Greek, Latin, and the Indian Civil Service

This is a slightly revised version of an article first published in the Cambridge Classical Journal, vol. 51 (2005), pp. 35-71.

Brill Greek, Adobe Arno Pro, Adobe Text/Brevier Greek typefaces

Typeface design: a series of collaborative projects commissioned by Adobe, Inc. and Brill to develop extensive polytonic Greek typefaces. The two Adobe typefaces can be seen as extension of previous research for the Garamond Premier Pro family (2005), and concludes a research theme started in 1998 with work for Adobe’s Minion Pro Greek. These typefaces together define the state of the art for text-intensive Greek typesetting for wide character set texts (from classical texts, to poetry, to essays, to prose). They serve both as exemplar for other developers, and as vehicles for developing the potential of Greek text typography, for example with the parallel inclusion of monotonic and polytonic characters, detailed localised punctuation options, fluid handling of case-conversion issues, and innovative options such as accented small caps (originally requested by bibliographers, and subsequently rolled out to a general user base). The Brill typeface (for the established academic publisher) has an exceptionally wide character set to cover several academic disciplines, and is intended to differentiate sufficiently from its partner Latin typeface, while maintaining a clear texture in both offset and low-resolution print-on-demand reproduction. This work involved substantial amounts of testing and modifying the design, especially of diacritics, to maintain clarity the readability of unfamiliar words. All together these typefaces form a study in how Greek typesetting meets contemporary typographic requirements, while resonating with historically accurate styles, where these are present. Significant research in printing archives helped to identify appropriate styles, as well as originate variants that are coherent stylistically, even when historical equivalents were absent.

Reported assembly scenes in Greek Tragedy

This paper presents a detailed consideration of the three democratic assembly meetings that are reported in Greek tragedy. The three scenes in their different ways reveal a preoccupation with a tension between elite rhetoric and popular wisdom in a democracy. Behind this preoccupation lies a shared assumption: that many people attended assemblies expecting their minds to be made up; and that persuasive oratory and the popular judgment of persuasive oratory could have a decisive influence on a vote.

Introduction: the legacy of Greek political thought

This Introduction offers context for the individual papers by examining the intersections and productive tensions between political thought and classical reception studies. While Plato and Aristotle have long been privileged interlocutors for political philosophers, classical reception studies has pluralised both this ancient canon and given rise to a more complex understanding of the modern heirs of ancient political thought. Similarly, the insights of studying the history of political texts and ideas across a longer tradition calls into question the fixity of concepts such as democracy, empire and political freedom. Indeed, we query the very notion of tradition by emphasising how the past has been repeatedly constructed and reconstructed in divergent modern political discourses and conversely how modern political theories and realities have been shaped and reshaped by an idea of antiquity. The Introduction closes with a brief survey of the collected papers.

Ancient Greek harbours used as geo-archives for palaeotsunami research : case studies from Krane (Cefalonia), Lechaion (Gulf of Corinth) and Kyllini (Peloponnese)

Since historical times, coastal areas throughout the eastern Mediterranean are exposed to tsunami hazard. For many decades the knowledge about palaeotsunamis was solely based on historical accounts. However, results from timeline analyses reveal different characteristics affecting the quality of the dataset (i.e. distribution of data, temporal thinning backward of events, local periodization phenomena) that emphasize the fragmentary character of the historical data. As an increasing number of geo-scientific studies give convincing examples of well dated tsunami signatures not reported in catalogues, the non-existing record is a major problem to palaeotsunami research. While the compilation of historical data allows a first approach in the identification of areas vulnerable to tsunamis, it must not be regarded as reliable for hazard assessment. Considering the increasing economic significance of coastal regions (e.g. for mass tourism) and the constantly growing coastal population, our knowledge on the local, regional and supraregional tsunami hazard along Mediterranean coasts has to be improved. For setting up a reliable tsunami risk assessment and developing risk mitigation strategies, it is of major importance (i) to identify areas under risk and (ii) to estimate the intensity and frequency of potential events. This approach is most promising when based on the analysis of palaeotsunami research seeking to detect areas of high palaeotsunami hazard, to calculate recurrence intervals and to document palaeotsunami destructiveness in terms of wave run-up, inundation and long-term coastal change. Within the past few years, geo-scientific studies on palaeotsunami events provided convincing evidence that throughout the Mediterranean ancient harbours were subject to strong tsunami-related disturbance or destruction. Constructed to protect ships from storm and wave activity, harbours provide especially sheltered and quiescent environments and thus turned out to be valuable geo-archives for tsunamigenic high-energy impacts on coastal areas. Directly exposed to the Hellenic Trench and extensive local fault systems, coastal areas in the Ionian Sea and the Gulf of Corinth hold a considerably high risk for tsunami events, respectively.Geo-scientific and geoarcheaological studies carried out in the environs of the ancient harbours of Krane (Cefalonia Island), Lechaion (Corinth, Gulf of Corinth) and Kyllini (western Peloponnese) comprised on-shore and near-shore vibracoring and subsequent sedimentological, geochemical and microfossil analyses of the recovered sediments. Geophysical methods like electrical resistivity tomography and ground penetrating radar were applied in order to detect subsurface structures and to verify stratigraphical patterns derived from vibracores over long distances. The overall geochronological framework of each study area is based on radiocarbon dating of biogenic material and age determination of diagnostic ceramic fragments. Results presented within this study provide distinct evidence of multiple palaeotsunami landfalls for the investigated areas. Tsunami signatures encountered in the environs of Krane, Lechaion and Kyllini include (i) coarse-grained allochthonous marine sediments intersecting silt-dominated quiescent harbour deposits and/or shallow marine environments, (ii) disturbed microfaunal assemblages and/or (iii) distinct geochemical fingerprints as well as (iv) geo-archaeological destruction layers and (v) extensive units of beachrock-type calcarenitic tsunamites. For Krane, geochronological data yielded termini ad or post quem (maximum ages) for tsunami event generations dated to 4150 ± 60 cal BC, ~ 3200 ± 110 cal BC, ~ 650 ± 110 cal BC, and ~ 930 ± 40 cal AD, respectively. Results for Lechaion suggest that the harbour was hit by strong tsunami impacts in the 8th-6th century BC, the 1st-2nd century AD and in the 6th century AD. At Kyllini, the harbour site was affected by tsunami impact in between the late 7th and early 4th cent. BC and between the 4th and 6th cent. AD. In case of Lechaion and Kyllini, the final destruction of the harbour facilities also seems to be related to the tsunami impact. Comparing the tsunami signals obtained for each study areas with geo-scientific data from palaeotsunami events from other sites indicates that the investigated harbour sites represent excellent geo-archives for supra-regional mega-tsunamis.

