969 resultados para Bibliographical citations
Resumo:
The purpose of this paper is to describe the collaboration between librarians and scholars, from a virtual university, in order to facilitate collaborative learning on how to manage information resources. The personal information behaviour of e-learning students when managing information resources for academic, professional and daily life purposes was studied from 24 semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The results of the content analysis of the interview' transcriptions, highlighted that in the workplace and daily life contexts, competent information behaviour is always linked to a proactive attitude, that is to say, that participants seek for information without some extrinsic reward or avoiding punishment. In the academic context, it was observed a low level of information literacy and it seems to be related with a prevalent uninvolved attitude.
Resumo:
[eng] Objective: To analyse the scientific papers studying citations in the areas of humanities during the period 1959-2008 and to determine the aspects evaluated. The main bibliometric aspects measured were type of study, obsolescence, dispersion, language, theme, author impact and self-citations.Methodology: Broad revision of the international literature in the area of library and information science in the period studied, and detailed analysis of 119 bibliometric studies.Results: Most of the few studies of this area are based on ad-hoc citation compilations. There is a certain predominance of philology. Library quarterly is the journal that has published most papers of this kind. The conclusions of these studies can be as useful as those in the experimental sciences; it would be useful to increase their number.
Resumo:
Proposta per elaborar referències i citacions de tot tipus de fonts bibliogràfiques i no bibliogràfiques, publicades i inèdites i les seves parts. Com a introducció, els autors justifiquen les raons de la proposta i expliquen els models en què es basa. Una vegada aprovades, aquestes directrius aniran adreçades principalment als autors i correctors de la revista Item; tanmateix, també s'espera que siguin emprades per redactar referències i citacions en treballs de biblioteconomia i documentació.
Resumo:
A citation analysis was carried out on the most important research journals in the field of Catalan literature between 1974 and 2003. The indicators and qualitative parameters obtained show the value of performing citation analysis in cultural and linguistic areas that are poorly covered by the A&HCI. Catalan literature shows a similar pattern to that of humanities in general, but it could still be in a stage of consolidation because too little work has as yet been published.
Resumo:
De manera cada vez más frecuente los trabajos de investigación, informes, estados de la cuestión, etc., hacen referencia a documentos y otros recursos de información publicados en formato electrónico. A menudo las listas de referencias bibliográficas que forman parte de estos trabajos incluyen recursos electrónicos y documentos tradicionales -libros, artículos de revista, grabaciones sonoras, etc.-. Así pues, cuando se cita un recurso electrónico no sólo es necesario que éste sea fácilmente identificable y recuperable a través de los datos bibliográficos reseñados, sino que, además, la referencia debe ser coherente con las de los otros documentos incluidos en la lista, es decir, todas deben seguir un modelo común.
Resumo:
A medida a que el número de documentos digitales crece y la facilidad de navegación entre ellos mejora, los usuarios se sienten cada vez más frustrados cuando no son capaces de tener acceso electrónico a los artículos citados desde otro artículo. Es en este punto donde las expectativas de una biblioteca digital chocan ante la realidad existente, la de los procedimientos tradicionales y laboriosos. El investigador tiene que preguntar primero dónde localizar el artículo citado que le interesa y luego iniciar el trámite para conseguirlo ¿normalmente a través de un préstamo interbibliotecario o de un servicio de obtención de copias de documentos¿. Por lo tanto, el acceso a la información de forma instantánea que ofrece el web es sólo posible para el documento que se consulta inicialmente, pero no para los otros artículos citados en él.
Resumo:
Anàlisi de citacions en tesis doctorals d'informàtica de la Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), presentades entre 1996-1998, per determinar l'ús d'informació segons la tipologia i el suport documental. Com a punt de partida per al disseny del projecte desenvolupat, s'analitzen els fonaments del mètode emprat en vista d'una revisió de la bibliografia sobre desenvolupament de col·leccions i estudis d'usuaris. Les dades obtingudes entre els doctorands de la UPC són consistents amb les característiques apuntades en la bibliografia sobre els investigadors de l'àrea de ciències de la computació: una elevada obsolescència de la bibliografia professional, el control de la bibliografia mitjançant les citacions en les lectures efectuades, la prioritat per les fonts més pròximes i accessibles, la consulta de cercadors de recursos web, la visita a llocs web d'investigadors i institucions de solvència en el seu terreny, i el contacte amb els col·legues mitjançant la comunicació electrònica, configuren un ús per tipus de documents que fa prevaler els congressos i la literatura grisa en més gran mesura que en altres àrees cientificotècniques.
