998 resultados para Artistic Activity
Resumo:
Mestrado, Educação Pré-Escolar e Ensino do 1º Ciclo do Ensino Básico, 20 de Junho de 2013, Universidade dos Açores (Relatório de Estágio).
Resumo:
Dissertação apresentada à Escola Superior de Educação de Lisboa para obtenção de grau de mestre em Educação Artística, na especialização de Teatro na Educação
Resumo:
Trabalho de natureza profissional no âmbito da área de Dança para a obtenção do título de Especialista.
Resumo:
Comunicando saberes es una propuesta de formación en artes y cultura que se articula en una región específica del País: el Departamento del Guaviare. A partir de la apropiación de “campos de expresiones y de conocimientos”, es decir, saberes colectivos y vigentes de los diferentes pueblos y regiones representados en este Departamento, se propone su reedificación (la creación), y su tránsito al plano de las significaciones colectivas (la comunicación). En esta propuesta formativa, el acto pedagógico no sólo deberá coincidir, suscitar y adaptarse a los procesos creativos conducidos o espontáneos que supone la actividad artística, sino que deberá poner en marcha otras estrategias tendientes a movilizar los conocimientos que luego se llevarán al acto formativo, a ampliar y mejorar la producción creativa, y activar las relaciones y el tránsito de las creaciones a la sociedad.
Dança: forma, técnica e poesia do movimento : na perspectiva de construção de sentidos coreográficos
Resumo:
A presente dissertação se construiu sobre o pressuposto de que forma, técnica e poesia são premissas que embasam uma determinada visão de dança enquanto manifestação artística do corpo humano em movimento. Norteia também este estudo a perspectiva de que as relações que se estabelecem no momento de execução de uma dança instauram processos de significação. Desse modo, este trabalho teve como principais objetivos: - entender a dança enquanto uma atividade artística que se constrói no(s) corpo(s) em movimento; - refletir sobre a elaboração de possíveis significados quando da criação e execução de uma dança; - descrever a dança como uma ação criadora que se faz no corpo humano em movimento. Para atingir os objetivos propostos utilizou-se a fenomenologia como método de investigação, optando-se, assim, por realizar uma descrição da dança que já é, ao mesmo tempo, uma maneira de compreendê-la. Como conseqüência deste procedimento buscou-se demontrar que: - a dança dever ser entendida enquanto arte porque ela resulta de um processo de transformação de uma matéria-prima - o movimento humano - através do uso de procedimentos técnicos e formativos, que resultam em obras coreográficas que se dão a reconhecer através de seu intrínseco caráter de forma; - o movimento é o que toma visível os possíveis sentidos/significados de uma dança: a realização de sentidos coreográficos se dá no contexto de uma coreografia e só se efetua plenamente quando os sentidos são retomados e revividos pelos espectadores; - os processos de criação coreográfica baseados em ações formativas proporcionam o desenvolvimento de uma disponibilidade corporal para a dança. Tal disponibilidade corporal está alicerçada, principalmente, numa inteligência e numa memória corporais, que dispõem o dançarino a exercer suas potencialidades criadoras através da dança. A concepção da dança como forma, técnica e poesia do movimento aponta para uma possibilidade de recuperação, através da dança, de saberes relativos ao corpo, ao movimento e à sensibilidade.
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Resumo:
A presente dissertação trata da atuação de intelectuais (poetas, jornalistas, militantes, estudantes, folcloristas, antropólogos) e artistas populares na formação da chamada “MPB”, Música Popular Brasileira, no Pará. Entre meados da década de 1960 e de 1970, setores intelectualizados da classe média paraense iniciaram uma grande mobilização no sentido de atualizarem a música popular produzida em Belém aos debates políticos e estéticos que a MPB realizava no restante do país. Festivais foram realizados, grupos de poesia e música surgiram, atuações políticas se misturavam com posturas boemias e grande atividade artística. A nova intelectualidade buscava ao mesmo tempo fazer uma música moderna, mas pautada em elementos da cultura popular paraense ou amazônida. Em meio a novos artistas advindos destes setores da sociedade uma revisão da memória da música popular se fazia e antigos nomes eram incorporados a uma tradição. Concomitantemente a isso, o carimbó, que até então estava restrito às cidades e comunidades interioranas, surge em Belém como uma explosão musical e torna-se música consumida pelas rádios, TVs e indústria do disco. A urbanização deste gênero do folclore regional leva a um amplo debate sobre autenticidade, mercado e identidade cultural da região amazônica e do Pará em particular. Neste processo, artistas de extratos populares entram em cena dando sua contribuição à música popular do Norte. O amplo debate nos jornais sobre o carimbó (sua autenticidade ou sua degeneração frente ao mercado) se soma as atuações da jovem intelectualidade. Neste complexo contexto de múltiplas atuações surge uma MPB de feições regionais.
