An overview of integrated pest management (IPM) in north-eastern Australian grain farming systems: Past, present and future prospects

The authors overview integrated pest management (IPM) in grain crops in north-eastern Australia, which is defined as the area north of latitude 32°S. Major grain crops in this region include the coarse grains (winter and summer cereals), oilseeds and pulses. IPM in these systems is complicated by the diversity of crops, pests, market requirements and cropping environments. In general, the pulse crops are at greatest risk, followed by oilseeds and then by cereal grains. Insecticides remain a key grain pest management tool in north-eastern Australia. IPM in grain crops has benefited considerably through the increased adoption of new, more selective insecticides and biopesticides for many caterpillar pests, in particular Helicoverpa spp. and loopers, and the identification of pest-crop scenarios where spraying is unnecessary (e.g. for most Creontiades spp. populations in soybeans). This has favoured the conservation of natural enemies in north-eastern Australia grain crops, and has arguably assisted in the management of silverleaf whitefly in soybeans in coastal Queensland. However, control of sucking pests and podborers such as Maruca vitrata remains a major challenge for IPM in summer pulses. Because these crops have very low pest-damage tolerances and thresholds, intervention with disruptive insecticides is frequently required, particularly during podfill. The threat posed by silverleaf whitefly demands ongoing multi-pest IPM research, development and extension as this pest can flare under favourable seasonal conditions, especially where disruptive insecticides are used injudiciously. The strong links between researchers and industry have facilitated the adoption of IPM practices in north-eastern Australia and augers well for future pest challenges and for the development and promotion of new and improved IPM tactics.

Part II: Binders & technologies - Research

The first report of report series I, II and III entitled 'basic principles' presented details of the binders and technologies available and used in the stabilisation/ solidification (S/S) treatment of hazardous waste and contaminated land. This second report entitled 'research' presents an overview of the main research work, both experimental and numerical, carried out in the UK concentrating on the last decade or so but also highlighting earlier significant research work. The research work is reported under the headings of the individual binders and for each binder the work is presented in chronological order. In this work, most of the S/S materials are prepared by manual/mechanical mixing. The latter part of this report presents research work on S/S materials prepared using soil mixing with mixing augers. © 2005 Taylor & Francis Group.

Amostragem de terra para fins de fertilidade em função da ferramenta de amostragem

Embora existam indicações de que a pá de corte proporcione melhor qualidade de amostragem de terra para fins de análise de fertilidade, seu manuseio demanda muito tempo. No presente trabalho foram comparados os resultados da análise química de terra proveniente de 15 áreas distintas, cujas amostras foram obtidas com cinco tipos de trado e com pá de corte. Também foram comparados o tempo demandado para a realização do trabalho e o volume de terra coletado com as diferentes ferramentas, em dois solos de texturas distintas. O tempo médio de amostragem foi estimado, avaliando-se o tempo gasto por seis pessoas para tomar dez amostras. Para o estudo de qualidade de resultados foram amostradas 15 áreas, com solos, manejos e níveis de fertilidade distintos, de modo a se obter grande variação entre os valores das características avaliadas. As amostragens constaram da estratificação por profundidades e amostras de 0 a 20 cm de profundidade no teste de tempo. A amostragem com a pá de corte demora de 1,3 a 2,3 vezes mais do que com os trados. Para os valores de pH, matéria orgânica, acidez do solo, Al trocável e P disponível, os resultados foram equivalentes para todas as ferramentas empregadas. Entretanto, para as bases do solo (Ca, Mg e K), as ferramentas empregadas resultaram, na maioria das vezes, em resultados diferentes dos obtidos pela pá de corte.

Análise multivariada de dados espaciais na classificação interpretativa de solos

Pós-graduação em Agronomia (Energia na Agricultura) - FCA

Operator and organizational maintenance manual : auger, earth, skid mounted (Texoma model 254-8-2), FSN 3820-201-8293.

"December 1973."

Direct support and general support maintenance manual : auger, earth, skid mounted (Texoma Inc. model 254-8-2), FSN 3820-201-8293.

"January 1974."

Organizational maintenance repair parts and special tools lists : auger, earth, skid mounted, gasoline engine driven, NSN 3820-00-201-8293, Texoma model 254-8x2.

Includes index.

Organizational maintenance repair parts and special tools lists : auger, earth, skid mounted, 9 foot boring depth, NSN 3820-00-931-4509, Texoma Enterprises model 254-10.

Includes index.

Direct support and general support maintenance repair parts and special tools lists : auger, earth, skid mounted, 9 foot boring depth, NSN 3820-00-931-4509, Texoma Enterprises model 254-10.

Includes index.

Operator, organizational, direct and general support and depot maintenance manual : auger, earth, skid mounted, 9 foot boring depth (Texoma Enterprises model 254-10) FSN 3820-931-4509.

"December 1968."

Unit maintenance, intermediate, direct support, and intermediate general support maintenance ... : auger, earth, skid mounted, 9 foot boring depth, NSN 3820-00-931-4509 : Texoma Enterprises model 254-10.

"May 1988."