(106)Ruthenium brachytherapy for retinoblastoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of (106)Ru plaque brachytherapy for the treatment of retinoblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed a retrospective, noncomparative case series of 39 children with retinoblastoma treated with (106)Ru plaques at the Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital between October 1992 and July 2006, with 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 63 tumors were treated with (106)Ru brachytherapy in 41 eyes. The median patient age was 27 months. (106)Ru brachytherapy was the first-line treatment for 3 tumors (4.8%), second-line treatment for 13 (20.6%), and salvage treatment for 47 tumors (74.6%) resistant to other treatment modalities. Overall tumor control was achieved in 73% at 1 year. Tumor recurrence at 12 months was observed in 2 (12.5%) of 16 tumors for which (106)Ru brachytherapy was used as the first- or second-line treatment and in 15 (31.9%) of 47 tumors for which (106)Ru brachytherapy was used as salvage treatment. Eye retention was achieved in 76% of cases (31 of 41 eyes). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed no statistically significant risk factors for tumor recurrence. Radiation complications included retinal detachment in 7 (17.1%), proliferative retinopathy in 1 (2.4%), and subcapsular cataract in 4 (9.7%) of 41 eyes. CONCLUSION: (106)Ru brachytherapy is an effective treatment for retinoblastoma, with few secondary complications. Local vitreous seeding can be successfully treated with (106)Ru brachytherapy.

Role of brachytherapy in the treatment of cancers of the anal canal. Long-term follow-up and multivariate analysis of a large monocentric retrospective series.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are few data on long-term clinical results and tolerance of brachytherapy in anal canal cancer. We present one of the largest retrospective analyses of anal canal cancers treated with external beam radiotherapy with/without (±) chemotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical results in terms of efficacy and toxicity. The impact of different clinical and therapeutic variables on these outcomes was studied. RESULTS: From May 1992 to December 2009, 209 patients received brachytherapy after external beam radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Of these patients, 163 were stage II or stage IIIA (UICC 2002) and 58 were N1-3. According to age, ECOG performance status (PS), and comorbidities, patients received either radiotherapy alone (58/209) or radiochemotherapy (151/209). The median follow-up was 72.8 months. The 5- and 10-year local control rates were 78.6 and 73.9 %, respectively. Globally, severe acute and late G3-4 reactions (NCI-CTC scale v. 4.0) occurred in 11.2 and 6.3 % of patients, respectively. Univariate analysis showed the statistical impact of the pelvic treatment volume (p = 0.046) and of the total dose (p = 0.02) on the risk of severe acute and late toxicities, respectively. Only six patients required permanent colostomy because of severe late anorectal toxicities. CONCLUSION: After a long follow-up time, brachytherapy showed an acceptable toxicity profile and high local control rates in patients with anal canal cancer.

