689 resultados para Rape Kits
Resumo:
"February 1983."
Resumo:
Description based on vol. 1.
Resumo:
"May 1982"--Vol. 1.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
"10 June 1973."
Resumo:
"Marine Corps stock list SL-4-07536A."
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
"Mounting kit M241E5 1450-00-078-1217 accessory kit M219E1 1450-00-179-5317 accessory kit M218E1 1450-00-179-5318 mounting kit M184 1450-00-179-6095 Pershing 1a Field Artillery Missile System.
Resumo:
Thesis (doctoral)--Universitat Rostock.
Resumo:
110 lines of Pope's Poem have been incorporated in the Play, and are indicated by brackets.--Author's note.
Resumo:
The epidemic of sexual assault on American university campuses that was first acknowledged by Mary P. Koss in 1987 has resulted in the centering of consent as a key way of distinguishing between acceptable, normal sex and unacceptable, punishable sex. Unfortunately, various experiences of sex that fit within the acceptable, normal sex category according to university policy frameworks can often have just as detrimental side effects on women as rape does. The need to investigate how simplistic notions of consent might be failing women in challenging rape culture then becomes paramount. This paper uses a mix of intersectional feminist theory and script theory to provide an analytical review of contemporary writings and studies derived from various books, journals, and news articles on sexual assault and consent movements available through the University of Washington library system and various online resources. The findings include how various forms of apparently consensual sex such as coerced sex, compliant sex, and even enthusiastic, pleasurable sex can play into upholding rape culture, harm women disproportionately, and uphold men’s systemic power. By becoming involved in the continued modern discussions of consent, this paper seeks to redirect the current discourse on sexual consent now common on university campuses in hopes of broadening our perception of consensual sex and more adequately challenge rape culture.
Resumo:
In Studies I and 21 after reading an acquaintance-rape but not a stranger-rape scenario, higher benevolent. sexist but not hostile sexist participants blamed the victim significantly more. In Study 2, higher hostile sexist but not benevolent sexist male participants showed significantly greater proclivity to commit acquaintance (but not stranger) rape. Studies 3 a effects of nd 4 'slippor,ted the hypothesis that the benevolent sexism and hostile sexism are mediated by different perceptions of the victim, as behaving. inappropriately and as really wanting sex with the rapist. These findings show that benevolent sexism and hostile sexism,underpin different assumptions about women that, generate sexist reactions toward rape victims.