Synthesis of the μ-PH hexaosmium clusters [Os6H2(CO)20L(μ3-PH)](L = CO or MeCN) and their reactions with base: X-ray crystal structures of [Os6H2(CO)20(MeCN)(μ3-PH)] and [Os6H3(CO)19(CO2Me)(μ3-PH)]

Mild heating of the phosphidotriosmium cluster [Os3H(CO)10(µ2-PH2)](1) with [Os3(CO)12 –n(MeCN)n](n= 1 or 2) gives high yields of the (µ3-PH) bridged hexaosmium clusters (2) and (3); reactions of (2) and (3) with bases and X-ray structure analyses of (3) and of (6), which was obtained from (3) and MeO– followed by acid treatment are described.

Upper limit on the cosmic-ray photon flux above 10(19) eV using the surface detector of the Pierre Auger Observatory

A method is developed to search for air showers initiated by photons using data recorded by the surface detector of the Auger Observatory. The approach is based on observables sensitive to the longitudinal shower development, the signal risetime and the curvature of the shower front. Applying this method to the data, tipper limits on the flux of photons of 3.8 x 10(-3), 2.5 x 10(-3), and 2.2 x 10(-3) km(-2) sr(-1) yr(-1) above 10(19) eV, 2 x 10(19) eV, and 4 x 10(19) eV are derived, with corresponding limits on the fraction of photons being 2.0%, 5.1%, and 31% (all limits at 95% c.l.). These photon limits disfavor certain exotic models of sources of cosmic rays. The results also show that the approach adopted by the Auger Observatory to calibrate the shower energy is not strongly biased by a contamination from photons. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

O conceito de liberdade em o ser e o nada de Jean-Paul Sartre

This dissertation aims to address the concept of freedom from the perspective of the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre with reference to the main work Being and Nothingness. After presenting the concept of freedom we will try to show that it is related to the notion of responsibility, which will lead, ultimately, to define the Sartrean philosophy as a philosophy of action. In the first chapter we will present in passing the phenomenology of Edmund Husserl, philosopher from which Sartre will develop his concept of freedom. The Husserlian notion of consciousness (intentionality) is the way to develop his analysis of Sartre phenomenon of being. From this analysis Sartre submits their concepts of being in-itself and being for-itself. Being initself is defined as the things of the world devoid of consciousness, are the things that surround us. The In-itself has as its main brand positivity: it is what it is, is all that can be said about him. In turn being For-itself is the very being of man, which differs radically from the In-itself. The For-itself has as its main intentionality, ie, its ability to project outside itself in existence. That's when Sartre shows that this type of being realizes its existence on the basis of a constant nihilation. Here comes the notion of anything. Among the relations of the For-itself with the surrounding world stands a very special: relationship between consciousnesses. It is when we discuss the issue of another. Intersubjectivity, through sartrean analysis of look, show that the For-itself assumes a new existential dimension: the being-for others. That's when Sartre will emphasize his notion of conflict. The conflict in intersubjectivity would come from the fact that you want to take another- For-itself as an object. Given this we will analyze what Sartre called the concrete relations with others. The philosopher submit such relations in the form of ducts and conduits assimilation of ownership. In the first my-self to try to "get lost" in the consciousness of another, ownership of my conduct in-itself tries to "take ownership" of the subjectivity of the other and try to treat others as things, as objects. In this sense Sartre examines the experiences of love, masochism, indifference, desire and sadism. Following this route we will enter the land of freedom itself, which is the major theme of our work. Since Sartre defines the For-itself as a being that is projected to create your way of being, it can only define it as freedom. The freedom of the For-itself is taken in terms of autonomy of choice. Once the For-itself has no way of being a thing as being in-itself, it just may be picking up, that is, making your being. Here Sartre speaks of the anguish that would be the symptom of freedom itself. The fact that the For-itself have to choose on whether the call as one being distressed. However, in most cases the For-itself tries to escape from the anguish of freedom and takes refuge in bad faith. After setting the man (For-itself) as freedom Sartre defends that he is totally responsible for what he does of himself. Once the philosopher holds that man is not predetermined, ie, does not have an a priori essence, his philosophy has as its basic assumption the action. If Sartre argues that the For-itself must constantly choose your way of being, the action is the basis on which man will exercise his own freedom. In this sense we conclude the work with an approach to work Existentialism is a Humanism, which represent the entry of the philosopher on the practical aspects of life

