Religion as Social Reality. A Take on the Emic–Etic Debate in Light of John Searle’s Philosophy of Society

In this article I argue that the shift from a private to a public–social understanding of religion raises new ontological and epistemological questions for the scientific study of religion\s. These questions are deeply related to three central features of the emic– etic debate, namely the problems of intentionality, objectivity, and comparison. Focusing on these interrelated issues, I discuss the potential of John Searle’s philoso- phy of society for the scientific study of religion\s. Considering the role of intentional- ity at the social level, I present Searle’s concept of “social ontology” and discuss its epistemological implications. To clarify Searle’s position regarding the objectivity of the social sciences, I propose a heuristic model contrasting different stances within the scientific study of religion\s. Finally, I explore some problematic aspects of Searle’s views for a comparative study of religion\s, and sketch a solution within his frame- work. I shall argue that a distinction between the epistemological and ontological dimensions of religious affairs would help clarify the issues at stake in the past and future of the emic–etic debate.

Dramas of Recognition: Philosophy as Literary History

Offers a critique of the concept of recognition (Honneth, Fraser), arguing that, from a literary-historical perspective, it connstitutes a step back behing modernism toward the agenda of Realism.

Eric D. Perl, Theophany. The Neoplatonic Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite, State University of New York Press (SUNY series in ancient Greek philosophy), 2007. 163 p., ISBN-13: 978-0-7914-7111-1

Fil: Caram, Gabriela de los Ángeles.

The Philosophical Forum. Published with the cooperation of the Departament of Philosophy of Baruch College of the City University of New York, v. XX, n. 1-2, Fall-Winter 1988-89

Fil: Jalif de Bertranou, Clara Alicia.

Walter Bernard Redmond: Bibliography of the philosophy in the iberian colonies of América. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1972.

Fil: Ares, Consuelo.

Irven M. Resnick (Ed.), A companion to Albert the Great. Theology, Philosophy and the sciences, Leiden- Boston, Brill, 2013, ISBN 978-90-04-23407-9, 833 págs.

Fil: Costarelli Brandi, Hugo Emilio. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo

Elements of the reception of aristotelian thought in 19th century german-language philosophy and economics

La cuestión de la interpretación de Aristóteles por parte de la Academia alemana del siglo XIX es de interés tanto para filósofos como para economistas. Esto se debe a que el pensamiento clásico constituyó una cuestión de discusión e inspiración para el Idealismo, el Hegelianismo, el Historicismo y los economistas históricos alemanes (comenzando por Roscher) y su oponente austríaco, Carl Menger, fundador de la Escuela Austríaca de Economía. De este modo la filosofía antigua permaneció vigente. Al evaluar esta recepción, en este trabajo se muestra que el debate sobre entidades colectivas versus individualidad encuentra allí una base, y el individualismo metodológico, una justificación. Esto resulta útil aún hoy en el siglo veintiuno, en que presenciamos una crisis de la corriente principal de la economía.

A.A.V.V.: Reason, morality, and law. The philosophy of John Finnis, J. Keown & R.P. George (eds.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, 616 pp.

Fil: Massini Correas, Carlos I.. Universidad de Mendoza

S. E. Wilmer and Audrone Zukauskaite. Interrogating Antigone in Postmodern Philosophy and Criticism. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 2010 pp: ix + 448

Fil: Saravia de Grossi, María Inés. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.

Dragonetti, Carmen and Fernando Tola, On the Myth of the Opposition between Indian Thought and Western Philosophy, Hildesheim-Zürich-New York, Georg Olms Verlag, 2004, 293 pp

Fil: Rollié, Emilio Federico. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.