Resumo:
A partir del análisis de citas bibliográficas presentes en las tesis doctorales de informática de la Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya (UPC), leídas entre 1996-1998, se determina el uso de información según la tipología y el soporte documental. Los datos obtenidos son consistentes con las características apuntadas en la bibliografía sobre los investigadores del área de ciencias de la computación: una elevada obsolescencia de la bibliografía profesional, el control de la bibliografía mediante las citas en las lecturas efectuadas, la prioridad por las fuentes más próximas y accesibles, la consulta de buscadores de recursos web, la visita a sitios web de investigadores e instituciones de solvencia en su terreno, y el contacto con los colegas mediante la comunicación electrónica. Todo ello configura un uso por categorías documentales que prima los congresos y la literatura gris en mayor medida que otras áreas científico-técnicas.
Resumo:
La finalitat d’aquesta guia és proposar unes pautes a l’estudiant per quan ha de citar legislació ijurisprudència en un treball, tant dins del text com en l’elaboració de la bibliografia de fonts jurídiquesconsultades i que s’ha d’incloure al final del mateix. Ara bé, no pretén ser un recull exhaustiu detotes les casuístiques que es puguin trobar, però si que es pot adaptar o resoldre a partir delsexemples donats. El document consta de dues parts, una primera de com citar la legislació estatal, autonòmica,comunitària i internacional i una segona de com citar la jurisprudència en els mateixos àmbits.També conté tres annexos1: I. Sigles de codis i lleis bàsiques ; II. Sigles de publicacions oficials i III.Sigles de jurisprudència que inclou les abreviatures dels diferents tipus de resolucions i dels principalstribunals.
Resumo:
La manca de normalització dels noms dels investigadors i de la mateixa Universitat de Barcelona en les publicacions científiques i en les principals bases de dades bibliogràfiques és un fet conegut que disminueix la visibilitat dels autors i de la UB a nivell nacional i internacional. El fet que els mateixos autors variïn la forma de la seva signatura o la de la institució on treballen, utilitzant de vegades distintes formes de nom al llarg de la seva producció científica, juntament amb la possibilitat de cometre errors en la transcripció de la informació del document original a l’electrònic perjudica als investigadors i a les institucions dificultant la recuperació de les seves publicacions en les revistes i bases de dades i de les citacions per elles rebudes.La signatura normalitzada, també anomenada Nom Bibliogràfic Únic (NBU) afavoreix la recuperació de la producció científica i proporciona fiabilitat d’indicadors bibliomètrics sobre productivitat, impacte, i rànquing entre d’altres. La Universitat de Barcelona, seguint les recomanacions de la Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT) en el seu document: "Propuesta de manual de ayuda a los investigadores españoles para la normalización del nombre de autores e instituciones en las publicaciones científicas", aconsella als autors membres de la UB tenir en compte les següents pautes a l’hora d’elaborar la forma de signatura normalitzada del seu nom personal i per citar correctament el lloc de treball en les publicacions científiques.
Resumo:
The purpose of this paper is to describe the collaboration between librarians and scholars, from a virtual university, in order to facilitate collaborative learning on how to manage information resources. The personal information behaviour of e-learning students when managing information resources for academic, professional and daily life purposes was studied from 24 semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The results of the content analysis of the interview' transcriptions, highlighted that in the workplace and daily life contexts, competent information behaviour is always linked to a proactive attitude, that is to say, that participants seek for information without some extrinsic reward or avoiding punishment. In the academic context, it was observed a low level of information literacy and it seems to be related with a prevalent uninvolved attitude.
