922 resultados para 551.46


Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação de Mestrado, Estudos Marinhos e Costeiros, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade do Algarve, 2009

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Tese de dout., Ciências do Mar, Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Univ. do Algarve, 2006

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação de Mestrado, Oceanografia, Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve, 2007

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação mest., Oceanografia, Universidade do Algarve, 2009

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Disssertação de mest., Estudos Marinhos e Costeiros, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Univ. do Algarve, 2010

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Tese de dout., Ciências do Mar, da Terra e do Ambiente (Ciências do Mar-Oceanografia Física), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Univ. do Algarve, 2011

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Tese de dout., Ciências do Mar (Geologia Marinha), Unidade de Ciências e Tecnologias dos Recursos Aquáticos, Univ. do Algarve, 1998

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Tese de dout., Ciências do Mar, Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Univ. do Algarve, 2005

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Tese de dout., Ciências do Mar, Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Univ. do Algarve, 2003

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The purpose of this article is to highlight the conflict in the policy objectives of subs 46(1) and subs 46(1AA) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (TPA). The policy objective of subs 46(1) is to promote competition and efficient markets for the benefit of consumers (consumer welfare standard). It does not prohibit corporations with substantial market power using cost savings arising from efficiencies such economies of scale or scope, to undercut small business competitors The policy objective of 46(1AA), on the other hand, is to protect small business operators from price discounting by their larger competitors.. Unlike subs 46(1), it does not contain a ‘taking advantage’ element. It is argued that subs 46(1AA) may harm consumer welfare by having a chilling effect on price competition if this would harm small business competitors.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

an initial public offering, the choices made by issuers, such as the offer price, might not appear to be wealth maximizing. In this article, we argue that the choices are strategic. Based on the model developed by Barry (1989), we show that the average change in the issuer's wealth (4.52 per cent) is lower than the average loss implied by underpricing (12.09 per cent). Our results support the notion that the choices issuers make at the offering generate a compensatory benefit in the aftermarket. That the issuer may well not suffer a net wealth loss from the offering is in accordance with continued initial public offering activity.