ARL1 of the Attribute c Control Chart with Estimated Parameter

International audience

Ras 超家族蛋白的起源演化研究

Ras 超家族蛋白是真核生物中普遍存在的一类小分子GTP 结合蛋白。它们 具有高度保守的GTP 结合结构域，根据序列结构和细胞功能被分为七个家族： Sar1、Arf、SRβ、Ran、Rab、Rho 和Ras。这些蛋白分别行使着真核生物特有的 细胞功能，诸如运输小泡的形成和转运（Sar1、Arf、Rab），胞质骨架的建成（Rho）， 细胞核-胞质运输及核膜重建（Ran）等，其起源演化和真核细胞的起源密切相关。 本文利用生物信息学手段和分子生物学实验调查研究了原核生物和原生生物中 Ras 超家族蛋白同源物的存在情况，并进行了分子系统分析，对Ras 超家族蛋白 的起源演化问题进行了较为深入、系统的探讨。获得了以下结果和结论： 1）通过原核生物基因组的搜索和序列结构分析，在一些真细菌中首次鉴定 出了高度相似于真核生物Ras 超家族蛋白的原核生物同源物，且实验证明它们的 基因具有表达活性；在原细菌中的产甲烷菌和热原体中也发现有序列分歧较大的 同源物。并在更多的真细菌种类中鉴定出了更多的前人已报道的另一种小分子 GTP 结合蛋白—MglA。序列比对分析表明MglA 蛋白具有自己独特的序列特征， 与真核生物的Ras 超家族蛋白序列差异较大。进一步的分子系统分析显示：真核 生物Ras 超家族蛋白的七个家族中，Ran、Rab、Rho 和Ras 等四个家族聚在一 起，上述我们所鉴定的真细菌的Ras 超家族蛋白同源物则紧聚在其外围；真核生 物的另三个家族（Sar1、Arf、SRβ）聚成另一枝，并接着与产甲烷原细菌的的同 源物及真细菌的MglA 蛋白聚在一起。这些结果表明：Ras 超家族蛋白不是前人 所认为的为真核生物所特有，实际上在一些原核生物中就已产生；真核生物Ras 超家族蛋白的祖先也不太可能是前人所认为的为真细菌的MglA；真核生物Ras 超家族蛋白的七个家族可能有两种不同的起源：Ran、Rab、Rho 和Ras 等可能 来源于蓝细菌或蛋白菌，或二者的共同祖先，而Sar1、Arf 和SRβ 可能来源于产 甲烷原细菌，这也可能反映了真核细胞“融合起源”的历史。 2）通过搜索一些较为低等的单细胞真核生物——原生生物基因组中Ras 超 家族蛋白，并结合一系列其他处在不同进化地位真核生物的Ras 超家族蛋白进行 分析，发现Sar1、Arf、Rab 和Ran 家族的蛋白在真核生物中普遍存在，而SRβ、 Rho 和Ras 家族蛋白在有些真核生物中未找到。根据各家族蛋白在真核生物中的分布情况推测在真核生物的最近共同祖先中存在的Ras 超家族蛋白可能有下列 两种情况：（1）最近的共同祖先已经具有了所有七个家族的蛋白，并且至少有 11 个成员：1 个Sar1、1 个SRβ、3 个Arf（Arf1、Arl1、Arl2）、3 个Rab（Rab1、 Rab6、Rab11）、1 个Ran、1 个Rho（Rac）和1 个Ras（RheB）。因而，部分真 核生物中缺少SRβ、Rho 和Ras 家族蛋白很可能是因基因丢失所致。植物中Ras 家族蛋白的缺少应该是由于在进化早期，其祖先绿藻丢失了单个Ras 家族蛋白基 因所致；（2）根据Cavalier-Smith 的真核生物划分为单鞭毛（变形虫类、真菌和 后生动物）和双鞭毛（藻类、植物和除变形虫外的原生动物）两大类的分类观点， 真核生物最近的共同祖先可能只具有除Ras 家族而外的六个家族的成员，而Ras 家族蛋白则是在此两大类群分化以后在单鞭毛类生物中才产生的，多数双鞭毛类 生物如原生动物、绿藻和植物中没有Ras 的情况应该是一种祖征，而个别双鞭毛 类生物如红藻具有的Ras 家族蛋白则很可能是从单鞭毛类生物那里水平基因转 移而来的。至于SRβ 和Rho 家族蛋白在部分物种中的缺少，则还是可能因为基 因丢失所致。此外，变形虫类生物中大量的Ras 超家族蛋白提示基因组的大小或 进化地位的高低并不是Ras 超家族蛋白成员多少的决定性因素，而细胞相应生理 活动的需求才是家族成员增多的关键。

Identification of yeast genes that confer resistance to chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) using chemogenomics

