La debida imparcialidad de la Administración Tributaria

Este trabajo de investigación, tiene por objeto el análisis de la posición de la Administración Tributaria en el marco conceptual de la relación jurídico-tributaria, y de las implicaciones que de cara al principio de imparcialidad, pueden tener los diversos posicionamientos conceptuales que de ésta se hagan, en procura de alcanzar una sana circunscripción de la naturaleza y el enfoque que se puede esperar y exigir de una Administración Tributaria moderna. Para lograrlo, se analizan los orígenes y alcances de la relación jurídico-tributaria, así como las múltiples y hasta divergentes acepciones doctrinales acerca de los actores directamente involucrados por el ordenamiento en tal relación, con especial atención a las divergentes acepciones del concepto de sujeto activo, y de la identificación de la Administración Tributaria en ese rol. Se aborda el estudio del panorama, las condiciones, el papel y los objetivos de la Administración Tributaria en la dinámica actual de la relación obligacional tributaria, de frente a la hipótesis de una concepción alternativa y más eficiente de la Administración Tributaria, como un garante del cumplimiento del Derecho Tributario, y ya no simplemente como un garante de la recaudación tributaria, lo que lleva casualmente a una revisión del modelo de “Relación Cooperativa” entre sujetos pasivos y Administración Tributaria, como un posible nuevo enfoque del paradigma de participación de ésta última en la relación, con evidencias funcionales y ejemplificativas, de institutos jurídicos tendentes a un nuevo paradigma, actualmente vigentes en España, Italia y Holanda.

Le Zone Franche Urbane: Mercato europeo e Ordinamenti tributari

Lo studio delle Zone Franche Urbane all’interno del Diritto tributario europeo non ha potuto prescindere da una introduttiva delimitazione del lavoro, capace di distinguere le diverse tipologie di zone franche esistenti nei Paesi intra/extra Ue. Attraversando i casi-studio di Madeira, delle Azzorre, fino alla istituenda Zona Franca di Bruxelles, Zone d’Economie Urbaine stimulée (ZEUS), si è giunti alla constatazione dell’assenza di una definizione di Zona Franca Urbana: analizzando le esperienze normative vissute in Francia e in Italia, si è potuto tratteggiare il profilo territoriale, soggettivo e oggettivo del sistema agevolativo rivolto al recupero delle aree urbane degradate. La funzione strumentale della fiscalità, esplicitata per mezzo delle ZFU, ha condotto ad una verifica di diritto interno per controllare la legittimità delle scelte nazionali in ragione dei principi costituzionali nazionali, come anche una di diritto europeo per evitare che le scelte nazionali, anche se legittime sul piano interno, possano per gli stessi effetti incentivanti alle attività d'impresa presentarsi come una forma territoriale di aiuti di Stato fiscali. Evidenziando il rapporto tra le ZFU e il Mercato europeo si è voluto, da un lato, effettuare una ricostruzione sistemica necessaria per un’interpretazione delle ZFU che metta in luce le componenti di tale strumento orientate al perseguimento di un interesse socioeconomico, che in prima battuta generi una contraddizione, una deroga ai principi costituzionali e comunitari, per poi “sciogliersi” in una coerente applicazione degli stessi; dall’altro, tentare di elevare le ZFU a misura sistemica dell’Ordinamento europeo. Si è svolto, infine, un ragionamento in termini di federalismo fiscale con riferimento alle ZFU, trovando una adeguata collocazione nel percorso di devoluzione intrapreso dal legislatore nazionale, avendo quali interlocutori privilegiati le Regioni a Statuto Speciale.

Razor Thin Win: The 1972 Constitution Ballot, Campaign, Ratification & the Courts -- Mae Nan (Robinson) Ellingson & Mick McKeon “In the Crucible of Change”

