Comparative analysis of adverse events between infliximab and adalimumab in Crohn's disease management: a Brazilian single-centre experience

INTRODUCTION: Data is scarce regarding adverse events (AE) of biological therapy used in the management of Crohn's Disease (CD) among Brazilian patients. OBJECTIVES: To analyse AE prevalence and profile in patients with CD treated with Infliximab (IFX) or Adalimumab (ADA) and to verify whether there are differences between the two drugs. METHOD: Retrospective observational single-centre study of CD patients on biological therapy. Variables analysed: Demographic data, Montreal classification, biological agent administered, treatment duration, presence and type of AE and the need for treatment interruption. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were analysed, 25 treated with ADA and 24 with IFX. The groups were homogeneous in relation to the variables studied. The average follow-up period for the group treated with ADA was 19.3 months and 21.8 months for the IFX group (p = 0.585). Overall, 40% (n = 10) of patients taking ADA had AE compared with 50% (n = 12) of IFX users (p = 0.571). There was a tendency towards higher incidence of cutaneous and infusion reactions in the IFX group and higher incidence of infections in the ADA treated group, although without significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in the AE prevalence and profile between ADA and IFX CD patients in the population studied.

Toxicity of High-Dose Intravitreal Adalimumab (Humira) in the Rabbit

Purpose: To evaluate the ocular toxicity of escalating doses of intravitreous adalimumab (Humira (R)) in the rabbit eye. Methods: Thirty New Zealand albino rabbits received intravitreous injections of 0.5mg (6 eyes), 1.0mg (6 eyes), 2.5mg (6 eyes), 5mg (6 eyes), and 10mg (6 eyes) adalimumab. Slit lamp biomicroscopy and fundoscopy were carried out at baseline, day 7, and day 14 after intravitreous injection, whereas electroretinography (ERG) was carried out at baseline and day 14. Animals were euthanized on day 14, and histopathological examination of the eyes was performed. Results: Slit lamp biomicroscopy and fundoscopy were normal in all eyes receiving doses up to 5mg. In the 10mg group, 3 of 6 eyes showed mild anterior chamber inflammatory reaction on day 7. Similarly, scotopic and photopic a- and b-wave ERG amplitudes at baseline and day 14 were similar in all groups up to 5mg, but there was a significant decrease in the photopic-wave ERG response in the 10mg group (P = 0.046). Finally, histopathology demonstrated no differences among eyes receiving balanced salt solution, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, or 10mg of adalimumab. Conclusions: Intravitreous adalimumab exhibited no associated ocular short-term toxicity in rabbit eyes up to the 5mg dose. In the 10mg group mild clinical findings and ERG amplitude reduction could reflect early toxicity.

Ocular toxicity of intravitreous adalimumab (Humira) in the rabbit

Purpose To evaluate the ocular toxicity of escalating doses of intravitreous adalimumab (Humira) in the rabbit eye. Methods Twelve New Zealand albino rabbits received unilateral intravitreous injections of 0.1 ml of adalimumab 0.25 mg (three eyes), 0.50 mg (three eyes), 1.0 mg (three eyes) or 0.1 ml balanced salt solution (BSS, threeeyes). Slit-lamp biomicroscopy and fundoscopy were carried out at baseline, day 1, 7 and 14 following intravitreous injection, while electroretinography (ERG) was carried out at baseline and day 14. Animals were euthanized on day 14, and histopathological examination of the eyes was performed. Results Slit-lamp biomicroscopy and fundoscopy were normal in eyes having received BSS, 0.25 mg or 0.50 mg adalimumab; however, inflammation was present in two of three eyes having received 1.0 mg adalimumab. Similarly, comparison of scotopic and photopic ERG light at baseline and day 14 demonstrated no changes in eyes receiving BSS, 0.25 mg or 0.50 mg adalimumab, but two of three eyes having received 1.0 mg adalimumab showed a greater than 30% reduction in a and b wave. Finally, histopathology demonstrated no differences between eyes receiving BSS, 0.25 mg or 0.50 mg of adalimumab, but two of three eyes injected with 1.0 mg demonstrated inflammatory cell infiltration of the vitreous and anterior chamber, with one of these eyes demonstrating retinal necrosis. Conclusions Escalating doses of intravitreous adalimumab in rabbit eyes caused no detectable functional or structural ocular toxicity up to a dose of 0.50 mg. Administration of 1.0 mg in 0.1 ml was associated with an inflammatory reaction and retinal necrosis.