Resumo:
O presente trabalho busca compreender a recepção crítica da poética de Max Martins no decorrer de 50 anos de atividade artística. A partir de uma abordagem estético recepcional, averiguaremos como as sucessivas leituras por parte de jornalistas e críticos determinaram a aceitação de sua produção e sua respectiva inserção dentro do cenário literário local e nacional. Baseando-se na perspectiva teórica da Estética da Recepção pretenderemos assim compreender diacronicamente o efeito causado pela obra de Max Martins junto aos seus leitores imediatos, e consequentemente perfazer uma história de sua recepção. A abordagem realizada por meio dos pressupostos apresentados por H. R. Jauss (em A História da Literatura como Provocação à Teoria Literária) - como o termo "horizonte de expectativa" - nos orientará quanto à historicidade da produção poética de Max Martins, esclarecendo o motivo que levou algumas leituras equivocadas de sua obra a se perpetuarem até o presente. Desse modo, por meio da reconstrução do “horizonte de expectativa” poderemos compreender a que demanda ou pergunta à obra de Max Martins atendeu no momento de sua publicação, além de averiguarmos como o trabalho de editoração da sua obra (G.Genette, 2009) influenciou sua leitura no decorrer do tempo, atualizando assim sua compreensão crítica e revelando algumas incongruências persistentes em estudos acadêmicos contemporâneos.
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Resumo:
The main aim of this project was to verify the possibility raised in the publication of new archival data in 1980 that the group of panel paintings attributed to the Master of the Rajhrad Altarpiece and his workshop were not created before 1420, as earlier academic opinion held, but in fact only around 1450. It included a detailed analysis of the 21 panels forming the group, including infrared reflectography research. This helped identify the highly personal underdrawing style of the "Rajhrad Master" as common to all the panels in the group, proving that they really form a coherent whole. Questions of the painter's education and the nature of Bohemian society around 1450 were also considered, as. Bartlova felt these had been neglected in earlier studies. She concludes that the Master studied in Prague in the late 1430s and then continued studying in Vienna and Munich from 1440. The new dating of the group of panels connected with this anonymous master and his workshop throws new light on Bohemian artistic production during the late Hussite period (c.1430-c.1470). It was generally thought that artistic activity moved out of Prague after the outbreak of the Hussite wars in the 1420s, but this research revealed considerable activity there throughout the period. Numerous painters listed in the Book of the Prague Painters' Guild for this period can now be linked with extant panels, although most of these have survived outside Prague, principally in South Bohemia. These findings have broad implications for studies of Bohemian art in this period.
