Influência do ácido peracético sobre a resistência flexural e rugosidade das cerâmicas do sistema Procera AllCeram

O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a influência da imersão em ácido peracético sobre a resistência flexural e rugosidade das cerâmicas do sistema Procera AllCeram. Para cada ensaio foram analisados, o grupo controle e experimental cuja variável foi a imersão em ácido peracético (0,2%), por 50 minutos. A resistência flexural biaxial foi avaliada de acordo com a especificação 6872, da International Organization for Standardization (ISO), que requer um valor mínimo de 50MPa para a cerâmica de cobertura (AllCeram) e 100MPa para a cerâmica de subestrutura (Procera). Para todos os ensaios foram confeccionados 10 corpos de prova, de cada material para compor os grupos experimental (imerso em desinfetante) e controle, com dimensões de (16±0,2)mm de diâmetro por (1,6±0,1)mm de espessura para o AllCeram e, (12±0,2)mm de diâmetro e (1,2±0,2)mm de espessura para o Procera, totalizando 60 corpos de prova. A rugosidade foi avaliada com um rugosímetro utilizando o parâmetro Ra. Os valores médios de resistência flexural biaxial e o desvio padrão dos grupos controle e experimental do Procera e AllCeram foram respectivamente, (440,7±114,77)MPa, (411,6±45,02)MPa, (76,5±3,59)MPa e (86,5±15,41)MPa. Os valores médios da rugosidade e o desvio padrão dos grupos controle e experimental do Procera e AllCeram foram respectivamente: (0,090±0,014)µm, (0,086±0,009) µm, (0,022±0,004)µm e (0,0210±0,006) µm. Quando comparados com a ISO 6872, todos os corpos de prova foram aprovados quanto à resistência flexural. Quando comparados entre si, através do teste “t” de Student não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos experimental e controle de cada um dos ensaios, mostrando que o ácido peracético não interferiu significativamente nas propriedades de resistência flexural e rugosidade dos materiais. Sendo assim, pode-se prever que tal procedimento não trará prejuízos ao desempenho clínico das próteses confeccionadas com as cerâmicas do sistema Procera AllCeram quando consideradas as propriedades analisadas, podendo ser um procedimento clinicamente recomendável. Unitermos: cerâmica odontológica, resistência flexural, rugosidade, ácido peracético.

All-Ceramic Crowns Over Single Implant Zircon Abutment. Influence of Young's Modulus on Mechanics

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Y-TZP ceramic processing from coprecipitated powders: A comparative study with three commercial dental ceramics

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

The effect of ceramic surface treatment on bonding to densely sintered alumina ceramic

Statement of problem. Ceramic surface treatment is crucial for bonding to resin. High crystalline ceramics are poorly conditioned using traditional procedures.Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of silica coating on a densely sintered alumina ceramic relative to its bond strength to composite, using a resin luting agent.Material and methods. Blocks (6 X 6 X 5 mm) of ceramic and composite were made. The ceramic (Procera AllCeram) surfaces were polished, and the blocks were divided into 3 groups (n = 5): SB, airborne-particle abrasion with 110-mu m Al(2)O(3); RS, silica coating using Rocatec System; and CS, silica coating using CoJet System. The treated ceramic blocks were luted to the composite (W3D Master) blocks using a resin luting agent (Panavia F). Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 7 days and then Cut in 2 axes, x and y, to obtain specimens with a bonding area of approximately 0.6 mm(2) (n = 30). The specimens were loaded to failure in tension in a universal testing machine, and data were statistically analyzed using a randomized complete block design analysis of variance and Tukey's test (alpha=.05). Fractured surfaces were examined using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy to determine the type of failure. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy was used for surface compositional analysis.Results. Mean bond strength values (MPa) of Groups RS (17.1 +/- 3.9) (P = .00015) and CS (18.5 +/- 4.7) (P=.00012) were significantly higher than the values of Group SB (12.7 +/- 2.6). There was no statistical difference between Groups RS and CS. All failures occurred at the adhesive zone.Conclusion. Tribochemical silica coating systems increased the tensile bond strength values between Panavia F and Procera AllCeram ceramic.

Effect of mechanical cycling on the flexural strength of densely sintered ceramics

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical cycling on the biaxial flexural strength of two densely sintered ceramic materials.Methods. Disc shaped zirconia (In-Ceram Zirconia) and high alumina (Procera AllCeram) ceramic specimens (diameter: 15 min and thickness: 1.2 mm) were fabricated according to the manufacturers' instructions. The specimens from each ceramic material (N = 40, n = 10/per group) were tested for flexural strength either with or without being subjected to mechanical cycling (20,000 cycles under 50 N load, immersion in distilled water at 37 degrees C) in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05).Results. High alumina ceramic specimens revealed significantly higher flexural strength values without and with mechanical cycling (647 +/- 48 and 630 +/- 143 MPa, respectively) than those of zirconia ceramic (497 +/- 35 and 458 +/- 53 MPa, respectively) (p < 0.05). Mechanical cycling for 20,000 times under 50 N decreased the flexural strength values for both high alumina andSignificance. High alumina ceramic revealed significantly higher mean flexural strength values than that of zirconia ceramic tested in this study either with or without mechanical cycling conditions. (C) 2005 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of procera/porcelain interface in metal-free prosthesis

Prosthetic substructures for dental application are veneered by porcelain comprising a structure with different elastic modulus and thermal expansion coefficients layers. This structure may present residual stresses in different layers leading to crack propagation and delamination. Although veneering porcelain remains basically on same strength than standard feldspathic porcelains, new ceramic cores have been developed with higher mechanical properties overcoming metal substructures, improving esthetics and biocompatibility. The interface between the Procera dense sintered alumina core and the manufacturer recommended veneering porcelain (AllCeram-Degussa) were evaluated using SEM in coping shaped specimen simulating the standard dental preparation. There were neither crack presences at the interface nor porcelain delamination.