A adaptação ao processo de mudança da forma de administração de Adalimumab 40 mg - perspectiva da enfermeira

Saúde e desenvolvimento

Exacerbation of Recalcitrant Cutaneous Sarcoidosis with Adalimumab - a Paradoxical Effect? A Case Report

The paradoxical adverse effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) antagonists have been described frequently as a result of the widespread use of these drugs. Among the TNF-alpha blocking agents, few reports exist relating the use of adalimumab in cutaneous sarcoidosis, although all of them show good results. More recently, sarcoidosis onsets have been reported with various TNF-alpha inhibitors. The current case is, to our knowledge, the first to describe the exacerbation of cutaneous lesions of sarcoidosis treated with adalimumab.

Adéquation et efficacité de l'Adalimumab dans une cohorte suisse multicentrique de patients avec maladie de Crohn

Résumé De nombreux essais cliniques randomisés ont démontré l'efficacité de l'adalimumab chez les patients atteints de maladie de Crohn modérée à sévère. Néanmoins, l'expérience sur le long terme est très limitée dans la pratique médicale quotidienne. But : Vérifier l'efficacité, la sûreté et l'adéquation de l'adalimumab dans une cohorte suisse multicentrique de patients atteints de maladie de Crohn. Méthode : Nous avons étudié rétrospectivement les dossiers de patients atteints de la maladie de Crohn traités par adalimumab sur une période de 3 ans. L'activité de la maladie a été mesurée par l'Index de Harvey-Bradshaw (HBI). Une rémission correspondant à un score <4 points et une réponse clinique à une diminution du HBI de >3 points par rapport au score pré-traitement. Pour évaluer l'adéquation de l'adalimumab, nous avons utilisé les critères développés par l'European Panel on the Appropriateness of Crohn's disease Therapy (EPACT II). Résultats : Les dossiers de 55 patients ont été analysés. Le taux de rémission et de réponse observés après 4 à 6 semaines était respectivement de 52.7% et 83.6%. La rémission a été maintenue à 12, 24 et 52 semaines chez respectivement 89.6%, 72.4% et 44.7% des patients. La rémission et la réponse clinique au traitement n'étaient pas correlés au status tabagique du patient, à la localisation ou la durée de la maladie, à la dose totale reçue le premier mois ou à un précédent traitement par infliximab. Le taux de rémission après 4 à 6 semaines de traitement était significativement plus élevé chez les patients ayant développés une intolérance à l'infliximab par rapport à ceux devenus réfractaires à ce traitement. L'adalimumab a été globalement bien toléré. 59 % des indications à l'adalimumab ont été adéquates. Conclusion : L'adalimumab peut être considéré comme un traitement efficace et approprié à long terme chez les patients avec une maladie de Crohn modérée à sévère.

Adalimumab in acute sciatica reduces the long-term need for surgery: a 3-year follow-up of a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Two subcutaneous injections of adalimumab in severe acute sciatica significantly reduced the number of back operations in a short-term randomised controlled clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To determine in a 3-year follow-up study whether the short-term benefit of adalimumab in sciatica is sustained over a longer period of time. METHODS: The primary outcome of this analysis was incident discectomy. Three years after randomisation, information on surgery could be retrieved in 56/61 patients (92%).A multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for potential confounders, was used to determine factors predisposing to surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-three (41%) patients had back surgery within 3 years, 8/29 (28%) in the adalimumab group and 15/27 (56%) in the placebo group, p=0.04. Adalimumab injections reduced the need for back surgery by 61% (HR)=0.39 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.92). In a multivariate model, treatment with a tumour necrosis factor-α antagonist remained the strongest protective factor (HR=0.17, p=0.002). Other significant predictors of surgery were a good correlation between symptoms and MRI findings (HR=11.6, p=0.04), baseline intensity of leg pain (HR=1.3, p=0.06), intensity of back pain (HR=1.4, p=0.03) and duration of sickness leave (HR=1.01 per day, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: A short course of adalimumab in patients with severe acute sciatica significantly reduces the need for back surgery.

Clinical experience with Adalimumab in a multicenter Swiss cohort of patients with Crohn's disease

Background. Des études précédentes ont démontré l'efficacité et la tolérance de l'adalimumab chez les patients avec maladie de Crohn modérée ou sévère. Les patients qu'on rencontre dans la pratique quotidienne peuvent être différents des patients rigoureusement sélectionnés dans les études contrôlées.But. Dans ce travail, nous résumons notre expérience avec l'adalimumab durant une période de 3 ans.Méthodes. Nous avons analysé rétrospectivement les dossiers de 55 patients atteints d'une maladie de Crohn modérée ou sévère et traités par adalimumab dans les hôpitaux universitaires de Bâle, Zurich, Genève et Lausanne, ainsi que dans un cabinet médical à Olten. Les informations collectées étaient les suivantes : données démographiques, localisation, phénotype et durée de la maladie, traitements chirurgicaux précédents, traitements précédents par anti-TNF alpha ou immunosuppresseur, le traitement concomitant et l'activité de la maladie à la « baseline » et durant le traitement. La sévérité de la maladie à l'inclusion a été établie en utilisant le score Harvey- Bradshaw Index (HBI). Durant le traitement, la rémission a été définie avec un HBI<4 et la réponse comme une réduction de l'HBI de plus de 3 points. L'analyse de régression logistique univariée a été utilisée pour déterminer si les variables étudiées étaient associées à la réponse ou à la rémission durant le traitement.Résultats. L'âge moyen des patients a été de 37.5 ± 11.4 ans et la durée moyenne de maladie à été de 12.7 ans. 29 des 55 patients étaient des fumeurs. Le traitement d'induction a été effectué chez 31 patients avec l'adalimumab en sous-cutané 160 mg à la semaine 0 et 80 mg à la semaine 2 et chez 24 patients avec 80 mg à la semaine 0 et 40 mg à la semaine 2. Le traitement d'entretien a été de 40 mg en sous-cutané toutes les 2 semaines. 13 patients (23.6%) ont nécessité l'augmentation de la dose d'adalimumab pour maintenir la rémission ou la réponse.Le taux de rémission et de réponse à la semaine 4-6 était de 52.7%, respectivement 83.6%. La rémission a été maintenue aux semaines 12, 24 et 52 chez 89.6%, 72.4%, respectivement 44.7% des patients. Le taux de rémission et de réponse n'a pas été influencé par le tabagisme, la location ou la durée de la maladie, la dose totale donnée durant le premier mois de traitement, la dose d'adalimumab par kilogramme-corps ou par le traitement précédent par infliximab. La rémission à la semaine 4-6 a été significativement plus élevée chez les patients intolérants à l'infliximab comparativement à ceux qui avaient perdu la réponse à l'infliximab (78.9% vs 42.1%, p=0.02). Le traitement par adalimumab a été bien toléré. Les effets secondaires les plus signalés ont été : la douleur au site d'injection (10.9%), l'asthénie (9%) et des infections (7.2%).Conclusions. L'adalimumab a démontré une bonne efficacité et tolérance dans la pratique quotidienne chez les patients avec une maladie de Crohn modérée ou sévère.

Estudi de l’efecte del tractament amb Adalimumab sobre la microbiota associada a la mucosa intestinal en pacients amb malaltia de Crohn.

La malaltia de Crohn és una malaltia inflamatòria intestinal en la qual s´ha observat que la densitat i la diversitat bacteriana difereixen dels subjectes sans. En els últims anys s’estan emprant tractaments biològics com els anti-TNFα (Adalimumab) de manera alternativa a tractaments ja existents. Els resultats obtinguts després de l’anàlisi de la composició bacteriana de la mucosa intestinal de pacients amb Malaltia de Crohn tractats amb Adalimumab, són esperançadors ja que apunten a una recuperació del patró normal a través de la recuperació d’espècies pròpies de persones sanes i la desaparició d’aquelles més prevalents en malalts de Crohn.

