Positioning of two alpha subunit carboxy-terminal domains of RNA polymerase at promoters by two transcription factors

Interactions between the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) and the carboxy-terminal regulatory domain (CTD) of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase α subunit were analyzed at promoters carrying tandem DNA sites for CRP binding using a chemical nuclease covalently attached to α. Each CRP dimer was found to direct the positioning of one of the two α subunit CTDs. Thus, the function of RNA polymerase may be subject to regulation through protein–protein interactions between the two α subunits and two different species of transcription factors.

RAP74 induces promoter contacts by RNA polymerase II upstream and downstream of a DNA bend centered on the TATA box

RAP74, the large subunit of transcription factor IIF, associates with a preinitiation complex containing RNA polymerase II (pol II) and other general initiation factors. We have mapped the location of RAP74 in close proximity to promoter DNA at similar distances both upstream and downstream of a DNA bend centered on the TATA box. Binding of RAP74 induces a conformational change that affects the position of pol II relative to that of the DNA. This reorganization of the preinitiation complex minimally requires the N-terminal region of RAP74 containing both its RAP30-binding domain and another region necessary for accurate transcription in vitro. We propose a role for RAP74 in controlling the topological organization of the pol II preinitiation complex.

Nonequilibrium mechanism of transcription termination from observations of single RNA polymerase molecules

Cessation of transcription at specific terminator DNA sequences is used by viruses, bacteria, and eukaryotes to regulate the expression of downstream genes, but the mechanisms of transcription termination are poorly characterized. To elucidate the kinetic mechanism of termination at the intrinsic terminators of enteric bacteria, we observed, by using single-molecule light microscopy techniques, the behavior of surface-immobilized Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) molecules in vitro. An RNAP molecule remains at a canonical intrinsic terminator for ≈64 s before releasing DNA, implying the formation of an elongation-incompetent (paused) intermediate by transcription complexes that terminate but not by those that read through the terminator. Analysis of pause lifetimes establishes a complete minimal mechanism of termination in which paused intermediate formation is both necessary and sufficient to induce release of RNAP at the terminator. The data suggest that intrinsic terminators function by a nonequilibrium process in which terminator effectiveness is determined by the relative rates of nucleotide addition and paused state entry by the transcription complex.

Upstream A-tracts increase bacterial promoter activity through interactions with the RNA polymerase α subunit

Upstream A-tracts stimulate transcription from a variety of bacterial promoters, and this has been widely attributed to direct effects of the intrinsic curvature of A-tract-containing DNA. In this work we report experiments that suggest a different mechanism for the effects of upstream A-tracts on transcription. The similarity of A-tract-containing sequences to the adenine- and thymine-rich upstream recognition elements (UP elements) found in some bacterial promoters suggested that A-tracts might increase promoter activity by interacting with the α subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP). We found that an A-tract-containing sequence placed upstream of the Escherichia coli lac or rrnB P1 promoters stimulated transcription both in vivo and in vitro, and that this stimulation required the C-terminal (DNA-binding) domain of the RNAP α subunit. The A-tract sequence was protected by wild-type RNAP but not by α-mutant RNAPs in footprints. The effect of the A-tracts on transcription was not as great as that of the most active UP elements, consistent with the degree of similarity of the A-tract sequence to the UP element consensus. A-tracts functioned best when positioned close to the −35 hexamer rather than one helical turn farther upstream, similar to the positioning optimal for UP element function. We conclude that A-tracts function as UP elements, stimulating transcription by providing binding site(s) for the RNAP αCTD, and we suggest that these interactions could contribute to the previously described wrapping of promoter DNA around RNAP.

Functional topography of nascent RNA in elongation intermediates of RNA polymerase

To determine the dynamics of transcript extrusion from Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), we used degradation of the RNA by RNases T1 and A in a series of consecutive elongation complexes (ECs). In intact ECs, even extremely high doses of the RNases were unable to cut the RNA closer than 14–16 nt from the 3′ end. Our results prove that all of the cuts detected within the 14-nt zone are derived from the EC that is denatured during inactivation of the RNases. The protected zone monotonously translocates along the RNA after addition of new nucleotides to the transcript. The upstream region of the RNA heading toward the 5′ end is cleaved and dissociated from the EC, with no effect on the stability and activity of the EC. Most of the current data suggest that an 8- to 10-nt RNA⋅DNA hybrid is formed in the EC. Here, we show that an 8- to 10-nt RNA obtained by truncating the RNase-generated products further with either GreB or pyrophosphate is sufficient for the high stability and activity of the EC. This result suggests that the transcript–RNAP interaction that is required for holding the EC together can be limited to the RNA region involved in the 8- to 10-nt RNA⋅DNA hybrid.