Background: Chitosan oligosaccharide (COS), a deacetylated derivative of chitin, is an abundant, and renewable natural polymer. COS has higher antimicrobial properties than chitosan and is presumed to act by disrupting/permeabilizing the cell membranes of bacteria, yeast and fungi. COS is relatively non-toxic to mammals. By identifying the molecular and genetic targets of COS, we hope to gain a better understanding of the antifungal mode of action of COS. Results: Three different chemogenomic fitness assays, haploinsufficiency (HIP), homozygous deletion (HOP), and multicopy suppression (MSP) profiling were combined with a transcriptomic analysis to gain insight in to the mode of action and mechanisms of resistance to chitosan oligosaccharides. The fitness assays identified 39 yeast deletion strains sensitive to COS and 21 suppressors of COS sensitivity. The genes identified are involved in processes such as RNA biology (transcription, translation and regulatory mechanisms), membrane functions (e.g. signalling, transport and targeting), membrane structural components, cell division, and proteasome processes. The transcriptomes of control wild type and 5 suppressor strains overexpressing ARL1, BCK2, ERG24, MSG5, or RBA50, were analyzed in the presence and absence of COS. Some of the up-regulated transcripts in the suppressor overexpressing strains exposed to COS included genes involved in transcription, cell cycle, stress response and the Ras signal transduction pathway. Down-regulated transcripts included those encoding protein folding components and respiratory chain proteins. The COS-induced transcriptional response is distinct from previously described environmental stress responses (i.e. thermal, salt, osmotic and oxidative stress) and pre-treatment with these well characterized environmental stressors provided little or any resistance to COS. Conclusions: Overexpression of the ARL1 gene, a member of the Ras superfamily that regulates membrane trafficking, provides protection against COS-induced cell membrane permeability and damage. We found that the ARL1 COS-resistant over-expression strain was as sensitive to Amphotericin B, Fluconazole and Terbinafine as the wild type cells and that when COS and Fluconazole are used in combination they act in a synergistic fashion. The gene targets of COS identified in this study indicate that COS’s mechanism of action is different from other commonly studied fungicides that target membranes, suggesting that COS may be an effective fungicide for drug-resistant fungal pathogens.

Mammalian GRIP domain proteins differ in their membrane binding properties and are recruited to distinct domains of the TGN

The four mammalian golgins, p230/golgin-245, golgin-97, GCC88 and GCC185 are targeted to trans-Golgi network ITGN) membranes by their C-terminal GRIP domain in a G-protein-dependent process. The Arf-like GTPase, Arl1, has been shown to mediate TGN recruitment of p230/golgin245 and golgin-97 by interaction with their GRIP domains; however, it is not known whether all the TGN golgins bind to Arl1 and whether they are all recruited to the same or different TGN domains. Here we demonstrate differences in membrane binding properties and TGN domain recruitment of the mammalian GRIP domain proteins. Overexpression of full-length GCC185 resulted in the appearance of small punctate structures dispersed in the cytoplasm of transfected cells that were identified as membrane tubular structures by immunoelectron microscopy. The cytoplasmic GCC185-labelled structures were enriched for membrane binding determinants of GCC185 GRIP, whereas the three other mammalian GRIP family members did not colocalize with the GCC185-labelled structures. These GCC185-labelled structures included the TGN resident protein alpha2,6 sialyltransferase and excluded the recycling TGN protein, TGN46. The Golgi stack was unaffected by overexpression of GCC185. Overexpression of both full-length GCC185 and GCC88 showed distinct and nonoverlapping structures. We also show that the GRIP domains of GCC185 and GCC88 differ in membrane binding properties from each other and, in contrast to p230/golgin245 and golgin-97, do not interact with Arl1 in vivo. Collectively these results show that GCC88, GCC185 and p230/golgin245 are recruited to functionally distinct domains of the TGN and are likely to be important for the maintenance of TGN subdomain structure, a critical feature for mediating protein sorting and membrane transport.

E-cadherin transport from the trans-Golgi network in tubulovesicular carriers is selectively regulated by Golgin-97

E-cadherin is a cell-cell adhesion protein that is trafficked and delivered to the basolateral cell surface. Membrane-bound carriers for the post-Golgi exocytosis of E-cadherin have not been characterized. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged E-cadherin (Ecad-GFP) is transported from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) to the recycling endosome on its way to the cell surface in tubulovesicular carriers that resemble TGN tubules labeled by members of the golgin family of tethering proteins. Here, we examine the association of golgins with tubular carriers containing E-cadherin as cargo. Fluorescent GRIP domains from golgin proteins replicate the membrane binding of the full-length proteins and were coexpressed with Ecad-GFP. The GRIP domains of p230/golgin-245 and golgin-97 had overlapping but nonidentical distributions on the TGN; both domains were on TGN-derived tubules but only the golgin-97 GRIP domain coincided with Ecad-GFP tubules in live cells. When the Arl1-binding endogenous golgins, p230/golgin-245 and golgin-97 were displaced from Golgi membranes by overexpression of the p230 GRIP domain, trafficking of Ecad-GFP was inhibited. siRNA knockdown of golgin-97 also inhibited trafficking of Ecad-GFP. Thus, the GRIP domains of p230/golgin-245 and golgin-97 bind discriminately to distinct membrane subdomains of the TGN. Golgin-97 is identified as a selective and essential component of the tubulovesicular carriers transporting E-cadherin out of the TGN.