Pesticides, preference heterogeneity and environmental taxes

In this paper we present results from two choice experiments (CE), designed to take account of the different negative externalities associated with pesticide use in agricultural production. For cereal production, the most probable impact of pesticide use is a reduction in environmental quality. For fruit and vegetable production, the negative externality is on consumer health. Using latent class models we find evidence of the presence of preference heterogeneity in addition to reasonably high willingness to pay (WTP) estimates for a reduction in the use of pesticides for both environmental quality and consumer health. To place our WTP estimates in a policy context we convert them into an equivalent pesticide tax by type of externality. Our tax estimates suggest that pesticide taxes based on the primary externality resulting from a particular mode of agricultural production are a credible policy option that warrants further consideration.

Prebiotics as gut microflora management tools

Functional foods is an often-used term applied to dietary ingredients that serve to improve consumer health. Over the last few decades, these foods have gained in popularity with sales continuing to increase rapidly. Recent scientific, and some lay, reports have shown the popularity of both probiotics and prebiotics. These serve to elicit changes in the gut microbiota composition that increase populations of purported beneficial gut bacterial genera, for example, lactobacilli or bifidobacteria. Probiotics use live microbial feed additions, whereas prebiotics target indigenous flora components. As gastrointestinal disorders are prevalent in terms of human health, both probiotics and prebiotics serve an important role in the prophylactic management of various acute and chronic gut derived conditions. Examples include protection from gastroenteritis and some inflammatory conditions.

Informações nutricionais de carnes ovinas em rótulos comerciais, comparativamente às obtidas em análises laboratoriais

Objetivou-se estudar as informações nutricionais de carnes ovinas comercializadas, comparativamente às determinadas por análises laboratoriais, utilizando-se 18 ovinos Ile de France x Ideal (cordeiros não castrados, ovelhas adultas de descarte e capões adultos de descarte). Os cordeiros foram desmamados com 17 kg e abatidos aos 32 kg. As ovelhas e capões, com 55 kg. As informações nutricionais dos rótulos de carne ovina embalada foram obtidas através do contato direto com 19 empresas que comercializam carne ovina. A maioria das empresas avaliadas não utiliza a informação nutricional na rotulagem da carne ovina embalada e também não descrimina a categoria ovina dos cortes da carcaça disponibilizados para venda. Os valores das informações nutricionais, analisadas laboratorialmente, da carne ovina evidenciaram, de modo geral, diferenças entre as categorias ovinas e seus respectivos cortes da carcaça para: valor calórico, teor de carboidratos, proteínas, gorduras totais, colesterol, cálcio e ferro. As empresas estudadas, de maneira geral, desconhecem ou ignoram tais diferenças entre as categorias e os cortes da carcaça ovina quanto às informações nutricionais, sendo necessário melhorar os rótulos comerciais dos cortes da carcaça ovina, a fim de informar o consumidor, de maneira mais simples, sobre o produto que está sendo adquirido para o consumo.

Excipientes de medicamentos e as informações da bula

Aim: To evaluate the presence of preservatives, dyes, sweeteners and flavouring substances in 73 pharmaceutical preparations of 35 medicines for oral administration, according to drug labeling information about the excipients. Methods: 35 medications were selected, both over-the-counter and prescription durgs, marketed in Brazil. The sample included: analgesic/antipyretic, antimicrobial, mucoregulatory, cough and cold, decongestant, antihistamine, bronchodilator, corticosteroid, antiinflammatory and vitamin medications. We collected data on 73 preparations of these drugs, according to drug labeling information regarding preservatives, dyes, sweeteners and flavourings. Results: Methylparaben and propylparaben were the most common preservatives found (43% and 35.6% respectively). The most common sweeteners were: sucrose (sugar) (53.4%), sodium saccharin (38.3%) and sorbitol (36.9%). Twenty-one medicines (28,7%) contained two sweeteners. Colourless medicines predominated (43.8%), followed by those with sunset yellow dye (FD&C yellow no. 6) (15%). Five products (6.8%) contained more than one colour agent. Tartrazine (FD&C yellow no. 5) was present in seven preparations (9.5%). Fruit was the most common flavouring found (83%). Labelings of drugs which contained sugar frequently omitted its exact concentration (77%). Of the four labelings of medicines which contained aspartame, two did not warn patients regarding phenylketonuria. Conclusions: Omission and inacuracy of drug labeling information on pharmaceutical excipients may expose susceptible individuals to adverse reactions caused by preservatives and dyes. Complications of inadvertent intake of sugar-containing medicines by diabetics, or aspartame intake by patients with phenylketonuria may also occur.