Auditory motion affects visual biological motion processing.

The processing of biological motion is a critical, everyday task performed with remarkable efficiency by human sensory systems. Interest in this ability has focused to a large extent on biological motion processing in the visual modality (see, for example, Cutting, J. E., Moore, C., & Morrison, R. (1988). Masking the motions of human gait. Perception and Psychophysics, 44(4), 339-347). In naturalistic settings, however, it is often the case that biological motion is defined by input to more than one sensory modality. For this reason, here in a series of experiments we investigate behavioural correlates of multisensory, in particular audiovisual, integration in the processing of biological motion cues. More specifically, using a new psychophysical paradigm we investigate the effect of suprathreshold auditory motion on perceptions of visually defined biological motion. Unlike data from previous studies investigating audiovisual integration in linear motion processing [Meyer, G. F. & Wuerger, S. M. (2001). Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals. Neuroreport, 12(11), 2557-2560; Wuerger, S. M., Hofbauer, M., & Meyer, G. F. (2003). The integration of auditory and motion signals at threshold. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(8), 1188-1196; Alais, D. & Burr, D. (2004). No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 185-194], we report the existence of direction-selective effects: relative to control (stationary) auditory conditions, auditory motion in the same direction as the visually defined biological motion target increased its detectability, whereas auditory motion in the opposite direction had the inverse effect. Our data suggest these effects do not arise through general shifts in visuo-spatial attention, but instead are a consequence of motion-sensitive, direction-tuned integration mechanisms that are, if not unique to biological visual motion, at least not common to all types of visual motion. Based on these data and evidence from neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies we discuss the neural mechanisms likely to underlie this effect.

Baroreflex and chemoreflex dysfunction in streptozotocin-diabetic rats

Several investigators have demonstrated that streptozotocin (STZ) diabetes induces changes in the autonomic control of the cardiovascular system. Changes in cardiovascular function may be related to peripheral neuropathy. The aim of the present study was to analyze changes in heart rate (HR) and arterial pressure (AP) as well as baroreflex and chemoreflex sensitivity in STZ-induced diabetic male Wistar rats (STZ, 50 mg/kg, iv, 15 days). Intra-arterial blood pressure signals were obtained for control and diabetic rats (N = 9, each group). Data were processed in a data acquisition system (CODAS, 1 kHz). Baroreflex sensitivity was evaluated by measuring heart rate changes induced by arterial pressure variation produced by phenylephrine and sodium nitroprusside injection. Increasing doses of potassium cyanide (KCN) were used to evaluate bradycardic and pressor responses evoked by chemoreflex activation. STZ induced hyperglycemia (447 ± 49 vs 126 ± 3 mg/dl), and a reduction in AP (99 ± 3 vs 118 ± 2 mmHg), resting HR (296 ± 11 vs 355 ± 16 bpm) and plasma insulin levels (16 ± 1 vs 57 ± 11 µU/ml). We also observed that the reflex bradycardia (-1.68 ± 0.1 vs -1.25 ± 0.1 bpm/mmHg, in the diabetic group) and tachycardia (-3.68 ± 0.5 vs -1.75 ± 0.3 bpm/mmHg, in the diabetic group) produced by vasopressor and depressor agents were impaired in the diabetic group. Bradycardia evoked by chemoreflex activation was attenuated in diabetic rats (control: -17 ± 1, -86 ± 19, -185 ± 18, -208 ± 17 vs diabetic: -7 ± 1, -23 ± 5, -95 ± 13, -140 ± 13 bpm), as also was the pressor response (control: 6 ± 1, 30 ± 7, 54 ± 4, 59 ± 5 vs diabetic: 6 ± 1, 8 ± 2, 33 ± 4, 42 ± 5 mmHg). In conclusion, the cardiovascular responses evoked by baroreflex and chemoreflex activation are impaired in diabetic rats. The alterations of cardiovascular responses may be secondary to the autonomic dysfunction of cardiovascular control

Memorias del III Congreso Internacional de Lectura y Escritura. Lectura y Escritura: Ejes de una Escuela de Calidad. Quito, 6, 7 y 8 de junio de 2007

El III Congreso Internacional de Lectura y Escritura “Lectura y escritura: ejes de una educación de calidad” fue pensado como un espacio de debate plural en torno a la pedagogía de la lectura y de la escritura, encaminado a la construcción colectiva de propuestas innovadoras que aporten al mejoramiento de la calidad educativa. Cerca de doscientos docentes, directivos e investigadores de la educación de todo el país participaron de las experiencias y aprendizajes desarrollados en el marco del Proyecto CECM, se vincularon a las últimas investigaciones sobre la didáctica de la lectura y escritura y reconocieron que la enseñanza signifi cativa de estas competencias comunicativas puede refutar el “determinismo socio-cultural” con el que tradicionalmente se ha explicado el fracaso de los y las estudiantes de los sectores sociales más desprotegidos: niño pobre – escuela pobre – futuro pobre transformarlo a: niño pobre – escuela de calidad – futuro de calidad. La programación del Congreso incluyó el dictado de dos conferencias magistrales que se reproducen y de las conferencias realizadas.