Drugs, law enforcement, and foreign policy : hearings before the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics, and International Communications and International Economic Policy, Trade, Oceans, and Environment of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session.

"February 8, 9, 10, and 11, 1988"--Pt. 2.

Relationship between Congress and the Executive in the formulation and implementation of foreign policy : hearings before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session.

Vol. called part 1, but no further parts.

Trade Expansion Act of 1962 : hearings before the Committee on Finance, United States Senate, Eighty-seventh Congress, second session, on H.R. 11970, an act to promote the general welfare, foreign policy, and security of the United States through international trade agreements and through adjustment assistance to domestic industry, agriculture, and labor, and for other purposes.

Hearings held July 23-August 16, 1962

Review of foreign policy, 1958. Hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Eighty-fifth Congress, second session ...

Hearings held Feb. 3-June 6, 1958.

Foreign policy choices for the seventies and eighties : hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, first and second sessions ...

Hearings held Sept. 10, 1975-Mar. 16, 1976

Multinational corporations and United States foreign policy : hearings before the Subcommittee on Multinational Corporations of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Ninety-third - [Ninety-fourth] Congress.

Hearings held March 1973-Sept. 1976.

Toward total peace; a liberal foreign policy for the United States.

Mode of access: Internet.

Fundamentals of U.S. foreign policy

Mode of access: Internet.

Sexual Minority Rights as Human Rights: Mapping the Evolution of LGBT Norms in Swedish and U.S. Foreign Policy

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-06

A rogue is a rogue is a rogue: US foreign policy and the Korean nuclear crisis

Two nuclear crises recently haunted the Korean peninsula, one in 1993/4, the other in 2002/3. In each case the events-were strikingly similar: North Korea made public its ambition to acquire nuclear weapons and withdrew from the Nonproliferation Treaty. Then the situation rapidly deteriorated until the peninsular was literally on the verge of war. The dangers of North Korea's actions, often interpreted as nuclear brinkmanship, are evident. and much discussed, but not so the underlying patterns that have shaped the conflict in the first place. This article sheds light on some of them. It examines the role of the United States in the crisis, arguing that Washington's inability to see North Korea as anything but a threatening 'rogue state' seriously hinders both an adequate understanding and possible resolution of the conflict. Particularly significant is the current policy of pre-emptive strikes against rogue states, for it reinforces half a century of American nuclear threats towards North Korea. The problematic role of these threats has been largely obscured, not least because the highly technical discourse of security analysis has managed to present the strategic situation on the peninsula in a manner that attributes responsibility for the crisis solely to North Korea's actions, even if the situation is in reality far more complex and interactive.

Hegemony, Institutionalism and US Foreign Policy: theory and practice in comparative historical perspective

This paper explores the theoretical and policy implications of contemporary American hegemony. A key argument is that the development of US hegemony generally, and the distinctive turn in US foreign policy that has occurred in the wake of 11 September in particular, can best be understood by placing recent events in a comparative and historical framework. The immediate post-World War II order laid the foundations of a highly institutionalised multilateral system that provided key benefits for a number of countries while simultaneously constraining and enhancing US power. An historical reading of US hegemony suggests that its recent unilateralism is undermining the foundations of its power and influence.

Issues in Australian Foreign Policy : January to June 2005

No abstract