A Formação do professor: um estudo a partir da concepção de ética em Paul Ricoeur

Pós-graduação em Educação Escolar - FCLAR

Taxonomic and distributional notes on Telebasis Selys, 1865, with a redescription of T. pallida Machado, 2010, and an evaluation of the T. racenisi Bick & Bick, 1995 "complex" of species (Odonata, Coenagrionidae)

A full checklist of the species of Telebasis Selys, 1865, housed in the Brazilian collections Colecao Entomologica Prof. Jose Alfredo Pinheiro Dutra, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio do Janeiro (DZRJ), and Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de Sao Paulo (MZSP) is presented. A total of 325 specimens representing 19 species were studied. Ten new records for Brazilian States were found for T. carmesina Calvert, 1909 (Rio de Janeiro and Rio Grande do Sul), T. corallina (Selys, 1876) (Pernambuco), T. demarara (Williamson, 1917) (Maranhao), T. filiola (Perty, 1834) (Paraiba and Santa Catarina), T. gigantea Daigle, 2002 (Sao Paulo), T. inalata (Calvert, 1961) (Mato Grosso do Sul), T. pallida Machado, 2010 (Goias) and T. obsoleta (Selys, 1876) (Mato Grosso do Sul), as well as a new record of T. carminita Calvert, 1909 for Suriname. Telebasis pallida Machado, 2010 is redescribed and diagnosed based on 14 males collected near the type locality, and its genital ligula is described and illustrated for the first time. Furthermore, the status of the three species of the Telebasis racenisi Bick & Bick, 1995 complex is evaluated. Of these, Telebasis pareci Machado, 2010 syn. n. is proposed as junior subjective synonym of Telebasis lenkoi Machado, 2010, and a possible synonymy among the three species is discussed under T. racenisi. ((c) 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 38 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Arthur E. Nadel (p. I 19, 1-102)

40 Briefe zwischen Arthur E. Nadel und Max Horkheimer, 1934-1939; 1 Brief von Arthur E. Nadel an Armin Hodler, 02.02.1939; 18 Briefe zwischen Otto Nathan und Max Horkheimer, 1934-1940; 1 Brief von Friedrich Pollock an Paul Tillich, 12.11.1938; 5 Briefe zwischen dem National Council of Jewish Women New York Section und Max Horkheimer, 1937-1939; 1 Brief vom National Council of Parent Education Poughkeepsie, New York an Max Horkheimer, 17.06.1940; 1 Brief vom National Research Council Washington an Max Horkheimer, 15.02.1941; 2 Briefe zwischen dem National Roster of Scientific and Specialized Personnel Washington und Max Horkheimer, 1940; 2 Briefe zwischen Lisel Nädele und Max Horkheimer, 11.12.1939, 22.01.1940; 1 Brief von Benjamin Nathaniel Nelson an Max Horkheimer, 20.04.1938 sowie Briefwechsel mit der C.R.B. Educational Foundation, New York; 2 Briefe zwischen der C.R.B. Educational Foundation, New York und Max Horkheimer, 16.12.1937; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Neumann, 08.07.1934; 3 Briefe und Beilage zwischen Fritz Neumark, Jenny Neumark und Max Horkheimer, 08.08.1939 sowie Briefwechsel mit Otto Strauß; 2 Briefe zwischen Otto Strauß vom Selfhelp for German Emigree New York und Max Horkheimer, 01.08.1939, 04.08.1939;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 547 - Korrespondenzen mit Leo Löwenthal (p. VI 19, 1-158)

107 Briefe zwischen Max Horkheimer und Leo Löwenthal; 10 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Samuel H. Flowerman (Sandy); 1 Brief von Samuel H. Flowerman an Frederick Pollock, 26.03.1946; 1 Brief von Paul F. Lazarsfeld an Max Horkheimer, 10.03.1946; 1 Brief von Frederick Pollock an Robert K. Merton, 17.04.1946; 1 Brief von Samuel H. Flowerman an Frederick Pollock, 26.03.1946; 1 Brief von Robert K. Merton an Arthur W. MacMahon, 12.03.1946; 1 Brief von E. Franklin Frazier an Leo Löwenthal, 27.03.1946; 2 Briefe zwischen Margaret Nicholson und Max Horkheimer, März 1946;