Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Elderly Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Brazil. The determination of the cutoff score for the Brazilian population is important for the comparison between Brazilian and international studies and establishment of guidelines for prevention of pressure ulcers in our health care facilities. This is the first study of its kind in Brazil. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study conducted with 233 LTCF residents aged 60 and over who underwent complete skin examination and Braden Scale rating every 2 days for 3 months. Two groups of patients were considered: the total group (N = 233) and risk group (n = 94, total scores <= 18). Data from the first and last assessments were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. The best results were obtained for the total group, with cutoff scores of 18 and 17, sensitivity of 75.9% and 74.1%, specificity of 70.3% and 75.4%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.79 and 0.81 at the first and last assessments, respectively. For the risk group, the cutoff scores of 16 (first assessment) and 13 (last assessment) were associated with a smaller AUC-ROC and, therefore, lower predictive accuracy. The Braden Scale showed good predictive validity in elderly LTCF residents. (Geriatr Nurs 2010;31:95-104)

O uso da escala de Braden e fotografias na avaliação do risco para úlceras por pressão

O objetivo deste artigo foi identificar casos de risco para úlcera por pressão (UP), em pacientes críticos, a partir da escala de Braden e de fotografias digitais. Uma amostra de 42 sujeitos foi avaliada durante 15 dias entre março a junho de 2009 em Fortaleza, Brasil. No total foram identificadas 47 lesões, sendo 23 (48,9%) com estágio I e 24 (51,1%) com estágio II. Conclui-se que é necessário que o enfermeiro que ainda não utiliza usualmente tecnologias na avaliação e tratamento procure se familiarizar com isso, a fim de diminuir as repercussões negativas deste problema de saúde coletiva.

Braden Residence Hall, Chapman College, Orange, California

Braden Hall, originally West Hall, men's dormitory, Chapman University, Orange, California. Constructed by Chapman College in 1959 and demolished in 2007.

Braden Residence Hall

Braden Residence Hall [formerly West Hall], Chapman University, Orange, California. It was constructed by Chapman College in 1959 for a men's dormitory and demolished in 2007.

Braden Hall [West Hall] groundbreaking

Groundbreaking for Left to right: unBraden Residence Hall [formerly West Hall], Chapman University, Orange, California. It was constructed by Chapman College in 1959 for a men's dormitory. Left to right: Randolph Cutlip, Colleen Richardson, Ellis Stiner, and Rod _____.

Groundbreaking for Braden Residence Hall [West Hall]

Groundbreaking ceremony for Braden Residence Hall [formerly West Hall], Chapman University, Orange, California. It was constructed by Chapman College in 1959 for a men's dormitory and torn down in 2007. Left to right, seated are Dr. Buell F. Enyeart, Director of Evening Division and Summer School; John Davis; standing behind is Randolph Cutlip, Dean of Graduate Studies; Colleen Richardson with shovel; Marshon De Poister [dark suit], Dean of the College; and J. E. Wilkinson at the podium.

Assistência de enfermagem e o risco para úlceras de pressão medido pela Escala de Braden em unidade de terapia intensiva

The problem facing the incidence of pressure ulcers (UP) in the hospital environment especially in the intensive care unit (ICU), although it is an old and frequent event in our professional practice, it is not notified in the researches as much as it should be. We observed a tendency to invest in therapeutical and in studies about the production of sophisticated new bandages. Few, however, are the investments in research on preventive measures in order to prevent or at least slow down the development of lesions. In this sense, the study aimed to analyze the correlation between nursing care and the risk of developing UP measured by the Braden scale in ICU patients. This is a descriptive study of longitudinal quantitative approach. The project obtained a favourable opinion from the Ethics Committee of HUOL (no 486/10). Data collection was carried out in the Hospital of Unimed in Natal during six months in 2011. The sample was of 32 patients hospitalized in ICU for over four days. The results were processed in SPSS 15.0 for descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. We identified that, only 9.4% of our sample developed UP, being predominantly male, elderly people aged above 60 years, Caucasian, with diagnostic hypothesis at the time of hospitalization of sepsis, were clinical patients, who presented hemodynamic instability, using orotracheal tube (TOT), enteral probe (SNE), vesical probe delay (SVD) and had values of albumin and hemoglobin levels below normal. In addition, these patients had a longer hospital stay, longer usage of TOT, SNE, SVD, increased use of sedation and drain than those who did not develop UP and were all at risk for developing these injuries second Braden scores. 66.7% of the lesions developed were located in the sacral region, limiting the degree I and all patients that developed were considered serious, 100.0% of them have evolved since the death. Small were the differences between the averages of Braden scores between patients with and without UP, 11,9+2,4 against 12,4+2,6 with p = 0.627. The clinical aspects of the patients in the study were instrumental in the development of UP, once, these findings were statistically significant through the Mann-Whitney test, and appropriateness of nursing conduct was decisive for the prevention of pressure ulcers in critical patients, since many were those classified as at risk (28) and few who have developed lesions (03)

