Economía institucional de la intervención urbanística estatal

La intervención urbanística del Estado es insustituible. En primer lugar porque el capital privado no está dispuesto a asumir el riesgo de depreciación virtual inherente a la provisión de bienes públicos. Tampoco ha alcanzado los  niveles de acumulación previa que de manera individual estén en capacidad de reemplazar los esfuerzos colectivos que se deben movilizar para tal efecto. Es por ello que estratégicamente el capital privado ha seducido al público con la idea de la eficiencia de las alianzas público-privadas y la gobernanza. En segundo lugar porque el mercado inmobiliario residencial formal es un mercado segmentado e imperfecto en el que el poder de mercado de los estructuradores urbanos y metropolitanos alcanza niveles cuasi-monopólicos. Por tanto, y siguiendo a Commons, la regulación y el control de la oferta inmobiliaria residencial incide positivamente en la ampliación de la libertad en la producción y en la elección de localización de las familias que habitan en las metrópolis. Un orden menos segregado que el perseverante se torna posible. Este trabajo se ocupa de analizar, desde una perspectiva teórica pluridisciplinar como la economía institucional urbana, las posibilidades e instrumentos con que se cuenta para alcanzar tal orden.

Desarrollo, bienestar y comparaciones interpersonales

El presente documento intenta esquematizar los conceptos que han sido estudiados en la teoría económica y que son necesarios para evaluar las condiciones de vida de las personas. Se estudian las distintas posturas que se enmarcan tanto dentro de la vieja como de la nueva economía del bienestar y se concluye que la teoría económica ha llegado a un concepto de bienestar y justicia ampliamente definido que permite evaluar de una manera distinta a los agentes y que también, permite considerar posturas alternativas cuando se habla de condiciones de vida.

Economía matemática: antecedentes, evolución y algunos desarrollos recientes

Se presenta aquí, en forma breve, el origen de la matematización económica y el campo de la economía matemática. Un enfoque histórico inicial divide dicho campo en un primer periodo denominado marginalista, otro donde se utiliza la teoría de los conjuntos y modelos lineales y por último un periodo que integra los dos anteriores. Posteriormente, se analiza la evolución de la Teoría del Equilibrio General desde Quesnay, pasando por Walras y desarrollos posteriores hasta su culminación con los trabajos de Arrow, Debreu y sus contemporáneos. Finalmente, se describe la influencia de las matemáticas, en especial de la optimización dinámica, en la teoría macroeconómica y a otras áreas de la economía.

Network externalities across financial institutions

We propose and estimate a financial distress model that explicitly accounts for the interactions or spill-over effects between financial institutions, through the use of a spatial continuity matrix that is build from financial network data of inter bank transactions. Such setup of the financial distress model allows for the empirical validation of the importance of network externalities in determining financial distress, in addition to institution specific and macroeconomic covariates. The relevance of such specification is that it incorporates simultaneously micro-prudential factors (Basel 2) as well as macro-prudential and systemic factors (Basel 3) as determinants of financial distress. Results indicate network externalities are an important determinant of financial health of a financial institutions. The parameter that measures the effect of network externalities is both economically and statistical significant and its inclusion as a risk factor reduces the importance of the firm specific variables such as the size or degree of leverage of the financial institution. In addition we analyze the policy implications of the network factor model for capital requirements and deposit insurance pricing.

Does the Stockholm Programme matter? The struggles over ownership of AFSJ multiannual programming. CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security No. 51/December 2012

Does the 2009 Stockholm Programme matter? This paper addresses the controversies experienced at EU institutional levels as to ‘who’ should have ownership of the contours of the EU’s policy and legislative multiannual programming in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) in a post-Lisbon Treaty landscape. It examines the struggles around the third multiannual programme on the AFSJ, i.e. the Stockholm Programme, and the dilemmas affecting its implementation. The latest affair to emerge relates to the lack of fulfilment by the European Commission of the commitment to provide a mid-term evaluation of the Stockholm Programme’s implementation by mid-2012, as requested by both the Council and the European Parliament. This paper shifts the focus to a broader perspective and raises the following questions: Is the Stockholm Programme actually relevant? What do the discussions behind its implementation tell us about the new institutional dynamics affecting European integration on the AFSJ? Does the EU actually need a new (post- Stockholm) multiannual programme for the period 2015–20? And last, what role should the EP play in legislative and policy programming in order to further strengthen the democratic accountability and legitimacy of the EU’s AFSJ?

Fragmentation or creative diversity? Options in the provision of land management advisory services

Rural land managers need access to sound advice and information to respond to pressures from environmental regulations, declining farm incomes, changing patterns in international trade and new institutional arrangements within the domestic food chain. Governments have cut back their provision of advisory services but need more than ever to influence land managers' decisions to achieve a growing array of policy objectives: The paper develops a conceptual framework for analysing advisory services and concludes, through a review of sixteen case studies, that the needs of both governments and land managers can be met by a diverse mixture of private and public sector provision. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Identifying and investigating pesticide application types to promote a more sustainable pesticide use: the case of smallholders in Boyacá, Colombia

The present paper investigates pesticide application types adopted by smallholder potato producers in the Department of Boyacá , Colombia. In this region, environmental, health and adverse economic effects due to pesticide mis- or over-use respectively have been observed. Firstly, pesticide application types were identified based on input-effectiveness. Secondly, their determinants of adoption were investigated. Finally suggestions were given to develop intervention options for transition towards a more sustainable pesticide use. Three application types were identified for fungicide and insecticide. The types differed in terms of input (intensity of pesticide application), effect (damage control), frequency of application, average quantity applied per application, chemical class, and productivity. Then, the determinants of different pesticide application types were investigated with a multinomial logistic regression approach and applying the integrative agent centred (IAC) framework. The area of the plot, attendance at training sessions and educational and income levels were among the most relevant determinants. The analysis suggested that better pesticide use could be fostered to reduce pesticide-related risks in the region. Intervention options were outlined, which may help in targeting this issue. They aim not only at educating farmers, but to change their social and institutional context, by involving other agents of the agricultural system (i.e. pesticide producers), facilitating new institutional settings (i.e. cooperatives) and targeting social dynamics (i.e. conformity to social norms).

Policy ‘framing’ and evidence-based planning: ‘epistemic communities’ in the multi-jurisdictional environment of an enlarged Europe

The following paper builds on ongoing discussions over the spatial and territorial turns in planning, as it relates to the dynamics of evidence-based planning and knowledge production in the policy process. It brings this knowledge perspective to the organizational and institutional dynamics of transformational challenges implicit in the recent enlargement of the EU. Thus it explores the development of new spatial ideas and planning approaches, and their potential to shape or ‘frame’ spatial policy through the formulation of new institutional arrangements and the de-institutionalization of others. That is, how knowledge is created, contested, mobilized and controlled across governance architectures or territorial knowledge channels. In so doing, the paper elaborates and discusses a theoretical framework through which the interplay of knowledge and policymaking can be conceptualized and analyzed.

Priority setting in healthcare: from arbitrariness to societal values

This paper develops an account of the normative basis of priority setting in health care as combining the values which a given society holds for the common good of its members, with the universal provided by a principle of common humanity. We discuss national differences in health basket in Europe and argue that health care decision-making in complex social and moral frameworks is best thought of as anchored in such a principle by drawing on the philosophy of need. We show that health care needs are ethically ‘thick’ needs whose psychological and social construction can best be understood in terms of David Wiggins's notion of vital need: a person's need is vital when failure to meet it leads to their harm and suffering. The moral dimension of priority setting which operates across different societies’ health care systems is located in the demands both of and on any society to avoid harm to its members.

'Doctor, Doctor...' entrepreneurial diagnosis and market making

Doctor-patient jokes are universally popular because of the information asymmetries within the diagnostic relationship. We contend that entrepreneurial diagnosis is present in markets where consumers are unable to diagnose their own problems and, instead, may rely on the entrepreneur to diagnose them. Entrepreneurial diagnosis is a cognitive skill possessed by the entrepreneur. It is an identifiable subset of entrepreneurial judgment and can be modeled – which we attempt to do. In order to overcome the information asymmetries and exploit opportunities, we suggest that entrepreneurs must invest in market making innovations (as distinct from product innovations) such as trustworthy reputations. The diagnostic entrepreneur described in this paper represents a creative response to difficult diagnostic problems and helps to explain the success of many firms whose products are not particularly innovative but which are perceived as offering high standards of service. These firms are trusted not only for their truthfulness about the quality of their product, but for their honesty, confidentiality and understanding in helping customers identify the most appropriate product to their needs.

Social entrepreneurship in South Africa: exploring the influence of environment

The influence of environment on social entrepreneurship requires more concerted examination. This paper contributes to emerging discussions in this area through consideration of social entrepreneurship in South Africa. Drawing upon qualitative case study research with six social enterprises, and examined through a framework of new institutional theories and writing on new venture creation, this research explores the significance of environment for the process of social entrepreneurship, for social enterprises, and for social entrepreneurs. Our findings provide insights on institutional environments, social entrepreneurship, and the interplay between them in the South African context, with implications for wider social entrepreneurship scholarship.

Follow the leaders? An analysis of convergence and innovation of faculty recruiting practices in US business schools

The debate associated with the qualifications of business school faculty has raged since the 1959 release of the Gordon–Howell and Pierson reports, which encouraged business schools in the USA to enhance their legitimacy by increasing their faculties’ doctoral qualifications and scholarly rigor. Today, the legitimacy of specific faculty qualifications remains one of the most discussed topics in management education, attracting the interest of administrators, faculty, and accreditation agencies. Based on new institutional theory and the institutional logics perspective, this paper examines convergence and innovation in business schools through an analysis of faculty hiring criteria. The qualifications examined are academic degree, scholarly publications, teaching experience, and professional experience. Three groups of schools are examined based on type of university, position within a media ranking system, and accreditation by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. Data are gathered using a content analysis of 441 faculty postings from business schools based in the USA over two time periods. Contrary to claims of global convergence, we find most qualifications still vary by group, even in the mature US market. Moreover, innovative hiring is more likely to be found in non-elite schools.

Public–private partnerships in Russia: dynamics contributing to an emerging policy paradigm

Public–private partnerships (PPPs) are new in Russia and represent project implementation in progress. The government is actively pursuing PPP deployment in sectors such as transportation and urban infrastructure, and at all levels including federal, regional and especially local. Despite the lack of pertinent laws and regulations, the PPP public policy quickly transforms into a policy paradigm that provides simplified concepts and solutions and intensifies partnership development. The article delineates an emerging model of Russia’s PPP policy paradigm, whose structure includes the shared understanding of the need for long-term collaboration between the public sector and business, a changing set of government responsibilities that imply an increasing private provision of public services, and new institutional capacities. This article critically appraises the principal dynamics that contribute to an emerging PPP policy paradigm, namely the broad government treatment of the meaning of a partnership and of a contractual PPP; a liberal PPP approval process that lacks clear guidelines and consistency across regions; excessive emphasis on positive PPP externalities and neglect of drawbacks; and unjustifiably extensive government financial support to PPPs. Whilst a paradigm appears to be useful specifically for the policy purpose of PPP expansion, it may also mask inefficiencies such as higher prices of public services and greater government risks.

A criação de um ambiente regulatório no Brasil: mecanismos de controle social e o processo de institucionalização das agências reguladoras federais

Mudanças recentes no ambiente regulatório brasileiro demandam a criação de um novo contexto institucional que permita uma melhor articulação na relação entre Estado e sociedade, em especial no que se refere aos mecanismos de controle social. A nova experiência baseada na criação de “agências reguladoras” no Brasil evidencia as deficiências de sua lógica. O trabalho apresentado, a partir de revisões da teoria institucional e da regulação, examina o surgimento e funcionamento do atual quadro regulatório brasileiro, e constrói um modelo que considera a inter-relação entre as dinâmicas institucionais das esferas social e política e, conseqüentemente, em uma real participação pública no processo de regulação.

Arranjo institucional do financiamento do ensino fundamental no Brasil: considerações sobre os municípios brasileiros e estudo de caso do município de São Paulo no período de 1997 a 2006

O ambiente institucional do financiamento do ensino fundamental no Brasil sofreu diversas modificações nas últimas décadas, principalmente nos anos 1990. Com o objetivo de aliar a priorização do ensino fundamental à descentralização das políticas públicas de educação para o nível municipal, o governo federal promoveu uma reforma profunda nas normas legais para a execução dessas políticas, inclusive através de emendas constitucionais, que passaram a constituir importantes regras para o financiamento do ensino. Uma das principais alterações foi a criação do Fundo de Manutenção e Desenvolvimento do Ensino Fundamental e de Valorização do Magistério – Fundef, destinado ao financiamento do ensino fundamental no Brasil. Apesar das reformas ocorridas, a situação do ensino fundamental no Brasil é ainda bastante precária. Esta não condiz com as necessidades de sua população, e nem com as possibilidades econômicas do Estado brasileiro. Do ponto de vista analítico, com base no referencial teórico da Nova Economia Institucional, a criação da vinculação de verbas para a política educacional é considerada a principal regra de financiamento do ensino fundamental e serviu à redução de vários custos de transação. Esses custos estão relacionados à descontinuidade de ações e ao comportamento oportunista dos atores envolvidos no cenário das políticas públicas. Dentre esses atores estão os representantes do poder público, executivo e legislativo, a burocracia estatal e a sociedade civil. Esta tese busca avaliar se o conjunto de estratégias de financiamento do ensino criado a partir das vinculações orçamentárias de receitas, em especial para o ensino fundamental, é condição suficiente para a obtenção de eficiência na condução das políticas de educação, ou se há outros elementos, ligados ou não a essa estratégia, que contribuem para a manutenção de ineficiências. O enfoque teórico utilizado na tese é o da Nova Economia Institucional, baseado, principalmente, nos trabalhos de North (1988 e 1990), Williamson (1985) e Miller (1992). Esse referencial teórico fundamenta-se no papel central das instituições na avaliação de problemas sócio-econômicos. Dessa maneira, a primeira parte da tese é dedicada à descrição dos elementos centrais dessa teoria, como, por exemplo, os conceitos de regras formais e informais, custos de transação e estruturas de governança. Com base nessa estruturação inicial é construído o modelo teórico utilizado na tese que pode ser entendido como uma adaptação da abordagem da Nova Economia Institucional para organizações do setor público. Esse modelo leva em consideração elementos e características importantes das instituições, atores e estruturas de governança, fundamentais na análise das organizações públicas. A partir desse modelo teórico é realizada uma análise pormenorizada do arranjo institucional desenvolvido para o financiamento do ensino fundamental nos municípios brasileiros, abrangendo o ambiente institucional, isto é, as regras do jogo, assim como o comportamento dos agentes frente a essas regras. Como forma de testar empiricamente os pressupostos teóricos utilizados na tese, é também realizado um estudo de caso para o Município de São Paulo. Esta tese busca contribuir com as discussões acerca das mudanças necessárias na construção das políticas de educação no Brasil, chamando atenção para a importância da adequação institucional entre as regras formais estabelecidas para as políticas e as características, valores e capacitação dos atores envolvidos na implantação dessas regras. A própria teoria institucional antecipa que a não consideração desses fatores implica a possibilidade de ocorrência de custos de transação associados aos custos de controle dos gestores públicos e ao comportamento oportunista dos agentes no cenário das políticas públicas. Com isso, mesmo existindo recursos vinculados não estará garantida uma condução eficiente das políticas públicas de ensino.