Endocan measurement for the postmortem diagnosis of sepsis

The vascular endothelium has been shown to play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of sepsis through the expression of surface proteins and secretion of soluble mediators. Endocan (endothelial cell-specific molecule-1), a 50-kDa dermatan sulfate proteoglycan, is expressed by endothelial cells in lung and kidney and can be detected at low levels in the serum of healthy subjects. Increased concentrations were described in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock compared to healthy individuals, with serum concentrations related to the severity of illness. In the present study, we investigated endocan, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in postmortem serum from femoral blood in a series of sepsis-related fatalities and control individuals who underwent medicolegal investigations. Endocan was also measured in pericardial fluid. Two study groups were prospectively formed, a sepsis-related fatalities group and a control group. The sepsis-related fatalities group consisted of sixteen forensic autopsy cases with documented clinical diagnosis of sepsis in vivo. The control group consisted of sixteen forensic autopsy cases with various noninfectious causes of death. Postmortem serum endocan concentrations were significantly higher in the sepsis group, with values ranging from 0.519ng/ml to 6.756ng/ml. In the control group, endocan levels were undetectable in eleven out of sixteen cases. The results of the data analysis revealed similar endocan concentrations in the pericardial fluid of both studied groups. Endocan can be considered a suitable biological parameter for the detection of sepsis-related deaths in forensic pathology routine.

La cohorte sepsis lausannoise: une opportunité de développer la recherche dans le Réseau latin de médecine intensive [Lausanne Cohort of septic patients as an opportunity to develop multidisciplinary research within the Swiss Latin Network of Intensive Care Medicine]

Despite recent medical progresses in patient support, the mortality of sepsis remains high. Recently, new supporting strategies were proposed to improve outcome. Whereas such strategies are currently considered as standard of care, their real impact on mortality, morbidity, length of stay, and hence, health care resources utilization has been only weakly evaluated so far. Obviously, there is a critical need for epidemiologic surveys of sepsis to better address these major issues. The Lausanne Cohort of septic patients aims at building a large clinical, biological and microbiological database that will be used as a multidisciplinary research platform to study the various pathogenic mechanisms of sepsis in collaboration with the various specialists. This could be an opportunity to strengthen the collaboration within the Swiss Latin network of Intensive Care Medicine.

Protection from lethal Gram-negative bacterial sepsis by targeting Toll-like receptor 4

