Scientia temporum & rerum : History or Antiquarianism? The collection of examples in Georg Calixtus' De studio historiarum oratio (1629)

This paper explores an early modern application of the Stoic principle of similitudo temporum to the study of history. In so doing, it highlights the tension between historiography and antiquarianism, suggesting that the collection of remains – whether material or immaterial – was understood in at least some early modern circles as an integral part of the historiographic process. It also emphasises the evolving meaning of “history” during this time, drawing attention to the perceived novelty of such antiquarian approaches to the study of the past, and briefly exploring subtle differences between the example at hand and the work and activities of better-known figures such as Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc and Justus Lipsius. As such, this paper makes a contribution to our evolving understanding of early modern scholarship, and draws attention to the variegated approaches of its practitioners to contemporary issues.

Non-reductive Physicalism, Irreducibility of the Mental and the Problem of Mental Causation : A study of Donald Davidson's and Georg Henrik von Wright's positions in the philosophy of mind

In this study I consider what kind of perspective on the mind body problem is taken and can be taken by a philosophical position called non-reductive physicalism. Many positions fall under this label. The form of non-reductive physicalism which I discuss is in essential respects the position taken by Donald Davidson (1917-2003) and Georg Henrik von Wright (1916-2003). I defend their positions and discuss the unrecognized similarities between their views. Non-reductive physicalism combines two theses: (a) Everything that exists is physical; (b) Mental phenomena cannot be reduced to the states of the brain. This means that according to non-reductive physicalism the mental aspect of humans (be it a soul, mind, or spirit) is an irreducible part of the human condition. Also Davidson and von Wright claim that, in some important sense, the mental aspect of a human being does not reduce to the physical aspect, that there is a gap between these aspects that cannot be closed. I claim that their arguments for this conclusion are convincing. I also argue that whereas von Wright and Davidson give interesting arguments for the irreducibility of the mental, their physicalism is unwarranted. These philosophers do not give good reasons for believing that reality is thoroughly physical. Notwithstanding the materialistic consensus in the contemporary philosophy of mind the ontology of mind is still an uncharted territory where real breakthroughs are not to be expected until a radically new ontological position is developed. The third main claim of this work is that the problem of mental causation cannot be solved from the Davidsonian - von Wrightian perspective. The problem of mental causation is the problem of how mental phenomena like beliefs can cause physical movements of the body. As I see it, the essential point of non-reductive physicalism - the irreducibility of the mental - and the problem of mental causation are closely related. If mental phenomena do not reduce to causally effective states of the brain, then what justifies the belief that mental phenomena have causal powers? If mental causes do not reduce to physical causes, then how to tell when - or whether - the mental causes in terms of which human actions are explained are actually effective? I argue that this - how to decide when mental causes really are effective - is the real problem of mental causation. The motivation to explore and defend a non-reductive position stems from the belief that reductive physicalism leads to serious ethical problems. My claim is that Davidson's and von Wright's ultimate reason to defend a non-reductive view comes back to their belief that a reductive understanding of human nature would be a narrow and possibly harmful perspective. The final conclusion of my thesis is that von Wright's and Davidson's positions provide a starting point from which the current scientistic philosophy of mind can be critically further explored in the future.

Portrait of Georg and Adele Rosenzweig outdoors Portraits; Couples

Parents of Franz Rosenzweig

Portrait of Georg Rosenzweig outdoors Portraits; Men

Father of Franz Rosenzweig

Family portrait of siblings Wladimir, Rosa, Lena and Georg Eliasberg; New York Portraits Family

Digital Image

Samuel Eliasberg in a park with his son Georg Eliasberg; Berlin Portraits Family

Digital Image

Portrait of Georg and Adele Rosenzweig outdoors Portraits; Couples

Parents of Franz Rosenzweig

Portrait of Georg Rosenzweig outdoors Portraits; Men

Father of Franz Rosenzweig

Family portrait of siblings Wladimir, Rosa, Lena and Georg Eliasberg; New York Portraits Family

Digital Image

Georg Lubinski; Reichsvertretung der Juden in Deutschland Portraits; Men

Digital Image

Profile portrait of Dr. Georg Michelsohn (Eli Elkana) Portraits Men

Handwritten on verso: Der verehrten Geistes-Schwester Gevereth Dr. Bertha Badt-Strauss dediziert zur freundlichen Erinnerung an den 83 jaehrigen Dichter-Arzt Dr. Georg Michelsohn (Eli Elkana)! Ramath-Gan (Israel) 1. Sept. 1959

Portrait of Georg Heinrich; Employee of Mendelssohn Bank, Berlin Portraits Men

"15.4.1889 Georg Heinrich geb. 12.5.1863. pens. 31.12.1927"

Georg and Hildegard Lewin Collection photo and autograph album Album

Includes F 34652a - F 34699