Avaliação da concordância na aplicação da Escala de Braden interobservadores

OBJETIVOS: Verificar a prevalência de úlcera por pressão nas unidades de internação de pacientes adultos do Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (HU-USP) e verificar a concordância entre observadores na avaliação de risco, por meio da Escala de Braden. MÉTODOS: Estudo exploratório, quantitativo. Os dados foram coletados por seis colaboradoras treinadas que realizaram exame físico e avaliação de risco em 87 pacientes, avaliação esta considerada "padrão ouro". Os dados das avaliações feitas pelas enfermeiras, nos mesmos pacientes, foram coletados dos prontuários. RESULTADOS: verificou-se prevalência de 19,5% no hospital e 63,6% na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva, 15,6% na Clínica Cirúrgica, 13,9% na Clínica Médica e 0% na Semi-Intensiva. Quanto à concordância entre os observadores na avaliação clínica dos pacientes, a percepção sensorial, atividade, mobilidade e fricção/cisalhamento apresentaram fortíssima concordância. Umidade e nutrição, baixa concordância, sugerindo que esses subescores deverão ser discutidos para verificar as causas da controvérsia. CONCLUSÃO: Estudos de prevalência de úlcera por pressão possibilitam verificar a extensão do problema e fornecem subsídios para construção de estratégias e programas de prevenção.

Prevalência de úlceras de pressão em dois hospitais portugueses: Impacto da Escala de Braden associada a um protocolo de prevenção

As úlceras de pressão constituem um importante problema de saúde pública comum a diversos cenários de cuidados, em todo o mundo, e também em Portugal, nomeadamente para a população mais idosa. O presente estudo teve como objectivos determinar o impacto da escala de Braden associada a um protocolo de prevenção de úlceras de pressão na prevalência destas lesões, assim como, monitorizar o problema das úlceras de pressão em dois hospitais portugueses, em que o Hospital A utiliza estes instrumento e o Hospital 8 não usa esses instrumentos. Foi utilizado o Instrumento de Prevalência de Úlceras de Pressão validado para Portugal na recolha dos dados. Os dados foram obtidos através da observação directa dos doentes. Foram realizadas duas avaliações com um intervalo de três meses em cada hospital. Os resultados encontrados revelaram que as úlceras de pressão constituem um problema de saúde para os dois hospitais observados. No entanto, o Hospital A apresenta menor taxa de prevalência de úlceras de pressão, menor número de úlceras de pressão mais graves, menor possibilidade de um doente adquirir uma úlcera de pressão e maior utilização de medidas preventivas. Os valores encontrados foram estatisticamente significativos para p <0,05. Confirma-se que a utilização da escala de Braden associada a um protocolo de prevenção de úlceras de pressão é uma medida eficaz na redução do número de úlceras de pressão. Para uma maior eficácia deste instrumento será importante a sua utilização como ferramenta de controlo da adequação das medidas preventivas. ABSTRACT; Pressure ulcers are an important public health problem common to several scenarios of care in the world, and also in Portugal, particularly for the elderly. This study aims to determine the impact of the Braden scale associated with a protocol for prevention of pressure ulcers in prevalence of these lesions, as well as monitor the problem of pressure ulcers in two Portuguesa hospitais, the Hospital A uses these instrument and Hospital B doesn’t. It was used the instrument of Prevalence of pressure ulcers validated for Portugal in the data collection. Data were collected through direct observation of patients. There were two assessments with an interval of three months in each hospital. The results showed that the pressure ulcers are a health problem for both hospitals observed. However, the Hospital A provides a lower prevalence rate of pressure ulcers, lower number of pressure ulcers more serious, less possibility of a patient acquiring a pressure ulcer and increased use of preventive measures. The values were statistically significant for p<0.05. lt is confirmed that the use of the Braden scale associated with a protocol for prevention of pressure ulcers is an effective measure in reducing the number of pressure ulcers. For greater efficiency will be important to use it as a tool for monitoring the adequacy of preventive measures.