Rapport de synthèse : L'immunité innée regroupe les mécanismes moléculaires et cellulaires formant la première ligne de défense contre les infections microbiennes. La détection des micro-organismes pathogènes est assurée par des cellules sentinelles (cellules dendritiques et macrophages) qui jouent un rôle fondamental dans l'initiation des mécanismes de défense de l'hôte. Au contact de produits microbiens, ces cellules produisent un large échantillonnage de molécules, dont des cytokines, impliquées dans le développement de la réponse inflammatoire. La régulation de cette réponse relève d'un équilibre délicat, son insuffisance tant que son excès pouvant compromettre le devenir des patients infectés. La sepsis sévère et le choc septique représentent les formes les plus sévères d'infection, et leur mortalité demeure élevée (25 à 30% pour la sepsis sévère et 50 à 60% pour le choc septique). De plus, l'incidence de la sepsis tend à augmenter, atteignant en 2000 plus de 240 cas pour 100'000 personnes en Grande-Bretagne. La sepsis est caractérisée dans sa phase aiguë par une réponse inflammatoire exubérante. La plupart des thérapies visant à la bloquer ont toutefois montré des bénéfices incertains lors de leur application clinique. Il est donc impératif d'identifier de nouvelles cibles thérapeutiques. Les "Toll-like receptors" (TLRs) sont une famille de récepteurs qui jouent un rôle fondamental dans la détection des micro-organismes par les cellules du système immunitaire inné. Parmi eux, TLR4 est indispensable à la reconnaissance du lipopolysaccharide (LPS) des bactéries Gram-négatives. L'interaction entre TLR4 et le LPS représentant un élément précoce de la réponse de l'hôte à l'infection, nous avons émit l'hypothèse que TLR4 pourrait représenter une cible de choix en vue du développement de nouvelles thérapies contre la sepsis. Dans l'objectif de valider ce concept, nous avons, dans un premier temps, démontré que des souris génétiquement déficientes en TLR4 étaient totalement résistantes au choc septique induit par Escherichia coli (E. coli), une bactérie Gram-négative fréquemment responsable de sepsis. Forts de cette observation, nous avons développé une molécule recombinante composée du domaine extracellulaire de TLR4 fusionné à la partie IgGi-Fc. Cette molécule soluble, qui inhibait la réponse des macrophages au LPS in vitro, a été utilisée pour générer des anticorps anti-TLR4 chez le lapin. La spécificité et l'efficacité de ces anticorps ont été prouvées en démontrant que les anti-TLR4 bloquaient les signaux d'activation intracellulaire et la production de TNF et d'IL-6 en réponse au LPS et aux bactéries Gram-négatives in vitro et in vivo. Enfin, l'efficacité des ces anticorps a été testée dans des modèles de sepsis chez la souris. Ainsi, l'injection prophylactique (-lh) ou thérapeutique (+3h) d'anticorps anti-TLR4 réduisait la production de TNF et protégeait les animaux de la mort. De manière spectaculaire, ces anticorps réduisaient également la production de TNF et protégeaient de la sepsis à E. coli lorsqu'ils étaient administrés de manière prophylactique (-4h) et thérapeutique, jusqu'à 13 heures après l'initiation de l'infection. Ces résultats indiquent donc qu'il est possible de bloquer le développement de la réponse inflammatoire et de protéger du choc septique à bactéries Gram-négatives en utilisant des thérapies ciblant TLR4. Par ailleurs, ils suggèrent qu'une fenêtre d'opportunité de plusieurs heures pourrait être mise à profit pour initier un traitement chez les patients septiques. Ces résultats devraient encourager la poursuite des essais cliniques en cours qui visent à tester l'efficacité de thérapies dirigées contre TLR4 comme traitement complémentaire de la sepsis.

Central line sepsis in intensive care units : overview and update

Catheter-related infection remains a leading cause of nosocomial infections, particularly in intensive care units. It includes colonization of the device, skin exit-site infection and device- or catheter-related bloodstream infection. The latter represents the most frequent life-threatening associated complication of central venous catheter use and is associated with significant patient morbidity, mortality and extra hospital costs. The incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection ranges from 2 to 14 episodes per 1000 catheter-days. On average, microbiologically-documented device-related bloodstream infections complicate from three to five per 100 central venous line uses, but they only represent the visible part of the iceberg and most clinical sepsis are nowadays considered to be catheter-related. We briefly review the pathophysiology of infection, highlighting the importance of the skin insertion site and of intravenous line hub as principal sources of colonization. Principles of therapy are reviewed. Several preventive approaches are also discussed, in particular the possible benefit of recently developed impregnated catheters. Finally, the potential positive impact of a multimodal global preventive strategy based on strict application of hygienic rules is presented.

Markers for sepsis diagnosis in the forensic setting: state of the art.

Reliable diagnoses of sepsis remain challenging in forensic pathology routine despite improved methods of sample collection and extensive biochemical and immunohistochemical investigations. Macroscopic findings may be elusive and have an infectious or non-infectious origin. Blood culture results can be difficult to interpret due to postmortem contamination or bacterial translocation. Lastly, peripheral and cardiac blood may be unavailable during autopsy. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 can be measured in biological fluids collected during autopsy and may be used as in clinical practice for diagnostic purposes. However, concentrations of these parameters may be increased due to etiologies other than bacterial infections, indicating that a combination of biomarkers could more effectively discriminate non-infectious from infectious inflammations. In this article, we propose a review of the literature pertaining to the diagnostic performance of classical and novel biomarkers of inflammation and bacterial infection in the forensic setting.

