Perch of the devil /

Mode of access: Internet.

Phylogenetic position and ultrastructure of two Dermocystidium species (Ichthyosporea) from the common perch (Perca fluviatilis)

Sequences of small-subunit rRNA genes were determined for Dermocystidium percae and a new Dermocystidium species established as D. fennicum sp. n. from perch in Finland. On the basis of alignment and phylogenetic analysis both species were placed in the Dermocystidium-Rhinosporidium clade within Ichthyosporea, D. fennicum as a specific sister taxon to D. salmonis, and D. percae in a clade different from D. fennicum. The ultrastructures of both species well agree with the characteristics approved within Ichthyosporea: walled spores produce uniflagellate zoospores lacking a collar or cortical alveoli. The two Dermocystidium species resemble Rhinosporidium seeberi (as described by light microscope), a member of the nearest relative genus, but differ in that in R. seeberi plasmodia have thousands of nuclei discernible, endospores are discharged through a pore in the wall of the sporangium, and zoospores have not been revealed. The plasmodial stages of both Dermocystidium species have a most unusual behaviour of nuclei, although we do not actually know how the nuclei transform during the development. Early stages have an ordinary nucleus with double, fenestrated envelope. In middle-aged plasmodia ordinary nuclei seem to be totally absent or are only seldom discernible until prior to sporogony, when rather numerous nuclei again reappear. Meanwhile single-membrane vacuoles with coarsely granular content, or complicated membranous systems were discernible. Ordinary nuclei may be re-formed within these vacuoles or systems. In D. percae small canaliculi and in D. fennicum minute vesicles may aid the nucleus-cytoplasm interchange of matter before formation of double-membrane-enveloped nuclei. Dermocystidium represents a unique case when a stage of the life cycle of an eukaryote lacks a typical nucleus.

Costs of learning: the dynamics of mixed-prey exploitation by silver perch, Bidyanus bidyanus (Mitchell, 1838)

Although generalist predators have been reported to forage less efficiently than specialists, there is little information on the extent to which learning can improve the efficiency of mixed-prey foraging. Repeated exposure of silver perch to mixed prey (pelagic Artemia and benthic Chironomus larvae) led to substantial fluctuations in reward rate over relatively long (20-day) timescales. When perch that were familiar with a single prey type were offered two prey types simultaneously, the rate at which they captured both familiar and unfamiliar prey dropped progressively over succeeding trials. This result was not predicted by simple learning paradigms, but could be explained in terms of an interaction between learning and attention. Between-trial patterns in overall intake were complex and differed between the two prey types, but were unaffected by previous prey specialization. However, patterns of prey priority (i.e. the prey type that was preferred at the start of a trial) did vary with previous prey training. All groups of fish converged on the most profitable prey type (chironomids), but this process took 15-20 trials. In contrast, fish offered a single prey type reached asymptotic intake rates within five trials and retained high capture abilities for at least 5 weeks. Learning and memory allow fish to maximize foraging efficiency on patches of a single prey type. However, when foragers are faced with mixed prey populations, cognitive constraints associated with divided attention may impair efficiency, and this impairment can be exacerbated by experience. (c) 2005 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Yellow perch population assessment in southwestern Lake Michigan, including the identification of factors that determine yellow perch year-class strength April 1, 2001 - March 31, 2002

Issued June 2002 F-123-R-8; NOTE: Two different reports numbered 02/06 were issued from the CAE.

Yellow Perch Population Assessment in Southwestern Lake Michigan, Including Evaluation of Sampling Techniques and the Identification Factors that Determine Yellow Perch Year-Class Strength April 1, 1996 - March 31, 1997

F-123-R; issued June 1, 1997; two different reports were issued from the Center for Aquatic Ecology with report number 1997 (9)

Yellow Perch Population Assessment in Southwestern Lake Michigan, Including the Identification Factors that Determine Yellow Perch Year-Class Strength April 1, 2000 - March 31, 2001

issued June 2001

Yellow Perch Population Assessment in Southwestern Lake Michigan, Including Identification of Factors that Determine Yellow Perch Year-Class Strength April 1, 2002 - March 31, 2003

INHS Technical Report prepared for unspecified recipient

Yellow Perch Population Assessment in Southwestern Lake Michigan, Including the Identification of Factors that Determine Yellow Perch Year-Class Strength April 1, 2003 - March 31, 2004

Annual Report to Division of Fisheries, Illinois Department of Natural Resources. F-123-R-10

Yellow Perch population assessment in Southwestern Lake Michigan, including evaluation of sampling techniques and identification of the factors that determine Yellow Perch year-class strength April 1, 2004 - March 31, 2005

ID: 8528; Annual Report to Division of Fisheries, Illinois Department of Natural Resources; F-123-R-11

Yellow Perch Population Assessment in Southwestern Lake Michigan, Including Evaluation of Sampling Techniques and Identification of factors that Determine Yellow Perch Year-Class Strength April 1, 2005 - March 31, 2006

Annual Report, Federal Aid Project F-123-R-12, April 1, 2005 - March 31, 2006

Yellow Perch Population Assessment in Southwestern Lake Michigan, Including Evaluation of Sampling Techniques and the Identification Factors that Determine Yellow Perch Year-Class Strength April 1,1997 - March 31, 1998

ID: 8827; issued June 1, 1998

Yellow Perch Population Assessment in Southwestern Lake Michigan, Including Evaluation of Sampling Techniques April 1, 1995 - March 31, 1996

issued June 1996

Yellow Perch Population Assessment in Southwestern Lake Michigan, Including Evaluation of Sampling Techniques and the identification Factors that Determine Yellow Perch Year-Class Strength April 1, 1998 - March 31, 1999

ID: 8863; issued June 1, 1999

Yellow Perch Population Assessment in Southwestern Lake Michigan, Including Evaluation of Sampling Techniques April 1, 1994 - March 31, 1995

issued June 1995

Aspects of migration, size structure and mortality of juvenile Nile perch in the Mwanza Gulf of Lake Victoria

A detailed study of the early life of fishes forms one of the very important aspects with respect to recruitment mechanism and proper uneterstanding of the dynamics leading to sustainance of fish populations. It should be the central theme of the fisheries biologist and managers to extract the bilogical information relevant to the proper understanding of this part of the population. A number of studies in the Mwanza gulf and Lake Victoria have emphasized the need to monitor the fishery by conducting observations of stock size, migration, catch effort data and growth of big specimen (Acere 1981, Goudsward et al 1984, Asila. Ogari 1988 and Okemwa 1984). The present paper discusses the preliminary information on the size structure, mortality and migration of juvenile Nile perch. The long term objectives of the programme is aimed at describing the size structure, growth, mortality, recruitment pattern and population dynamics of the Nile perch up to 30 cm total length in the, Mwanza Gulf.