Beyond the challenge of crafting a new state Constitution that empowered the people and modernized and opened up state and local government in Montana, the Constitutional Convention delegates, as they signed the final document, looked forward to the arduous task of getting it ratified by the electorate in a short ten week period between the end of the convention on March 24 and the ratification election of June 6, 1972. While all 100 delegates signed the draft Constitution, not all supported its adoption. But the planning about how to get it adopted went back to the actions of the Convention itself, which carefully crafted a ballot that kept “hot political issues” from potentially killing the entire document at the polls. As a result, three side issues were presented to the electorate on the ballot. People could vote for or against those side issues and still vote to ratify the entire document. Thus, the questions of legalizing gambling, having a unicameral legislature and retaining the death penalty were placed separately on the ballot (gambling passed, as did the retention of the death penalty, but the concept of a one-house legislature was defeated). Once the ballot structure was set, delegates who supported the new Constitution organized a grassroots, locally focused effort to secure ratification – thought hampered by a MT Supreme Court decision on April 28 that they could not expend $45,000 in public monies that they had set aside for voter education. They cobbled together about $10,000 of private money and did battle with the established political forces, led by the MT Farm Bureau, MT Stockgrowers’ Assn. and MT Contractors Assn., on the question of passage. Narrow passage of the main document led to an issue over certification and a Montana Supreme Court case challenging the ratification vote. After a 3-2 State Supreme Court victory, supporters of the Constitution then had to defend the election results again before the federal courts, also a successful effort. Montana finally had a new progressive State Constitution that empowered the people, but the path to it was not clear and simple and the win was razor thin. The story of that razor thin win is discussed in this chapter by the two youngest delegates to the 1972 Constitutional Convention, Mae Nan Ellingson of Missoula and Mick McKeon, then of Anaconda. Both recognized “Super Lawyers in their later professional practices were also significant players in the Constitutional Convention itself and actively participated in its campaign for ratification. As such, their recollections of the effort provide an insider’s perspective of the struggle to change Montana for the better through the creation and adoption of a new progressive state Constitution “In the Crucible of Change.” Mae Nan (Robinson) Ellingson was born Mae Nan Windham in Mineral Wells, TX and graduated from Mineral Wells High School in 1965 and Weatherford College in Weatherford, TX in 1967. Mae Nan was the youngest delegate at the 1972 Convention from Missoula. She moved to Missoula in 1967 and received her BA in Political Science with Honors from the University of MT in 1970. She was a young widow known by her late husband’s surname of Robinson while attending UM graduate school under the tutelage of noted Professor Ellis Waldron when he persuaded her to run for the Constitutional Convention. Coming in a surprising second in the delegate competition in Missoula County she was named one of the Convention’s “Ten Outstanding Constitutional Convention Delegates,” an impressive feat at such a young age. She was 24 at the time, the youngest person to serve at the ConCon, and one of 19 women out of 100 delegates. In the decade before the Convention, there were never more than three women Legislators in any session, usually one or two. She was a member of the American Association of University Women, a Pi Sigma Alpha political science honorary, and a Phi Alpha Theta historical honorary. At the Convention, she led proposals for the state's bill of rights, particularly related to equal rights for women. For years, Ellingson kept a copy of the preamble to the Constitution hanging in her office; while all the delegates had a chance to vote on the wording, she and delegate Bob Campbell are credited with the language in the preamble. During the convention, she had an opportunity that opened the door to her later career as an attorney. A convention delegate suggested to her that she should go to law school. Several offered to help, but at the time she couldn't go to school. Her mom had died in Texas, and she ended up with a younger brother and sister to raise in Missoula. She got a job teaching, but about a year later, intrigued with the idea of pursuing the law as a career, she called the man back to ask about the offer. Eventually another delegate, Dave Drum of Billings, sponsored her tuition at the UM School of Law. After receiving her JD with Honors (including the Law Review and Moot Court) from the UM Law School Ellingson worked for the Missoula city attorney's office for six years (1977-83), and she took on landmark projects. During her tenure, Missoula became the first city to issue open space bonds, a project that introduced her to Dorsey & Whitney. The city secured its first easement on Mount Sentinel, and it created the trail along the riverfront with a mix of playing fields and natural vegetation. She also helped develop a sign ordinance for the city of Missoula. She ended up working as bond counsel for Dorsey & Whitney, and she opened up the firm's full-fledged Missoula office after commuting a couple of years to its Great Falls office. She was a partner at Dorsey Whitney, working there from 1983 until her retirement in 2012. The area of law she practiced there is a narrow specialty - it requires knowledge of constitutional law, state and local government law, and a slice of federal tax law - but for Ellingson it meant working on great public projects – schools, sewer systems, libraries, swimming pools, ire trucks. At the state level, she helped form the Montana Municipal Insurance Authority, a pooled insurance group for cities. She's shaped MT’s tax increment law, and she was a fixture in the MT Legislature when they were debating equal rights. As a bond lawyer, though, Ellingson considers her most important work for the state to be setting up the Intercap Program that allowed local governments to borrow money from the state at a low interest rate. She has been a frequent speaker at the League of Cities and Towns, the Montana Association of Counties, and the Rural Water Users Association workshops on topics related to municipal finance, as well as workshops sponsored by the DNRC, the Water and Sewer Agencies Coordination Team, and the Montana State University Local Government Center. In 2002, she received an outstanding service award from the Montana Rural Water Users Association. In addition to being considered an expert on Montana state and constitutional law, local government law and local government finance, she is a frequent teacher at the National Association of Bond Lawyers (NABL) Fundamentals of Municipal Bond Law Seminar and the NABL Bond Attorney’s Workshop. For over 30 years Mae Nan has participated in the drafting of legislation in Montana for state and local finance matters. She has served on the Board of Directors of NABL, as Chairman of its Education Committee, was elected as an initial fellow in 1995 to the American College of Bond Counsel, and was recognized as a Super Lawyer in the Rocky Mountain West. Mae Nan was admitted to practice before the MT and US Supreme Courts, was named one of “America’s Leading Business Lawyers” by Chambers USA (Rank 1), a Mountain States Super Lawyer in 2007 and is listed in Best Lawyers in America; she is a member and former Board Member of NABL, a Fellow of the American College of Bond Counsel and a member of the Board of Visitors of the UM Law School. Mae Nan is also a philanthropist who serves on boards and applies her intelligence to many organizations, such as the Missoula Art Museum. [Much of this biography was drawn from a retirement story in the Missoulian and the Dorsey Whitney web site.] Mick McKeon, born in Anaconda in 1946, is a 4th generation Montanan whose family roots in this state go back to the 1870’s. In 1968 he graduated from Notre Dame with a BA in Communications and received a Juris Doctorate degree from the University of Montana Law School in 1971. Right after graduating from law school, Mick was persuaded by his father, longtime State Senator Luke McKeon, and his uncle, Phillips County Attorney Willis McKeon, to run for delegate to Montana’s Constitutional Convention and was elected to represent Deer Lodge, Philipsburg, Powell, and part of Missoula Counties. Along with a coalition of delegates from Butte and Anaconda, he fought through the new Constitution to eliminate the legal strangle hold, often called “the copper collar,” that corporate interests -- the Anaconda Company and its business & political allies -- had over state government for nearly 100 years. The New York Times called Montana’s Constitutional Convention a “prairie revolution.” After helping secure the ratification of the new Constitution, Mick began his practice of law in Anaconda where he engaged in general practice for nearly 20 years. Moving to Butte in 1991, Mick focused has practice in personal injury law, representing victims of negligence and corporate wrongdoing in both Montana district courts and federal court. As such, he participated in some of the largest cases in the history of the state. In 1992 he and his then law partner Rick Anderson obtained a federal court verdict of $11.5 million -- the largest verdict in MT for many years. Mick’s efforts on behalf of injured victims have been recognized by many legal organizations and societies. Recently, Mick was invited to become a member of the International Academy of Trial Lawyers - 600 of the top lawyers in the world. Rated as an American Super Lawyer, he has continuously been named one of the Best Lawyers in America, and an International Assn. of Trial Lawyers top 100 Trial Lawyer. In 2005, he was placed as one of Montana’s top 4 Plaintiff’s lawyers by Law Dragon. Mick is certified as a civil trial specialist by the National Board of Trial Advocacy and has the highest rating possible from Martindale-Hubble. Mick was awarded the Montana Trial Lawyers Public Service Award and provided pro bono assistance to needy clients for his entire career. Mick’s law practice, which he now shares with his son Michael, is limited to representing individuals who have been injured in accidents, concentrating on cases against insurance companies, corporations, medical providers and hospitals. Mick resides in Butte with his wife Carol, a Butte native. Mick, Carol, Michael and another son, Matthew, who graduated from Dartmouth College and was recently admitted to the Montana bar, enjoy as much of their time together in Butte and at their place on Flathead Lake.