Severe Postnatally Acquired Cytomegalovirus Infection Presenting with Colitis, Pneumonitis and Sepsis-Like Syndrome in an Extremely Low Birthweight Infant

Few cases of severe postnatally acquired cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection are reported in premature infants. We report on an extremely low birthweight (ELBW) preterm infant who presented with a sepsis-like syndrome and multiple organ involvement, notably pneumonitis and colitis. The course of infection was assessed by repeated analysis of urine, tracheal aspirates and blood. The patient was given intravenous ganciclovir. The clinical course was rapidly favorable. Development of neutropenia led to the discontinuation of the antiviral treatment after 28 days. Follow-up showed moderate white matter anomalies on cerebral MRI, a transient hypoacusis and a mild developmental delay at 18 months of corrected age. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of a severe combination of pneumonitis and colitis in postnatal CMV infection. Many issues remain controversial and are discussed. We propose that antiviral treatment should be considered in severe postnatal CMV infection in ELBW patients.

Efficacy and safety of a phospholipid emulsion (GR270773) in Gram-negative severe sepsis: results of a phase II multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the survival benefit and safety profile of low-dose (850 mg/kg) and high-dose (1350 mg/kg) phospholipid emulsion vs. placebo administered as a continuous 3-day infusion in patients with confirmed or suspected Gram-negative severe sepsis. Preclinical and ex vivo studies show that lipoproteins bind and neutralize endotoxin, and experimental animal studies demonstrate protection from septic death when lipoproteins are administered. Endotoxin neutralization correlates with the amount of phospholipid in the lipoprotein particles. DESIGN: A three-arm, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Conducted at 235 centers worldwide between September 2004 and April 2006. PATIENTS: A total of 1379 patients participated in the study, 598 patients received low-dose phospholipid emulsion, and 599 patients received placebo. The high-dose phospholipid emulsion arm was stopped, on the recommendation of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee, due to an increase in life-threatening serious adverse events at the fourth interim analysis and included 182 patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A 28-day all-cause mortality and new-onset organ failure. There was no significant treatment benefit for low- or high-dose phospholipid emulsion vs. placebo for 28-day all-cause mortality, with rates of 25.8% (p = .329), 31.3% (p = .879), and 26.9%, respectively. The rate of new-onset organ failure was not statistically different among groups at 26.3%, 31.3%, 20.4% with low- and high-dose phospholipid emulsion, and placebo, respectively (one-sided p = .992, low vs. placebo; p = .999, high vs. placebo). Of the subjects treated, 45% had microbiologically confirmed Gram-negative infections. Maximal changes in mean hemoglobin levels were reached on day 10 (-1.04 g/dL) and day 5 (-1.36 g/dL) with low- and high-dose phospholipid emulsion, respectively, and on day 14 (-0.82 g/dL) with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with phospholipid emulsion did not reduce 28-day all-cause mortality, or reduce the onset of new organ failure in patients with suspected or confirmed Gram-negative severe sepsis.

Sepsis: time to reconsider the concept.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the difficulty in using the concept of sepsis for clinical trials and propose new ways for designing future trials for severe infections. DESIGN: Short position statement. METHODS AND MAIN RESEARCH: Using a thorough evaluation of the recent literature in the field of severe sepsis and septic shock, the authors challenge the concept of sepsis as used in the past two decades and propose new ideas for designing future trials in this setting. The two main proposals are first to use a systematic assessment of the targeted inflammatory mediators when the study intends to counteract or replace those mediators (e.g., anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha, activated protein C) and, second, to select more homogeneous populations, coming back to "precise infectious diseases," such as severe community-acquired pneumonia, severe peritonitis, or meningitis. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of sepsis has been useful to help clinicians to suspect and detect severe infections. Due to a considerable heterogeneity in the patients and type of infections included in the trials performed in the last two decades, it has not been useful in demonstrating the efficacy of new compounds. The authors propose a dramatic change in the design of future trials dealing with severe infections.

Reduction in the use of diagnostic tests in infants with risk factors for early-onset neonatal sepsis does not delay antibiotic treatment.