Braquiterapia prostática: morbilidade urinária e sexual

RESUMO: Objectivos 1. Avaliar a morbilidade urinária e sexual secundária à braquiterapia prostática com implante de I125. 2. Avaliar a influência da hormonoterapia neoadjuvante e adjuvante na morbilidade urinária e sexual secundária à braquiterapia(I125). 3. Avaliar a influência da associação da radioterapia externa na morbilidade urinária e sexual secundária à braquiterapia(I125). 4. Avaliar a morbilidade urinária dos doentes com contra-indicação relativa (próstatas volumosas, IPSS elevado).Material e métodos De Setembro de 2000 a Dezembro de 2004 foram recrutados 204 doentes com o diagnóstico de carcinoma da próstata localizado (T1 e T2) ou localmente avançado (T3) e expectativa de vida superior a 10 anos. Foram submetidos a braquiterapia, com implante transperineal de Iodo 125 (I125) em monoterapia ou combinada com hormonoterapia e/ou radioterapia externa (tratamento trimodal). Definiram-se diversos sub-grupos de pacientes, consoante algumas características habitualmente referidas como factores de risco para a morbilidade do tratamento de braquiterapia prostática, com o objectivo de analisar a sua influência sobre a morbilidade urinária e sexual: Grupo 1: Braquiterapia em monoterapia (MONO) versus braquiterapia associada a radioterapia externa (BCOMB) Grupo 2: Próstatas volumosas (>50ml) versus próstatas não volumosas (<50ml)Grupo 3: Braquiterapia associada a hormonoterapia (HORM) versus braquiterapia sem hormonoterapia (NHORM)Grupo 4: IPSS elevado versus IPSS baixo Avaliou-se a evolução do IPSS, QoL, taxa de RTU-P e retenção urinária pós implante, e evolução do BSFI durante todo o período de seguimento. Resultados Grupo 1: Para o grupo MONO o IPSS iniciou-se com 7.1, sofreu agravamento para 16.1 e 15.9 ao primeiro e terceiro meses. Aos 12 meses, o IPSS desceu para 10.1 enquanto que, aos 18 e 24 meses, o IPSS foi de 7.3 e 5.8. O grupo BCOMB iniciou com IPSS de 9.4. Sofreu agravamento ligeiro e pouco acentuado até aos 6 meses (IPSS de 14). A evolução do IPSS foi, então, flutuante com IPSS de 5.9 aos 12 meses e 9.5 aos 18 meses. Aos 24 meses apresentava IPSS de 6.7. A taxa de retenção urinária (6.4% e 0%) e de RTU-P (2.0% e 0%) foram semelhantes nos grupos MONO e BCOMB, respectivamente (p=0.375 e p=1). A evolução da qualidade das erecções foi semelhante nos dois grupos excepto aos 6 meses em que MONO apresentou o valor 6 e BCOMB 3.7 (p=0.029). A percentagem de doentes potentes foi significativamente inferior nos primeiros 6 meses após a braquiterapia para o grupo BCOMB relativamente ao grupo MONO: 36%–74%; 33%–73%; 33%–75%. Após os 6 meses os grupos foram homogéneos. Grupo 2: O IPSS evoluiu nas próstatas <50ml e >50ml de 7–9 para 15-19 ao primeiro mês e 15-18 ao 3.º mês. Apenas ao primeiro mês é que as diferenças no IPSS foram significativas (p=0.061). Após o 3.º mês os dois grupos foram semelhantes: IPSS de 8 e 12 ao 12.º mês e 5.7 e 6 ao 24.º mês. As taxas de retenção urinária e de RTU-P foram semelhantes (p=0.054 e p=0.286) Grupo 3: A evolução do IPSS, taxas de retenção urinária e de RTU-P foram sobreponíveis em ambos os grupos. A evolução da líbido, erecções, percentagem de doentes potentes, ejaculação, incómodo e satisfação foi significativamente inferior no grupo HORM relativamente ao grupo N HORM apenas ao primeiro mês (valores de p<0.0001; <0.0001; < 0.0001; 0.009 e 0.002 respectivamente) Grupo 4: A evolução do IPSS nos doentes com IPSS elevado foi a seguinte: 22.17(0M); 19.5(1M); 20.5(3M); 15.3(6M); 15.7(12M); 11(18M); 8(24M) A evolução do IPSS nos doentes com IPSS baixo foi a seguinte: 5.9(0M); 15.3(1M); 14.9(3M); 12.2(6M); 8.9(12M); 7.2(18M), 5.5(24M) As taxas de RTU-P (2.8% e 0%) e retenção urinária (5.1% e 5.9%) foram semelhantes em ambos os grupos de doentes (p=1). Conclusões 1. A radioterapia intersticial da próstata com implante transperineal e ecoguiado de Iodo 125 é frequentemente acompanhada de morbilidade urinária transitória e de intensidade moderada. A Morbilidade consiste em sintomatologia do aparelho urinário baixo (“LUTS – lower urinary tract symptoms”) que, na maioria dos doentes, sofre um agravamento máximo do primeiro ao 3.º mês. Segue-se uma melhoria ligeira até ao 6.º mês que é mais acentuada daí em diante. Por volta do 12.º e 18.º mês, a maior parte dos doentes apresenta sintomatologia urinária muito semelhante à que apresentava antes do tratamento. Após o 18.º mês, os doentes mantêm uma melhoria da sintomatologia urinária para além da que apresentavam previamente ao implante. As taxas de retenção urinária e de ressecção transuretral prostática após o implante de braquiterapia são muito baixas, inferiores a 10%. 2. A associação da braquiterapia prostática com radioterapia externa adjuvante influencia a evolução da sintomatologia urinária: o aparecimento da sintomatologia urinária é mais lento, demorando 6 meses a atingir o seu valor máximo que, por sua vez, é de intensidade menos acentuada do que quando a braquiterapia é utilizada em monoterapia. 