Interpretação das imunidades do art. 150, VI, da Constituição Federal

O presente trabalho examina a interpretação das imunidades tributárias previstas no art. 150, VI, da Constituição Federal brasileira de 1988. Em primeiro lugar, são examinadas as teorias sobre a interpretação jurídica e conclui-se que a interpretação deve ser entendida como a construção do sentido do texto. No entanto, tal interpretação está limitada ao sentido literal possível do texto e, ademais, deve ser devidamente fundamentada, através do discurso argumentativo, de modo que a decisão possa ser intersubjetivamente controlada. Conclui-se que, no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, têm primazia os argumentos de natureza linguística e sistemática, visto que se referem diretamente à ordem jurídica vigente. E, dentre os argumentos sistemáticos, deve-se prestigiar aquele sentido que seja mais consentâneo com o princípio constitucional subjacente ao dispositivo a ser interpretado. As mesmas conclusões aplicam-se às normas de Direito Tributário, já que estão sujeitas aos mesmos métodos de interpretação aplicáveis às demais normas jurídicas. Contudo, deve ser ressaltado que as normas que estabelecem a incidência dos tributos, bem como os preceitos que fixam a competência, incluindo as imunidades, têm sua interpretação limitada ao sentido literal possível, sendo vedado o recurso à analogia. Diante disso, afirma-se que, na aplicação desses preceitos, devem ser considerados principalmente os argumentos linguísticos, que limitam a interpretação ao sentido possível do texto, e os argumentos sistemáticos, que estudam a relação das imunidades com as outras normas inseridas no ordenamento pátrio, especialmente os princípios constitucionais. Nesse estudo, deve ser examinada a função exercida pelas imunidades, que não apenas bloqueiam a instituição de tributos, como podem resguardar certas condutas e promover um estado de coisas desejado pelo Estado. Estabelecidas tais premissas, são examinadas as imunidades do art. 150, VI, da Constituição, tendo em vista as principais questões hoje debatidas pela doutrina e pela jurisprudência acerca desses preceitos.

Limitações aos deveres instrumentais tributários (aplicação do art. 113, §2º do código tributário nacional)

Pouca atenção tem merecido o estudo dos deveres instrumentais tributários pelos estudiosos do direito tributário em nosso país, com a preocupação de conferir contornos nítidos ao regime jurídico dos deveres instrumentais dentro do sistema tributário brasileiro e, em especial, de examinar a quais limitações está adstrita a Administração Pública na imposição desses deveres. O presente trabalho visa tentar suprir, em alguma medida, essa lacuna, promovendo uma análise das limitações à imposição de deveres instrumentais tributários, que leve em consideração, não apenas os princípios que conformam seu regime jurídico, mas, principalmente, a existência de regras objetivas disciplinando o tema, partindo-se da premissa de que, genericamente, dicções principiológicas, por sua abstração, não são suficientes para a adequada regulação das condutas intersubjetivas, seja entre particulares, seja entre estes e o Poder Público. Merecerá especial atenção a regra inserta no art. 113, §2º do Código Tributário Nacional, de forte vocação limitadora, especificamente no que tange à investigação do conteúdo semântico da expressão interesse da arrecadação ou da fiscalização dos tributos, que, a nosso ver, constitui a pedra-de-toque do regime jurídico dos deveres instrumentais e das sanções punitivas impostas em virtude de seu descumprimento. Por fim, buscar-se-á conferir a devida importância aos custos de conformidades e demonstrar que seu estudo é relevante para o sistema tributário, na medida em que tais custos, enquanto efeito econômico da imposição de deveres instrumentais, implicam efeitos relevantes no âmbito jurídico, inclusive restrições no âmbito de proteção de direitos fundamentais dos contribuintes.

Extract from legislation passed 1799 February 7

One fragment of a leaf containing a handwritten extract from unidentified legislation stipulating that a section of the bill "should not be so construed as to exempt" the real estate of the College or its officers from payment of local taxes beyond that exempted in the Charter of 1650 and the state Constitution. The text includes the note, "passed 7 Feb'y --99" and presumably refers to the bill referenced in President Willard's letter to Samuel Phillips that "passed the House, and is now before the Senate." The section did not become part of the tax law.

Letter from Joseph Willard to Samuel Phillips, 1799 February 14

Three folio-sized pages containing a handwritten letter from President Willard to the President of the Massachusetts Senate, Samuel Phillips, regarding proposed changes to the tax law before the Senate regarding the tax exemptions of College administrators and faculty.

[ Property act], 1787

Copy of act pertaining to taking of property for failure to pay taxes. Signed: Alexander Martin and John Sitgreaves.

Encadrement juridique des monnaies numériques : bitcoin et autres cryptomonnaies

Les informations relatives aux cryptomonnaies sont susceptibles de changer à l'avenir tant cette matière est nouvelle et encore peu ancrée dans le droit. Ce mémoire est une réflexion sur l'essor du Bitcoin et des cryptomonnaies à leurs débuts, alors même que le droit cherche à s'accaparer ces nouvelles technologies, à les intégrer dans son système préexistant.

Encadrement juridique des monnaies numériques : bitcoin et autres cryptomonnaies

Les informations relatives aux cryptomonnaies sont susceptibles de changer à l'avenir tant cette matière est nouvelle et encore peu ancrée dans le droit. Ce mémoire est une réflexion sur l'essor du Bitcoin et des cryptomonnaies à leurs débuts, alors même que le droit cherche à s'accaparer ces nouvelles technologies, à les intégrer dans son système préexistant.

Forestry publication.

No. 53. Survey of forest plantations of Ottawa, Sandusky, and Seneca Counties, Ohio.--no. 54. Survey of forest plantations of Erie and Huron Counties.--no. 55. Survey of forest plantations of Mercer, Allen, Auglaize, and Shelby Counties, Ohio.--no. 56. Survey of forest plantations of Lorain and Medina Counties.--no. 57. Survey of forest plantations of Wayne County, Ohio.-- no. 58. Survey of forest plantations of Wyandot, Hardin, Marion, Logan, Union and Champaign Co.--no. 59. Forest resources of Preble County, Ohio. no. 62. Survey of forest plantations of Crawford and Morrow Counties.--no. 63. Survey of forest plantations of Franklin and Delaware Counties.--no. 64. Survey of forest plantations of Butler, Hamilton, Warren and Clermont Counties.--no. 65. Forest resources of Wayne County, Ohio. no. 68. Forest resources of Lorain County, Ohio.--no. 69. Forest resources of Medina County, Ohio.--no. 71. Ohio forest survey. A manual of procedure.--no. 73. Fires today and poverty tomorrow.--no. 74. Laws of Ohio relating to forest fires.--no. 75. Twenty-year plan for establishing a more adequate system of state forests and forest parks in Ohio.--no. 76. Ohio's forest resources. 1944.--no. 80. Growing conifers from seed.

European War pamphlets

A collection of miscellaneous pamphlets on World War I.

The general statutes of the state of Michigan : In force. Including the acts of the extra sessions of 1882. With notes and digests of the decisions of the Supreme court relating thereto ... /

Vol. 1: With an appendix containing the general tax law of 1882; v. 2 containing Index to Annotated statutes, by A.P. Jacobs, p. 2388-2764.; v. 3: Containing the public acts of the Legislature passed at the sessions of 1883, 1885, 1887, 1889.

Development of a web-service-agents-based family wealth management system

The roiling financial markets, constantly changing tax law and increasing complexity of planning transaction increase the demand of aggregated family wealth management (FWM) services. However, current trend of developing such advisory systems is mainly focusing on financial or investment side. In addition, these existing systems lack of flexibility and are hard to be integrated with other organizational information systems, such as CRM systems. In this paper, a novel architecture of Web-service-agents-based FWM systems has been proposed. Multiple intelligent agents are wrapped as Web services and can communicate with each other via Web service protocols. On the one hand, these agents can collaborate with each other and provide comprehensive FWM advices. On the other hand, each service can work independently to achieve its own tasks. A prototype system for supporting financial advice is also presented to demonstrate the advances of the proposed Webservice- agents-based FWM system architecture.

Legislating unorthodox taxes: The Hungarian experience

To date, a series of non-traditional schemes have proliferated in the area of tax law, challenging the widely accepted principles of tax legislation. Lump-sum or presumptive taxes, redemption fees or tax amnesty, corrective taxes (bank levies), or confiscatory taxes (e.g., banker bonuses) can hardly be reconciled with the hard core of tax legislation that is established on the principles of equality and legal certainty. The present paper discusses these unorthodox types of public charges.