Iowa Utilities Board Fiscal Year 2002 Regulatory Plan Prepared Pursuant to Executive Order Nine, August 1, 2001

Report for the Iowa Utilities Board

Specific vs general cognitive remediation for executive functioning in schizophrenia: A multicenter randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses the benefits of an individualized therapy (RECOS program) compared with the more general cognitive remediation therapy (CRT). METHODS: 138 participants took part with 65 randomized to CRT and 73 to RECOS. In the RECOS group, participants were directed towards one of five training modules (verbal memory, visuo-spatial memory and attention, working memory, selective attention or reasoning) corresponding to their key cognitive concern whereas the CRT group received a standard program. The main outcome was the total score on BADS (Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome) and the secondary outcomes were: cognition (executive functions; selective attention; visuospatial memory and attention; verbal memory; working memory) and clinical measures (symptoms; insight; neurocognitive complaints; self-esteem). All outcomes were assessed at baseline (T1), week 12 (posttherapy, T2), and follow-up (week 36, i.e., 6months posttherapy, T3). RESULTS: No difference was shown for the main outcome. A significant improvement was found for BADS' profile score for RECOS at T2 and T3, and for CRT at T3. Change in BADS in the RECOS and CRT arms were not significantly different between T1 and T2 (+0.86, p=0.108), or between T1 and T3 (+0.36, p=0.540). Significant improvements were found in several secondary outcomes including cognition (executive functions, selective attention, verbal memory, and visuospatial abilities) and clinician measures (symptoms and awareness to be hampered by cognitive deficits in everyday) in both treatment arms following treatment. Self-esteem improved only in RECOS arm at T3, and working memory improved only in CRT arm at T2 and T3, but there were no differences in changes between arms. CONCLUSIONS: RECOS (specific remediation) and CRT (general remediation) globally showed similar efficacy in the present trial.

Iowa Utilities Board Fiscal Year 2004 Regulatory Plans Pursuant to Executive Order Nine, August 1, 2003

Report for Iowa Utilities Board

Final Report on the Polk County Adult Drug Court Executive Summary and Summary of Findings, 2001

An evaluation has been conducted on the Polk County Drug Court, comparing clients entering the program from its inception through September 30, 1998 with a group of revoked probationers from FY96 (the “pilot group”) and other offenders referred to drug court who did not enter the program (the “referred group”).

Iowa Utilities Board Fiscal Year 2005 Regulatory Plan Pursuant to Executive Order Nine, August 2, 2004

Regulatory Plan for Fiscal Year 2005

Iowa Utilities Board Fiscal Year 2003 Regulatory Plan Prepared Pursuant to Executive Order Nine, August 26, 2002

Regulatory Plan for Fiscal Year 2003

Report of Recommendations to the University of Northern Iowa on a Review of Selected General and Application Controls over the Modern Executive Management Financial Information System, June 7, 2004 through July 29, 2004

State University Audit Report

Report of Recommendations to the University of Northern Iowa on the Review of Selected General and Application Controls Over the Modern Executive Management Financial Information, June 2 to July 17, 2003

State University Audit Report

Executive Order Number Ten, September 1999

Executive order signed by Governor Thomas Vilsck

Executive Order Number One, January 1999

Excecutive order signed by Governor Thomas Vilsck

Executive Order Number Two, February 1999

Executive order signed by Governor Thomas Vilsck

Executive Order Number Three, February 1999

Executive order signed by Governor Thomas Vilsck

Executive Order Number Four, February 1999

Executive order signed by Governor Thomas Vilsck

Executive Order Number Five, March 1999

Executive order signed by Governor Thomas Vilsck