954 resultados para Agricultural extension work.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Contribution from Extension service.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"May 1929."
Resumo:
At head of title: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Resumo:
At head of title: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Resumo:
Prepared at the request of Agency for International Development, by the division's Foreign Education Branch.
Resumo:
"Originally issued September 1937."
Resumo:
"September 1937."
Resumo:
Caption title.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Some no. in rev. editions.
Resumo:
Natural Resource Management project developing reources and supporting best practice management for irrigated cotton and grain growers in Queensland.
Resumo:
Purpose: Malawi’s current extension policy supports pluralism and advocates responsiveness to farmer demand. We investigate whether smallholder farmers’ experience supports the assumption that access to multiple service providers leads to extension and advisory services that respond to the needs of farmers. Design/methodology/approach: Within a case study approach, two villages were purposively selected for in-depth qualitative analysis of available services and farmers’ experiences. Focus group discussions were held separately with male and female farmers in each village, followed by semi-structured interviews with 12 key informants selected through snowball sampling. Transcripts were analysed by themes and summaries of themes were made from cross case analysis. Findings: Farmers appreciate having access to a variety of sources of technical advice and enterprise specific technology. However, most service providers continue to dominate and dictate what they will offer. Market access remains a challenge, as providers still emphasize pushing a particular technology to increase farm productivity rather than addressing farmers’ expressed needs. Although farmers work in groups, providers do not seek to strengthen these to enable active interaction and to link them to input and produce markets. This limits farmers’ capacity to continue with innovations after service providers pull out. Poor coordination between providers limits exploitation of potential synergies amongst actors. Practical implications: Services providers can adapt their approach to engage farmers in discussion of their needs and work collaboratively to address them. At a system level, institutions that have a coordination function can play a more dynamic role in brokering interaction between providers and farmers to ensure coverage and responsiveness. Originality/value: The study provides a new farmer perspective on the implementation of extension reforms.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.