Trajectory of DNA in the RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex

By using site-specific protein-DNA photocrosslinking, we define the positions of TATA-binding protein, transcription factor IIB, transcription factor IIF, and subunits of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) relative to promoter DNA within the human transcription preinitiation complex. The results indicate that the interface between the largest and second-largest subunits of RNAPII forms an extended, ≈240 Å channel that interacts with promoter DNA both upstream and downstream of the transcription start. By using electron microscopy, we show that RNAPII compacts promoter DNA by the equivalent of ≈50 bp. Together with the published structure of RNAPII, the results indicate that RNAPII wraps DNA around its surface and suggest a specific model for the trajectory of the wrapped DNA.

An initiation element in the yeast CUP1 promoter is recognized by RNA polymerase II in the absence of TATA box-binding protein if the DNA is negatively supercoiled

Purified RNA polymerase II initiated transcription from the yeast CUP1 promoter fused to a C-less cassette if the DNA was negatively supercoiled. Relaxed plasmid was not transcribed. Transcription did not require addition of any other transcription factors. TATA box-binding protein (TBP) was not detectable in the polymerase preparation and the TATA box was not required. Deletion analysis of the CUP1 promoter revealed that a 25-bp element containing the initiation region was sufficient for recognition by polymerase. Two transcription start sites were mapped, one of which is identical to one of the two major start sites observed in vivo. Our observations can be accounted for by using a theoretical analysis of the probability of DNA melting within the plasmid as a function of superhelix density: the CUP1 initiation element is intrinsically unstable to superhelical stress, permitting entry of the polymerase, which then scans the DNA to locate the start site. In support of this analysis, the CUP1 promoter was sensitive to mung bean nuclease. These observations and a previous theoretical analysis of yeast genes support the idea that promoters are stress points within the DNA superhelix. The role of transcription factors might be to mark the promoter and to regulate specific melting of promoter DNA.

RNA polymerase subunit RPB5 plays a role in transcriptional activation

A mutation in RPB5 (rpb5–9), an essential RNA polymerase subunit assembled into RNA polymerases I, II, and III, revealed a role for this subunit in transcriptional activation. Activation by GAL4-VP16 was impaired upon in vitro transcription with mutant whole-cell extracts. In vivo experiments using inducible reporter plasmids and Northern analysis support the in vitro data and demonstrate that RPB5 influences activation at some, but not all, promoters. Remarkably, this mutation maps to a conserved region of human RPB5 implicated by others to play a role in activation. Chimeric human-yeast RPB5 containing this conserved region now can function in place of its yeast counterpart. The defects noted with rpb5–9 are similar to those seen in truncation mutants of the RPB1-carboxyl terminal domain (CTD). We demonstrate that RPB5 and the RPB1-CTD have overlapping roles in activation because the double mutant is synthetically lethal and has exacerbated activation defects at the GAL1/10 promoter. These studies demonstrate that there are multiple activation targets in RNA polymerase II and that RPB5 and the CTD have similar roles in activation.

Histones H3 and H4 are components of upstream activation factor required for the high-level transcription of yeast rDNA by RNA polymerase I

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) transcription in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is greatly stimulated in vivo and in vitro by the multiprotein complex, upstream activation factor (UAF). UAF binds tightly to the upstream element of the rDNA promoter, such that once bound (in vitro), UAF does not readily exchange onto a competing template. Of the polypeptides previously identified in purified UAF, three are encoded by genes required for Pol I transcription in vivo: RRN5, RRN9, and RRN10. Two others, p30 and p18, have remained uncharacterized. We report here that the N-terminal amino acid sequence, its mobility in gel electrophoresis, and the immunoreactivity of p18 shows that it is histone H3. In addition, histone H4 was found in UAF, and myc-tagged histone H4 could be used to affinity-purify UAF. Histones H2A and H2B were not detectable in UAF. These results suggest that histones H3 and H4 probably account for the strong binding of UAF to DNA and may offer a means by which general nuclear regulatory signals could be transmitted to Pol I.

