclusions, in that pamphlet, are fully detected and refuted : addressed to the Right Hon. Earl T-mple.

In defence of William Pitt.

The lives of Sir Matthew Hale and John, Earl of Rochester.

Also special t.-p. for each pt. with title-vignettes (ports.)

Memoirs of the life of Robert Cary, Baron of Leppington, and Earl of Monmouth. Written by himself, and now published from an original manuscript in the custody of John Earl of Corke and Orrery. With some explanatory notes.

Mode of access: Internet.

A history of the life and death of John, Earl of Gowrie : with preliminary dissertations /

Page [342] misnumbered 243.

Lives of Sir Matthew Hale and John, Earl of Rochester /

Each section has separate t.p. dated 1820.

The death of John Stuart Mill

This article surveys the fiercely contested posthumous assessments of John Stuart Mill in the newspaper and periodical press, in the months following his death in May 1873, and elicits the broader intellectual context. Judgements made in the immediate wake of Mill's death influence biographers and historians to this day and provide an illuminating aperture into the politics and shifting ideological forces of the period. The article considers how Mill's failure to control his posthumous reputation demonstrates both the inextricable intertwining of politics and character in the 1870s, and the difficulties his allies faced. In particular, it shows the sharp division between Mill's middle and working class admirers; the use of James Mill's name as a rebuke to his son; the redefinition of Malthusianism in the 1870s; and how publication of Mill's Autobiography damaged his reputation. Finally, the article considers the relative absence of both theological and Darwinian critiques of Mill.

Liberty in key works of John Locke and John Stuart Mill

The ideas of liberty presented in the important works of John Locke and John Stuart Mill, The Second Treatise of Government (1689) and On Liberty (1859), are often viewed as belonging to the same conceptual tradition, that of English liberalism. This thesis is an articulation of the diversity between the theories of liberty expressed by Locke and Mill in the Second Treatise and On liberty. \ am aiming to provide a corrective to the tendency to ignore or to gloss over very significant differences between the two men. The work concentrates on the philosophical aspects of each theory of liberty, arguing that they differ in four respects. These are; definitions of liberty; justifications of liberty; how much liberty and for whom they recommend it, and finally, who they believe threatens liberty and how this threat is to be curbed. It is the purpose of this thesis to show that in terms of these areas Locke and Mill are pursuing different ends. I conclude that Locke and Mill present strikingly different theories of liberty and cannot be thought of as belonging to the one conceptual tradition in terms of the definition, the justification, the prescription and the threat to liberty. Ultimately, I question the value of including Locke and Mill in the one conceptual tradition of liberty solely on the basis that they argue ‘freedom from.’