3. O volume prostático superior a 50 ml não influencia a morbilidade urinária. 4. A terapêutica hormonal, neoadjuvante e adjuvante, não influencia a sintomatologia urinária. 5. Os doentes com sintomatologia urinária prévia muito acentuada não sofrem agravamento da referida sintomatologia. Pelo contrário, apresentam uma melhoria de sintomas urinários desde o primeiro mês, e que se mantém ao longo dos 24 meses de seguimento, apresentando, no final deste período, sintomatologia urinária ligeira e muito inferior à que apresentavam antes do implante. As taxas de retenção urinária e RTU-P após a braquiterapia são semelhantes às que ocorrem nos doentes assintomáticos previamente ao implante. 6. A vida sexual está preservada, em mais de 70% dos casos, ao fim dos 24 meses de seguimento. No entanto, imediatamente após o primeiro mês de seguimento, ocorre uma diminuição ligeira da qualidade das erecções que se mantém, sem melhoria ou agravamento, durante todo o período de seguimento. A hormonoterapia afecta todos os parâmetros da vida sexual, embora de forma apenas temporária. Após a suspensão da terapêutica hormonal este grupo de doentes recupera a actividade sexual e apresenta-se idêntico ao grupo de doentes que não foram sujeitos a essa terapêutica.----------------ABSTRACT: Objectives 1. To assess urinary and sexual morbility after prostatic brachytherapy with the implant of I125 seeds. 2. To assess the influence of neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy in urinary and sexual morbility after prostatic brachytherapy with the implant of I125 seeds. 3. To assess the effects, on urinary and sexual morbility, of associating external radiotherapy after prostatic brachytherapy with the implant of I125 seeds. 4. To assess the urinary morbility in patients with relative contraindications (voluminous prostates, high IPSS). Material and Methods From September, 2000 to December, 2004 a total of 204 patients were recruited with a diagnosis of localized (T1 and T2) or locally advanced (T3) carcinoma of the prostate and a life expectancy in excess of 10 years. The patients underwent brachytherapy with transperineal seed implant of iodine (I125) as a monotherapy or in combination with hormone therapy and/or external radiotherapy (trimodal treatment). With the aim of evaluating the treatment’s influence on urinary and sexual morbility, a number of patient sub-groups were defined in accordance with certain characteristics normally mentioned as morbility risk factors for prostatic brachytherapy treatment: Group 1: Brachytherapy as monotherapy (MONO) versus brachytherapy in combination with external radiotherapy (BCOMB) Group 2: Voluminous prostates (>50ml) versus non- voluminous prostates (<50ml) Group 3: Brachytherapy in combination with hormone therapy (HORM) versus brachytherapy without hormone therapy (NHORM)Group 4: High IPSS versus a low IPSS. The evolution of the IPSS, QoL, TURP rate and post-implant urinary retention as well as the BSFI were assessed throughout the entire follow-up period. Results Group 1: For the MONO group the IPSS began at 7.1, and then rose to 16.1 and 15.9 in the first and third months, respectively. At month 12, the IPSS had dropped to 10.1 and at month 18 and 24 the IPSS was registered at 7.3 and 5.8, respectively. The BCOMB group started out with an IPSS of 9.4. It underwent a slight and little-significant rise until month 6 (IPSS at 14). The evolution of the IPSS then began to fluctuate from an IPSS of 5.9 at month 12 and 9.5 at month 18. At month 24 we registered an IPSS of 6.7. The urinary retention rate (6.4% and 0%) and TURP rate (2.0% e 0%) were similar to those of the MONO and BCOMB groups, respectively (p=0.375 and p=1). The evolution regarding the quality of erections was similar for the two groups except at 6 months when the MONO group displayed a value of 6 and the BCOMB group 3.7 (p=0.029). The percentage of sexually potent patients was significantly lower in the first six months after brachytherapy for the BCOMB group when compared with the MONO group: 36%–74%; 33%–73%; 33%–75%. After six months, the results became more consistent. Group 2: IPSS results evolved in <50ml and >50ml prostates from 7–9 to 15-19 in the first month and from 15-18 after the third month. It was only in the first month that the differences in the IPSS were significant (p=0.061). After the third month, the two groups displayed similar outcomes: IPSS 8 and 12 at month 12 and 5.7 and 6 at month 24. Urinary retention and TURP rates were similar (p=0.054 e p=0.286). Group 3: IPSS evolution and rates of urinary retention and TURP were identical in both groups. Figures regarding libido, erections, percentage of sexually potent patients, ejaculation, discomfort and sexual satisfaction were always significantly lower for the HORM group, when compared to the NHORM group in the first month only (values of