Effects of gonadotropin-exposed medium with high concentrations of progesterone and estradiol-17 beta on in vitro maturation of canine oocytes

During the process of maturation in the oviduct, canine oocytes in the germinal vesicle stage are exposed to decreasing levels of estradiol-17 beta and increasing levels of progesterone. However, hormone concentrations in the microenvironments in which they act are higher than serum concentrations. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the meiotic competence of canine oocytes harvested from anestrous bitches in culture medium containing high concentrations (20 mu g ml(-1)) of estradiol-17 beta and/or progesterone in association to gonadotropins (luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone) using three different maturation periods (48, 72, and 96 h). Oocytes were cultured in tissue culture medium (TCM-199) and arranged in four experimental groups: group control, group E2 (estradiol-17 beta), group P4 (progesterone), and group E2 + P4. Regardless of the maturation period, groups P4 and E2 + P4 presented statistically higher rate of germinal vesicle breakdown oocytes compared to the group control and group E2. There were no significant differences among groups on germinal vesicle, metaphase I, metaphase II, and degenerated or unidentifiable oocytes rates. The mean percentage of metaphase II oocytes was higher at 96 h when compared to 72 h. Results of the present research indicate no influence of estradiol-17 beta supplementation, unless in association with progesterone. There is an evidence of the positive effect of progesterone on germinal vesicle breakdown. Results also showed that extended periods of in vitro maturation affect positively maturation rates to metaphase II of low competent oocytes harvested from anestrous bitches, independent of the maturation media. In conclusion, high concentrations of steroids, especially progesterone, have positive effect on in vitro oocyte maturation when the oocytes are derived from the anestrous status.

Tooth Replantation After Use of Euro-Coffins Solution or Bovine Milk as Storage Medium: A Histomorphometric Analysis in Dogs

Purpose: Euro-Collins solution was developed for the preservation of organs for transplantation, whose characteristics have raised interest for its use as a storage medium for avulsed teeth before replantation. This study evaluated histologically and morphometrically the healing process of dog teeth replanted after storage in Euro-Collins solution or bovine milk. Materials and Methods: Eighty roots of 4 young adult mongrel clogs were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 20) and the root canals were instrumented and obturated with gutta-percha and a calcium hydroxide-based sealer. After 2 weeks, the teeth were extracted and subjected to the following protocols: GI (negative control), replantation immediately after extraction; GII (positive control), bench-drying for 2 hours before replantation; GIII and GIV, immersion in 10 mL of whole bovine milk and Euro-Collins solution at 4 C, respectively, for 8 hours before replantation. The animals were sacrificed 90 days postoperatively. The pieces containing the replanted teeth were subjected to routine processing for histologic and histometric analyses under light microscopy and polarized light microscopy. Results: Root resorption was observed in all groups. GII exhibited the greatest loss of dental structure (P < .01), and inflammatory resorption was predominant in this group. Storage in milk showed poorer results than immediate replantation and storage in Euro-Collins solution (P < .01). The teeth stored in Euro-Collins solution presented similar extension of root resorption and periodontal ligament reorganization to those of immediately replanted teeth. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the Euro-Collins solution is an adequate storage medium for keeping avulsed teeth for up to 8 hours before replantation. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved. Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:111-119, 2010