Resumo:
The scientific community has been suffering from peer review for decades. This process (also called refereeing) subjects an author's scientific work or ideas to the scrutiny of one or more experts in the field. Publishers use it to select and screen manuscript submissions, and funding agencies use it to award research funds. The goal is to get authors to meet their discipline's standards and thus achieve scientific objectivity. Publications and awards that haven't undergone peer review are often regarded with suspicion by scholars and professionals in many fields. However, peer review, although universally used, has many drawbacks. We propose replacing peer review with an auction-based approach: the better the submitted paper, the more scientific currency the author likely bid to have it published. If the bid correctly reflects the paper's quality, the author is rewarded in this new scientific currency; otherwise, the author loses this currency. We argue that citations are an appropriate currency for all scientists. We believe that citation auctions encourage scientists to better control their submissions' quality. It also inspire them to prepare more exciting talks for accepted papers and to invite discussion of their results at congresses and conferences and among their colleagues. In the long run, citation auctions could have the power to greatly improve scientific research
Resumo:
This paper describes the basis of citation auctions as a new approach to selecting scientific papers for publication. Our main idea is to use an auction for selecting papers for publication through - differently from the state of the art - bids that consist of the number of citations that a scientist expects to receive if the paper is published. Hence, a citation auction is the selection process itself, and no reviewers are involved. The benefits of the proposed approach are two-fold. First, the cost of refereeing will be either totally eliminated or significantly reduced, because the process of citation auction does not need prior understanding of the paper's content to judge the quality of its contribution. Additionally, the method will not prejudge the content of the paper, so it will increase the openness of publications to new ideas. Second, scientists will be much more committed to the quality of their papers, paying close attention to distributing and explaining their papers in detail to maximize the number of citations that the paper receives. Sample analyses of the number of citations collected in papers published in years 1999-2004 for one journal, and in years 2003-2005 for a series of conferences (in a totally different discipline), via Google scholar, are provided. Finally, a simple simulation of an auction is given to outline the behaviour of the citation auction approach
Resumo:
The scientific community has been suffering from peer review for decades. This process (also called refereeing) subjects an author's scientific work or ideas to the scrutiny of one or more experts in the field. Publishers use it to select and screen manuscript submissions, and funding agencies use it to award research funds. The goal is to get authors to meet their discipline's standards and thus achieve scientific objectivity. Publications and awards that haven't undergone peer review are often regarded with suspicion by scholars and professionals in many fields. However, peer review, although universally used, has many drawbacks. We propose replacing peer review with an auction-based approach: the better the submitted paper, the more scientific currency the author likely bid to have it published. If the bid correctly reflects the paper's quality, the author is rewarded in this new scientific currency; otherwise, the author loses this currency. We argue that citations are an appropriate currency for all scientists. We believe that citation auctions encourage scientists to better control their submissions' quality. It also inspire them to prepare more exciting talks for accepted papers and to invite discussion of their results at congresses and conferences and among their colleagues. In the long run, citation auctions could have the power to greatly improve scientific research
Resumo:
This paper describes the basis of citation auctions as a new approach to selecting scientific papers for publication. Our main idea is to use an auction for selecting papers for publication through - differently from the state of the art - bids that consist of the number of citations that a scientist expects to receive if the paper is published. Hence, a citation auction is the selection process itself, and no reviewers are involved. The benefits of the proposed approach are two-fold. First, the cost of refereeing will be either totally eliminated or significantly reduced, because the process of citation auction does not need prior understanding of the paper's content to judge the quality of its contribution. Additionally, the method will not prejudge the content of the paper, so it will increase the openness of publications to new ideas. Second, scientists will be much more committed to the quality of their papers, paying close attention to distributing and explaining their papers in detail to maximize the number of citations that the paper receives. Sample analyses of the number of citations collected in papers published in years 1999-2004 for one journal, and in years 2003-2005 for a series of conferences (in a totally different discipline), via Google scholar, are provided. Finally, a simple simulation of an auction is given to outline the behaviour of the citation auction approach