Taking The 'Sport' Out of Sports Parenting: Toward A Theory of Sport Related Parent-Child Communication Competency

Research has shown that over-emphasis on winning is the number one reason why approximately seventy percent of the forty million children who participate in youth sports will quit by age 13. This study utilized a constructivist grounded theory approach to investigate the role of parent-child communication within the context of youth sports. A total of 22 athletes and 20 parents were recruited through a Western university to discuss messages exchanged during youth sport participation. The results suggest that the delineation between messages of support and pressure is largely dependent on discursive work done by both parent and child. Parents who employed competent communicative strategies to avoid miscommunications regarding participation and sports goals were able to provide support and strengthen the relationship despite pressurized situations. The present study frames the youth sport dilemma within a developing conceptualization of communicative (in)competence and offers theoretical implications for sport related parent-child communication competency (SRPCCC).

A role for Dynamin-dependent endocytosis during Drosophila gastrulation

Gastrulation, a process conserved among many higher organisms, is the directed migration of cells into layers that will establish various tissues targeted to become anatomical structures. This process is accomplished through another conserved morphogenetic event, known as cell intercalation. Early in development, this movement of cells within an organized tissue leads to unique cellular arrangements where neighboring cells contract their shared interfaces in order to meet at a shared vertex. In this thesis, I present work that demonstrates a requirement for Dynamin-dependent endocytosis during these contraction events. Using quantitative analysis, I have identified varied cell behaviors during experiments which knockdown the function of dynamin. In addition, I demonstrate the existence of an antagonistic relationship between Dynamin and the Myosin II motor protein. Lastly, localization and functional studies I performed for this work suggest a role for Sorting Nexin proteins during plasma membrane reorganization required for Dynamin-dependent endocytosis.

Women and Performance in Corporate America

Women and Performance in Corporate America The glass ceiling has been shattered. Women like Indra Nooyi, the CEO of PepsiCo.; Angela Braly, the CEO of Wellpoint; and Patricia Woertz, the CEO of Archer Daniels Midland, are proof that women can achieve top leadership positions in corporate America. However, the scarcity of female leaders occupying the top ranks of corporate America, and the significant wage gap between men and women, suggest that there are significant complications along the path toward success for women in the corporate world.The data show that a disproportionately small number of women are making it to top leadership positions in corporate America. According to the US Department of Labor, in 2007 women accounted for 46% of the total work force, and 51 % of all workers in management, professional, and related occupations. Women outnumbered men in occupations including financial managers, human resource managers, education administrators, medical and health service managers, accountants and auditors, budget analysts, and property, real estate, and social and community association managers (US Department of Labor, 2007). However, women hold only 15.2% of board director positions, 15.7% of corporate officer positions, and 6.2% of top earner positions (Catalyst, 2009b). Additionally, according to a 2008 Corporate Library survey, only 2.6% of Fortune 500 companies currently have female CEOs (as cited in Jones, 2009).The data also show that women earn less than men in the work force. The US Department of Labor found that women working full time in 2007 made only 80% of the salaries of men (US Department of Labor, 2008). Studies designed to control for factors other than gender have not been able to account for the wage gap between men and women (Eagly & Carli, 2007, US Government Accountability Office, 2003). Even among CEO's of fortune 500 companies, female CEO's make only 85% of the salaries of male CEO's (Jones, 2009).

Sustainable Energy Plan for a Small Island Economy: St. Vincent & the Grenadines

This paper defines a sustainable energy plan to provide the basis for renewable energy initiatives that will increase energy security, reduce negative economic impacts and provide a cleaner environment. The hotel, agriculture, transportation, construction, utility, government and private sectors will play pivotal roles in achieving targets and will see significant gains. Government policies, educational campaigns and financial incentives will be required to facilitate and encourage renewable energy development and entrepreneurship. Utilization of solar energy, energy conservation measures and the use of efficient and alternative fuel vehicles by the commercial/industrial and private sectors will be crucial in meeting targets. The utility company will be charged with developing large scale renewable energy applications and with improving efficiency of the electrical system.

EU immigration trends and policies: Spain and France as case studies. Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series Vol. 13 No. 10, August 2013

From the Introduction. The Treaty on European Union, also known as the Treaty of Maastricht or the Maastricht Treaty, created the European Union (EU) from the existing European Economic Community (EEC.) It was signed by the member states on February 7, 1992, and entered into force on November 1, 1993.1 Among its many innovations was the creation of European citizenship, which would be granted to any person who was a citizen of an EU member state. Citizenship, however, is intertwined with immigration, which the Treaty also attempted to address. Policy on visas, immigration and asylum was originally placed under Pillar 3 of the EU, which dealt with Justice and Home Affairs. In 1997, however, the Amsterdam Treaty moved these policies from Pillar 3 to Pillar 1, signaling “a shift toward more supranational decision-making in this area,” as opposed to the intergovernmental method of Pillars 2 and 3.2

1975 UM Women's Tennis Team

1977 UM Women's Tennis Team

U-M Softball Team, 2000

Front Row: Karmen Lappo, Jamie Gillies, Melissa Gentile (co-captain), Pam Kosanke (co-captain),

Second Row: Kate Eiland, Marissa Young, Courtney Murdock, Melinda Moulden, Meghan Doe, Marie Barda, Mary Conner.

Third Row: Liz Elsner, Chrissy Garza, Rebecca Tune, Kelsey Kollen, Stefanie Volpe,

Top Row: Melissa Taylor, Lisa Mack, Kim Bugel.

U-M Softball Team, 2001

Front Row: Kim Bugel, Chrissy Garza, Rebecca Tune, Courtney Murdock, Marie Barda, Melissa Taylor-captain.

