Report on the review of selected general and application controls over the State University of Iowa (University of Iowa) ePro System for the period June 15, 2009 through July 31, 2009

Report on the review of selected general and application controls over the State University of Iowa (University of Iowa) ePro System for the period June 15, 2009 through July 31, 2009

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the University of Northern Iowa Accounts Payable/Purchasing System for the period of June 10, 2009 through August 20, 2009

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the University of Northern Iowa Accounts Payable/Purchasing System for the period of June 10, 2009 through August 20, 2009

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the State University of Iowa BuildUI System for the period June 14, 2010 through July 19, 2010

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the State University of Iowa BuildUI System for the period June 14, 2010 through July 19, 2010

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the Iowa State University of Science and Technology Accounts Receivable System for the period of March 29, 2010 through May 6, 2010

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the Iowa State University of Science and Technology Accounts Receivable System for the period of March 29, 2010 through May 6, 2010

Report on a review of selected application controls over the University of Northern Iowa Non-Student Accounts Receivable System for the period June 10, 2010 through July 23, 2010

Report on a review of selected application controls over the University of Northern Iowa Non-Student Accounts Receivable System for the period June 10, 2010 through July 23, 2010

Audit report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting of the State University of Iowa as of and for the year ended June 30, 2011

Audit report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting of the State University of Iowa as of and for the year ended June 30, 2011

Report on a review of selected application controls over the University of Northern Iowa General Ledger System for the period of June 22, 2011 through August 4, 2011

Report on a review of selected application controls over the University of Northern Iowa General Ledger System for the period of June 22, 2011 through August 4, 2011

Report on a review of selected application controls over the Iowa State University of Science and Technology Facilities Planning and Management - Facilities Administrative Management Information System for the period of April 18, 2011 through May 16, 2011

Report on a review of selected application controls over the Iowa State University of Science and Technology Facilities Planning and Management - Facilities Administrative Management Information System for the period of April 18, 2011 through May 16, 2011

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the Iowa State University of Science and Technology Room and Board System for the period of April 9, 2012 through May 1, 2012

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the Iowa State University of Science and Technology Room and Board System for the period of April 9, 2012 through May 1, 2012

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics’ GE Centricity System for the period May 28, 2012 through July 30, 2012

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics’ GE Centricity System for the period May 28, 2012 through July 30, 2012

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the State University of Iowa ePost and Effort Reporting systems for the period May 29, 2013 through July 19, 2013

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the State University of Iowa ePost and Effort Reporting systems for the period May 29, 2013 through July 19, 2013

The european higher education area at work: Lights and shadows defining continuous assessment

The aim of this paper is to analyse how learning assessment, particularly the Continuous Assessment system, has been defined in the Public Administration and Management Diploma Course of the University of Barcelona (Spain). This course was a pioneering experiment at this university in implementing the guidelines of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), and thus represents a good case study for verifying whether one of the cornerstones of the EHEA has been accomplished with success. Using data obtained from the Teaching Plans elaborated by the lecturers of each subject, we are able to establish that the CA system has been progressively accepted to such an extent that it is now the assessment formula used by practically all of the lecturers, conforming in this way to the protocols laid down by the Faculty of Law in which this diploma course is taught. Nevertheless, we find that high dispersion exists in how Continuous Assessment is actually defined. Indeed, it seems that there is no unified view of how Continuous Assessment should be performed. This dispersion, however, seems to diminish over time and raises some questions about the advisability of agreement on criteria, considering the potential which CA has as a pedagogical tool. Moreover, we find that the Unique Assessment system, which students may also apply for, is an option chosen only by a minority, with lecturers usually defining it as merely a theoretical and/or practical test, of little innovation in relation to traditional tests.

The european higher education area at work: Lights and shadows defining continuous assessment

The aim of this paper is to analyse how learning assessment, particularly the Continuous Assessment system, has been defined in the Public Administration and Management Diploma Course of the University of Barcelona (Spain). This course was a pioneering experiment at this university in implementing the guidelines of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), and thus represents a good case study for verifying whether one of the cornerstones of the EHEA has been accomplished with success. Using data obtained from the Teaching Plans elaborated by the lecturers of each subject, we are able to establish that the CA system has been progressively accepted to such an extent that it is now the assessment formula used by practically all of the lecturers, conforming in this way to the protocols laid down by the Faculty of Law in which this diploma course is taught. Nevertheless, we find that high dispersion exists in how Continuous Assessment is actually defined. Indeed, it seems that there is no unified view of how Continuous Assessment should be performed. This dispersion, however, seems to diminish over time and raises some questions about the advisability of agreement on criteria, considering the potential which CA has as a pedagogical tool. Moreover, we find that the Unique Assessment system, which students may also apply for, is an option chosen only by a minority, with lecturers usually defining it as merely a theoretical and/or practical test, of little innovation in relation to traditional tests.

The european higher education area at work: Lights and shadows defining continuous assessment

The aim of this paper is to analyse how learning assessment, particularly the Continuous Assessment system, has been defined in the Public Administration and Management Diploma Course of the University of Barcelona (Spain). This course was a pioneering experiment at this university in implementing the guidelines of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), and thus represents a good case study for verifying whether one of the cornerstones of the EHEA has been accomplished with success. Using data obtained from the Teaching Plans elaborated by the lecturers of each subject, we are able to establish that the CA system has been progressively accepted to such an extent that it is now the assessment formula used by practically all of the lecturers, conforming in this way to the protocols laid down by the Faculty of Law in which this diploma course is taught. Nevertheless, we find that high dispersion exists in how Continuous Assessment is actually defined. Indeed, it seems that there is no unified view of how Continuous Assessment should be performed. This dispersion, however, seems to diminish over time and raises some questions about the advisability of agreement on criteria, considering the potential which CA has as a pedagogical tool. Moreover, we find that the Unique Assessment system, which students may also apply for, is an option chosen only by a minority, with lecturers usually defining it as merely a theoretical and/or practical test, of little innovation in relation to traditional tests.

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the State University of Iowa MAUI Student Financial Aid system for the period May 19, 2014 through July 31, 2014

Report on a review of selected general and application controls over the State University of Iowa MAUI Student Financial Aid system for the period May 19, 2014 through July 31, 2014