Méthodes de génération et de validation de champs de déformation pour la recombinaison de distribution de dose à l’aide d’images 4DCT dans le cadre d’une planification de traitement de cancers pulmonaires

Des efforts de recherche considérables ont été déployés afin d'améliorer les résultats de traitement de cancers pulmonaires. L'étude de la déformation de l'anatomie du patient causée par la ventilation pulmonaire est au coeur du processus de planification de traitement radio-oncologique. À l'aide d'images de tomodensitométrie quadridimensionnelles (4DCT), une simulation dosimétrique peut être calculée sur les 10 ensembles d'images du 4DCT. Une méthode doit être employée afin de recombiner la dose de radiation calculée sur les 10 anatomies représentant une phase du cycle respiratoire. L'utilisation de recalage déformable d'images (DIR), une méthode de traitement d'images numériques, génère neuf champs vectoriels de déformation permettant de rapporter neuf ensembles d'images sur un ensemble de référence correspondant habituellement à la phase d'expiration profonde du cycle respiratoire. L'objectif de ce projet est d'établir une méthode de génération de champs de déformation à l'aide de la DIR conjointement à une méthode de validation de leur précision. Pour y parvenir, une méthode de segmentation automatique basée sur la déformation surfacique de surface à été créée. Cet algorithme permet d'obtenir un champ de déformation surfacique qui décrit le mouvement de l'enveloppe pulmonaire. Une interpolation volumétrique est ensuite appliquée dans le volume pulmonaire afin d'approximer la déformation interne des poumons. Finalement, une représentation en graphe de la vascularisation interne du poumon a été développée afin de permettre la validation du champ de déformation. Chez 15 patients, une erreur de recouvrement volumique de 7.6 ± 2.5[%] / 6.8 ± 2.1[%] et une différence relative des volumes de 6.8 ± 2.4 [%] / 5.9 ± 1.9 [%] ont été calculées pour le poumon gauche et droit respectivement. Une distance symétrique moyenne 0.8 ± 0.2 [mm] / 0.8 ± 0.2 [mm], une distance symétrique moyenne quadratique de 1.2 ± 0.2 [mm] / 1.3 ± 0.3 [mm] et une distance symétrique maximale 7.7 ± 2.4 [mm] / 10.2 ± 5.2 [mm] ont aussi été calculées pour le poumon gauche et droit respectivement. Finalement, 320 ± 51 bifurcations ont été détectées dans le poumons droit d'un patient, soit 92 ± 10 et 228 ± 45 bifurcations dans la portion supérieure et inférieure respectivement. Nous avons été en mesure d'obtenir des champs de déformation nécessaires pour la recombinaison de dose lors de la planification de traitement radio-oncologique à l'aide de la méthode de déformation hiérarchique des surfaces. Nous avons été en mesure de détecter les bifurcations de la vascularisation pour la validation de ces champs de déformation.

Improving 4D plan quality for PBS-based liver tumour treatments by combining online image guided beam gating with rescanning.

Pencil beam scanned (PBS) proton therapy has many advantages over conventional radiotherapy, but its effectiveness for treating mobile tumours remains questionable. Gating dose delivery to the breathing pattern is a well-developed method in conventional radiotherapy for mitigating tumour-motion, but its clinical efficiency for PBS proton therapy is not yet well documented. In this study, the dosimetric benefits and the treatment efficiency of beam gating for PBS proton therapy has been comprehensively evaluated. A series of dedicated 4D dose calculations (4DDC) have been performed on 9 different 4DCT(MRI) liver data sets, which give realistic 4DCT extracting motion information from 4DMRI. The value of 4DCT(MRI) is its capability of providing not only patient geometries and deformable breathing characteristics, but also includes variations in the breathing patterns between breathing cycles. In order to monitor target motion and derive a gating signal, we simulate time-resolved beams' eye view (BEV) x-ray images as an online motion surrogate. 4DDCs have been performed using three amplitude-based gating window sizes (10/5/3 mm) with motion surrogates derived from either pre-implanted fiducial markers or the diaphragm. In addition, gating has also been simulated in combination with up to 19 times rescanning using either volumetric or layered approaches. The quality of the resulting 4DDC plans has been quantified in terms of the plan homogeneity index (HI), total treatment time and duty cycle. Results show that neither beam gating nor rescanning alone can fully retrieve the plan homogeneity of the static reference plan. Especially for variable breathing patterns, reductions of the effective duty cycle to as low as 10% have been observed with the smallest gating rescanning window (3 mm), implying that gating on its own for such cases would result in much longer treatment times. In addition, when rescanning is applied on its own, large differences between volumetric and layered rescanning have been observed as a function of increasing number of re-scans. However, once gating and rescanning is combined, HI to within 2% of the static plan could be achieved in the clinical target volume, with only moderately prolonged treatment times, irrespective of the rescanning strategy used. Moreover, these results are independent of the motion surrogate used. In conclusion, our results suggest image guided beam gating, combined with rescanning, is a feasible, effective and efficient motion mitigation approach for PBS-based liver tumour treatments.