Resumo:
Este trabajo se centra en el estudio de las investigaciones de Jorge Oteiza en torno a la funcionalidad estética del espacio, en especial, en la actividad artística que desarrolló en el año 1958, un año decisivo en la vida del escultor en el que dio por finalizado su proceso de experimentación sobre la naturaleza espacial de la estatua. En este desenlace tuvo un papel fundamental la relación funcional que planteó, a la hora de retomar su trabajo después de su triunfo en la IV Bienal de São Paulo de 1957, entre la escultura y la arquitectura. La primera, entendida como organismo puramente espacial, debía de responder a las condiciones de su mundo circundante, el espacio arquitectónico. Su función: acondicionarlo estéticamente para satisfacer las necesidades espirituales del habitante. Siguiendo el canon estético que para la escultura acababa de anunciar en Brasil, la desocupación espacial (la liberación de la energía espacial de la estatua, el rompimiento de la neutralidad del espacio libre) no se trataba de embellecer superficialmente la arquitectura sino de activar su vacío interior. Oteiza, que siempre estuvo muy interesado por la arquitectura y que había colaborado con anterioridad en numerosas ocasiones con los mejores arquitectos del país, fue durante este año cuando profundizó de manera más sistemática (teórica y prácticamente) sobre la relación arte-arquitectura. De hecho, él mismo nombraba como el último trabajo de su línea de experimentación en escultura a su propuesta para el concurso del Monumento a José Batlle en Montevideo, que junto al arquitecto Roberto Puig acabaron a finales de año. En el proyecto se planteaba a escala urbana, y como ejemplo concreto, el modelo teórico de integración arquitectura + (arte=0) que había elaborado los meses anteriores, la integración vacía. En el texto explicativo que acompañaba al proyecto (un texto que desbordaba los límites de una memoria al uso) demandaba la necesidad de la toma de conciencia estética del espacio, como acto de libertad individual, y declaraba el fin del rol de espectador del hombre frente a la obra de arte, reclamando su participación activa en la misma. Para él, la noción del espacio estético no era una condición innata en el hombre, se descubría, se aprendía, evolucionaba y se olvidaba (una vez convertido en hábito). Frente a la ceguera de la sensibilidad espacial del hombre, proponía la educación de la percepción espacial, condicionar emocionalmente la reflexión espontánea ante el juego espacial de las formas en la naturaleza y el espectáculo natural de la ciudad. Aprender a leer el lenguaje emocional del espacio, a pensar visualmente. La obra de arte era así un catalizador espiritual del contorno del mundo, modificador de la vida espacial circundante que corregía hábitos visuales y condicionaba estímulos y reflejos. Desde una resonancia afectiva con la definición psicológica del término (como energía psíquica profunda que invita o incita a pasar a la acción), a diferencia del instinto, la pulsión (siendo la fuente de toda conducta espontánea) es susceptible de ser modificada por la experiencia, por la educación, por la cultura, por el deseo. Es desde esta aproximación en términos de energía desde la que se propone la noción pulsiones del espacio como fórmula (reversible) entre la energía espacial liberada en el proceso de desocupación definido por Oteiza y caracterizadora de la obra como vacío activo (en escultura, en arquitectura), y la energía psíquica profunda que invita o incita a la toma de posesión del espacio (la voluntad espacial absoluta con la que Oteiza definía su modelo de arte=0, cero como expresión formal). Si el hombre modifica su entorno al mismo tiempo que es condicionado por él, es indispensable una conciencia estética del espacio que le enseñe, de entre todas las posibilidades que este le ofrece, qué es lo que necesita (qué es lo que le falta), para tomar posesión de él, para un efectivo ser o existir en el espacio. Es desde esta caracterización como energía por lo que las pulsiones del espacio se sitúan entre el hombre y su entorno (construido) y permiten la transformación entre energía espacial y energía psíquica; entre su hábitat y sus hábitos. Por estas mismas fechas, Oteiza definía una casa como un conjunto articulado de vacíos activos, como una obra de plástica pura que no es arte sino en función del habitante. Es este habitante, educado en la toma de conciencia estética del espacio, el que participando activamente en la interpretación de los espacios previstos por el arquitecto, sintiendo y movido por las pulsiones del espacio, hará uso adecuado de la arquitectura; pasando de un arte como objeto a un arte como comportamiento, transformará su habitar en un arte, el arte de habitar. ABSTRACT This work focuses on the study of Jorge Oteiza’s investigations on the aesthetic functionality of space, especially on his artistic activity developed in 1958, a decisive year in the life of the sculptor, in which he gave end to his process of experimentation on the spatial nature of the statue. In this outcome it was fundamental the functional relationship that he propounded, at the time of returning to work after his triumph in the IV Bienal de São Paulo in 1957, between sculpture and architecture. The first, understood as a purely spatial organism, should respond to the conditions of its environment (umwelt), the architectonic space. Its function: set it up aesthetically to meet the spiritual needs of the inhabitant. Following the aesthetic canon that he had just announced in Brazil for sculpture, the spatial disoccupation (the liberation of the spatial energy of the statue, the breaking of the neutrality of the free space) the aim