Despite a low positive predictive value, diagnostic tests such as complete blood count (CBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are commonly used to evaluate whether infants with risk factors for early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) should be treated with antibiotics. We investigated the impact of implementing a protocol aiming at reducing the number of diagnostic tests in infants with risk factors for EOS in order to compare the diagnostic performance of repeated clinical examination with CBC and CRP measurement. The primary outcome was the time between birth and the first dose of antibiotics in infants treated for suspected EOS. Among the 11,503 infants born at ≥35 weeks during the study period, 222 were treated with antibiotics for suspected EOS. The proportion of infants receiving antibiotics for suspected EOS was 2.1% and 1.7% before and after the change of protocol (p = 0.09). Reduction of diagnostic tests was associated with earlier antibiotic treatment in infants treated for suspected EOS (hazard ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.07; p <0.001), and in infants with neonatal infection (hazard ratio 2.20; 95% CI 1.19-4.06; p = 0.01). There was no difference in the duration of hospital stay nor in the proportion of infants requiring respiratory or cardiovascular support before and after the change of protocol. Reduction of diagnostic tests such as CBC and CRP does not delay initiation of antibiotic treatment in infants with suspected EOS. The importance of clinical examination in infants with risk factors for EOS should be emphasised.

Usefulness of pericardial and pleural fluids for the postmortem diagnosis of sepsis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postmortem distributions of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) levels in postmortem serum from femoral blood, pericardial fluid and pleural fluid in a series of sepsis-related fatalities (12 subjects) and control cases (20 subjects) that underwent medico-legal investigations. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic potential of the results obtained from pericardial and pleural fluid analysis in identifying sepsis-related deaths. All sepsis-related cases had a documented, clinical diagnosis that was established in vivo during hospitalization. Pneumonia was the main infectious focus identified during autopsy and histology. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pnemoniae and Escherichia coli were the most commonly identified bacteria in blood and lung tissue cultures. The preliminary results corroborate the usefulness of PCT, CRP, sTREM-1 and sIL-2R determination in postmortem serum for the identification of sepsis-related deaths. Moreover, the data suggest that, as far as PCT, CRP, sTREM-1 and sIL-2R measurements are concerned, pericardial and pleural fluids can be considered suitable alternatives to postmortem serum should femoral blood prove unavailable at autopsy.

Targeting Toll-Like Receptors: Promising Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of Sepsis-Associated Pathology and Infectious Diseases.

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pattern recognition receptors playing a fundamental role in sensing microbial invasion and initiating innate and adaptive immune responses. TLRs are also triggered by danger signals released by injured or stressed cells during sepsis. Here we focus on studies developing TLR agonists and antagonists for the treatment of infectious diseases and sepsis. Positioned at the cell surface, TLR4 is essential for sensing lipopolysaccharide of Gram-negative bacteria, TLR2 is involved in the recognition of a large panel of microbial ligands, while TLR5 recognizes flagellin. Endosomal TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9 are specialized in the sensing of nucleic acids produced notably during viral infections. TLR4 and TLR2 are favorite targets for developing anti-sepsis drugs, and antagonistic compounds have shown efficient protection from septic shock in pre-clinical models. Results from clinical trials evaluating anti-TLR4 and anti-TLR2 approaches are presented, discussing the challenges of study design in sepsis and future exploitation of these agents in infectious diseases. We also report results from studies suggesting that the TLR5 agonist flagellin may protect from infections of the gastrointestinal tract and that agonists of endosomal TLRs are very promising for treating chronic viral infections. Altogether, TLR-targeted therapies have a strong potential for prevention and intervention in infectious diseases, notably sepsis.

Continuous positive airway pressure causes lung injury in a model of sepsis.