Second Row: Julie Pfitzenmaier-manager, Mary Conner, Kate Eiland-captain, Melinda Moulden, Kelsey Kollen, Stefanie Volpe.

Third Row: Marissa Young, Liz Elsner, Meghan Doe, Lisa Mack.

Back Row: Courtney Betley, Amy Prichard, Meghan Ritter, Angie Churchill, Monica Shock.

U-M Softball Team, 2002

Front Row: Kelsey Kollen, Stefanie Volpe, Mary Conner.

Second Row: Meghan Doe, Liz Elsner, Lisa Mack, Marissa Young, Courtney Betley, Monica Schock, Amy Prichard.

Back Row: Student Manager Natalie Shaver, Jennifer Kreinbrink, Michelle Teschler, Meghan Ritter, Melinda Moulden, Lauren Holland, Jessica Merchant, Nicole Motycka, Angie Churchill.

School of Nursing Class of 2011

Top Row: Dereje Amente, Grace Baek, Anne Benitez, Anna Berry-Krumrey, Amber Blake, Daniela Bravo-Corona, Shelley Brenner, Melissa Butzky, Ann Cassel, Chantal Chin, Mee-Sook Choo, Stephanie Clapham, Kathryn Clark, Joseph Cleary, Stephanie Conn, Casie Cook

Row 2: Christina Cook, Jessica Cook, Renea Cox, Marissa DaSilva, Kathryn Davenport, Ashley Deford, Alyse DeHaan, Maria Didio, Alyssa Diroff, Amy Doenitz, Emily Domansky, Deanna Dong, Ross Drake, Brian Dulzo, Michelle Dwyer, Jill Eberly, Rachel Escobar, Kathryn Falvey

Row 3: Michelle Fauver, Paula Fe Francisco, Lindsey Frick, Amannda Casper, Ashley Pickett, Kristin Kingma, Thomas Donnelly, Danielle Besk, Kimberly Cristobal, Heather Erdmann, Jessica Kramer, Ana Kotsogiannis, Sarah Bloom, Anna Evola, Melissa Dulic, Anna Garcia, Christopher Gargala, Thomas Geigert

Row 4: Megan Giles, Kristen Gniewkowski, Alexandra Gold, Sarah Gorzalski, Michele Grabow, Amber Gramling, Hannah Gregerson, Maria Hegan, Wendy Hastings, Ahsley Hayner

Row 5: Leanne Heilig, Lauryn Hildensperger, Rachel Hollern, Laura Jean Howatt, Eve Jaehnen, Stephanie Johnson, Peter Kachur, Rachelle Kilburg, Rachel Klein, Sara Klok, Caitlyn Kochanski, Valerie Kotal

Row 6: Lidia Kraft, Allison Kruger, Omotara Kufeji, Jill Kuhlman, Karah Kurdys, Kathryn Lang, Elsa Lindquist, Sara Mangus, Kathryn Marten, Samantha Maskell, Lauren McBride, Kelly McCarley

Row 7: Rachel McClure, Angela McCracken, Mallory Missad, Kathleen Murray, Mariko Nakagawa, Jaclyn Nancekivell, Tracey Negrelli, Kathleen Potempa, Bonnie Hagerty, Healee On, Sarah Osentoski, Kelsey Owens, Kelly Paulisin, Amanda Phillips, Emily Pressley, Kaitlyn Radius

Row 8: Rebecca Reits, Elin Ridenour, Amanda Robbins, Chayla Robles, Jessica Roossien, Alyssa Roy, Leslie Russell, Kristen Ruster, Cynthia Scheuher, Julie Schramm, Kim Schroers, Jennifer Schwartz, Kelly Seestedt, Shannon shank, Andrea Sherzer, Lauren Sir, Erinn Smith, Kathleen Soedarjatno

Row 9: Jessica Stefko, Alexandra Stencel, Brianne Stowell, Alexandra Suseland, Lauren Taylor, Deborah Thornton, Amanda Timmer, Daniel Tjarks, Jillian Traskos, Graham Valley, Sarah Wade, Rachel Wagner, Drew Wakefield, Marlena Westerlund, Katie Wheelock, Jennifer Wilcox, Dana York

U-M Softball Team, 2003

Front Row: Jennifer Kreinbrink, Nicole Motycka, Michelle Teschler, Lauren Holland, Jessica Merchant.

Second Row: Jennifer Olds, Amy Prichard, Meghan Ritter, Courtney Betley, Monica Schock, Angie Churchill, Meghan Doe.

Third Row: Liz Elsner, Melinda Moulden, Lisa Mack, Marissa Young.

Back Row: Stephanie Bercaw, Grace Leutele, Tiffany Haas, Jennie Ritter, Student Manager Natalie Shaver.

Prioritizing global conservation efforts

One of the most pressing issues facing the global conservation community is how to distribute limited resources between regions identified as priorities for biodiversity conservation(1-3). Approaches such as biodiversity hotspots(4), endemic bird areas(5) and ecoregions(6) are used by international organizations to prioritize conservation efforts globally(7). Although identifying priority regions is an important first step in solving this problem, it does not indicate how limited resources should be allocated between regions. Here we formulate how to allocate optimally conservation resources between regions identified as priorities for conservation - the 'conservation resource allocation problem'. Stochastic dynamic programming is used to find the optimal schedule of resource allocation for small problems but is intractable for large problems owing to the curse of dimensionality(8). We identify two easy- to- use and easy- to- interpret heuristics that closely approximate the optimal solution. We also show the importance of both correctly formulating the problem and using information on how investment returns change through time. Our conservation resource allocation approach can be applied at any spatial scale. We demonstrate the approach with an example of optimal resource allocation among five priority regions in Wallacea and Sundaland, the transition zone between Asia and Australasia.