930 resultados para food price crises of 2008
Resumo:
Cover title.
Resumo:
"Now first collected in one volume."
Resumo:
Letterpress on verso of each plate.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Top Row: Therese Adamowski, Anel Adamson, Michelle Ahleman, Brooke Babineau, Jennifer Ballough, Lisa Anne Beckman, Jennifer Bergeren, Tedra Boedigheimer, Mary Bonner, Genevieve Bott, Megan Bouwhuis, Mitchell Bradley, Rachel Brown, Katherine Bulson, Jennifer Calhoun, Carley Cebelak, Sarah Choinard
Row 2: Sarah Clevenger, Elizabeth Anne Conway, Erin Coughlin, Karie Curtis, Stephanie Curtis, Jodi Danhof, Rebecca Debri, Stacie Deleszek, Andrea Dehline, Amanda Devlin, Charlotte Dietrich, Angela Dodge, Elizabeth Dougherty, Ashley Doyle, Lindsay Driver, Nancy Duckworth, Kathy Dunnuck, Jennifer Dziadaio, Ellen English
Row 3: Kelly Esser, Amanda Fender, Lindsey Smith, Andrew Bradburn, Fallon Garfield Turner, Margaret Dembeck, Courtney Van Essen, Jessica paige Smith, Lauren Inouye, Jacqueline Dufek, Emily Klump, Amanda Jones, Tiffany Burrell, Deborah Mitchell, Emily Michel, Michelle Steen, Kirsten Thulin, Emily Hautamaki, Sheila Fender, Keith Ferguson
Row 4: Annie Fields, Jillian Fisher, Erin Flatley, Renee Forma, Aileen Franchi, Lindsey Freysinger, Sarah Fulgenzi, Beth Funnell, Andrea Galaviz, Lacey Garbo, Katherine Garcia, Lynn Garofalo
Row 5: Heather Gehrke, Nicole Genrich, Katie Giordano, Lindsey Glover, Andrea Godfrey, Jocelyn Gossman, Alana Greenberg, Julien Guttman, Sarah Halfmann, Kimberly Hanger, Allison Hanson, Stephanie Hecklin
Row 6: Geri Helminiak, Kristi Hershiser, Erin Hipp, Amanda Hoath, Tracy Hurlbutt, Nadya Indrei, Nisa Joorabchi, Katy Kerrigan, Layne Kiella, Jessica Kim, Samantha Klaiman, Jodi Knight, Laura Kovacic, Alicia Kreger
Row 7: Amanda Kretsch, Kimberly Kurzeja, Julie Lamonoff, Sarah Leirstein, Ashley Labb, Suzanne Loeb, Alessandra Lollini, Heather Loomis, Caroline Luke, Stephanie Maniquis, Elizabeth Mann, LaTasha Marable, Amanda McAdams, Mara McKinley
Row 8: Leah McLaughlin, Erin Migda, Scott Migut, Joane Nwoke, Lazarus Okammor, Brittany Pajewski, Judith Lynch-Sauer, Patricia Coleman-Burns, Bonnie Hagerty, Kathleen Potempa, Carol Loveland-Cherry, Carolyn Sampselle, Joanne Pohl, Sarah Pajtas, Maria Paneda, Jennifer Parker, Carol Peterson, Kimberley Peven, Rachel Poterek, Sarah Poucher
Row 9: Jannet Provost, Jessica Quigley, Nicole Rasmuson, Joanthan Reed, Sharon Reske, John Reves, Amy Riebe, Sara Riegner, Kelly Risicato, Christine Sabado, Stephanie Sargent, Jolene Schaefer, Erin Schroeder, Catherine Scott, Katherine See, Andrea Semaan, Jessica Shantz, Kathryn Sibbold, Kathleen Skendrovic, Aaron Smith, Elizabeth Stanton
Row 10: Mary Stewart, Ashley Strotbaum, Danielle Swartz, Janet Trost, Elizabeth Underwood, Lauren Underwood, Allison Vanhall, Brian Velker, Kristen Wells, Ryan Werblow, Jennifer Werden, David Westrin, Mallory Wiesen, Karen Wingrove, Amy Wright, Carrie Wright, Emily Wright, Minou Xie, Charles Zimmerman
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
The Euro has been used as the largest weighting element in a basket of currencies for forex arrangements adopted by several Central European countries outside the European Union (EU). The paper uses a new time-series approach to examine the relationship between the Euro exchange rate and the level of foreign reserves. It employs Zero-no-zero (ZNZ) patterned vector error-correction (VECM) modelling to investigate Granger causal relations among foreign reserves, the European Monetary Union money supply and the Euro exchange rate. The findings confirm that foreign reserves may influence movements in the Euro's exchange rate. Further, ZNZ patterned VECM modelling with exogenous variables is used to estimate the amount of foreign reserves currently required in order to again achieve a targetted Euro exchange rate
Resumo:
Objective - The aim of the current study was to validate child (PFA-QL) and parent–proxy (PFA-QL-PF) versions of the scale in a specialist allergy clinic and in parents of children with food allergy. Methods - For the clinic sample, a generic QoL scale (PedsQL) and the PFA-QL were completed by 103 children (age 6–16 yrs) with peanut or tree nut allergy; test–retest reliability of the PFA-QL was tested in 50 stable patients. For the non-clinical sample, 756 parents of food allergic children completed the PFA-QL-PF, the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ-PF50), Food Allergy Quality of Life Parental Burden Scale (FAQL-PB) and a Food Allergy Impact Measure. Results - The PFA-QL and PFA-QL-PF had good internal consistency (a's of 0.77–0.82), and there was moderate-to-good agreement between the generic- and disease-specific questionnaires. The PFA-QL was stable over time in the clinic sample, and in both samples, girls were reported to have poorer QoL than boys. Conclusions - The PFA-QL and PFA-QL-PF are reliable and valid scales for use in both clinical and non-clinical populations. Unlike other available tools, they were developed and validated in the UK and thus provide a culture-specific choice for research, clinical trials and clinical practice in the UK. Validation in other countries is now needed.
Resumo:
Purpose - Food allergy can have a profound effect on quality of life (QoL) of the family. The Food Allergy Quality of Life—Parental Burden Questionnaire (FAQL-PB) was developed on a US sample to assess the QoL of parents with food allergic children. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the FAQL-PB in a UK sample and to assess the effect of asking about parental burden in the last week compared with parental burden in general, with no time limit for recall given. Methods - A total of 1,200 parents who had at least one child with food allergy were sent the FAQL-PB and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ-PF50); of whom only 63 % responded. Results - Factor analysis of the FAQL-PB revealed two factors: limitations on life and emotional distress. The total scale and the two sub-scales had high internal reliability (all a > 0.85). There were small to moderate but significant correlations between total FAQL-PB scores and health and parental impact measures on the CHQ-PF50 (p < 0.01). Significantly greater parental burden was reported for the no-time limited compared with the time-limited version (p < 0.01). Conclusions - The FAQL-PB is a reliable and valid measure for use in the UK. The scale could be used in clinic to assess the physical and emotional quality of life in addition to the impact on total quality of life.