p<0.0001; <0.0001; <0.0001; 0.009 e 0.002, respectively). Group 4: IPSS evolution in patients with a high IPSS was as follows: 22.17(0M); 19.5(1M); 20.5(3M); 15.3(6M); 15.7(12M); 11(18M); 8(24M) IPSS evolution in patients with a low IPSS was as follows: 5.9(0M); 15.3(1M); 14.9(3M); 12.2(6M); 8.9(12M); 7.2(18M), 5.5(24M)TURP rates (2.8% e 0%) and those for urinary retention (5.1% e 5.9%) were similar in both patient groups (p=1). Conclusions 1. Interstitial radiotherapy of the prostate with transperineal, ultrasound-guided implant of Iodine-125 seeds is often followed by transitory urinary morbility of moderate intensity. The morbility involves symptoms of the lower urinary tract which, in most cases are at their worst from the first to the third months. There is a slight improvement up to the sixth month, at which point improvement becomes more accentuated. Around months 12 or 18, most patients display urinary symptoms that are very similar to those noted before treatment. After month 18, patients’ urinary symptoms continue to improve past the point they displayed prior to the implant. Urinary retention rates and those for transurethral resection of the prostate are very low (below 10%), after brachytherapy seed implant. 2. The combination of prostatic brachytherapy and adjuvant external radiotherapy affects the evolution of urinary symptoms: the appearance of urinary symptoms is much slower, taking six months to peak, and is less intense than when brachytherapy is employed as the only means of treatment. 3. The fact that the prostate displays a volume greater than 50 ml does not influence urinary morbility. 4. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy do not influence urinary symptomology. 5. Patients with severe, preexisting symptoms of the urinary tract do not experience a worsening of those symptoms. On the contrary, they exhibit an improvement in urinary symptoms as of the first month. This improvement continues for the 24 months, after which patients display symptoms of the urinary tract that are slight and a noticeable improvement over the urinary complaints registered before the implant. Urinary retention and TURP rates subsequent to brachytherapy are similar to those registered for asymptomatic patients. 6. The patient’s sexual performance is maintained in more than 70% of the cases, as noted after 24 months of follow-up. However, immediately after the first follow-up month there is a lessening in the quality of erections that continues, without improving or worsening, for the whole follow-up period. Hormone therapy affects all the parameters of sexual performance, albeit temporarily. After suspending hormone therapy, this group recovered with regard to sexual performance, and showed itself to be identical to the group of patients that had not undergone hormone therapy.-------------------RESUMÉ:Objectives 1. Évaluer la morbilité urinaire et sexuelle après la realisation la curiethérapie de la prostate avec implant de I125. 2. Évaluer l’ influence de la thérapie hormonale néoadjuvante et adjuvante en ce qui concerne la morbilité urinaire et sexuelle après la réalisation de la curiethérapie (I125). 3. Évaluer l’influence de l’association de la radiothérapie externe dans la morbilité urinaire et sexuelle après la réalisation de la curiethérapie (I125). 4. Évaluer la morbilité urinaire des malades avec des contre indications relatives (prostates volumineuses, IPSS élevé). Matériel et méthodologie De Septembre 2000 à Décembre 2004, on a recruté 204 patients ayant pour diagnostique un carcinome de la prostate localisé (T1 et T2) ou localement avancé (T3) et dont l’expectative de vie était de plus de 10 ans. Ils ont été soumis au traitement de la curiethérapie avec l’implantation transpérinéal de l’iode 125 (I125) en monothérapie ou en traitement combiné avec une thérapie hormonale et/ou radiothérapie externe (traitement trimodale). Il y a eu plusieurs sous-catégories de patients, et cela dépend de quelques caractéristiques normalement considérées comme des facteurs à risque en ce qui concerne la morbilité du traitement de la curiethérapie de la prostate, et l’objective étant d’analyser son influence sur la morbilité urinaire et sexuelle. Groupe 1: Curiethérapie en traitement unique (MONO) par rapport à la curiethérapie associée au traitement externe (BCOMB). Groupe 2: Prostates volumineuses (>50ml) par rapport au prostates qui ne sont pas volumineuses (<50ml). Groupe 3: Curiethérapie associée au traitement hormonale (HORM) par rapport à la curiethérapie sans traitement hormonale (NHORM). Groupe 4: IPSS élevé par rapport au IPSS diminué. Nous avons évalué l’evolution du IPSS, Qualité de vie, le taux de RTU-P et la retention de l’urine après l’implant, BSFI pendant toute la période du traitement. Résultats Groupe 1: Pour le groupe MONO l’IPSS a commençé avec un taux de 7.1, et les patients ont souffert d’un empirement allant jusqu’à 16.1 et 15.9 pendant le premier et le troisième mois. 12 mois après l’IPSS diminua jusqu’à 10.1 À 18 mois le taux fût de 7.3 et à 24 mois il diminua encore jusqu’à atteindre 5.8. Le groupe BCOMB commença avec un taux d’IPSS de 9.4. Ils souffrirent un empirement légér et peu accentué jusqu’aux 6 premiers mois (IPSS de 14). L’évolution de l’IPSS était fluctuante allant de 5.9 à 12 mois et 9.5 à 18 mois. À 24 mois, l’IPSS était de 6.7. Le taux de retention de l’urine (6.4% et 0%) et de la RTU-P (2.0% et 0%) étaient simmilaires dans les groupes MONO et BCOMB respectivement (p=0.375 et p=1). L’ évolution de la qualité des érections fût semblable dans les 2 groupes excepté le groupe MONO qui présenta une valeure de 6 à 6 mois et le groupe BCOMB qui présenta une valeure de 3.7 (p=0.029). Le pourcentage des malades sexuellement puissants a été significativement inférieur pendant les 6 premiers mois depuis la curiethérapie pour le groupe BCOMB si on le compare au groupe MONO: 36%–74%; 33%–73%; 33%–75%. Après cette période, les groupes eûrent des résultats homogénes. Groupe 2: L’ IPSS a évolué dans les prostates <50ml et >50ml de 7–9 jusqu’à 15-19 pendant le premier mois et jusqu’à 15-18 au 3ème mois. C’est seulement pendant le premier mois que les différences de l’IPSS ont été significatives (p=0.061). Après le 3ème mois les deux groupes ont eu des résultats semblables: IPSS 8 et 12 à 12.º mois et 5.7 et 6 à 24.º mois. Le taux de retention de l’urine et de la RTU-P ont été simmilaires (p=0.054 e p=0.286). Groupe 3: L’evolution de l’ IPSS, les taux de retention de l’urine et de la RTU-P pourraient se surposer pour les deux groupes. L’évolution de la libido, des érections, le pourcentage des malades sexuellements puissants, l’incommodité et la satisfaction ont été toujours significativement infériures dans le groupe HORM par rapport au groupe NHORM dès le premier mois (valeurs de p <0.0001; <0.0001; < 0.0001; 0.009 et 0.002 respectivement) Groupe 4: L’évolution de l’ IPSS pour les malades ayant un IPSS élevé fût ainsi: 22.17(0M); 19.5(1M); 20.5(3M); 15.3(6M); 15.7(12M); 11(18M); 8(24M)L’évolution de l’ IPSS pour les malades ayant un IPSS diminué fût ainsi:5.9(0M); 15.3(1M); 14.9(3M); 12.2(6M); 8.9(12M); 7.2(18M), 5.5(24M) Le taux de RTU-P (2.8% e 0%) et de retention de l’urine (5.1% et 5.9%) ont été semblables dans les 2 groupes de malades (p=1). Conclusions 1. La radiothérapie interstitielle de la prostate avec implant transpérinéal de l’iode 125 est fréquamment acompagnée d’une morbilité urinaire transitoire et d’intensité modérée. La morbilité consiste d’une symptomatologie de l’apparéil urinaire inférieure qui, dans la plupart des malades, empire gravement du premier au troisième mois. La situation s’améliore légèrement jusqu’au 6ème mois, l’amélioration étant plus accentuée à partir de là. Autour du 12ème jusqu’au 18ème mois, la majorité des malades présente une symptomatologie urinaire qui se ressemble beaucoup à celle qu’ils avaient avant le traitement. Après le 18ème mois l’amélioration de la symptomatologie urinaire est constante par rapport à celle qu’ils présentaient avant l’implant. Le taux de retention de l’urine et de RTU-P après l’implant de la curiethérapie sont très basses, au dessus de 10%. 2. L’association de la curiethérapie de la prostate avec la radiothérapie externe adjuvante a une influence sur l’évolution de la symptomatologie urinaire: l’apparition des symptômes est plus lente, prenant jusqu’à 6 mois pour atteindre son niveau maximum, qui à son tour, a une intensité moins accentuée que lorsque la curiethérapie est utilisée en monothérapie. 3. Le volume de la prostate supérieure à 50 ml n’a pas d’influence sur la morbilité urinaire. 4. La thérapie hormonale, néoadjuvante et adjuvante, n’a pas d’influence sur la symptomatologie urinaire. 5. Les malades ayant une symptomatologie urinaire préalable et très accentuée ne souffrent pas d’empirement de leur situation. Au contraire, ils présentent une amélioration des symptômes urinaires à partir du premier mois et ceci se maintient tout au long des 24 mois que dure le traitement, ayant à la fin de cette période une symptomatologie urinaire légère et beaucoup plus basse que celle qu’ils présentaient avant l’implant. Le taux de retention de l’urine et de la RTU-P après la curiethérapie est simmilaire à celui que les malades qui n’ont pas de symptômes présentent avant l’implant. 6. La vie sexuelle est préservée dans plus du 70% des cas à la fin de la période de traitement (24 mois). Entretemps, immédiatement après le premier mois d’étude, on note une légère diminution de la qualité des érections qui se maintient sans amélioration ou empirement tout au long du traitement. Le traitement à base d’hormones affecte tous les paramètres de la vie sexuelle, mais de façon temporaire. Après la suspension de la thérapie hormonale ce groupe de malades récupère l’activité sexuelle et se présente de façon égale au groupe de malades qui n’ont pas été soumis à ce traitement.

Endocavitary contact radiation therapy for ultrasonographically staged T1 N0 and T2 N0 rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing endocavitary contact radiation therapy (ECR) for stage I rectal cancer. METHODS: A database of patients treated with ECR for biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma from July 1986 to June 2006 was reviewed retrospectively. Only patients with primary, non-metastatic, ultrasonographically staged T1 N0 and T2 N0 cancer who had no adjuvant treatment were included. Patients received a median of 90 (range 60-190) Gy contact radiation, delivered transanally by a 50-kV X-ray tube in two to five fractions. RESULTS: Of 149 patients, 77 (40 T1, 37 T2) met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 74 (range 38-104) years, and median follow-up 69 (range 10-219) months. ECR failed in 21 patients (27 per cent) (persistent disease, four; recurrence, 17), of whom ten remained disease free after salvage therapy. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate was 74 (95 per cent confidence interval 63 to 83) per cent after ECR alone, and 87 (76 to 93) per cent when survival after salvage therapy for recurrence was included. CONCLUSION: ECR is a minimally invasive treatment option for early-stage rectal cancer. However, similar to other local therapies, ECR has a worse oncological outcome than radical surgery.

Results of high dose-rate brachytherapy boost before 2D or 3D external beam irradiation for prostate cancer

Background and purpose: To evaluate biochemical control and treatment related toxicity of patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) combined with conventional 2D or 3D-conformal external beam irradiation (EBI). Material and methods: Four-hundred and three patients treated between December 2000 and March 2004. HDRB was delivered with three fractions of 5.5-7 Gy with a single implant, followed by 45 Gy delivered with 2D or 3D conformal EBI. Results: The median follow-up was 48.4 months. Biochemical failure (BF) occurred in 9.6% according to both ASTRO and Phoenix consensus criteria. Mean time to relapse was 13 and 26 months, respectively. The 5-year BF free survival using the ASTRO criteria was 94.3%, 86.9% and 86.6% for the low, intermediate and high risk groups, respectively; using Phoenix criteria, 92.4%, 88.0% and 85.3%, respectively. The only predictive factor of BF in the multivariate analysis by both ASTRO and Phoenix criteria was the presence of prostate nodules detected by digital palpation, and patients younger than 60 years presented a higher chance of failure using Phoenix criteria only. Conclusions: Treatment scheme is feasible and safe with good efficacy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 98 (2011) 169-174

Direct measurement of instantaneous source speed for a HDR brachytherapy unit using an optical fiber based detector

Purpose: Several attempts to determine the transit time of a high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy unit have been reported in the literature with controversial results. The determination of the source speed is necessary to accurately calculate the transient dose in brachytherapy treatments. In these studies, only the average speed of the source was measured as a parameter for transit dose calculation, which does not account for the realistic movement of the source, and is therefore inaccurate for numerical simulations. The purpose of this work is to report the implementation and technical design of an optical fiber based detector to directly measure the instantaneous speed profile of a (192)Ir source in a Nucletron HDR brachytherapy unit. Methods: To accomplish this task, we have developed a setup that uses the Cerenkov light induced in optical fibers as a detection signal for the radiation source moving inside the HDR catheter. As the (192)Ir source travels between two optical fibers with known distance, the threshold of the induced signals are used to extract the transit time and thus the velocity. The high resolution of the detector enables the measurement of the transit time at short separation distance of the fibers, providing the instantaneous speed. Results: Accurate and high resolution speed profiles of the 192Ir radiation source traveling from the safe to the end of the catheter and between dwell positions are presented. The maximum and minimum velocities of the source were found to be 52.0 +/- 1.0 and 17.3 +/- 1:2 cm/s. The authors demonstrate that the radiation source follows a uniformly accelerated linear motion with acceleration of vertical bar a vertical bar = 113 cm/s(2). In addition, the authors compare the average speed measured using the optical fiber detector to those obtained in the literature, showing deviation up to 265%. Conclusions: To the best of the authors` knowledge, the authors directly measured for the first time the instantaneous speed profile of a radiation source in a HDR brachytherapy unit traveling from the unit safe to the end of the catheter and between interdwell distances. The method is feasible and accurate to implement on quality assurance tests and provides a unique database for efficient computational simulations of the transient dose. (C) 2010 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3483780]

Postoperative vaginal vault brachytherapy for node-negative Stage II (occult) endometrial carcinoma

Objective. The aim of this study is to look at the efficacy of extended surgical staging and postoperative vaginal vault brachytherapy in patients with Stage II (occult) endometrial carcinoma. Methods. Between January 1989 and December 1997, there were 30 patients with Stage II (occult) endometrial carcinoma who received postoperative vaginal vault brachytherapy as the only adjuvant treatment. The study group consisted of 15 of these patients who had extended surgical staging (including lymphadenectomy). Results. At a median follow-up of 36 months (range 17 to 113 months), there has been no recurrence. There were no major complications from surgery. Only 1 patient had mild rectal bleeding following vaginal vault brachytherapy and there were no grade 3 or 4 bowel toxicities. Conclusions. Extended surgical staging and postoperative vaginal vault brachytherapy for Stage II (occult) endometrial carcinoma is associated with minimal morbidity and excellent survival. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

HDR brachytherapy boost and external radiotherapy for unfavorable prostate cancer patients

Purpose/Objective: To evaluate the outcome of prostate cancer patients treated with a combination of HDR Brachytherapy boost (HDR-BT) and 3D conformal external pelvic radiotherapy (EBRT) in a dose escalation study. Materials and Methods: 162 patients were followed between November 2004 and December 2010 . Two different dose escalation groups were done: group 1 (n= 92), 1 fraction HDR boost (9-10 Gy ) followed by EBRT (60 Gy in 6 weeks) - BED: 203-216 Gy and group 2 (n=70): 2 fraction HDR boost (18-19 Gy), 6 hours interval between fractions, followed by EBRT (46 Gy in 4.5 weeks) - BED: 233.3 -247 Gy; 116 pts (71.6%) received concomitant androgen deprivation. Patients were classified according to the MSKCC criteria into high (N=137) and intermediate (N=25) risk. Phoenix biochemical failure definition was used. Toxicity was scored by Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria (RTOG) Results: The mean follow-up was 41 (range 7-84) months. The 7- years cancer-specific and overall survival was 100% an 92%, respectively. The 7 years actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% and 100% for group 1 and 2, respectively. One patient from group 1 and two patients from group 2 never reached a low nadir. Two patients developed distant metastases 12 and 16 months after the treatment. In a multivariate Cox-regression analysis neither treatment nor risk group (intermediate vs. high risk) were associated with increased risk for biochemical failure. The RTOG grade 3 genitourinary early toxicity was 1.0% and 8.5% while gastrointestinal/genitourinary late toxicity was 7.6% and 1.4% for group 1 and 2, respectively Conclusions: HDR BT boost followed by EBRT appears to be a safe, feasible and effective treatment for patients with unfavorable localized prostate cancer. This study shows a beneficial effect on biochemical control in group 2 pts, however without statistical significance. Higher radiation doses (BED 233.3-247 Gy) do not seem to carry extra toxicity.

Association of urethral toxicity with dose exposure in combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: To report acute and late toxicities in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer treated with combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-B) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2003 to September 2005, 64 men were treated with a single implant HDR-B with 21 Gy given in three fractions, followed by 50 Gy IMRT along with organ tracking. Median age was 66.1 years, and risk of recurrence was intermediate in 47% of the patients or high in 53% of the patients. Androgen deprivation therapy was received by 69% of the patients. Toxicity was scored according to the CTCAE version 3.0. Median follow-up was 3.1 years. RESULTS: Acute grade 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicity was observed in 7.8% of the patients, and late grades 3 and 4 GU toxicity was observed in 10.9% and 1.6% of the patients. Acute grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was experienced by 1.6% of the patients, and late grade 3 GI toxicity was absent. The urethral V(120) (urethral volume receiving &gt; or =120% of the prescribed HDR-B dose) was associated with acute (P=.047) and late &gt; or = grade 2 GU toxicities (P=.049). CONCLUSIONS: Late grades 3 and 4GU toxicity occurred in 10.9% and 1.6% of the patients after HDR-B followed by IMRT in association with the irradiated urethral volume. The impact of V(120) on GU toxicity should be validated in further studies.

Comparative dosimetry in intracavitary balloon catheter brachytherapy with I-125 and in Cf-252 brachytherapy combined with BNCT for brain tumors

Objective Comparative analysis of dosimetry in intracavitary balloon catheter brachytherapy with I-125 and in Cf-252 brachytherapy combined with BNCT for treatment of brain tumors. Materials and Methods Simulations of intracavitary balloon catheter brachytherapy with I-125 and in Cf-252 brachytherapy combined with BNCT were performed with the MCNP5 code, modeling the treatment of a brain tumor on a voxel computational phantom representing a human head. Absorbed dose rates were converted into biologically weighted dose rates. Results Intracavitary balloon catheter brachytherapy with I-125 produced biologically weighted mean dose rates of 3.2E-11, 1.3E-10, 1.9E-11 and 6.9E-13 RBE.Gy.h-1.p-1.s, respectively, on the healthy tissue, on the balloon periphery and on the I 1 and I 2 tumor infiltration zones. On the other hand, Cf-252 brachytherapy combined with BNCT produced a biologically weighted mean dose rate of 5.2E-09, 2.3E-07, 8.7E-09 and 2.4E-09 RBE.Gy.h-1.p-1.s, respectively on the healthy tissue, on the target tumor and on the I 1 and I 2 infiltration zones. Conclusion Cf-252 brachytherapy combined with BNCT delivered a selective irradiation to the target tumor and to infiltration zones, while intracavitary balloon catheter brachytherapy with I-125 delivered negligible doses on the tumor infiltration zones.