was not to superficially beautify architecture but to activate its inner void. Oteiza, who had always been very interested in architecture and who had previously collaborated on numerous occasions with the best architects in the country, was in this year when he deepened in a more systematic way (theoretically and practically) about the art-architecture relationship. In fact, he named as the last work of his line of experimentation in sculpture to his proposal for the competition of the Monument to José Batlle in Montevideo, which, developed together with the architect Roberto Puig, was ended at the end of the year. The project proposed on an urban scale, and as a concrete example, the theoretical model of integration architecture + (art = 0) which he had elaborated the previous months, the empty integration. In the explanatory text accompanying the project (a text that exceeded the normal extents of a competition statement) he demanded the need of the aesthetic awareness of space, as an act of individual freedom, and it declared the end of the role of man as passive spectator in front of the work of art, claiming his actively participation in it. For him, the notion of the aesthetic space was not an inborn condition in man; first it was discovered, then learned, evolved and finally forgotten (once converted into a habit). To counteract blindness of the spatial sensitivity of man, he proposed the education of spatial perception, to emotionally influence the spontaneous reflection in front of the spatial game of forms in nature and the natural spectacle of the city. Learn to read the emotional language of space, to think visually. The work of art was thus a spiritual catalyst of the world’s contour, a modifier of the surrounding spatial life that corrected visual habits and conditioned stimuli and reflexes. From an emotional resonance with the psychological definition of the term (such as deep psychic power that invites or urges action), as opposed to instinct, drive (being the source of all spontaneous behavior) is likely to be modified by experience, by education, by culture, by desire. It is from this approach in terms of energy from which the notion drives of space is proposed, as a (reversible) formula between the spatial energy released in the process of disoccupation defined by Oteiza and characterizing of the work as a charged void (in sculpture, in architecture), and the deep psychic energy that invites or encourages the taking possession of the space (the absolute spatial will with which Oteiza defined its model of Art = 0, zero as a formal expression). If man changes his environment at the same time that is conditioned by it, it is essential an aesthetic awareness of space that shows him, among all the possibilities that it offers, what he needs (what is what he lacks), in order to take possession of it, for an effective being or existing in space. It is this characterization as energy by what drives of space lie between man and his (built) environment and allow the transformation between spatial and psychological energy; between his habitat and his habits. Around this same time, Oteiza defined a House as an articulated set of charged voids, as a work of pure plastic that is not art but according to the inhabitant. It is this inhabitant, educated in aesthetic awareness of space, who actively participating in the interpretation of the spaces provided by the architect, feeling and moved by the drives of the space, will make proper use of the architecture; from an art as object to an art as behavior, he will transform his inhabitation into an art, the art of inhabitation.
Une étude générique du metteur en scène au théâtre:son émergence et son rôle moderne et contemporain
Resumo:
The theatre director (metteur en scene in French) is a relatively new figure in theatre practice. It was not until the I820s that the term 'mise en scene' gained currency. The term 'director' was not in general use until the I880s. The emergence and the role of the director has been considered from a variety of perspectives, either through the history of theatre (Allevy, Jomaron, Sarrazac, Viala, Biet and Triau); the history of directing (Chinoy and Cole, Boll, Veinstein, Roubine); semiotic approaches to directing (Whitmore, Miller, Pavis); the semiotics of performance (De Marinis); generic approaches to the mise en scene (Thomasseau, Banu); post-dramatic approaches to theatre (Lehmann); approaches to performance process and the specifics of rehearsal methodology (Bradby and Williams, Giannachi and Luckhurst, Picon-Vallin, Styan). What the scholarly literature has not done so far is to map the parameters necessarily involved in the directing process, and to incorporate an analysis of the emergence of the theatre director during the modem period and consider its impact on contemporary performance practice. Directing relates primarily to the making of the performance guided by a director, a single figure charged with the authority to make binding artistic decisions. Each director may have her/his own personal approaches to the process of preparation prior to a show. This is exemplified, for example, by the variety of terms now used to describe the role and function of directing, from producer, to facilitator or outside eye. However, it is essential at the outset to make two observations, each of which contributes to a justification for a generic analysis (as opposed to a genetic approach). Firstly, a director does not work alone, and cooperation with others is involved at all stages of the process. Secondly, beyond individual variation, the role of the director remains twofold. The first is to guide the actors (meneur de jeu, directeur