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase terminates transcription efficiently at rho-independent terminators on single-stranded DNA templates

Several models have been proposed for the mechanism of transcript termination by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at rho-independent terminators. Yager and von Hippel (Yager, T. D. & von Hippel, P. H. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 1097–118) postulated that the transcription complex is stabilized by enzyme–nucleic acid interactions and the favorable free energy of a 12-bp RNA–DNA hybrid but is destabilized by the free energy required to maintain an extended transcription bubble. Termination, by their model, is viewed simply as displacement of the RNA transcript from the hybrid helix by reformation of the DNA helix. We have proposed an alternative model where the RNA transcript is stably bound to RNA polymerase primarily through interactions with two single-strand specific RNA-binding sites; termination is triggered by formation of an RNA hairpin that reduces binding of the RNA to one RNA-binding site and, ultimately, leads to its ejection from the complex. To distinguish between these models, we have tested whether E. coli RNA polymerase can terminate transcription at rho-independent terminators on single-stranded DNA. RNA polymerase cannot form a transcription bubble on these templates; thus, the Yager–von Hippel model predicts that intrinsic termination will not occur. We find that transcript elongation on single-stranded DNA templates is hindered somewhat by DNA secondary structure. However, E. coli RNA polymerase efficiently terminates and releases transcripts at several rho-independent terminators on such templates at the same positions as termination occurs on duplex DNAs. Therefore, neither the nontranscribed DNA strand nor the transcription bubble is essential for rho-independent termination by E. coli RNA polymerase.

Fluorescent RNA cytochemistry: tracking gene transcripts in living cells

The advent of jellyfish green fluorescent protein and its spectral variants, together with promising new fluorescent proteins from other classes of the Cnidarian phylum (coral and anemones), has greatly enhanced and promises to further boost the detection and localization of proteins in cell biology. It has been less widely appreciated that highly sensitive methods have also recently been developed for detecting the movement and localization in living cells of the very molecules that precede proteins in the gene expression pathway, i.e. RNAs. These approaches include the microinjection of fluorescent RNAs into living cells, the in vivo hybridization of fluorescent oligonucleotides to endogenous RNAs and the expression in cells of fluorescent RNA-binding proteins. This new field of ‘fluorescent RNA cytochemistry’ is summarized in this article, with emphasis on the biological insights it has already provided. These new techniques are likely to soon collaborate with other emerging approaches to advance the investigation of RNA birth, RNA–protein assembly and ribonucleoprotein particle transport in systems such as oocytes, embryos, neurons and other somatic cells, and may even permit the observation of viral replication and transcription pathways as they proceed in living cells, ushering in a new era of nucleic acids research in vivo.

Interaction of a transcriptional repressor with the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme plays a crucial role in repression

The yeast transcriptional repressor Tup1, tethered to DNA, represses to strikingly different degrees transcription elicited by members of two classes of activators. Repression in both cases is virtually eliminated by mutation of either member of the cyclin-kinase pair Srb10/11. In contrast, telomeric chromatin affects both classes of activators equally, and in neither case is that repression affected by mutation of Srb10/11. In vitro, Tup1 interacts with RNA polymerase II holoenzyme bearing Srb10 as well as with the separated Srb10. These and other findings indicate that at least one aspect of Tup1's action involves interaction with the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme.

In Vivo Binding and Hierarchy of Assembly of the Yeast RNA Polymerase I Transcription Factors

Transcription by RNA polymerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a series of transcription factors that have been genetically and biochemically identified. In particular, the core factor (CF) and the upstream activation factor (UAF) have been shown in vitro to bind the core element and the upstream promoter element, respectively. We have analyzed in vivo the DNAse I footprinting of the 35S promoter in wild-type and mutant strains lacking one specific transcription factor at the time. In this way we were able to unambiguously attribute the protections by the CF and the UAF to their respective putative binding sites. In addition, we have found that in vivo a binding hierarchy exists, the UAF being necessary for CF binding. Because the CF footprinting is lost in mutants lacking a functional RNA polymerase I, we also conclude that the final step of preinitiation-complex assembly affects binding of the CF, stabilizing its contact with DNA. Thus, in vivo, the CF is recruited to the core element by the UAF and stabilized on DNA by the presence of a functional RNA polymerase I.