Relationship between two year PSA nadir and biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients treated with iodine-125 brachytherapy

Objective To evaluate the relationship between two year PSA nadir (PSAn) after brachytherapy and biochemical recurrence rates in prostate cancer patients. Materials and Methods In the period from January 1998 to August 2007, 120 patients were treated with iodine-125 brachytherapy alone. The results analysis was based on the definition of biochemical recurrence according to the Phoenix Consensus. Results Biochemical control was observed in 86 patients (71.7%), and biochemical recurrence, in 34 (28.3%). Mean PSAn was 0.53 ng/ml. The mean follow-up was 98 months. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1, with two year PSAn < 0.5 ng/ml after brachytherapy (74 patients; 61.7%), and group 2, with two year PSAn ≥ 0.5 ng/ml after brachytherapy (46 patients; 38.3%). Group 1 presented biochemical recurrence in 15 patients (20.3%), and group 2, in 19 patients (43.2%) (p < 0.02). The analysis of biochemical disease-free survival at seven years, stratified by the two groups, showed values of 80% and 64% (p < 0.02), respectively. Conclusion Levels of two year PSAn ≥ 0.5 ng/ml after brachytherapy are strongly correlated with a poor prognosis. This fact may help to identify patients at risk for disease recurrence.

Neoadjuvant interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This is the first study investigating neoadjuvant interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. The goal was to evaluate the type of surgical treatment, histopathologic response, side effects, local control, and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 53 patients, who could not be treated with breast-conserving surgery due to initial tumor size (36/53) or due to an unfavorable breast-tumor ratio (17/53), were analyzed retrospectively. All but one were in an intermediate/high-risk group (St. Gallen criteria). The patients received a neoadjuvant protocol consisting of systemic chemotherapy combined with fractionated HDR brachytherapy (2 x 5 Gy/day, total dose 30 Gy). In cases, where breast-conserving surgery was performed, patients received additional external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT, 1.8 Gy/day, total dose 50.4 Gy). In patients, who underwent mastectomy but showed an initial tumor size of T3/T4 and/or more than three infiltrated lymph nodes, EBRT was also performed. RESULTS: In 30/53 patients (56.6%) breast-conserving surgery could be performed. The overall histopathologic response rate was 96.2% with a complete remission in 28.3% of patients. 49/53 patients were evaluable for follow-up. After a median of 58 months (45-72 months), one patient showed a mild fibrosis of the breast tissue, three patients had mild to moderate lymphatic edema of the arm. 6/49 (12.2%) patients died of distant metastases, 4/49 (8.2%) were alive with disease, and 39/49 (79.6%) were free from disease. Local recurrence was observed in only one case (2%) 40 months after primary therapy. After mastectomy, this patient is currently free from disease. CONCLUSION: The combination of interstitial HDR brachytherapy and chemotherapy is a well-tolerated and effective neoadjuvant treatment in patients with breast cancer. Compared to EBRT, treatment time is short. Postoperative EBRT of the whole breast -- if necessary -- is still possible after neoadjuvant brachytherapy. Even though the number of patients does not permit definite conclusions, the results are promising regarding survival and the very low rate of local recurrences.

Applicability and dosimetric impact of ultrasound-based preplanning in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Analyses of permanent brachytherapy seed implants of the prostate have demonstrated that the use of a preplan may lead to a considerable decrease of dosimetric implant quality. The authors aimed to determine whether the same drawbacks of preplanning also apply to high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 15 patients who underwent two separate HDR brachytherapy implants in addition to external-beam radiation therapy for advanced prostate cancer were analyzed. A pretherapeutic transrectal ultrasound was performed in all patients to generate a preplan for the first brachytherapy implant. For the second brachytherapy, a subset of patients were treated by preplans based on the ultrasound from the first brachytherapy implant. Preplans were compared with the respective postplans assessing the following parameters: coverage index, minimum target dose, homogeneity index, and dose exposure of organs at risk. The prostate geometries (volume, width, height, length) were compared as well. RESULTS: At the first brachytherapy, the matching between the preplan and actual implant geometry was sufficient in 47% of the patients, and the preplan could be applied. The dosimetric implant quality decreased considerably: the mean coverage differed by -0.11, the mean minimum target dose by -0.15, the mean homogeneity index by -0.09. The exposure of organs at risk was not substantially altered. At the second brachytherapy, all patients could be treated by the preplan; the differences between the implant quality parameters were less pronounced. The changes of prostate geometry between preplans and postplans were considerable, the differences in volume ranging from -8.0 to 13.8 cm(3) and in dimensions (width, height, length) from -1.1 to 1.0 cm. CONCLUSION: Preplanning in HDR brachytherapy of the prostate is associated with a substantial decrease of dosimetric implant quality, when the preplan is based on a pretherapeutic ultrasound. The implant quality is less impaired in subsequent implants of fractionated brachytherapy.