d'acteurs, coach); the second is to make a visual representation in the performance space (set designer, stage designer, costume designer, lighting designer, scenographe). The increasing place of scenography has brought contemporary theatre directors such as Wilson, Castellucci, Fabre to produce performances where the performance space becomes a semiotic dimension that displaces the primacy of the text. The play is not, therefore, the sole artistic vehicle for directing. This definition of directing obviously calls for a definition of what the making of the performance might be. The thesis defines the making of the performance as the activity of bringing a social event, by at least one performer, providing visual and/or textual meaning in a performance space. This definition enables us to evaluate four consistent parameters throughout theatre history: first, the social aspect associated to the performance event; second, the devising process which may be based on visual and/or textual elements; third, the presence of at least one performer in the show; fourth, the performance space (which is not simply related to the theatre stage). Although the thesis focuses primarily on theatre practice, such definition blurs the boundaries between theatre and other collaborative artistic disciplines (cinema, opera, music and dance). These parameters illustrate the possibility to undertake a generic analysis of directing, and resonate with the historical, political and artistic dimensions considered. Such a generic perspective on the role of the director addresses three significant questions: an historical question: how/why has the director emerged?; a sociopolitical question: how/why was the director a catalyst for the politicisation of theatre, and subsequently contributed to the rise of State-funded theatre policy?; and an artistic one: how/why the director has changed theatre practice and theory in the twentieth-century? Directing for the theatre as an artistic activity is a historically situated phenomenon. It would seem only natural from a contemporary perspective to associate the activity of directing to the function of the director. This is relativised, however, by the question of how the performance was produced before the modern period. The thesis demonstrates that the rise of the director is a progressive and historical phenomenon (Dort) rather than a mere invention (Viala, Sarrazac). A chronological analysis of the making of the performance throughout theatre history is the most useful way to open the study. In order to understand the emergence of the director, the research methodology assesses the interconnection of the four parameters above throughout four main periods of theatre history: the beginning of the Renaissance (meneur de jeu), the classical age (actor-manager and stage designer-manager), the modern period (director) and the contemporary period (director-facilitator, performer). This allows us properly to appraise the progressive emergence of the director, as well as to make an analysis of her/his modern and contemporary role. The first chapter argues that the physical separation between the performance space and its audience, which appeared in the early fifteenth-century, has been a crucial feature in the scenographic, aesthetic, political and social organisation of the performance. At the end of the Middle Ages, French farces which raised socio-political issues (see Bakhtin) made a clear division on a single outdoor stage (treteau) between the actors and the spectators, while religious plays (drame fiturgique, mystere) were mostly performed on various outdoor and opened multispaces. As long as the performance was liturgical or religious, and therefore confined within an acceptable framework, it was allowed. At the time, the French ecclesiastical and civil authorities tried, on several occasions, to prohibit staged performances. As a result, practitioners developed non-official indoor spaces, the Theatre de fa Trinite (1398) being the first French indoor theatre recognized by scholars. This self-exclusion from the open public space involved breaking the accepted rules by practitioners (e.g. Les Confreres de fa Passion), in terms of themes but also through individual input into a secular performance rather than the repetition of commonly known religious canvases. These developments heralded the authorised theatres that began to emerge from the mid-sixteenth century, which in some cases were subsidised in their construction. The construction of authorised indoor theatres associated with the development of printing led to a considerable increase in the production of dramatic texts for the stage. Profoundly affecting the reception of the dramatic text by the audience, the distance between the stage and the auditorium accompanied the changing relationship between practitioners and spectators. This distance gave rise to a major development of the role of the actor and of the stage designer. The second chapter looks at the significance of both the actor and set designer in the devising process of the performance from the sixteenth-century to the end of the nineteenth-century. The actor underwent an important shift in function in this period from the delivery of an unwritten text that is learned in the medieval oral tradition to a structured improvisation produced by the commedia dell 'arte. In this new form of theatre, a chef de troupe or an experienced actor shaped the story, but the text existed only through the improvisation of the actors. The preparation of those performances was, moreover, centred on acting technique and the individual skills of the actor. From this point, there is clear evidence that acting began to be