Comparison of Tumor Shrinkage and Cumulative Dose Distribution for Lung Cancers

Background: The physical characteristic of protons is that they deliver most of their radiation dose to the target volume and deliver no dose to the normal tissue distal to the tumor. Previously, numerous studies have shown unique advantages of proton therapy over intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in conforming dose to the tumor and sparing dose to the surrounding normal tissues and the critical structures in many clinical sites. However, proton therapy is known to be more sensitive to treatment uncertainties such as inter- and intra-fractional variations in patient anatomy. To date, no study has clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of proton therapy compared with the conventional IMRT under the consideration of both respiratory motion and tumor shrinkage in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Purpose: This thesis investigated two questions for establishing a clinically relevant comparison of the two different modalities (IMRT and proton therapy). The first question was whether or not there are any differences in tumor shrinkage between patients randomized to IMRT versus passively scattered proton therapy (PSPT). Tumor shrinkage is considered a standard measure of radiation therapy response that has been widely used to gauge a short-term progression of radiation therapy. The second question was whether or not there are any differences between the planned dose and 5D dose under the influence of inter- and intra-fractional variations in the patient anatomy for both modalities. Methods: A total of 45 patients (25 IMRT patients and 20 PSPT patients) were used to quantify the tumor shrinkage in terms of the change of the primary gross tumor volume (GTVp). All patients were randomized to receive either IMRT or PSPT for NSCLC. Treatment planning goals were identical for both groups. All patients received 5 to 8 weekly repeated 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans during the course of radiation treatments. The original GTVp contours were propagated to T50 of weekly 4DCT images using deformable image registration and their absolute volumes were measured. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the distribution of tumor shrinkage between the two population groups. In order to investigate the difference between the planned dose and the 5D dose with consideration of both breathing motion and anatomical change, we re-calculated new dose distributions at every phase of the breathing cycle for all available weekly 4DCT data sets which resulted 50 to 80 individual dose calculations for each of the 7 patients presented in this thesis. The newly calculated dose distributions were then deformed and accumulated to T50 of the planning 4DCT for comparison with the planned dose distribution. Results: At the end of the treatment, both IMRT and PSPT groups showed mean tumor volume reductions of 23.6% ( 19.2%) and 20.9% ( 17.0 %) respectively. Moreover, the mean difference in tumor shrinkage between two groups is 3% along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval, [-8%, 14%]. The rate of tumor shrinkage was highly correlated with the initial tumor volume size. For the planning dose and 5D dose comparison study, all 7 patients showed a mean difference of 1 % in terms of target coverage for both IMRT and PSPT treatment plans. Conclusions: The results of the tumor shrinkage investigation showed no statistically significant difference in tumor shrinkage between the IMRT and PSPT patients, and the tumor shrinkage between the two modalities is similar based on the 95% confidence interval. From the pilot study of comparing the planned dose with the 5D dose, we found the difference to be only 1%. Overall impression of the two modalities in terms of treatment response as measured by the tumor shrinkage and 5D dose under the influence of anatomical change that were designed under the same protocol (i.e. randomized trial) showed similar result.