Validación de las escalas de Braden y EMINA en pacientes de atención domiciliaria incluidos en programa de inmovilizados

Objetivo: comprobar la validez de las escalas Braden y EMINA y seleccionar puntos de corte cuantitativos para discriminar el riesgo de úlcera por presión (UPP) en pacientes domiciliarios. Método: estudio longitudinal o de seguimiento de una cohorte de 6 meses de duración, con cuatro valoraciones, una cada 2 meses. Ámbito de estudio: áreas de gestión sanitaria Este de Málaga-Axarquía y Serranía, de Málaga. Sujetos de estudio: pacientes en programa de inmovilizados sin UPP. Cuestionario confeccionado por los autores que incluye entre otros: datos demográficos, ingreso hospitalario, escalas de Braden y EMINA. Muestra: 353 pacientes, usando muestreo aleatorio simple. Resultado: las escalas originales mantienen consistencia interna con alpha superior a 0,7. Se han establecido nuevos puntos de corte, discriminando pacientes con riesgo de UPP o sin él, resultando una sensibilidad del 61-89% y una especificidad del 64-70%. Las escalas categorizadas tienen exactitud como método diagnóstico igual o superior al 65%. Las odds ratio (OR) son significativas e indican que existen diferencias en el riesgo de UPP en función de nuevos puntos de corte. La determinación de los puntos de corte resultaron: riesgo alto: sensibilidad ≤ 10%, especificidad ≥ 95%, puntuación en la escala de Braden ≤ 10, EMINA 12-15; riesgo moderado: sensibilidad entre el 10% y el 83%, especificidad entre el 64% y el 95%, Braden 11-15 y EMINA 7-11; riesgo bajo: sensibilidad entre el 83% y el 100%, especificidad entre el 0% y el 64%, Braden 16-22 y EMINA 1-6; riesgo nulo: sensibilidad 100%, especificidad 0%, Braden 23, EMINA 0. Conclusiones: la escala de Braden resultó tener mayor consistencia que EMINA para población domiciliaria, existiendo alta correlación entre variables de ambas escalas; medición del riesgo: similar. Para ambas escalas las razones de verosimilitud positiva son similares, por lo que se validan ambas escalas por igual como métodos de diagnóstico del riesgo. Los puntos de corte definidos por este estudio son válidos para discriminar entre pacientes con y sin úlcera en domicilio: Braden 15 y EMINA 7.

Incidence of Pressure Ulcers in the Institutionalized Elderly

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of pressure ulcers (PUs) in elderly people living in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). DESIGN: We completed a prospective, comparison cohort study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Ninety-four persons, 60 years or older, participated in the study. Participants resided in 4 not-for-profit LTCFs in 3 cities in the southern region of the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais. METHODS: Participants underwent complete skin examination and Braden Scale rating every 2 days for 3 months. When a PU was detected, a careful examination was done to assess its stage, location, and size. From this moment on, the patient was included in the incidence rate and was excluded from the study. RESULTS: The incidence rate of PUs was 39.4%; 37 (77.1%) developed a single ulcer. The most common locations were the malleolus (27.1%) and the ischium (25.0%). Stage I PU were most frequent (66.7%). Females (62.8%) and whites (68.19%) prevailed, with an average age of 79.06 +/- 9.6 years. Body mass index was 20.93 +/- 4.9, with a predominance of urinary diseases (58.5%) and use of neuroleptics/psychotropics (52.1%); 28.7% had had a previous ulcer. Gender and the occurrence of a previous ulcer were found to predict the development of PU, based on logistic regression analysis (r(2) = 0.311). CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of PU was significant, but the incidence of stage II and higher PUs was less than 12% and no elders had stage III or IV ulcers. Factors associated with PU development include female gender, regular use of neuroleptic or psychotropic medications, and a history of pressure ulceration.