the subject of a number of studies in the mid-sixteenth-century, and more significantly in the seventeenth-century, in Italy and France. This is revealed through the implementation of a system of notes written by the playwright to the actors (stage directions) in a range of plays (Gerard de Vivier, Comedie de la Fidelite Nuptiale, 1577). The thesis also focuses on Leoni de' Sommi (Quatro dialoghi, 1556 or 1565) who wrote about actors' techniques and introduced the meneur de jeu in Italy. The actor-manager (meneur de jeu), a professional actor, who scholars have compared to the director (see Strihan), trained the actors. Nothing, however, indicates that the actor-manager was directing the visual representation of the text in the performance space. From the end of the sixteenth-century, the dramatic text began to dominate the process of the performance and led to an expansion of acting techniques, such as the declamation. Stage designers carne from outside the theatre tradition and played a decisive role in the staging of religious celebrations (e.g. Actes des Apotres, 1536). In the sixteenth-century, both the proscenium arch and the borders, incorporated in the architecture of the new indoor theatres (theatre a l'italienne), contributed to create all kinds of illusions on the stage, principally the revival of perspective. This chapter shows ongoing audience demands for more elaborate visual effects on the stage. This led, throughout the classical age, and even more so during the eighteenth-century, to grant the stage design practitioner a major role in the making of the performance (see Ciceri). The second chapter demonstrates that the guidance of the actors and the scenographic conception, which are the artistic components of the role of the director, appear to have developed independently from one another until the nineteenth-century. The third chapter investigates the emergence of the director per se. The causes for this have been considered by a number of scholars, who have mainly identified two: the influence of Naturalism (illustrated by the Meiningen Company, Antoine, and Stanislavski) and the invention of electric lighting. The influence of the Naturalist movement on the emergence of the modem director in the late nineteenth-century is often considered as a radical factor in the history of theatre practice. Naturalism undoubtedly contributed to changes in staging, costume and lighting design, and to a more rigorous commitment to the harmonisation and visualisation of the overall production of the play. Although the art of theatre was dependent on the dramatic text, scholars (Osborne) demonstrate that the Naturalist directors did not strictly follow the playwright's indications written in the play in the late nineteenth-century. On the other hand, the main characteristic of directing in Naturalism at that time depended on a comprehensive understanding of the scenography, which had to respond to the requirements of verisimilitude. Electric lighting contributed to this by allowing for the construction of a visual narrative on stage. However, it was a master technician, rather than an emergent director, who was responsible for key operational decisions over how to use this emerging technology in venues such as the new Bayreuth theatre in 1876. Electric lighting reflects a normal technological evolution and cannot be considered as one of the main causes of the emergence of the director. Two further causes of the emergence of the director, not considered in previous studies, are the invention of cinema and the Symbolist movement (Lugne-Poe, Meyerhold). Cinema had an important technological influence on the practitioners of the Naturalist movement. In order to achieve a photographic truth on the stage (tableau, image), Naturalist directors strove to decorate the stage with the detailed elements that would be expected to be found if the situation were happening in reality. Film production had an influence on the work of actors (Walter). The filmmaker took over a primary role in the making of the film, as the source of the script, the filming process and the editing of the film. This role influenced the conception that theatre directors had of their own work. It is this concept of the director which influenced the development of the theatre director. As for the Symbolist movement, the director's approach was to dematerialise the text of the playwright, trying to expose the spirit, movement, colour and rhythm of the text. Therefore, the Symbolists disengaged themselves from the material aspect of the production, and contributed to give greater artistic autonomy to the role of the director. Although the emergence of the director finds its roots amongst the Naturalist practitioners (through a rigorous attempt to provide a strict visual interpretation of the text on stage), the Symbolist director heralded the modem perspective of the making of performance. The emergence of the director significantly changed theatre practice and theory. For instance, the rehearsal period became a clear work in progress, a platform for both developing practitioners' techniques and staging the show. This chapter explores and contrasts several practitioners' methods based on the two aspects proposed for the definition of the director (guidance of the actors and materialisation of a visual space). The fourth chapter argues that the role of the director became stronger, more prominent, and more hierarchical, through a more political and didactic approach to theatre as exemplified by the cases of France and Germany at the end of the nineteenth-century and through the First World War. This didactic perspective to theatre defines the notion of political