Jüdische Drehbühnen: Biblische Variationen im antiken Judentum

In der Antike haben jüdische Autoren in ganz unterschiedlichen literarischen Gefäßen die Tora mit häufig bemerkenswerter inhaltlicher Freiheit für sich gedeutet und weiter gesponnen. Wie auf einer Drehbühne konnten biblische Texte immer wieder neu inszeniert werden - ohne, dass der Urtext deswegen in Frage gestellt werden musste. Die Tora war die Vorlage für unterschiedlichste Deutungen der eigenen Lebenswelten. René Bloch untersucht solche literarischen Imaginationen und deren Entstehungskontexte. Die in diesem Band versammelten Texte sind aus den Tria Corda-Vorlesungen an der Universität Jena hervorgegangen. Vier Texte aus der jüdischen Diaspora und Palästina stehen im Zentrum: der jüdisch-hellenistische Liebesroman Joseph und Aseneth, die Moses-Biographie des Philon von Alexandrien, das Buch der Biblischen Altertümer des Pseudo-Philo und schließlich - über die Antike hinaus, aber eng mit der Antike verbunden - der Josippon, eine hebräische Neufassung der biblischen Geschichte und des jüdisch-römischen Kriegs aus dem Italien des 10. Jahrhunderts. Die literarischen Genres der diskutierten Texte reichen vom Roman über das religionsphilosophische Traktat bis zur Geschichtsschreibung. Alle vier Autoren nehmen biblische Figuren auf und schreiben deren Geschichten um und weiter. Alle vier Texte sind stark geprägt von ihrem zeitlichen und geographischen Entstehungskontext und spiegeln ein komplexes Verhältnis zur nichtjüdischen Umwelt wider: Zum einen stehen sie für ein authentisches, teils gar wegweisendes Judentum ein. Zum andern sind sie aber auch um Verbindungen mit der Mehrheitsgesellschaft bemüht.

Die frühe hebräische Geschichtsschreibung und die Historien Herodots - zwei Paar Stiefel?

In der Vergangenheit ist vielfach behauptet worden, dass die Hebräische Bibel und die Historien Herodots in ganz verschiedene literarische bzw. konzeptionelle Kategorien gehören. Ein Textvergleich soll klären, ob diese These haltbar ist. Der Tagungsbeitrag gibt Einblick in grundsätzliche Überlegungen im Zuge der Präzisierung des methodischen Zugriffs und der Fragestellung. Es werden zunächst kurz verschiedene Begründungen für die Verneinung von Historiographie im Tanach beleuchtet (Christian Meier, Erhard Blum, Philip Davies) und dann kurz die Schwierigkeiten bei der Definition von antiker Geschichtsschreibung dargestellt, die im Ergebnis für das Offenhalten von Kategorien- und Genregrenzen sprechen. Möglicherweise kann beim Umgang mit dieser etwas diffusen Situation die Kategorienbildung in der Prototypensemantik helfen. Ausgehend von einer Liste von Elementen, die nicht als ‚KO-Kriterien‘ für antike Geschichtsschreibung in Frage kommen wird kurz erläutert, warum Geschichtsschreibung und mythisches Erzählen in frühen historiographischen Texten miteinander kompatibel sind. Kurze Beispiele zeigen, dass Herodots Verhältnis zu mythischen und religiösen Vorstellungen keineswegs einheitlich ist, und dass diese Tradition einen der Bezugsrahmen seines Werks ausmacht. Diese Einsichten schlagen sich in den methodischen Überlegungen nieder. Ein wichtiger Ausgangspunkt ist hier die Annahme der Andersartigkeit der antiken Historiographie und ihrer Auffassung von der Arbeit und Aufgabe eines Historikers. In der Forschung sind zu meinem oder ähnlichen Themen verschiedene methodische Ansätze gewählt worden; so das Ausgehen von modernen oder antiken Geschichts- bzw. Literaturtheorien oder die Rekonstruktion des Umgangs der Autoren mit ihren Quellen. Demgegenüber bietet eine literaturwissenschaftlich-vergleichende Erzähltextanalyse gewisse Vorteile. Damit die Auswahl der Vergleichshinsichten nicht willkürlich erfolgt, brauchen komparatistische Textanalysen trotzdem ein theoretisches Konzept oder zumindest einen übergeordneten Leitgedanken. Hier scheint mir das Herausarbeiten der jeweils spezifischen ‚historischen Wahrheit‘ der Texte fruchtbar zu sein.