Predictive Validity of Waterlow Scale for Pressure Ulcer Development Risk in Hospitalized Patients

AIM: We sought to evaluate the predictive validity of the Waterlow Scale in hospitalized patients. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The study was conducted at a general private hospital with 220 beds and a mean time of hospitalization of 7.4 days and a mean occupation rate of approximately 80%. Adult patients with a Braden Scale score of 18 or less and a Waterlow Scale score of 16 or more were studied. The sample consisted of 98 patients with a mean age of 71.1 +/- 15.5 years. METHODS: Skin assessment and scoring by using the Waterlow and Braden scales were completed on alternate days. Patients were examined at least 3 times to be considered for analysis. The data were submitted to sensitivity and specificity analysis by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and positive (+LR) and negative (-LR) likelihood ratios. RESULTS: The cutoff scores were 17, 20, and 20 in the first, second, and third assessment, respectively. Sensitivity was 71.4%, 85.7%, and 85.7% and specificity was 67.0%, 40.7%, and 32.9%, respectively. Analysis of the area under the ROC curve revealed good accuracy (0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.93) only for the cutoff score 17 in the first assessment. The results also showed probabilities of 14%, 10%, and 9% for the development of pressure ulcer when the test results were positive (+LR) and of 3% (-LR) when the test results were negative for the cutoff scores in the first, second, and third assessment, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Waterlow Scale achieved good predictive validity in predicting pressure ulcer in hospitalized patients when a cutoff score of 17 was used in the first assessment.

Tradução, Adaptação e Validação para o Português da Escala de Sunderland e da Escala Revista de Cubbin & Jackson

Objetivo: Traduzir para o português e avaliar as propriedades de medidas da Escala de Sunderland e da Escala Revista de Cubbin & Jackson, instrumentos cuja finalidade é avaliar o risco de desenvolvimento de úlceras por pressão em terapia intensiva. Métodos: O estudo compreendeu os processos de tradução e de adaptação das escalas à língua portuguesa, bem como o processo de validação dos instrumentos em estudo. A amostra foi constituída por 90 pacientes internados na unidade de terapia intensiva. Na avaliação da fiabilidade, foram identificados valores de alfa de Cronbach de 0,702 e de 0,708 para a Escala de Sunderland e a Escala Revista de Cubbin & Jackson, respectivamente. A validação de critério (preditiva) foi realizada comparativamente com a Escala de Braden (padrão-ouro), sendo as principais medidas avaliadas a sensibilidade, a especificidade, o valor preditivo positivo, o valor preditivo negativo e a área sob uma curva,que foram calculadas com base nos pontos de corte definidos pelos autores. Resultados: A Escala de Sunderland obteve 60% de sensibilidade, 86,7% de especificidade, 47,4% de valor preditivo positivo, 91,5% de valor preditivo negativo e 0,86 para a área sob uma curva. A Escala Revista de Cubbin & Jackson obteve 73,3% de sensibilidade, 86,7% de especificidade, 52,4% de valor preditivo positivo, 94,2% de valor preditivo negativo e 0,91 para a área sob uma curva. A Escala de Braden obteve 100% de sensibilidade, 5,3% de especificidade, 17,4% de valor preditivo positivo, 100% de valor preditivo negativo e 0,72 para a área sob uma curva. Conclusão: Ambos os instrumentos demonstram possuir fiabilidade e validade para a utilização. Nessa amostra, a Escala Revista de Cubbin & Jackson obteve melhores valores preditivos para desenvolvimento de úlceras por pressão em terapia intensiva.

Escalas de valoración del riesgo de desarrollar úlceras por presión

Aim: to find the Risk Assessment Scales (RAS) for pressure ulcers in children published in the literature. To determine which of them have been properly validated. Methods: a systematic review of the literature has been conducted searching in 14 Health Sciences databases. The inclusion criteria were: studies published between 1962 and 2009, with a prospective design, less than a 25 % lost to follow-up, and with data of validity, prognostic or reliability. No language restriction was applied. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed by the CASP guide. Results: seventeen studies were found. In these studies 11 RAS for children were identified. Most of them were developed for the critical care area, based on previous risk assessment scales for adult. There are only 3 scales with one validation study: NSRAS, Braden Q and Starkid Skin. Their sensibility and specificity figures are: Braden Q, sens = 88% and specif. 58%; NSRAS, 83% and 81%; and Starkid Skin, 17% and 98%. Although the NSRAS scale has good validity figures, the simple size of this study was too small, so these results need further validation. The Starkid scale has a sensibility too low. The Braden Q was the only scale with suitable validity and prognostic figures, though its inter-observers reliability has not been tested, so more research to confirm these results is needed. The assessment of pressure ulcers risk in children is recommended, although, with the available evidence, we can not recommend the use of any of these RAS over the others. More research about this topic is needed.