theatre. Political theatre is often approached by the literature (Esslin, Willett) through a Marxist interpretation of the great German directors' productions (Reinhardt, Piscator, Brecht). These directors certainly had a great influence on many directors after the Second World War, such as Jean Vilar, Judith Molina, Jean-Louis Barrault, Roger Planchon, Augusto Boal, and others. This chapter demonstrates, moreover, that the director was confirmed through both ontological and educational approaches to the process of making the performance, and consequently became a central and paternal figure in the organisational and structural processes practiced within her/his theatre company. In this way, the stance taken by the director influenced the State authorities in establishing theatrical policy. This is an entirely novel scholarly contribution to the study of the director. The German and French States were not indifferent to the development of political theatre. A network of public theatres was thus developed in the inter-war period, and more significantly after the Second World War. The fifth chapter shows how State theatre policies establish its sources in the development of political theatre, and more specifically in the German theatre trade union movement (Volksbiihne) and the great directors at the end of the nineteenth-century. French political theatre was more influenced by playwrights and actors (Romain Rolland, Louise Michel, Louis Lumet, Emile Berny). French theatre policy was based primarily on theatre directors who decentralised their activities in France during both the inter-war period and the German occupation. After the Second World War, the government established, through directors, a strong network of public theatres. Directors became both the artistic director and the executive director of those institutionalised theatres. The institution was, however, seriously shaken by the social and political upheaval of 1968. It is the link between the State and the institution in which established directors were entangled that was challenged by the young emerging directors who rejected institutionalised responsibility in favour of the autonomy of the artist in the 1960s. This process is elucidated in chapter five. The final chapter defines the contemporary role of the director in contrasting thework of a number of significant young theatre practitioners in the 1960s such as Peter Brook, Ariane Mnouchkine, The Living Theater, Jerzy Grotowski, Augusto Boal, Eugenio Barba, all of whom decided early on to detach their companies from any form of public funding. This chapter also demonstrates how they promoted new forms of performance such as the performance of the self. First, these practitioners explored new performance spaces outside the traditional theatre building. Producing performances in a non-dedicated theatre place (warehouse, street, etc.) was a more frequent practice in the 1960s than before. However, the recent development of cybertheatre questions both the separation of the audience and the practitioners and the place of the director's role since the 1990s. Secondly, the role of the director has been multifaceted since the 1960s. On the one hand, those directors, despite all their different working methods, explored western and non-western acting techniques based on both personal input and collective creation. They challenged theatrical conventions of both the character and the process of making the performance. On the other hand, recent observations and studies distinguish the two main functions of the director, the acting coach and the scenographe, both having found new developments in cinema, television, and in various others events. Thirdly, the contemporary director challenges the performance of the text. In this sense, Antonin Artaud was a visionary. His theatre illustrates the need for the consideration of the totality of the text, as well as that of theatrical production. By contrasting the theories of Artaud, based on a non-dramatic form of theatre, with one of his plays (Le Jet de Sang), this chapter demonstrates how Artaud examined the process of making the performance as a performance. Live art and autobiographical performance, both taken as directing the se(f, reinforce this suggestion. Finally, since the 1990s, autobiographical performance or the performance of the self is a growing practical and theoretical perspective in both performance studies and psychology-related studies. This relates to the premise that each individual is making a representation (through memory, interpretation, etc.) of her/his own life (performativity). This last section explores the links between the place of the director in contemporary theatre and performers in autobiographical practices. The role of the traditional actor is challenged through non-identification of the character in the play, while performers (such as Chris Burden, Ron Athey, Orlan, Franko B, Sterlac) have, likewise, explored their own story/life as a performance. The thesis demonstrates the validity of the four parameters (performer, performance space, devising process, social event) defining a generic approach to the director. A generic perspective on the role of the director would encompass: a historical dimension relative to the reasons for and stages of the 'emergence' of the director; a socio-political analysis concerning the relationship between the director, her/his institutionalisation, and the political realm; and the relationship between performance theory, practice and the contemporary role of the director. Such a generic approach is a new departure in theatre research and might resonate in the study of other collaborative artistic practices.
Resumo:
Preprint. Título do artigo editado: "Dimensões formais, informais e não-formais em diversos contextos de aprendizagem da dança". Publicação na Revista Portuguesa de Educação Artística, 2015 (5), pp. 61-72.
Resumo:
La tesi prende in esame l’attività artistica di Nicolò dell’Abate (Modena, 1509 – Parigi, 1571), con particolare riferimento alla sua grafica. L’artista lavorò circa sessanta anni suddivisi fra l’Emilia, in alcune delle sue piccole entità politiche autonome come Modena, Scandiano, Soragna, Busseto, Bologna, e la Francia, potente stato nazionale che, all’epoca qui presa in considerazione, era guidato dalla casata dei Valois: la carriera italiana di Nicolò dell’Abate si sviluppa in un arco temporale che si estende dal 1529 alla primavera del 1552, quando si trasferisce definitivamente oltralpe, morendo a Parigi alla fine di marzo del 1571. L’elaborato è diviso in quattro capitoli, dei quali il primo, introduttivo, ripercorre per sommi capi le principali tappe della sfaccettata attività italiana; il secondo e il terzo sono invece incentrati sull’esame dell’attività artistica francese del maestro, con particolare riferimento alla grafica, indagata sulla base della ricostruzione del contesto storico, culturale e artistico della Francia dell’epoca, con specifico riguardo alla corte reale della famiglia Valois nei periodi compresi fra l’arrivo di Nicolò, nel 1552, e la morte prematura del re Enrico II, nel 1559, e fra il 1560 e il 1571, durante il quale deteneva il potere de facto la regina madre Caterina de’ Medici, moglie di Enrico. Il quarto e ultimo capitolo costituisce il catalogo dei disegni italiani e francesi: è preceduto da un saggio introduttivo che esamina lo stile disegnativo di Nicolò dell’Abate in Italia e in Francia, le sue caratteristiche fondamentali e il suo mutamento, oltre alle tecniche grafiche impiegate dall’artista, la loro evoluzione e variazione e il loro ruolo nella sua poetica. Infine, in appendice, è presente il regesto delle fonti francesi sull’attività dell’artista e di alcuni dei maggiori esponenti della cosiddetta scuola di Fontainebleau.
Resumo:
To evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of Clearfil SE Protect (CP) and Clearfil SE Bond (CB) after curing and rinsed against five individual oral microorganisms as well as a mixture of bacterial culture prepared from the selected test organisms. Bacterial suspensions were prepared from single species of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Streptococcus gordonii, Actinomyces viscosus and Lactobacillus lactis, as well as mixed bacterial suspensions from these organisms. Dentin bonding system discs (6 mm×2 mm) were prepared, cured, washed and placed on the bacterial suspension of single species or multispecies bacteria for 15, 30 and 60 min. MTT, Live/Dead bacterial viability (antibacterial effect), and XTT (metabolic activity) assays were used to test the two dentin system's antibacterial effect. All assays were done in triplicates and each experiment repeated at least three times. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Scheffe's f-test (5%). Greater than 40% bacteria killing was seen within 15 min, and the killing progressed with increasing time of incubation with CP discs. However, a longer (60 min) period of incubation was required by CP to achieve similar antimicrobial effect against mixed bacterial suspension. CB had no significant effect on the viability or metabolic activity of the test microorganisms when compared to the control bacterial culture. CP was significantly effective in reducing the viability and metabolic activity of the test organisms. The results demonstrated the antimicrobial efficacy of CP both on single and multispecies bacterial culture. CP may be beneficial in reducing bacterial infections in cavity preparations in clinical dentistry.