Continuous positive airway pressure, aimed at preventing pulmonary atelectasis, has been used for decades to reduce lung injury in critically ill patients. In neonatal practice, it is increasingly used worldwide as a primary form of respiratory support due to its low cost and because it reduces the need for endotracheal intubation and conventional mechanical ventilation. We studied the anesthetized in vivo rat and determined the optimal circuit design for delivery of continuous positive airway pressure. We investigated the effects of continuous positive airway pressure following lipopolysaccharide administration in the anesthetized rat. Whereas neither continuous positive airway pressure nor lipopolysaccharide alone caused lung injury, continuous positive airway pressure applied following intravenous lipopolysaccharide resulted in increased microvascular permeability, elevated cytokine protein and mRNA production, and impaired static compliance. A dose-response relationship was demonstrated whereby higher levels of continuous positive airway pressure (up to 6 cmH(2)O) caused greater lung injury. Lung injury was attenuated by pretreatment with dexamethasone. These data demonstrate that despite optimal circuit design, continuous positive airway pressure causes significant lung injury (proportional to the airway pressure) in the setting of circulating lipopolysaccharide. Although we would currently avoid direct extrapolation of these findings to clinical practice, we believe that in the context of increasing clinical use, these data are grounds for concern and warrant further investigation.

Effect of n-3 fatty acids on markers of brain injury and incidence of sepsis-associated delirium in septic patients.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding immunomodulatory effects of parenteral n-3 fatty acids in sepsis are conflicting. In this study, the effect of administration of parenteral n-3 fatty acids on markers of brain injury, incidence of sepsis-associated delirium, and inflammatory mediators in septic patients was investigated. METHODS: Fifty patients with sepsis were randomized to receive either 2 ml/kg/day of a lipid emulsion containing highly refined fish oil (equivalent to n-3 fatty acids 0.12 mg/kg/day) during 7 days after admission to the intensive care unit or standard treatment. Markers of brain injury and inflammatory mediators were measured on days 1, 2, 3 and 7. Assessment for sepsis-associated delirium was performed daily. The primary outcome was the difference in S-100β from baseline to peak level between both the intervention and the control group, compared by t-test. Changes of all markers over time were explored in both groups, fitting a generalized estimating equations model. RESULTS: Mean difference in change of S-100β from baseline to peak level was 0.34 (95% CI: -0.18-0.85) between the intervention and control group, respectively (P = 0.19). We found no difference in plasma levels of S-100β, neuron-specific enolase, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, and C-reactive protein between groups over time. Incidence of sepsis-associated delirium was 75% in the intervention and 71% in the control groups (risk difference 4%, 95% CI -24-31%, P = 0.796). CONCLUSION: Administration of n-3 fatty acids did not affect markers of brain injury, incidence of sepsis-associated delirium, and inflammatory mediators in septic patients.

Brain perfusion in sepsis.

Brain dysfunction is a frequent complication of sepsis, usually defined as "sepsis-associated encephalopathy" (SAE). Its pathophysiology is complex and related to numerous processes and pathways, while the exact mechanisms producing neurological impairment in septic patients remain incompletely elucidated. Alterations of the cerebral blood flow (CBF) may represent a key component for the development of SAE. Reduction of CBF may be caused by cerebral vasoconstriction, either induced by inflammation or hypocapnia. Endothelial dysfunction associated with sepsis leads to impairment of microcirculation and cerebral metabolic uncoupling that may further reduce brain perfusion so that CBF becomes inadequate to satisfy brain cellular needs. The natural autoregulatory mechanisms that protect the brain from reduced/ inadequate CBF can be impaired in septic patients, especially in those with shock or delirium, and this further contributes to cerebral ischemia if blood pressure drops below critical thresholds. Sedative agents alter cerebro-vascular reactivity and may significantly reduce CBF. Although disorders of brain perfusion and alteration of CBF and cerebral autoregulation are frequently observed in humans with sepsis, their exact role in the pathogenesis of SAE remains unknown. Brain perfusion can further become inadequate due to cerebral microcirculatory dysfunction, as evidenced in the experimental setting. Microvascular alterations can be implicated in the development of electrophysiological abnormalities observed during sepsis and contribute to neurological alterations in septic animals. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the pathophysiology of brain perfusion in sepsis, with a particular focus on human clinical investigation and novel tools for CBF monitoring in septic patients.