Analyses of demographic, attitudinal and behavioral characteristics of participants in the diagnostic inspection demonstration projects. Volume I - consumer responses in group comparisons.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Neutron slowing down in group diffusion theory

"Contract AT-11-1-GEN-14. Bettis PLant, Pittsburgh, Pa., operated for the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission by Westinghouse Electric Corporation."

The new psychology for leadership, based on researches in group dynamics and human relations,

Mode of access: Internet.

Sociometry in group relations; a manual for teachers.

Mode of access: Internet.

Households, population in group quarters, household size, and vacant units, 1980 and 1990 : by county, township, and municipality.

Chiefly tables.

Qualitative organic analysis; an elementary course in the identification of organic compounds.

Includes bibliographical references.

Gaby Smart, co-founder of Esquire, with David Smart and others in group.

Student Army Training Corps - World War I - Photograph LA XXXII - The Usual Manner of Conducting a Class in Visual Signaling

Gaby Smart, co-founder of Esquire, with David Smart in group, November 13, 1940.

Student Army Training Corps - World War I - Photograph LA XXXII - The Usual Manner of Conducting a Class in Visual Signaling

Percival C. Lowery in group photograph

Scene showing a group of men, women, and children. The men appear to be members of the Grand Army of the Republic, possibly the Gov. Crapo Post #145

Predicting the Paths of Peripherals: The Interaction of Identification and Future Possibilities

Two studies investigated how both degree of identification and the individual's position within the group influence aspects of group loyalty. The authors considered ingroup position in terms of both the individual's current position within a group and expectations concerning the likelihood that one's position might change., in the future. Peripheral group members learned that their acceptance by other group members would improve in the future or that they could expect rejection by other group members. Various indices of group loyalty (ingroup homogeneity, motivation to work for the group, and evaluation of a motivated group member) showed that when group members anticipated future rejection, the lower the identification the less loyal they were. In contrast, those who expected future acceptance were more loyal (more motivated to work for the group) the lower their identification. Current group behavior depends on both intragroup future expectations and level of identification.