Bond strength of a resin cement to high-alumina and zirconia-reinforced ceramics: The effect of surface conditioning

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to three high-strength core ceramics: high alumina-based (In-Ceram Alumina, Procera AllCeram) and zirconia-reinforced alumina-based (In-Ceram Zirconia) ceramics. Materials and Methods: Ten blocks (5 ×6 × 8 mm) of In-Ceram Alumina (AL), In-Ceram Zirconia (ZR), and Procera (PR) ceramics were fabricated according to each manufacturer's instructions and duplicated in composite. The specimens were assigned to one of the two following treatment conditions: (1) airborne particle abrasion with 110-μm Al2O3 particles + silanization, (2) silica coating with 30 μm SiOx particles (CoJet, 3M ESPE) + silanization. Each ceramic block was duplicated in composite resin (W3D-Master, Wilcos, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil) using a mold made out of silicon impression material. Composite resin layers were incrementally condensed into the mold to fill up the mold and each layer was light polymerized for 40 s. The composite blocks were bonded to the surface-conditioned ceramic blocks using a resin cement system (Panavia F, Kuraray, Okayama, Japan). One composite resin block was fabricated for each ceramic block. The ceramic-composite was stored at 37°C in distilled water for 7 days prior to bond tests. The blocks were cut under water cooling to produce bar specimens (n = 30) with a bonding area of approximately 0.6 mm2. The bond strength tests were performed in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed: 1 mm/min). Bond strength values were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (≤ 0.05). Results: Silica coating with silanization increased the bond strength significantly for all three high-strength ceramics (18.5 to 31.2 MPa) compared to that of airborne particle abrasion with 110-μm Al2O3 (12.7-17.3 MPa) (ANOVA, p < 0.05). PR exhibited the lowest bond strengths after both Al2O3 and silica coating (12.7 and 18.5 MPa, respectively). Conclusion: Conditioning the high-strength ceramic surfaces with silica coating and silanization provided higher bond strengths of the resin cement than with airborne particle abrasion with 110-μm Al2O3 and silanization.

Stress distribution in ceramic restorations over natural tooth using finite element analysis. lithium disilicate x aluminum oxide material

Background: Data on stress distribution in tooth-restoration interface with different ceramic restorative materials are limited. The aim of this chapter was to assess the stress distribution in the interface of ceramic restorations with laminate veneer or full-coverage crown with two different materials (lithium dissilicate and densely sintered aluminum oxide) under different loading areas through finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: Six two-dimensional finite element models were fabricated with different restorations on natural tooth: laminate veneer (IPS Empress, IPS Empress Esthetic and Procera AllCeram) or full-coverage crown (IPS e.max Press and Procera AllCeram). Two different loading areas (L) (50N) were also determined: palatal surface at 45° in relation to the long axis of tooth (L1) and perpendicular to the incisal edge (L2). A model with higid natural tooth was used as control. von Mises equivalent stress (σ vM) and maximum principal stress (σ max) were obtained on Ansys software. Results: The presence of ceramic restoration increased σ vM and σ max in the adhesive interface, mainly for the aluminum oxide (Procera AllCeram system) restorations. The full-coverage crowns generated higher stress in the adhesive interface under L1 while the same result was observed for the laminate veneers under L2. Conclusions: Lithium dissilicate and densely sintered aluminum oxide restorations exhibit different behavior due to different mechanical properties and loading conditions. © 2011 Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Influência do método de processamento na resistência à flexão, tração diametral e dureza dos sistemas cerâmicos

Pós-graduação em Reabilitação Oral - FOAR

Análise da distribuição das tensões em restaurações cerâmicas sobre dente natural e implante por meio do método dos elementos finitos

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Avaliação da microdureza de quatro cimentos resinosos duais fotopolimerizados através da interposição de diferentes materiais: estudo in vitro

Pós-graduação em Odontologia Restauradora - ICT

Avaliação da resistência adesiva entre a superfície de uma cerâmica aluminizada e um cimento resinoso

Pós-graduação em Odontologia Restauradora - ICT

Study of thermocycling effect on the bond strength between an aluminous ceramic and a resin cement

This study evaluated the effect of thermocycling on the bond strength between Procera AllCeram (Nobel-Biocare) and a resin cement (Panavia F, Kuraray CO). Nine ceramic blocks with dimensions of 5x6x6mm were conditioned at one face with Rocatec System (Espe). After, they were luted with Panavia F to composite resin blocks (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray CO). The nine groups formed by ceramic, cement and composite resin were split up obtaining 75 samples with dimensions of 12x1x1mm and adhesive surface presenting 1mm2±0.1mm2 of area. The samples were divided into 3 groups (n=25): G1 - 14 days in distilled water at 37ºC; G2 – 6,000 cycles in water (5ºC - 55ºC – 30s); G3 – 12,000 cycles in water (5ºC - 55ºC – 30s). The samples were tested in a universal testing machine (EMIC) at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests. The results indicated that mean values of rupture tension (MPa) of G1 (10.71 ± 3.54) did not differ statistically (p <5%) from G2 (9.01 ± 3.90), however there was statistical difference between G1 and G3 (7.28 ± 3.00). It was concluded that thermocycling significantly reduced the bond strength values when samples were submitted to 12,000 cycles.