Adalimumab in Severe and Acute Sciatica (ASAS) : a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial : 1240

Background Based on several experimental results and on a preliminary study, a trial was undertaken to assess the efficacy of adalimumab, a TNF-α inhibitor, in patients with radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation. Methods A multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted between May 2005 and December 2007 in Switzerland. Patients with acute (< 12 weeks) and severe (Oswestry Disability index > 50) radicular leg pain and imaging-confirmed lumbar disc herniation were randomised to receive as adjuvant therapy either two subcutaneous injections of adalimumab (40 mg) at 7 days interval or matching placebo. The primary outcome was leg pain, which was recorded every day for 10 days and at 6-weeks and 6- months based on a visual analogue scale (0 to 100). Results Of the 265 patients screened, 61 were enrolled (adalimumab= 31) and 4 were lost to follow-up. Over time, the evolution of leg pain was more favourable in the adalimumab group than in the placebo group (p<0.001). However, the effect size was relatively small and at last follow-up the difference was 13.8 (CI95% -11.5 - 39.0). In the adalimumab group twice as many patients fulfilled the criteria for "responders" and for "low residual disease impact" ( p<0.05) and fewer surgical discectomies were performed (6 versus 13, p=0.04). Conclusion The addition of a short course of adalimumab to the treatment regimen of patients suffering from acute and severe sciatica resulted in a small decrease in leg pain and in significantly fewer surgical procedures.

Evaluación económica de la monoterapia con tocilizumab frente a adalimumab en artritis reumatoide.

BACKGROUND Tocilizumab (TCZ) was superior to adalimumab (ADA), as monotherapy, in reducing signs and symptoms of adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when methotrexate (MTX) treatment is poorly tolerated or inappropriate. The aim of the study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of TCZ vs ADA in these patients. METHODS Economic evaluation of the cost per response or remission of TCZ vs ADA from ADACTA (time horizon: 24 weeks). Clinical response criteria ACR or disease remission criteria, DAS28. PERSPECTIVE National Health System. The costs included (acquisition, administration and monitoring of medicines; € 2012) were obtained from Spanish sources. Simple univariate sensitivity analyzes were performed. RESULTS ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response rates with TCZ and ADA were obtained in 65% and 49.4% (p <0.01), 47.2% and 27.8% (p <0.01); and 32.5% and 17.9% (p <0.01) of patients, respectively. DAS28 remission occurred in 39.9% and 10.5%, respectively (p <0.0001). The cost per response was lower with TCZ than with ADA (ACR20: € 8,105 and € 11,553; ACR50: € 11,162 and € 20,529; ACR70: € 16,211 and € 31,882) respectively. The cost of DAS28 remission was € 13,204 and € 54,352, respectively. Treatment with TCZ was dominant (more effective, with lower costs vs ADA) in all scenarios analyzed. CONCLUSIONS According to this analysis, in Spain TCZ monotherapy is an efficient strategy vs ADA for treating RA patients intolerant to MTX or in which there is inappropriate response.

Miller-Fisher syndrome in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab.

Adalimumab is a frequently prescribed TNFalpha inhibitor for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. We report on a patient who probably developed a Miller-Fisher syndrome after the second injection of adalimumab.

Clinical experience with adalimumab in a multicenter Swiss cohort of patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD), but there is, however, only limited long-term experience with adalimumab in daily practice. AIM: To assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in a multicenter cohort of practice-based patients with moderate-to-severe CD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of CD patients who received adalimumab over a 3-year period. Disease severity was scored using the Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI). Remission was defined as an HBI of <or=4 and response as a reduction in the HBI of >3 points at evaluation compared to the baseline. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the predictive variables associated with response. RESULTS: The charts of 55 patients were reviewed; remission and response rates observed at weeks 4-6 were 52.7 and 83.6%, respectively. Remission was maintained at weeks 12, 24 and 52 in 89.6, 72.4 and 44.7% of patients, respectively. Remission and response rates were not influenced by smoking status, disease location or duration, the first month total dose, or previous infliximab therapy. The remission rate at weeks 4-6 was significantly higher in patients intolerant of infliximab as compared to those who lost response to this drug. Adalimumab was well tolerated overall. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab can be considered a suitable option in patients with moderate-to-severe CD, demonstrating sustained long-term effectiveness.