978 resultados para National Institute of Justice (U.S.)


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Shipping list no.: 96-0088-P.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Item 1070-M

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Shipping list no.: 90-207-P.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Estudio descriptivo de pacientes con ictus isquémico ingresados en el Hospital Vicente Corral dentro de las 24 horas de inicio de síntomas, desde enero a diciembre de 2004. El daño neurológico inicial fue cuantificado usando la NIHSS. El desenlace neurológico fue valorado a los 7 días y 3 meses utilizando el Indice de Barthel. Resultados: De 75 pacientes ingresados en el período de estudio, 24 cumplieron los criterios de inclusión y 23 completaron el seguimiento. A los 3 meses 66.7de pacientes, con puntaje inicial NIHSS menor que 6 evolucionaron a un resultado excelente. Los pacientes con un puntaje NIHSS igual o mayor que 16 tuvieron un mal desenlace. El 50de pacientes con un puntaje de 16 a 20 y los pacientes con puntaje mayor que 20 fallecieron. En el análisis estadístico, un puntaje mayor a 13 tuvo un Odds Ratio de 49.5 (IC 954.5 - 480.5) para un desenlace fatal a los 3 meses. La asociación fue significativa lo que otorga al punto de corte de 13 puntos una gran validez para pronosticar un buen o mal desenlace. Conclusión. Aplicando el NIHSS a los pacientes con ictus isquémico observamos que un puntaje igual o mayor a 16 predice una alta probabilidad de muerte o severa incapacidad, mientras que un puntaje igual o menor a 6 pronostica una buena recuperación. Descriptores DeCS. Ictus isquémico, NIHSS, Índice de Barthel

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The “political” dynamics and the details of conducting criminological research on a day-to-day basis are examined. The role of government and commercial contracts in contemporary criminological scholarship are explored, as well as the various obstacles that criminologists must negotiate during the completion of a research project. The criminological implications of the ways in which academic environments are changing under new managerialist philosophies are examined. The ways in which notions of “critique” have become subordinate to the politics of existing governing rationalities are also examined. Chapter 1 details the questions, contours, and methods of “deviant knowledge.” Chapter 2 discusses the contours of criminological knowledge, including early criminological developments, international reconstruction and developments in criminological research following World War II, the United Nations, and the rise of critical genres. Chapter 3 explores criminology, government, and public policy, including the policies of the Home Office of England and Wales; the National Institute of Justice in Washington, DC; and the Australian Institute of Criminology in Canberra. The politics and control of criminological knowledge are discussed in chapter 4, along with ethical and legal issues, gathering and accessing data, and publishing results of research. Chapter 5 describes the “War on Terror” and government intolerance and suppression of free speech. Chapter 6 examines the new modes of governance and the commercialization of criminological knowledge. Chapter 7 discusses intellectual independence and collective concern, and the value of critique. 3 appendices, 546 references, index

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"RC 013246"--Cover.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Distributed to depository libraries in microfiche.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"The material in this publication was prepared pursuant to a contract with the National Institute of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare."