Officials and organizations concerned with wildlife protection, 1938 /

"October 1938."

Wildlife leaflet.

Contains multiple subseries.

Wildlife habitat on the national forest in Wisconsin : a program.

Prepared in cooperation with Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources and Wisconsin Wildlife Federation.

Wildlife for tomorrow /

Mode of access: Internet.

Wildlife for tomorrow,

Mode of access: Internet.

National conference on conservation of game, fur-bearing animals and other wild life.

"Appendix II. The Northwest game act" : p. [165]-169.

Wildlife circular /

Title from caption.

Study to evaluate the adequacy and predictive value of fish and wildlife planning recommendations at Corps of Engineers reservoir projects : individual reservoir project evaluation reports : the Pat Mayse Lake project /

"July 1983"--Cover.

Evaluation of planning for fish & wildlife : Pine Flat Lake Reservoir, California /

Contract DACW31-79-C-0005

Conservation officers killed and assaulted, 1990-1992.

"August 1996."

Endangered Species Act reauthorization : field hearings before the Subcommittee on Drinking Water, Fisheries, and Wildlife of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session ....

"July 13, 20, and August 3, 1995"--Pt. 2.

Binghamton wastewater management study : report of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on plans developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for short- and long-range wastewater management to insure high quality water for future generations in Broome and Tioga Counties.

Caption title.

[Current information on federally-listed endangered and threatened species within the Southeast region of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service]

Title from shipping list.

Changing abundance of elephants and willingness to pay for their conservation

This paper explores the way in which the stated willingness to pay for the conservation of Asian elephants in Sri Lanka varies with hypothetical variations in their abundance. To do that, it relies on results from a sample of residents of Colombo. The willingness to pay function is found to be unusual. It increases at an increasing rate for hypothetical reductions in the elephant population compared to its current level (a level that makes the Asian elephant endangered) and also increases at a decreasing rate for increases in this population from its current level. Rational explanations are Oven for this relationship. The relationship is, however, at odds with relationships suggested in some of the literature for total economic value as a function of the abundance of a wildlife species. It is suggested that willingness to pay for conservation of a species rationally includes a strategic element and may not always measure the total economic value of it species. Nevertheless. willingness to pay is still policy relevant in such cases. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Public choice of species for the 'Ark': Phylogenetic similarity and preferred wildlife species for survival

Humans play a role in deciding the fate of species in the current extinction wave. Because of the previous Similarity Principle, physical attractiveness and likeability, it has been argued that public choice favours the survival of species that satisfy these criteria at the expense of other species. This paper empirically tests this argument by considering a hypothetical ‘Ark’ situation. Surveys of 204 members of the Australian public inquired whether they are in favour of the survival of each of 24 native mammal, bird and reptile species (prior to and after information provision about each species). The species were ranked by percentage of ‘yes’ votes received. Species composition by taxon in various fractions of the ranking was determined. If the previous Similarity Principle holds, mammals should rank highly and dominate the top fractions of animals saved in the hierarchical list. We find that although mammals would be over-represented in the ‘Ark’, birds and reptiles are unlikely to be excluded when social choice is based on numbers ‘voting’ for the survival of each species. Support for the previous Similarity Principle is apparent particularly after information provision. Public policy implications of this are noted and recommendations are given.