999 resultados para Aretusi, Cesare (1580-1612) -- Portraits


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Cartel, en italien, de Cagnino di Gonzaga à Cesare Fregoso. Bozolo,31 juillet 1539 (fol. 112), orig. imprimé, avec le sceau de Gonzaga. — Extraits des Mémoires de Sully (fol. 14). — Duels de Jean de Harcourt et Guillaume III de Tancarville, 1286 (fol. 20), — Raymond du Marcadil de Penne en Agenois et Étienne Donnadieu, 1330 (fol. 24), — M. de Sauvebeuf et Peyrot de Rastinhac, 1587 (fol. 26), — baron de Conros et Carbonat (fol. 29), — Louis de Loudierche, de Grizol et de Cheyladet, 1612 (fol 31, 59), — MM. de Candale et de Schomberg (fol. 36), — combat de la Barrière, 1605 (fol. 37). — Édit de Henri IV défendant les duels (fol. 39). — Accords faits par le connétable, les maréchaux de France et les lieutenants généraux des provinces entre MM. de Clermont et de S. Gery d'Avignon (fol. 50), — de Reilhac et de Drageac (fol. 53), — le duc de Nevers et M. de Montpensier, 1580 (fol. 55), — de Brezolles et de Carluz de Calvimond, 1610 (fol. 57), — de Naves et de Montaignac, 1613 (fol. 61), — le comte de Sault et M. de Brissac, 1638 (fol. 62). — Extraits du « stylus antiquus Parlamenti Parisiensis Caroli Molinoei », éd. 1558 (fol. 66, 72, 74, 156), — du « Coustumier de Normendie », éd. 1539 (fol. 76). — Duels de Jacques Le Gris et Jean de Carouges, 1387 (fol. 84) et autres duels extraits de Froissart (fol. 99 et suiv.). — Lettre orig. de Gaucher de Dinteville à Mgr le Dauphin [Henri II], Venise, 20 décembre 1538 (fol. 142). — « Les Cartelz, reponces et procès-verbaux du different d'entre le sieur de Vassé et le comte Guillaume de Furstenberg, 1540 (fol. 144).

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Contient : Instructions de la Cour aux ambassadeurs et autres personnages dont les noms suivent : [Nicolas ?] d'Angennes, marquis de Rambouillet, 1562 (f. 4), — Gaspard de Schomberg, 1573 (f. 14), — le même, 1580 (f. 32), — le même, 1589 (f. 38), — Guillaume de Baradat, 1589 (f. 49), — Henri de La Tour, vicomte de Turenne, 1590 (f. 58), — M. de Marescot, 1598 (f. 95), — Jacques Bongars, 1599 (f. 106), — Urbain de Laval, maréchal de Boisdauphin, 1603 (f. 123), — Mr de Monglas, 1606 (f. 138), — Jacques Bongars, 1609 (f. 174), — Mr de Widemarck, 1609 (f. 199), — Badovere, 1609 (f. 205), — Jacques Bongars, novembre 1609 (f. 215), — Mr de Sainte-Catherine, 1609 (f. 228), — Jean de Thumery, sieur de Boissise, 1609 (f. 246), — [Charles ?] de Rambures (f. 287), — le maréchal de La Châtre, 1610 (f. 295), — le maréchal de Bouillon, 1610 (f. 318), — Nicolas de Baugy (f. 328), — Robert de La Vieuville et Lazare de Selve, 1611 (f. 331), — Guillaume Ancel, 1612 (f. 344), — Henri de Schomberg (f. 385), — Jacques Bongars, 1593 (f. 415), — le même, 1594 (f. 423), — le même, 1595 (f. 435) ; Instructions de la Cour à divers ambassadeurs en Suisse : Nicolas de Harlay-Sancy (f. 442), — Honoré Mauroy, sieur de La Verrière (f. 461), — Méry de Vic, 1600 (f. 408), — Louis Le Fèvre de Caumartin, 1604 (f. 487), — et Charles Pascal, 1604 (f. 506)

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The first German edition, 1580, was an adaptation of Folengo's Moscaea by Fuchs; the 1612 ed. names Schnurr as editor. cf. Vorwort.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In this paper I analyse UK artist Alison Jones’ sonic interventions Portrait of the Artist by Proxy (2008), Voyeurism by Proxy (2008) and Art, Lies and Audio Tapes (2009). In Portrait of the Artist by Proxy, Jones – who, due to deteriorating vision, has not seen her reflection in a mirror in years – asks and trusts participants to audio-describe her own image back to her. In Voyeurism by Proxy, Jones asks participants to audio-describe erotic drawings by Gustav Klimt. In Art, Lies and Audio Tapes, Jones asks participants to audio-describe other artworks, such as W.F. Yeames’ And When Did You Last see Your Father?. In these portraits by proxy, Jones opens her image, and other images, to interpretation. In doing so, Jones draws attention to the way sight is privileged as a mode of access to fixed, fundamental truths in Western culture – a mode assumed to be untainted by filters that skew perception of the object. “In a culture where vision is by far the dominant sense,” Jones says, “and as a visual artist with a visual impairment, I am reliant on audio-description …Inevitably, there are limitations imposed by language, time and the interpreter’s background knowledge of the subject viewed, as well as their personal bias of what is deemed important to impart in their description” . In these works, Jones strips these background knowledges, biases and assumptions bare. She reveals different perceptions, as well as tendencies or censor, edit or exaggerate descriptions. In this paper, I investigate how, by revealing unconscious biases, Jones’ works renders herself and her participants vulnerable to a change of perception. I also examine how Jones’ later editing of the audio-descriptions allows her to show the instabilities of sight, and, in Portrait of the Artist by Proxy, to reclaim authorship of her own image.