Petrology and geochemistry of basalts at DSDP Hole 86-581

Approximately 5 m of aphyric to sparsely phyric basalt was recovered from Hole 581, the only hole on Leg 86 where basement was cored. The occurrence of samples with altered glassy rinds indicates that at least three cooling units (pillows or thin flows) were sampled. The samples were moderately to intensely altered; groundmass crystals are generally fresh, but all glass is altered. Alteration is greatest in vesicular samples, but most of the samples have fractures filled with iron oxyhydroxide, clay, and/or calcite. All 13 samples analyzed are moderately fractionated aluminous N-type mid-ocean ridge basalts. The samples can be divided into two groups based on TiO2 and FeO contents. The least-evolved group may be derived from a more primitive mid-ocean ridge basalt by the crystallization of 18% plagioclase, 24% clinopyroxene, and 3% olivine. The more evolved group may be derived from the first group by the fractionation of 18% plagioclase, 11% clinopyroxene, and 3% olivine. However, higher Ce/Yb ratios in the more evolved group cannot be produced by fractionation and thus we must invoke a more complex process such as dynamic melting to relate the two groups to a common source.

(Table 1) Climate characteristics of the four North American Tundra Experiment (ITEX) sites

Climate warming is expected to differentially affect CO2 exchange of the diverse ecosystems in the Arctic. Quantifying responses of CO2 exchange to warming in these ecosystems will require coordinated experimentation using standard temperature manipulations and measurements. Here, we used the International Tundra Experiment (ITEX) standard warming treatment to determine CO2 flux responses to growing-season warming for ecosystems spanning natural temperature and moisture ranges across the Arctic biome. We used the four North American Arctic ITEX sites (Toolik Lake, Atqasuk, and Barrow [USA] and Alexandra Fiord [Canada]) that span 10° of latitude. At each site, we investigated the CO2 responses to warming in both dry and wet or moist ecosystems. Net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE), ecosystem respiration (ER), and gross ecosystem photosynthesis (GEP) were assessed using chamber techniques conducted over 24-h periods sampled regularly throughout the summers of two years at all sites. At Toolik Lake, warming increased net CO2 losses in both moist and dry ecosystems. In contrast, at Atqasuk and Barrow, warming increased net CO2 uptake in wet ecosystems but increased losses from dry ecosystems. At Alexandra Fiord, warming improved net carbon uptake in the moist ecosystem in both years, but in the wet and dry ecosystems uptake increased in one year and decreased the other. Warming generally increased ER, with the largest increases in dry ecosystems. In wet ecosystems, high soil moisture limited increases in respiration relative to increases in photosynthesis. Warming generally increased GEP, with the notable exception of the Toolik Lake moist ecosystem, where warming unexpectedly decreased GEP >25%. Overall, the respiration response determined the effect of warming on ecosystem CO2 balance. Our results provide the first multiple-site comparison of arctic tundra CO2 flux responses to standard warming treatments across a large climate gradient. These results indicate that (1) dry tundra may be initially the most responsive ecosystems to climate warming by virtue of strong increases in ER, (2) moist and wet tundra responses are dampened by higher water tables and soil water contents, and (3) both GEP and ER are responsive to climate warming, but the magnitudes and directions are ecosystem-dependent.