104 resultados para Schweiger


Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

On reel 229 beginning frame no. 1040.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Reprint of Didot's folio edition, Paris, 1798, with plates (engraved by Bartolozzi, Fittler, Sharp, and Neagle) copied from those of Gerard and Girodet in the Paris edition. In this copy there are 15 plates--one to each book of the Aeneis, one to the Bucolica, and two to the Georgica. cf. Schweiger, Class. bibl. latein. schriftst.; Brunet's Manuel.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A reprint of one of Keuchenius' Leyden editions. cf. Graesse, and also Schweiger.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Wild bee species abundance based on combined flight traps (yellow funnels with perspex windows) placed at ecotones between semi-natural habitats and agricultural fields. Design: six agricultural dominated landscapes of 4x4 km with one trap per square km in Saxony-Anhalt (Germany), activity of traps in late spring-early summer (three sampling rounds) and late summer (three sampling rounds).

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Acknowledgements We thank the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK, for a research grant. Funded by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Wild bee species abundance based on combined flight traps (yellow funnels with perspex windows) placed at ecotones between semi-natural habitats and agricultural fields. Design: six agricultural dominated landscapes of 4x4 km with one trap per square km in Saxony-Anhalt (Germany), activity of traps in late spring-early summer (three sampling rounds) and late summer (three sampling rounds).

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Wild bee species abundance based on combined flight traps (yellow funnels with perspex windows) placed at ecotones between semi-natural habitats and agricultural fields. Design: six agricultural dominated landscapes of 4x4 km with one trap per square km in Saxony-Anhalt (Germany), activity of traps in late spring-early summer (three sampling rounds) and late summer (three sampling rounds).

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In 2001 we started as part of the EU FP5 project Greenveins monitoring of insect communities in the normal landscape of Saxony-Anhalt (Germany), which is dominated by agricultural use. We selected four landscape sites of 4x4 km and recorded insects using combined flight traps, combining the ideas of window and yellow pan traps (see Duelli et al., 1999). Traps consist of a yellow funnel (25 cm diameter) filled with water (preserving agent added) and two perspex windows mounted in a way that they are crossed in the center. Within each square km of a site one trap was placed at ecotones between semi-natural habitats and agricultural fields (16 traps per site). Traps were operated in late spring-early summer (three sampling rounds) and late summer (three sampling rounds). Follow-up sampling started in 2010 as long-term monitoring within the TERENO project (www.tereno.net), contributing to the LTER network (Long-Term Ecosystem Research) in Germany (www.lter-d.de) and internationally as well (www.lter-europe.net). Metadata about the sites and related activities and data sets can be found in the DEIMS Repository for Research Sites and Datasets (https://data.lter-europe.net/deims/). In 2010 another two landscapes were added and yearly sampled in the same way. Due to long processing time of trapped insects data of follow-up years will be available about 18 months after trapping.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Wild bee species abundance based on combined flight traps (yellow funnels with perspex windows) placed at ecotones between semi-natural habitats and agricultural fields. Design: six agricultural dominated landscapes of 4x4 km with one trap per square km in Saxony-Anhalt (Germany), activity of traps in late spring-early summer (three sampling rounds) and late summer (three sampling rounds).

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Wild bee species abundance based on combined flight traps (yellow funnels with perspex windows) placed at ecotones between semi-natural habitats and agricultural fields. Design: six agricultural dominated landscapes of 4x4 km with one trap per square km in Saxony-Anhalt (Germany), activity of traps in late spring-early summer (three sampling rounds) and late summer (three sampling rounds).

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Land-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. Global models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' responses to these human impacts. The available data are, however, geographically and taxonomically unrepresentative; most data are from North America and Western Europe, overrepresenting bumblebees and raising concerns that model results may not be generalizable to other regions and taxa. To assess whether the geographic and taxonomic biases of data could undermine effectiveness of models for conservation policy, we have collated from the published literature a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification, and assess whether bee responses to these pressures vary across 11 regions (Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe; North, Central and South America; Australia and New Zealand; South East Asia; Middle and Southern Africa) and between bumblebees and other bees. Our analyses highlight strong regionally-based responses of total abundance, species richness and Simpson's diversity to land use, caused by variation in the sensitivity of species and potentially in the nature of threats. These results suggest that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomically restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises.