Soviet strategy and tactics in economic and commercial negotiations with the United States /

"ER 79-10276."

Soviet economic growth: a comparison with the United States; a study prepared for the Subcommittee on Foreign Economic Policy of the Joint Economic Committee.

Mode of access: Internet.

Labor in Europe : Reports from the consuls of the United States in th several countries of Europe on the rates of wages, cost of living to the laboring classes, past and present wages, &c., in their several districts, in response to a circular from the Department of state ... together with a letter from the secretary of state transmitting the same to the House of representatives.

Mode of access: Internet.

United States and Soviet civil defense programs : hearings before the Subcommittee on Arms Control, Oceans, International Operations, and Environment of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, second session, March 16 and 31, 1982.

Mode of access: Internet.

State of labor in Europe: 1878. Reports from the United States consuls in the several countries of Europe, on the rates of wages; cost of living to the laborers; past and present rates; present condition of trade; business habits, and systems; amount of paper money in circulation, and its relative value to gold and silver; for the several consular districts, in response to a circular from the Department of state requesting information upon these subjects;

Mode of access: Internet.

United States scientific and technical exchanges with the Soviet Union : hearing before the Subcommittees on International Security and Scientific Affairs and International Operations of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, second session, on H.J. Res. 534, May 20, 1980.

Mode of access: Internet.

The states of the former Soviet Union : an updated overview /

Mode of access: Internet.

U.S. chemical exports to Latin America : hearing before the Subcommittee on Foreign Commerce and Tourism of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, One Hundred First Congress, second session, on chemical exports by the United States to Latin America, February 6, 1990.

"August 1, 1990"--Pt. 2.

Transfer of technology to the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe : hearing before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations, United States Senate, Ninety-third Congress, second session, July 19, 1974.

Pt. 1 not named as such.

The INF Treaty : hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, second session, on the treaty between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the elimination of their intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles.

"March 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, and 30, and May 16, 1988"--Pt. 6.

Soviet imperatives for the 1990's : hearing before the Subcommittee on European Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, first session, September 12, 1985.

Item 1039-A, 1039-B (microfiche).

"Rentier States" or the Relationship between Regime Stability and Exercising Power in Post-Soviet Central Asia

The paper intends to give an insight into the relations of the economic and political systems of the Central Asian republics using the theoretical framework of the "rentier economy" and "rentier state" approach. The main findings of the paper are that two (Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan) of the five states examined are commodity export dependent “full-scale” rentier states. The two political systems are of a stable neo-patrimonial regime character, while the Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan, poor in natural resources but dependent on external rents, may be described as "semi-rentier" states or "rentier economies". They are politically more instable, but have an altogether authoritarian, oligarchical “clan-based” character. Uzbekistan with its closed economy, showing tendencies of economic autarchy, is also a potentially politically unstable clan-based regime. Thus, in the Central Asian context, the rentier state or rentier economy character affects the political stability of the actual regimes rather than having a direct impact on whether power is exercised in an autocratic or democratic way.

The civil war of ideas: Ayn Rand, intellectual freedom, and the regulation of thought in the Soviet Union and United States, 1905-1943

The philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand (1905–1982) is an icon of American culture. That culture misunderstands her, however. It perceives her solely as a pure market conservative. In the first forty years of her life, Rand's individualism was intellectual and served as a defense for the free trade of ideas. It originated in the Russian Revolution. In 1926, when Rand left the Soviet Union, she developed her individualism into an American philosophy. Her ideas of the individual in society belonged to a debate where intellectuals intended to abolish the State and free man and woman from its intellectual snares. To present Rand as a freethinker allows me to examine her anticommunism as a reaction against Leninism and to consider the relation of her ideas to Marxism. This approach stresses that Rand, as Marx, opposed the State and argued for the historical importance of a capitalist revolution. For Rand the latter, however, depended on an entrepreneurial class that rejected Protestantism as ideology – which she contended threatened its interests because Christianity had lost its historical significance. This exposes the nature of Rand's intellectual individualism in American society, where the majority on the entire political spectrum still identified with the teachings of Christ. It also reveals the dynamics of her anticommunism. From 1926 to 1943, Rand remodeled American individualism and as she did so, she determined her opposition first to the New Deal liberals and second business conservatives. To these ends, Marxism and Protestantism served Rand's individualism and made her an American icon of the twentieth century.

Two Decades Out of the Whirlpool: Past (and Possible Future) United States Interventions in Latin America [Student's Paper Series]

This paper examines the history of U.S. interventions in Latin America and attempts to explain their frequency by highlighting two factors – besides security and economic interests – that have made American interventions in Latin America so common. First, immense differences in size and influence between the United States and the States of Latin America have made interventions appear to be a low risk solution to crises that threaten American interests in the region. Second, when U.S government concerns and aspirations for Latin America converge with the general fears and aspirations of American foreign policy, interventions become much more likely. Such a convergence pushes Latin American issues high up the U.S. foreign policy agenda because of the region’s proximity to the United States and the perception that costs of intervening are low. The leads proponents of intervention to begin asking questions like “if we cannot stop communism/revolutions/drug-trafficking in Latin America, where can we stop it?” This article traces how these factors influenced the decision to intervene in Latin America during the era of Dollar Diplomacy and during the Cold War. It concludes with three possible scenarios that could lead to a reemergence of an American interventionist policy in Latin America. It makes the argument that even though the United Sates has not intervened in Latin America during the twenty-two years, it is far from clear that American interventions in Latin America will be consigned to the past.