Aristotle's Ethics and politics : comprising his practical philosophy /

Includes bibliographical references and indexes.

The principles of moral and political philosophy /

Page 239 incorrectly numbered 236.

The principles of moral and political philosophy.

Mode of access: Internet.

The principles of moral and political philosophy.

Mode of access: Internet.

The principles of moral and political philosophy.

Mode of access: Internet.

Paley's moral and political philosophy.

Mode of access: Internet.

Democracy and social ethics,

Series title also at head of t.-p.

Democracy and social ethics /

Introduction -- Charitable effort -- Filial relations -- Household adjustment -- Industrial amelioration -- Educational methods -- Political reform -- Index.

Resolves, divine, moral and political;

Title within architectural border.

Moral and political philosophy /

On cover: Paley's works. 2.

The principles of moral and political philosophy /

Mode of access: Internet.

Ethics and intervention: The 'humanitarian exception' and the problem of abuse in the case of Iraq

This article investigates the ethics of intervention and explores the decision to invade Iraq. It begins by arguing that while positive international law provides an important framework for understanding and debating the legitimacy of war, it does not cover the full spectrum of moral reasoning on issues of war and peace. To that end, after briefly discussing the two primary legal justifications for war (implied UN authorization and pre-emptive self-defence), and finding them wanting, it asks whether there is a moral 'humanitarian exceptions to this rule grounded in the 'just war' tradition. The article argues that two aspects of the broad tradition could be used to make a humanitarian case for war: the 'holy war' tradition and classical just war thinking based on natural law. The former it finds problematic, while the latter it argues provides a moral space to justify the use of force to halt gross breaches of natural law. Although such an approach may provide a moral justification for war, it also opens the door to abuse. It was this very problem that legal positivism from Vattel onwards was designed to address. As a result, the article argues that natural law and legal positivist arguments should be understood as complementary sets of ideas whose sometimes competing claims must be balanced in relation to particular cases. Therefore, although natural law may open a space for justifying the invasion of Iraq on humanitarian terms, legal positivism strictly limits that right. Ignoring this latter fact, as happened in the Iraq case, opens the door to abuse.